Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influences of consumer culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Materialism is very complex, and can be defined on a number of different platforms. There is no one definite definition of materialism, meaning there is an ambiguity surrounding the construct of materialism. According to Kasser et al. (2004), consumers develop a materialistic value orientation at times when they experience feelings of insecurity, and from exposure to materialistic models and values. When the psychological needs of individuals are not met, they tend to move toward materialism in order to help them feel better about themselves, and reduce feelings of insecurity and self-doubt through the consumption of materialistic items.
The general idea of materialism is through conspicuous consumption, whereby the satisfaction derived from the product through the reaction of the audience, rather than personal utility use (Flouri, 1999). Materialistic tend to focus on the purchasing of “status goods” that impress other people (Fournier and Richins, 1991).
Individuals also learn to adopt materialistic values through social learning from family members, peers, and the materialistic messages that they are frequently bombarded with in television programs advertisements (Kasser et al., 2004). The materialistic lifestyle, According to Kasser (2002), is a process of acquiring material goods beyond the necessities to meet human needs. It is of high importance to the individuals to attain financial success, impressive possessions, an attractive image, and a replicable status. Materialistic people tend to use money as a mean of self-enhancement (Kasser et al, 2004). Similarly, Belk (1985) explains materialism as the importance a consumer places on the acquisition and ownership of possessions (Belk 1985) and the view that there is a ris...
... middle of paper ...
...wo influences: “scarcity and socialization hypotheses”. The scarcity theory explains how "an individual's priorities reflect one's socioeconomic environment: one places the greatest subjective value on those things that are in relatively short supply" (1990, p.68). Thus, people who are less economically advanced focus a greater importance on material acquisition then the more affluent people. The socialization hypothesis explains that "one's basic values reflect the conditions that prevailed during one's pre adult years" (1990, p.68), and these values are persistently stable over a long period of time. Consequently, the people whom experienced a lack of possessions in previous years are more likely to develop an obsessive desire for material goods, while people who originated from wealthy families may focus on personal fulfillment at the expense of higher incomes.
“I rather would be blind than then see this world in yellow, and bought and sold by kings that hammer roses into gold.” (King Midas Pg.462 Para.10) Many think that if they got what they wanted they would be happy, but if the world was all based on malterlistic things and everyone got what they wanted there would be chaos and no feelings just want and people would do crazy things to get what they want. Now a day’s people mistake malterlistic things for happiness. “The necklace”, “Ads may spur unhappy kids to embrace materialism”, And “Thrill of the chase” illustrates examples of materialism and show some base their happiness on it.
I feel like materialistic best fits me, because I am externally into name brand items. Sometimes I place myself on a pedestal above everyone else, and if I don’t have the best material things or someone has something that I want but don’t have, I will through a huge fit until I get it. Once I get it there will be something else that I have to have to ensure that I’m better than the next person. From my socks to my suits, if it’s
...hat materialistic attitudes are harmful to one's well-being. “The psychological perspective attributes the development of materialistic values to family circumstances that create stress and self esteem issues that promote materialistic values,” (Hung Vu Nguyen.) Many people in our culture attribute material goods to personal achievement. Truth rings true with Bertrand Russell’s statement “It is the preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else that prevents us from living freely and nobly.” Even at young ages children are competing and bragging to one another of who has more possessions. Past studies by Rindfleisch say that materialism developed over time as a response to stress due to family issues such as divorce, separation, and loss of loved ones. Materialism leads consumers to put a disproportionate amount of their resources into acquiring goods.
Have you ever wanted something, an item or material so badly that you would do anything or give up anything for it? Well, guess what? Materials are not a necessary thing in your life. Materialism is ruining people's lives to the point where it is their occupation. In today’s society materialism take part in every person’s life, no matter where they are from or what social class they are.
In today’s world, people in general like to keep up with the latest things such as gadgets like the iPhone. They tend to spend an ample amount of time on their gadgets or whatever the latest item is instead of dedicating their time to the more important things. During family dinners, everyone is usually on their phones. People may prefer to spend a day at the mall instead of volunteering. High credit card bills can result from spending so much money on the new things rather than paying bills. The social pressure to keep up with these material items has an effect on quality bonding time which has an effect on money. Consumerism actually sets a person against oneself because of the never-ending mission to acquire material objects therefore people should not concentrate their religious faith in materialism.
Conspicuous consumption means the rich man show their money and social class by spending money on something that beyond practical, and cause the waste, and pass through this to gain the fame and honour. In the 19th century, Americans still uphold diligent and thrifty, but that just lasted about three hundred years. In the 1920s, many consumers spent a lot of money on something expensive that they cannot afford in the past and they don’t really need. Conspicuous Consumption Definition | Investopedia.
In 1899 Thorstein Veblen wrote The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. In this work, Veblen presented critical thinking that pertains to people’s habits and their related social norms. He explores the way certain people disregard the divisions that exist within the social system, while subsequently emulating certain aspects of the leisure class in an effort to present an image of higher social status. He also presented the theory of conspicuous consumption, which refers to an instance when a person can fulfill their needs by purchasing a product at a lower cost that is equal in quality and function to its more expensive counterpart; however, said person chooses to buy the more expensive product, by doing so, they are attempting to present an image of a higher social status. The almost 110 year cycle between 1899 and 2010 reveals few differences in buying behaviors, other than the differing selection of luxury goods to indulge, or over-indulge in.
Of all the strange beasts that have come slouching into the 20th century, none has been more misunderstood, more criticized, and more important than materialism. Who but fools, toadies, hacks, and occasional loopy libertarians have ever risen to its defense? Yet the fact remains that while materialism may be the most shallow of the 20th century's various -isms, it has been the one that has ultimately triumphed. The world of commodities appears so antithetical to the world of ideas that it seems almost heresy to point out the obvious: most of the world most of the time spends most of its energy producing and consuming more and more stuff. The really interesting question may be not why we are so materialistic, but why we are so unwilling to acknowledge
Materialism may be defined as attention to or emphasis on material objects, needs or considerations, with a disinterest in or rejection of spiritual values.
society. Much of the world today is based on materialism and the worth of one’s
These different dimensions have an impact on marketing, which materialistic societies will respond to more informative advertisements about specific luxury products or must-haves, and the non-materialistic culture will not respond well to such advertisements because of how they are content within themselves with the guidance of their spiritual other. The non-materialistic societies will be more focused on spiritual alignment than getting the new Bentley, which means that more operantly conditioned advertisements would be effective in these cultures.
Materialism leads people to be financially irresponsible. People are more likely to buy certain products because
Spending and being able to afford luxury items has easily become part of a human’s everyday life and can even be considered human nature at this point in time. Humans for the most part purchase materials that they might consider essential to their life such as food, water, clothes, etc; however; it has become common within the societal norms to feel the need to flaunt the things that are purchased with our own money. The need to show off/flaunt to others about the things that one does have occurs because humans do not like to feel less than anyone else and so by buying things that are not really essential takes place in order to impress those around oneself and let them know that they too can afford luxury items/items that are too expensive. This is especially common within teenagers due to the fact that teenagers care for about what people think about them because they want to fit in and seem lavish and so they go out of their way to attain all the items in which they desire. In addition, impoverished within the current society seems to be a form
When asked to choose between materialism and dualism it can be a difficult question to answer. People must understand the arguments for and against both of these subjects to truly determine which one makes the most logical sense to them. By looking into both of these subjects one can determine that the argument for dualism is much stronger and makes more sense than the one for the materialism. The mind-body problem is best defined as how to understand the relationship between the mind and body.
This is a thought-provoking book about the pursuit of material goods. Kasser is not a preacher, but a scientist. He presents his evidence carefully, and concludes that materialism is a game not worth playing even on its own terms of promoting human happiness.