Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion and crime in society
Relationship of men with god
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religion and crime in society
Is the man of the 20th century unreasonable to believe in the existence of God? Atheism is constantly attacking religion, and very sharply. For example, Freud said that religion is the desire for a noble origin; it was created due to fears of natural phenomena, the fear of parents, and alike. But the religious psychologists have made psychoanalysis of Freud, and concluded that Freud had a bad attitude toward his father. Instead of intent to kill his earthly father, he decided to "avenge" the heavenly Father.
Freud, Feuerbach, Marx and Nietzsche criticized the wrong motive for the religiosity of some people. Some people actually believe in God because of guilt, fear of punishment, because of the inability to solve their problems, because of
…show more content…
the lack of understanding of natural disasters and phenomena, because they were being manipulated by some people, and they invented gods with human characteristics. However, some people believe in the existence of God for the wrong motives, but this doesn’t mean that God does not exist and does not mean that all people have the wrong motive of faith in God. God can exist even though there are people who understand it incorrectly. If anyone can prove that a man could commit a bank robbery, and prove that he had a motive to rob a bank, it does not mean that he really robbed a bank. All these criticisms do not touch God's existence, but a human perversion of religion. Karl Marx said that religion is the "opium of the people, which prevents us from enjoying the life here and now." According to him, "it is a big game of hypocritical clergy to manipulate us run for their goals; it is the failure to get out of the children's dependence on other people." Today we see that Marx's ideas in practice do not work: all societies based on communist ideas have failed and are in search for other ideas.
Nevertheless, Marx's atheism survived today. We all know that such abuse of religion that Marx criticized really exist. But if there is a genuine religion in practice implemented the doctrine that God has revealed, then Marx's critique does not stand.
Marx predicted that religion would disappear as a phenomenon of false (because there is no God, according to Marx), and churches will become museums. All see how the number of churches in the world increases, a church becoming the heavy believers. However, the council rejected Marx, and yet kept his not believing in God.
Atheists say that not only there is no God, but religion has bad consequences in practice. The Inquisition was torturing people, burned them at the stake, were led and are still "holy" crusades or jihad. Fundamentalism refers more victims, and there are religions that are granted immorality, drug abuse, collective suicide ... The combination of church and state has always been in the history of bringing
evil. Chesterton said: "There is only one really persuasive argument against Christianity (religion), and to the believers." However, there is a really compelling argument for religion, and that believers are sincere, dedicated people that can see the reflection of God's character. The life of Jesus, his apostles, God and other religious people, made a great confirmation of the existence of God who changes people to the ideal character for which one seeks and craves. Atheists say: "If God existed, would not have been a multitude of religious communities, but only one religion. All people would believe the same thing." Believer answers: "That there are many religious communities proves that God gave humans free will. People can choose whether to believe the truth that God has revealed, or if you believe the lies that are constantly inventing some. There is one true religion which God described in the Scriptures, and a multitude of false religion. "
The fear of early twentieth century dystopian writers is the fear that people in general had in this era; what is the impact of communism or what the future of religion with evolution and Darwinism would be. The may concern was that if religion was obsolete, what would replace it as the moral compass of the people. One of the most important individuals of the early twentieth century Karl Marx had his own philosophy for a replacement. The role of religion in Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto is stated as,” But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis…’" (Marx 19) That new bases he mentioned in the quote is the state, the new morale code that society must follow.
First, I want to identify who Marx and Nietzsche are and their critiques on religion. Karl
Similar to Marx, Freud believes humans simply make up the idea of God in explanation to things science could not disprove. Humans take relationships from our Earthly fathers and compare it to our Heavenly father. According to Freud, “Religion is an attempt to master the sensory world in which we are situated by means of the wishful world which we have developed within us as a result of biological and psychological necessities.” (H/R,p.26) Science can neither prove or disprove religion. Freud chooses to believe science and claims religion is only comforting and hopeful thinking to our purpose after
Marx argues religion acts as a drug to be more exact like opium. People who usually do drugs do it typically because it is an escape from their problems. Likewise, people typically follow a religion because it help’s them escape from their problems. Following a religion helps them to numb the pain of reality. Some people born in society have it better than others and for those who do not religion turn into a great hope for them. Additionally, Marx goes onto say religion is man made and we do not need it to survive. Furthermore, the more people have the less they tend to care about religion. For example,
In what ways do countries differing religions affect our ever changing society? Does our diversity, combined with our lack of resources and overpopulation, ensure constant violence? I believe that the religious persecution of certain nations has been nothing more than denial of a human right. In Brave New World, Huxley predicts an all powerful government: “the world state”. The world state controls its people from creation, to cremation. With multiple emotion inducing elements in society to balance the distaste that had originally been tied to religion, society has no conflict. “There isn't any need for a civilized man to bear anything that's seriously unpleasant. And as for doing things–Ford forbid that he should get the idea into his head. It would upset the whole social order if men started doing things on their own." The world state is a fair representation of what the communist party had aimed to achieve. The ideal society; without conflicting religions, or conflicting ideals, and the perfect drug that came with complete government control. With one solid regime in the form of government religion, people became pawns for specific purposes until they are recycled. The past and present communist nations of our time, to an extent, have attempted to unite their people and control, yet have only prevented their people from having a basic human right, and at times brought violence. Religious repression by past and present communist states like the USSR, China, Cuba, and North Korea could have been guiding them in the right direction, or be denying their respective people or a human right. The effect religious repression had differed between countries, but overall religious repression has been the denial of...
Berlinski opens up by giving an introduction to the scientism of the new atheists and presents his own critique on a common slogan of the party: religion as a primary cause of evil in the world. Berlinski explains that the issues atheism has caused in the world cannot be ignored. Fundamentally because what atheistic regimes did not believe is more important than what they did believe in. Therefore, this is the real cause of many twentieth century problems. Berlinski explains: “What Hitler did not believe and what Stalin did not believe and what Mao did not believe and what the SS did not believe and what the Gestapo did not believe and what the NKVD did not believe and what the commissars, functionaries, swaggering executioners, Nazi doctors, Communist Party theoreticians, intellectuals, Brown Shirts, Black Shirts, gauleiters, and a thousand party hacks di...
...im, nor explain or rationalize God's will while in the faith. Whereas Marx finds Hegel's frustratingly apathetic towards the worker's struggle. Hegel's disregard for the physical being and objective nature is the cause of Marx's disenchantment with Hegel. Marx also recognizes the need for the individual as a utility to begin the Bloody Revolution. Without the individual, the secular Giest has no ground to stand upon.
...en civilization and the individual. Living in a nation still recovering from a brutally violent war (Germany), Freud began to criticize organized religion as a collective neurosis, or mental disorder. Freud, a strong proponent of atheism, argued that religion tamed asocial instincts and created a sense of community because of the shared set of beliefs. This undoubtedly helped a civilization. However, at the same time organized religion also exacts an enormous psychological cost to the individual by making him or her perpetually subordinate to the primal figure embodied by God.
Theology is an intentionally reflective endeavor. Every day we reflect upon the real, vital, and true experience of the benevolent God that exists. We as humans tend to be social beings, and being so we communicate our beliefs with one another in order to validate ourselves. Furthermore atheism has many forms, three of the most popular atheistic beliefs include: scientific atheism, humanistic atheism and the most popular one being protest atheism. Scientific atheism is the idea that science is the answer for everything and god is not existent. The humanistic approach states that society is self-sufficient; therefore God is not needed for survival. Therefore how could he exist? The position that I will argue in this paper is the pessimistic idea of protest atheism.
Welcome to CHSBS! | Central Michigan University. Karl Marx. Retrieved January 27, 2014, from http://www.chsbs.cmich.edu/fattah/COURSES/modernthought/marx.htm
15Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818 to Heinrich and Henrietta Marx in the historical city of Trier. Karl was one of seven children raised within a comfortable middle class home provided by his father. Marx’s father worked as a counselor-at-law at the High-Court of Appeal in Trier. David McClellan believes that, “Trier first imbued Marx with his abiding passion for history.”1 Although the Marx family was linked to a long lineage of Jewish ancestry, Heinrich converted his family to Protestantism in order to keep his position at the courthouse. “Some have considered this rabbinic ancestry to be the key to Marx’s ideas and see him as a secularized version of an Old Testament prophet.”2 Overall, Marx was raised in a very loving, supportive, environment, and maintained a special relationship with his father throughout his life.3
Erich Fromm in his psychoanalytical approach to religion is distinct from the earlier works of Sigmund Freud. Fromm defines religion as “any system of thought and action shared by a group which gives the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion.” Fromm argues that irreligious systems including all the different kinds of idealism and “private” religions deserve being defined as a “religion.” Based on Fromm’s theory, it is explained that there is no human being who does not have a “religious need,” almost every part of human life reflects religious need and its fulfillment, in fact he states it to be “inherent” in man.
...ferences and similarities as its predecessor atheism. Individuals and groups continue to assert their ideologies through their writings and critics continue to rebut these claims. As discussed, new atheism has shown evident different approaches in showing how religion has detrimental effects on society using events such as the many previous wars that have been initiated due to issues concerning religion. New atheism also addresses how these views and conceptions are forced upon children which highlight the significant developments of the ideas that have emerged since traditional atheistic times. By understanding how atheism and new atheism has developed and evolved, it can also be understood that there will be an endless and continuous arrivals of more diverse interpretations, approaches and goals of new atheism and issues revolving around religion in the future.
Marx saw religion as a tool for class oppression because of the conflict it provided for societies. According to Marx, “religion is the opium of the people” and “religion promotes stratification because it supports a hierarchy of people in Earth and the subordination of humankind to divine authority.” Marx believes that man makes religion, and not vice versa. He argues that religion is a mere product of man and is for people who have not won himself or has lost himself again. He calls for the banishment of religion stating that religion is just an illusion of happiness and the abolition of it is a demand for real happiness. Religion highlights social conditions and causes people to think and act the way religion teaches instead of having individuals act based on their own agency.
6. Bohdan R. Bociurkiw and John W. Strong, Religion and Atheism in the U.S.S.R. and