Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Karl Marx and the Revolution
Religion and social change
Marx 4 class struggle
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Karl Marx and the Revolution
Marx views religion as a drug that gives the people temporary relief from their unhappiness, which inhibits them from conducting social change. To better understand Marx’ view of religion one must question, why is it so important that human beings stop looking to a metaphysical world for happiness? What is real happiness? And why does social change depend upon abandoning religion? Marx examines the importance of why human beings must stop looking to a metaphysical world. This can be translated into, why must humans stop turning to religion to be happy and fulfilled. Humans live their lives under the impression that they must obey g-ds orders, and fulfill certain requirements to live a happy life. It is believed that if these orders are fulfilled …show more content…
Marx views religion as a “universal source of consolation and justification.” (Marx 8) Meaning that humans are upset with something in their lives, but rather than facing what is upsetting them they turn to religion to forget about their problems. However, the problem with this is, religion does not solve any unhappiness or problems one is facing. Religion only gives temporary relief. It is for this reason Marx believes, religion is “the opium of the people” (Marx 8) because similar to the drug, religion gives temporary relief that makes one feel good but once one is addicted to relying on religion, they become powerless. It is for this reason that Marx sees the urgency for abandoning religion. Man must focus on making himself more powerful. Marx recognizes “man is the highest being for man, hence with the categorical imperative to overthrow all relations in which is debased, enslaved forsaken, despicable being.” (Marx 9) The meaning of this quote is to …show more content…
For a social change to occur, humans must realize that a change must be made in the first place. Marx claims that the only way the people will have this epiphany is by abandoning religion, to see what is upsetting them in life. As explained earlier, religion is a form of “consolation and justification” (Marx 8) which allows the people to feel relief from their problems. Marx believes “the criticism of heaven turns into the criticism of the earth, the criticism of religion into the criticism of law and the criticism of theology into the criticism of politics…” (Marx 9) the meaning of this is that once humans criticize and question the meaning and importance of the metaphysical and religion, they will begin to criticize everything else in life. By criticizing the laws and politics that humans follow, flaws will be noticed therefore a need for social change will be recognized. Marx believes that for our society to work properly everyone should be viewed as equal. If there exists no social classes and large institutions dictating our actions, society will then be able to flourish. Ultimately, Marx views man as an extremely powerful being. He recognizes that since the people were powerful enough to create a social institution as powerful as religion, we must be capable of being strong enough to forget about religion entirely. Marx has hope that once logic and understanding of the matter reach the
The fear of early twentieth century dystopian writers is the fear that people in general had in this era; what is the impact of communism or what the future of religion with evolution and Darwinism would be. The may concern was that if religion was obsolete, what would replace it as the moral compass of the people. One of the most important individuals of the early twentieth century Karl Marx had his own philosophy for a replacement. The role of religion in Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto is stated as,” But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis…’" (Marx 19) That new bases he mentioned in the quote is the state, the new morale code that society must follow.
Marx believed in socialism and that communism would eventually follow. He argued that social theorists and underprivileged people should topple capitalism and bring about socio-economic change. This is the ‘change we can believe in’ touted by Obama.
First, I want to identify who Marx and Nietzsche are and their critiques on religion. Karl
9. Hoselitz, Ben F. "Karl Marx on Secular and Social Development: A Study in the
According to Marx, religion comes from the imagination of the mind, “Man makes religion.” (H/R,p.11) Marx believes in Atheism and that religion is simply justification to our actions and behaviors as “followers.”
Karl Marx 's writing of ‘The Communist Manifesto’ in 1848 has been documented by a vast number of academics as one of the most influential pieces of political texts written in the modern era. Its ideologically driven ideas formed the solid foundation of the Communist movement throughout the 20th century, offering a greater alternative for those who were rapidly becoming disillusioned and frustrated with the growing wealth and social divisions created by capitalism. A feeling not just felt in by a couple of individuals in one society, but a feeling that was spreading throughout various societies worldwide. As Toma highlights in his work, Marx felt that ‘capitalism would produce a crisis-ridden, polarized society destined to be taken over by
...im, nor explain or rationalize God's will while in the faith. Whereas Marx finds Hegel's frustratingly apathetic towards the worker's struggle. Hegel's disregard for the physical being and objective nature is the cause of Marx's disenchantment with Hegel. Marx also recognizes the need for the individual as a utility to begin the Bloody Revolution. Without the individual, the secular Giest has no ground to stand upon.
The theory of communism revolves around the idea that individuality should be completely quelled and with that should come an overwhelming wholeness as a group. Marx once said “society does not consist of individuals but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individual stand.” In Flatland, the power of the configurations was challenged during the Color Revolt. In the Color Revolt, the various shapes painted themselves at their own free will. Some shapes even painted themselves to look like they had numerous sides, and therefore were mistakenly identified as a shape in a higher configuration. This resulted in the upheaval of the society that the Circles had ordained and established. It had to be put down in order to maintain order. Communism usually follows this line of thinking. Marx was an atheist, not because he thought there was something wrong with religion, but because he thought religion was the “sigh of the oppressed people.” He thought that religion was the result of people trying to make sense of their hardships. Therefore, to Marx, religion showed a flaw in society just like the Circles of Flatland thought that any flaw in an individual showed a flaw in the
Karl Marx noted that society was highly stratified in that most of the individuals in society, those who worked the hardest, were also the ones who received the least from the benefits of their labor. In reaction to this observation, Karl Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto where he described a new society, a more perfect society, a communist society. Marx envisioned a society, in which all property is held in common, that is a society in which one individual did not receive more than another, but in which all individuals shared in the benefits of collective labor (Marx #11, p. 262). In order to accomplish such a task Marx needed to find a relationship between the individual and society that accounted for social change. For Marx such relationship was from the historical mode of production, through the exploits of wage labor, and thus the individual’s relationship to the mode of production (Marx #11, p. 256).
"Karl Marx on Religion: The Opiate of the Masses?" About.com Agnosticism / Atheism. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 May 2014.
Karl Marx is living in a world he is not happy with, and seems to think that he has the perfect solution. I am a strong believer in his ideas. We are living in a time period with a huge class struggle. The Bourgroise exploits and the proletariat are being exploited. Marx did not like the way this society was and searched for a solution. Marx looked for “universal laws of human behavior that would explain and predict the future course of events" (36). He saw an unavoidable growth and change in society, coming not from the difference in opinions, but in the huge difference of opposing classes. He speaks of his ideal society and how he is going to bring about this utopia in his book The Communist Manifesto. I am going to share with you more on his ideas of this “world-wide revolution” (36) that would put an end to social classes and allow people to live with equal sharing which would result in a harmonious and much peaceful world.
Marx saw religion as an evil that existed in society and that it brought down all the people that believed in that religion. Marx said that, ?It [religion] is the opium of the people,?[1] and in saying this, Marx meant that religion was contagious on society. Once the society had a taste for the religion, they became totally engulfed it in, and then they do not want to get out of that way of live because they see it as a good way to live. Then even if people wanted to get out of the religion it was hard to get out because the whole society had already been infected by the ?opium.?
Marx believes that religion is an ideology of the ruling class and, therefore, supports the status quo. In this approach to explaining religion, subordinate groups come to believe in the legitimacy of the social order that oppresses them by internalizing the ideology of the ruling class. Marx is often quoted as saying that “religion is the opium of the people”. Marx advocates that people should reject other-worldly values to focus on the here and now and work for rewards in this life (Johnstone 2007). The film A Question of Miracle confirms that Marx’s theory is true based on the activities taken place. The film leads viewers and participants to believe in miracles through the faith of being a Christian. In the film, members of Pastor Hinn’s
Workers of the World Unite: You Have Nothing to Lose but Your Chains. Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto. Karl Marx had very strong viewpoints in regards to capitalism, making him a great candidate for this assignment. People constantly debate over whether his ideology holds any grain of truth to them. I believe that although not everything Marx predicted in his writings has come true (yet), he was definitely right on a lot of issues.
Marx thought of a society that would create equality and bring power to the people. He didn 't expect society to be totally equal but a society with distributed justice. According to Marx, a good society is when there is no exploitation. To get rid of exploitation, we have to get rid of surplus values and make everyone equal. But Marx also knows that no good society can exist as long as exploitation is allowed. That is why some societies will want a Marx type of living and some will not. A society that has used and embodied the Marxist tradition is Russia. They have used Marx ideas and lived by the communist manifesto. This way of life worked for many years and to the people of Russia, it made a good society. But to people outside of Russia, people who lived in a democratic state or country, they looked at it as a failed society. A type of society that should not be allowed to exist in the world of democracy. But like Marx said, some societies will be able to live in a Marxist environment and some won’t. Marx also states, “ In a communist society, the working class will be more important than the capital class”(M 10-25-2016). By having everyone equal, this allows for class conflict to be no more and exploitation not exist. Marx knows there can be no good society but a Marxist society will do its best to form a ideal