The Enlightenment of Woman
The enlightenment, also referred to as the age of reason, was a 18th century philosophical movement. Key to this movement, was the emphasis its proponents placed on the rights of individuals, equality, and the use of reason/rationality to support beliefs. The writers in this period, like John Locke and Jean Rousseau, boasted this “enlightened” way as superior to that of the emotionally-driven Romantic period. However, to others, particularly feminist writer Mary Wollstonecraft, the ideals are sullied by the fact that women are not also incorporated into this movement that claims equality amongst its virtues. In her work, A Vindication of the Right of Woman, Wollstonecraft delineates the placement of women in this
…show more content…
Wollstonecraft acknowledges this argument, as she uses the example of Jean Rousseau in her book. She accepts the claim that women are weaker physically, but she states that this is not reason enough to keep women from developing themselves in both body and mind. Wollstonecraft explains that, “men endeavor to sink us still lower, merely to render us alluring objects for a moment; and women, intoxicated by the adoration which men, under the influence of their senses, pay them, do not seek to obtain a durable interest in their hearts, or to become the friends of the fellow creatures who find amusement in their society.” (Wollstonecraft 7). The treatment of women, therefore, has gone beyond claiming that it is the natural order for women to be weaker, but has actually denied the sex the opportunity to improve its position by holding it firmly in its birth-given state. Additionally, women, allow this to happen because they are tranquilized by the compliments paid to them by …show more content…
In The Vindication, Wollstonecraft says “gentleness, docility, and a spaniel-like affection are, on this ground, consistently recommended as the cardinal virtues of the sex” (Wollstonecraft 33). By focusing on the attainment of beauty and remaining in their weak state women are left with nothing but to pan to the desires of men. While “strength of body and mind are sacrificed to libertine notions of beauty, to the desire of establishing themselves, - the only way women can rise in the world, - by marriage” (Wollstonecraft 9). Men are free to expand their horizons through other virtuous activities in their prospective career, while women are idly left to dedicate themselves to the notion of love (Wollstonecraft 122). This too, to Wollstonecraft, would not be the case if women were able to be educated as is the case with men. She says, “strengthen the female mind by enlarging it, and there will be an end to blind obedience” (Wollstonecraft 24). With the ability to pursue the virtue of the acquirement of knowledge and reason women would be viewed as human beings rather than a “fanciful kind of half being” (Wollstonecraft
She saves her best description for last, comparing soldiers' dim politeness to women's. She describes the current state of women's analysis ability as "a kind of instinctive glance, that catches proportions, and decides with respect to manners; but fails when arguments areto be pursued below the surface, or opinions analyzed" (Wollstonecraft 136). She's basically saying that women of the time were taught a superficial set of manners and ideals, without the logic reasoning to back them up. Because of this, she submits that women are raised to not question authority and that, like soldiers, both are "taught to please, and they only live to please" (136). Therefore, Wollstonecraft points to education as the main reason women aren't excelling and demanding better treatment.De La Cruz, on the other hand, fervently blames men and society's double standards for women's struggles, even challenging who should get blamed for adultery and prostitution. In her poem "Philosophical Satire," De La Cruz claims, "You foolish and unreasoning men/who cast all blame on women,/not seeing you yourselves are cause/of the same faults you accuse:"
"This is the very point I aim at. I do not wish [women] to have power over men; but over themselves" (Wollstonecraft 63). Wollstonecraft made this statement in response to Roseau dictating that if society "[Educated] women like men..." (Wollstonecraft 63), and women would resemble the male sex, and then carry less power over men. Instead of succumbing to men, Wollstonecraft stressed how education could elevate a women to reach equal statue in society. Following similar ideas to the Tao Te Ching and the Art of War, Wollstonecraft serves education as a tool of discipline to women who can use it to help elevate them in society. Wollstonecraft points out in her introduction that, "One cause to [the problem of women sacrificing their usefulness and strength to beauty attributes] to a false system of education..." (Wollstonecraft 6), and how a reformation and push for women to better educate themselves and look past what is currently there will help them reach higher status in society; therefore giving them their own independence. As Wollstonecraft dictates, "It follows then, I think, that from their infancy women should either be shut up like eastern princes, or educated in such a manner as to be able to think and act for themselves (Wollstonecraft
While the issue of women’s suffrage has roots based in every country in the world, most think that the initial inroads were painfully carved through the efforts of early women pioneers in America. This perception is easily formed due to the early publication of Mary Wollstonecraft’s Vindication of the Right’s of Women in 1792. However, the movement gained national attention in New Zealand in 1893 and in Australia in 1902, eclipsing the suffrage movement in Britain, Canada and America by at least 25 years. The struggle for women’s rights has been ponderous and slow moving throughout the years and not without internal divisions.
Chimamanda Ngozi describes a feminist as “A person who believes in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.”During her Ted Talk from April 12th, 2013, She talks about how since she knew she was female she would have to try and prove her worth in school. She states that “I was worried that if I looked too feminine I would not be taken seriously. I really wanted to wear my shiny lip gloss and my girly skirt, but I decided not to. I wore a very serious, very manly, and very ugly suit.The sad truth of the matter is that when it comes to appearance we start off with men as the standard, as the norm. Many of us think that the less feminine a woman appears, the more likely she is to be taken seriously.” Her words ring true especially
Indisputably, Mary Wollstonecraft was one of the most influential figures of Enlightenment, also considered the ‘first feminist’. It is certain that her works and writing has influenced the lives of many women and altered the outlook of some societies on women, evolving rights of women a great deal from what they used to be in her time. It is clear that Wollstonecraft’s arguments and writing will remain applicable and relevant to societies for many years to come, as although there has been progression, there has not been a complete resolution. Once women receive so easily the freedom, rights and opportunities that men inherently possess, may we be able to say that Wollstonecraft has succeeded in vindicating the rights of women entirely.
A change in feminism is shown between Wollstonecraft’s essay and Young’s essay. As women first demanded rights, they were coming out of complete dependence on men. Wollstonecraft and other activists fought for the basic right of education for women. As women gained liberty, they began to oppress themselves in the Third Wave of feminism. Wollstonecraft focused on the basic rights of women in her paper, saying “They must be permitted to turn to the fountain of light, and not forced to shape their course by the twinkling of a mere satellite” (Wollstonecraft 5). Here Wollstonecraft is saying that women need to be given the opportunity to get a good education, not just be taught by what their husbands tell them, so they could be their better selves.
Mary Wollstonecraft was as revolutionary in her writings as Thomas Paine. They were both very effective writers and conveyed the messages of their ideas quite well even though both only had only the most basic education. Wollstonecraft was a woman writing about women's rights at a time when these rights were simply non-existent and this made her different from Paine because she was breaking new ground, thus making her unique. Throughout her lifetime, Wollstonecraft wrote about the misconception that women did not need an education, but were only meant to be submissive to man. Women were treated like a decoration that had no real function except to amuse and beguile. Wollstonecraft was the true leader in women's rights, advocating a partnership in relationships and marriage rather than a dictatorship. She was firm in her conviction that education would give women the ability to take a more active role in life itself.
Marry Wollstonecraft was a famous women’s right activist and was also considered one of the most famous feminist, she fought for equal rights between men and women because people considered women weaker than men.
Rousseau argues that “women ought to be weak and passive, because she has less bodily strength than man; and hence infers, that she was formed to please and to be subject to him; and that it is her duty to render herself agreeable to her master” (Wollstonecraft 79). Thus affirming that women were in more of a slave-like condition than an equal. Wollstonecraft views marriage as a bond of friendship and love rather than the man holding all of the power in the relationship and the woman just being there to please her husband. Women are not viewed as equals, but more so an outlet for quick pleasure and nothing more. Wollstonecraft states that, “Most of the evils of life arise from a desire of present enjoyment that outruns itself. The obedience required of women in the marriage state comes under this description; the mind, naturally weakened by depending on authority, never exerts its own powers, and the obedient
In Mary Wollstonecraft’s The Wrongs of Woman, or Maria and Mary Robinson’s The Natural Daughter women are subject to many hardships economically, simply because they are women. Women are not given sufficient opportunity, as men are, to pursue a living. Even if she is a woman of taste and morals, she may be treated as though she is a criminal and given no means to protect herself. In order for a woman to be sustained, she must marry into slavery, dishonor herself through unsavory work, or be lucky enough to be properly educated and given proper reference.
Vindication of the Rights for Women by Mary Wollstonecraft was published in 1792, during the French Revolution. Wollstonecraft preached that intellect will always govern to persuade women not to endeavor to acquire knowledge but convince them that the soft phrases, acceptability of heart, delicacy of sentiment, and refinement of taste, are most preferred. By intellect, I mean the men because they were the ones that were allowed to get an education therefore allowing them to become intellectual. Wollstonecraft cleverly does not try to prove her point through protests or accusations, but argue that women are not naturally inferior to men, but appear to be only because they lack education. She suggests that both men and women should be treated as rational beings and imagines a social order founded on reason. She believed it was unfair for women to be treated differently and passionately wanted to make a change. That it was time to let go of feelings and begin the thought process behind the rationality of the women’s predicament. Men felt that while they would get an education an...
Women today are still viewed as naturally inferior to men, despite the considerable progress done to close this gap. Females have made a huge difference in their standing from 200 years ago. Whether anyone is sexist or not, females have made considerable progress from where they started, but there is still a long journey ahead. Mary Wollstonecraft was an advocate of women 's rights, a philosopher, and an English writer. One of Wollstonecraft’s best works was “A Vindication of the Rights of Women” (1792). In her writing, she talks about how both men and women should be treated equal, and reasoning could create a social order between the two. In chapter nine of this novel, called “Of the Pernicious Effects Which Arise from the Unnatural Distinctions Established in Society,”
Mary Wollstonecraft was a self-educated, radical philosopher who wrote about liberation, and empowering women. She had a powerful voice on her views of the rights of women to get good education and career opportunities. She pioneered the debate for women’s rights inspiring many of the 19th and the 20th century’s writers and philosophers to fight for women’s rights, as well. She did not only criticize men for not giving women their rights, she also put a blame on women for being voiceless and subservient. Her life and, the surrounding events of her time, accompanied by the strong will of her, had surely affected the way she chose to live her life, and to form her own philosophies.
Wollstonecraft disagreed with Rousseau in several different areas. She created a counter argument on Rousseau’s work that was based on “the standard Enlightenment philosopher’s contention that all human beings have reason and that when reason is educated all human beings can become good and virtuous citizens” (p.19). Her work “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman” opened with “in the grand light of human creatures, who in common with men are placed on this earth to unfold their faculties” (p.19). She believed that both women and men have the faculty of reason and if women’s were not alongside with men’s, women could stop the process of knowledge and virtue. She believed strongly that throughout the post revolutionary Soviet Union as well as in China, there was no gender equality and the issue behind this was never properly addressed. “Wollstonecraft called Rousseau’s portrait of Sophie “grossly unnatural”” (p.19). It should be noted that Wollstonecraft describes this view of women that Rousseau had of women as “by their very construction, slaves, and not allowed to breathe the sharp invigorating
The Enlightenment questioned the role of women. For centuries men have dominated what the role of women should be. Many male writers believed that that women were lower intellectually value to men. But there were some philosophies, which showed some positive feed back for women. They argued that women were capable of all that men are. It was the woman thinkers who added new perspectives to the women question by suggesting better improvements for woman. Those thinkers believed that woman should be better educated. They should be able to learn what men are learning. A English writer Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) was the fonder of modern European feminism. She began the women movement arguing the rights of women. She declared, that women should have equal rights with education and in economic and political life.