Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Marxist approach to health and social care
Essay on criticism of rawls theory of distributive justice
4. Two main features of John Rawls's theory of distributive justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Marxist approach to health and social care
As current heated political and economic deliberations about universal health care suggest, the topics of fair and equal access to basic health services and assuaging inequalities in health care is at the forefront of society. Many disagree on the best methods and theories by which to achieve these goals. Marxism holds that all people of a society are equal in material matters and that each person should contribute according to ability and receive according to need; capitalism should be disregarded and the power taken from the bourgeois should be given to the working class. Yet, under the reality of communism, only those in positions of power live well, off the productivity of the masses. Communistic societies suffer because those who are most productive are not rewarded monetarily for their hard work, rather they are taught to believe that others deserve the money and benefits that they have earned …show more content…
Thus, the communist system subverts the reward system of economics. This is a theory that American citizens would not accept and, long term, this model cannot succeed. While a person can choose, voluntarily, to give away their hard earned money, when forced to give it up, resentment builds, and the result is lack of efficiency in any industry. When there is no personal reward, there is no desire for citizens to push harder and excel. Rawlsian theory of social justice maintains through the major principles of liberty, equal fairness of opportunity, and the difference principle that each member of society should have the ability to possess equal rights, opportunities, and goods essential to survival. Rawls’ broader societal vision provides significant considerations concerning health care inequalities. In A Theory of Justice, Rawls addresses health care policy indirectly. The right to health care may be realized as a way to
A Comparison of Communism versus Capitalism Communism versus Capitalism is a debate that has raged on for over two centuries. Whether to allow everyone equal opportunities and to do with those opportunities as they please or to mandate class equality in order to keep peace has in itself been the cause of war. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels saw the working class of the world—the proletariat—being squashed by the greedy business owners—the bourgeoisie. In their view, the bourgeoisie owned too much and the proletariat had no chance to make their own fortunes. In Marx and Engels Communist Manifesto, they propose doing away with private property, nationality, and even countries in order to take power away from the bourgeoisie.
Though the rewards are pleasing to the ear, the path to obtaining the benefits of communism is a violent one. This strict governing idea was derived from Communist Manifesto, a book written by two German economists, Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels, who declare that many problems in society are caused by the unequal distribution of wealth. These two believe that “Communism deprives no man of the ability to appropriate the fruits of his labour. The only thing it deprives him of is the ability to enslave others by means of such appropriations.” To achieve the goal of happiness and prosperity for all, the lines that distinguish the differences between the rich and poor must be erased. Obviously, the rich will never voluntarily give up their goods or status; therefore the figureheads must force equality among the citizens. Communism places their citizens, whether they be the wealthy or the laborers, into working classes that specify their contribution to the government. With such balanced placement of the people, individuality is impossible for any single person to achieve.
Daniels states that by not having access to adequate health care, disease and disability affects people’s “normal species functioning”, thus disabling the “equality of opportunity” portion of Rawls’ principle. Daniels claims that the legal right to adequate health care enables people to keep their “normal range of opportunities.” In this way Daniels’ assertion ensures that the “fair equality of opportunity” component stays intact by revitalizing the disabled and diseased. Hence, the right to basic health care resources for all ensures the “fair equality” portion of Rawls’ principle. Daniels’ defends his claim of the right to health care on the basis of the fundamental theory
As an attempt to make the economy better Karl Marx a philosopher thought up the philosophy of Communism. A communist government plans and controls the economy, also has an authoritarian that has total control. Often the authoritarian claims that he will progress toward a higher social order in which the people equally share all goods. Although, the citizens in Harrison Bergeron in the same way “equal every which way” in the economy but, they are also “equal every which way” in physical characteristics (Vonnegut). In which the people know that they are unequal and that is why they have the handicaps.
Overtime, sociology has played an essential role in the aid of healthcare policies and procedures, along with playing a fundamental role in one’s understanding of health inequalities. This paper explores how sociology has played such a role in healthcare, whilst including discussions regarding the influence of social structures and inequalities in the health of an individual, their family and community, with the topic of health variations between social classes being the main focus of the discussion. A structured overview, review and evaluation of a specific health policy in the UK will also be provided within this paper. Sociology in healthcare. Sociology can be defined in a number of ways, due to its almost limitless scope (Denny, Earle,
INTRODUCTION John Rawls most famous work, A Theory of Justice, deals with a complex system of rules and principles. It introduces principles of justice to the world, principles which Rawls argues, are meant to create and strengthen equality while removing the inequality which exists within society. These principles are both meant as standalone laws and regulations, but they can be joined as well. The main function of the first principle is to ensure the liberty of every individual, while the second principle is meant to be the force for the removal of inequality through what Rawls calls distributive justice. I will begin this paper by making clear that this is a critique of Rawls and his principle of difference and not an attempt at a neutral analysis.
Karl Marx noted that society was highly stratified in that most of the individuals in society, those who worked the hardest, were also the ones who received the least from the benefits of their labor. In reaction to this observation, Karl Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto where he described a new society, a more perfect society, a communist society. Marx envisioned a society, in which all property is held in common, that is a society in which one individual did not receive more than another, but in which all individuals shared in the benefits of collective labor (Marx #11, p. 262). In order to accomplish such a task Marx needed to find a relationship between the individual and society that accounted for social change. For Marx such relationship was from the historical mode of production, through the exploits of wage labor, and thus the individual’s relationship to the mode of production (Marx #11, p. 256).
In the past centuries, health care was the responsibility of individuals and their own families but today Medicine comes to be an institution only as societies are more productive and people take on specialized work. At the same time as people become dependent on governments and organizations to provide them their health care and insurance, here is the problem. Social conflict analysis points out the connection between health and social inequality. Following the ideas of Karl Marx, we can match health to the operation of capitalism. Most attention has gone to three main issues: access to medical care, the effects of the profit motive, and the politics of medicine.
Whether one thinks that the ideas of communism are good or bad, by taking a look a today’s society, we can certainly see the affect The Communist Manifesto and other books of its kind have had. Karl Marx’s ideas have shaped many programs and organizations to attempt following along the lines of equality.
John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice presents an ideal society based on several simple principles. While the system Rawls suggests is well constructed, it is not without its flaws. I will now attempt to explain Rawls’ idea of Justice as Fairness and explain where the system fails.
When Karl Marx first penned his shaping works on communism, he assumed that the relationship between workers and capital would always be opposing. While most rejected his overall theories, they did not argue with the basic idea that the interests of workers would always be at odds with those of owners. This is one of Marx's only theories that has proven to be true. As a consequence, over the years, that thought has guided the marketplace in terms of deciding wages, working conditions and other worker centered benefits.
Political philosopher John Rawls believed that in order for society to function properly, there needs to be a social contract, which defines ‘justice as fairness’. Rawls believed that the social contract be created from an original position in which everyone decides on the rules for society behind a veil of ignorance. In this essay, it will be argued that the veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. First, the essay will describe what the veil of ignorance is. Secondly, it will look at what Rawls means by the original position. Thirdly, it will look at why the veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. Finally, the essay will present a criticism to the veil of ignorance and the original position and Rawls’ potential response to this.
John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice holds that a rational, mutually disinterested individual in the Original Position and given the task of establishing societal rules to maximise their own happiness throughout life, is liable to choose as their principles of justice a) guaranteed fundamental liberties and b) the nullification of social and economic disparities by universal equality of opportunities, which are to be of greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society , . Rawls’ system of societal creation has both strengths and weaknesses, but is ultimately sound.
First and foremost, a capitalist economic system motivates people by rewarding them for their skills and efforts that they put into their work (Deane). Promotions and pay raises are some examples of the rewards that people are able to receive if they put great effort into their work. However, if people exert average or small amounts of effort, chances are that the rewards that they receive will reflect on their lack of effort. The rewards that can be received inspire ambition and an avid desire in people to be successful. People will apply themselves and be determined to reach their highest potential in order to acquire great rewards. People who work hard to earn more money will typically cause them to experience a feeling of accomplishment and will often give them the means to for a higher standard of living (Burke). Having a society where people are motivated to work hard to succeed will result in a more successful economy. On the other hand, socialist economic systems offer little or no reward for people who really apply t...
Born from the revolutions of 1848 throughout Europe, Marxism sought to end the class struggles that were destroying the continent. The solution to the problems of all nations occurred to Marx to be Socialism, a branch that is presently known as Marxism. Under this seemingly “utopian” socioeconomic system, equality was granted to all citizens who were in essence a community of one. “. . . universal free education; arming of the people; a progressive income tax; limitations upon inheritance; state ownership of banks. . .”(Palmer 506). These rights of which constituted Marxism eventually went on to be incorporated in Leninism and modern-day socialism. At least in its beginning, the intent of Marxism and the Communist League were noble towards the goal o...