Marxist Criticism Paper

1013 Words3 Pages

For my paper I plan on using one of the interventionist methods focused on Power. I will be using Marxist criticism to analyze the piece of rhetoric I have chosen. The reason I have chosen this theory is because of how it interprets that ideas from this world are an outcome of ideas, rules, laws customs and social arrangements. Marxist Criticism argues that experience fuels ideology. While some might argue that ideology fuels experience, with the text I will analyze and the context, Marxist criticism fits perfectly. The text is a performance about the experiences of a girl named Ana Maria and how they shape her ideology. In my paper I will be using many aspects of Marxism criticism. I will be using the concept of materialism, superstructures …show more content…

For years undocumented immigration has been attacked and been stigmatized as being a burden to our economy. Fighting for survival and existence does not come from one’s own ideology, but ones experiences. The experiences of the undocumented community has spurred a movement to break the preferred readings set upon them by society as being, job stealers, a burden to the economy, criminals, and so many more. The performance by Denice Froham at the Mitu Town hall is just one of many texts that are oppositional readings that are trying to break stigmas. The main point of this performance is to highlight the struggles of undocumented people in the United States. The experiences that built the ideology of many DREAMers who are fighting to get an education and to stay in the U.S. This narrative about the life of Ana Maria is using describing her experiences to show case the struggles of the undocumented community. This text analyzes the superstructure of society. The racism that is inherent to the American way of life. The structures that oppress. The fact that Ana Maria does not have the option to pay in state tuition and must find avenues to pay for school. This text analyzes the economic structure of society, which is capitalism and how it is detrimental to the livelihood of people who are told they are “illegal.” Marxist criticism is perfect for this text, because it analyzes the structure of society, is an oppositional reading, and is a text about a movement fueled by

Open Document