Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What was the role of the church in the Renaissance
The role of the churches in the era of the renaissance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One of the greatest debates of history has been regarding how much separation there should be between church and state. Prior to the Reformation, the church had a significant amount of power in regard to the government and society. There was a lot of corruption and greed, as the people of the church were able to find ways to abuse this power for their own profit. This corruption was a major reason for the rise of Martin Luther and it set the basis for the Protestant Reformation as a whole. He was able to completely change the trajectory of the Christian religion. Luther recognized the corruption and excessive power within the church, and he believed it was neither good for the Christians of the church or for the rest of the people of society …show more content…
to have the church and state so closely bonded. He believed that these realms should be kept separate, while he also found it important for Christians to participate in the government and for the power of the government to be controlled, as this would protect the purity of Christianity. He wrote about this deeply in his essay titled Concerning Governmental Authority.
In terms of keeping these two realms separate, Luther firmly believed that they could both stay side by side and flourish wonderfully without any qualms. He moved on to describe the two types of governing authorities. The government of the earth; the temporal power, had the responsibility to take care of issues concerning worldly things like property and crime. Without the power of the temporal authority, the crimes committed by non-Christians would be out of control. It was a system necessary to keep relative peace on earth. God, on the other hand, dealt with peoples’ souls and faith, as he controlled the spiritual realm of the church. Luther found it pivotal that these two realms should not cross over each other, especially in terms of the temporal authority making laws over a person’s …show more content…
soul. One of Luther’s first topics in his article discussed why the government was necessary and why it needed to be kept separate from the church. Luther believed that having a structured government was pivotal for peace on earth, due to the fact that not all people governed themselves as Christians. One of Luther’s first defenses for his point of view was how, if everyone was a Christian, there would be no need for any temporal power. A true god following Christian would be a servant to all, and so there would be no greed or selfishness to cause issues among people. However, he stated how true Christians were quite rare, and so it was impossible to rule a non-Christian state in a Christian view. “But take heed and first fill the world with real Christians before you attempt to rule it in a Christian and evangelical manner” (Luther 74). He realized that trying to govern the masses under a viewpoint of the minority would be reckless and unsuccessful. It would not succeed in maintaining a peaceful and just community, or achieve the upbringing of true Christians. That is why there was a necessity for a government in his view. Though the Christians didn’t need a government to govern themselves, there needed to be a system for the non-believers to keep evil acts from being rampant. Luther also described the church and the need for it to be kept separate from the temporal power. Just as non-believers needed a system to keep peace on earth and to keep them safe, Christians also required a system on earth. That system was the church and it was meant to help them connect with God and their faith. Luther knew that Christians were very rare because of how difficult it was to follow God on earth, so a church free of Government interference was pivotal to keep the Christians strong in their belief. With a corrupt church, it made it even more difficult to remain a true Christian, so Luther wanted to avoid that hindrance by keeping the two realms separate. So, the two realms were very necessary, but it was also very important for their success to stay separated. After showing why the government was necessary, he commented on if Christians should live by the rules of the government and assist it.
This depended on the work of the temporal authority. Though Luther did not believe in the non-Christian population being ruled under a Christian methodology, Luther did believe that the temporal authority of the state should be doing the work of God. “In short, since Paul says here that the governing authority is God’s servant, we must allow it to be exercised not only by the heathen but by all men” (Luther 80). Luther showed here that the governing authority was a tool for God’s use. Luther believed that the government was an institution and a servant of God; something to further his bidding. He went on to further express what that should mean to Christians. “Therefore, you should esteem the sword or governmental authority as highly as the estate of marriage, or husbandry, or any other calling which God has instituted” (Luther 81). So, he also believed that it should be highly respected by Christians as it was an institution of God. Luther believed that it was the requirement of a Christian to help with the bringing of justice against those who had done wrong. He did not, however, think that they should do so when a wrong is done against them personally, but rather when a wrong is committed against their neighbor. “You should help him that he may have peace and that his enemy may be curbed, but this is not possible unless the
governing authority is honored and feared” (Luther 77). So, Luther viewed helping the temporal power of the government as another way to help one’s neighbor, which is something that a good Christian should do. Now that he had asserted that Christians should live within the bounds of the government, the next question that Luther discussed was if Christians should actually wield the sword of the government. Going off the point that the government was an institution to further God’s work, Luther made it clear that a Christian should help spread the work of God through any way possible to them. “Therefore, if you see that there is a need of hangmen, constables, judges, lords, or princes, and you find that you are qualified, you should offer your services and seek the position that the essential governmental authority may not be despised and become enfeebled or perish” (Luther 78). Luther showed that if the government was in need of help, a Christian should offer their services as they were actually offering their services to God. He further commented that Christians, in fact, would be the most fitting wielders of the governmental sword, as they were most accustomed to being God’s servants. They would be the most effective at doing the job without corrupting the system, as they would be doing it for the glory of God, and not for selfish reasons. So, Luther did believe a Christian should offer their bodies to the work of the Government, as they would actually be offering to do the work of God. He also clarified that when there was no need for the temporal sword of the state, one should be free to do nothing for the government. Luther showed that the government was a thing of God that should be assisted by Christians, as long as the temporal authority was not commanding them to do acts against God. After showing that Christians should take part in the government and in protecting justice, Luther found it quite important to set guidelines for the state in regard to how much power and control it should have. Luther firmly stated that the government did not have the right or power to rule over one’s faith or soul, as that responsibility lay solely in the hands of God. He deemed that the government should only have power over earthly things; things that they could touch, as they could not touch the soul. His main worry or trepidation was that the arms of the state would encroach on God’s ruling, which is why he made it clear that the government should be kept completely separate from the church. He also made it clear that he thought it wrong for the government to try and make people follow Christianity, as people would be forced to say they believed even if they did not truly have any faith in God. One who was forced to believe would not truly believe. As the Christian faith was already very hard to follow, watering it down with fake Christians would not be positive for the church. Another thing he discussed, was how much the temporal force should wield their power to punish. This would determine if the ruling authority was too forceful or not forceful enough, as both these situations could lead to problems. Luther thought it better to punish less, as “The world has plenty of scoundrels anyways and must continue to have them, but godly men are scarce” (Luther 83). This once again reinforced Luther’s view that Christians were very few and they must be protected. He deeply desired to keep the Godly people protected, and it can be seen that this was a big reason as to why he wanted to keep the church and state separated. Just as Luther outlined how much power the state should have, he also described how far the arms of the church should reach. This responsibility and power to keep over one’s soul remained solely under God’s control. He did not want the realm of God interfered with, as that would interfere with the faith of the Christians, which he wanted to keep protected. Luther also made it clear that he did not want the church to interfere with the government as it was designed to keep evil acts from being done. Just as Luther found it wrong for the government to force religion on anyone, he also did not want the church forcing Christianity on anyone. A Christian must believe in God truly and for the right reasons, not because they were forced into it. The bishops did have the power to show the path to God, but no one had the authority to force anyone to believe as they would not truly have faith. Luther then discussed how the church had no need for any type of temporal power over the true Christians. “What kind of authority can there be where all are equal and have the same right, power, possession, and honor, and where no one deserves to be the other’s superior, but each the other’s subordinate?” (Luther 92). He believed that true Christians did not need to be ruled over because they were all on the same level as each other and were all serving one another. They lived life as equals humbling themselves to one another, so there was no place for a person of the church to correct them for their wrongs. The one ruler they needed was God, as he was the only one who could bring about change to their souls. So, Luther did not believe the church needed to have much power over the people of the church or over anyone else. The church was a system to keep the faith of the Christians secure, but the only sort of authority required was the authority of God.
The periods during the Reformation, Industrial Revolution, and the World at War all experienced religious and church conflicts. During the Renaissance and Reformation (1330 – 1650), the fundamental practices of the church came under fire. The church at this time was the largest and most political body. The pope, himself, was the most recognizable political figure. It was due to this authority that the church and its pope were more interested in political issues and less with the spiritual needs of the people (McGraw-Hill, p. 76). Many of the Roman Catholic Church’s high priests had bought their way into position and had very little religious experience. Often the only members of the community that were literate were the clergy thus adding to their control of the common people.
Luther had a change in his philosophy of how God deals with sinners. Luther believe red that God just sat in Heaven and just passed judgment on sinners. In (Psalm 22: 1-8 AMP) the scriptures talk about God delivering the saints versus just being a God who only judges the people that he condemns for their sins. Luther revolved against the Pope once he realized that the Pope did not have the power to control the final resting place in Purgatory or in Hell. Bainton makes a great point, for the saints by pointing out that the forgiveness of Christ outweighs the indulgences of the Pope. In the end Luther’s theology change featured embracing God’s word from scripture, versus relying on his relationships with religious leader such as the
“Under the outward appearance of the gospel, they honor and serve the devil, thus deserving death in body and soul ten times over.” Luther’s brutal words against the rebelling peasants of Germany in 1525 reveal the complex reality of the Reformation. Suppression of the rebellion by the German aristocracy was swift and violent, leaving over 70,000 German peasants dead. The rebellion targeted the social and political oppression of the peasantry in the early 16th century. The peasants found new justification for revolt in the promising words of Martin Luther. Luther proclaimed a new kind of freedom for the Christian soul and the peasants applied his idea to their own circumstances. However a dichotomy emerged between spiritual freedom and worldly freedom. Luther argued that good Christians were spiritually free but still subject to temporal laws. The kingdom of God and the kingdom of man were separate spheres. Luther rejected attempts to integrate spiritual freedom into the temporal sphere [Luther turned against the peasants’ revolt of 1525 because the demands of the peasants went against his doctrine of Christian freedom, which stressed the spiritual freedom of Christians and concordant obedience to temporal authority. By using scripture as a justification for rebellion, the peasants not only blasphemed God’s name but also acted against the natural order mandated by God.
The reformations of the sixteenth century challenged the ideals of many religious institutions, but they also contested political institutions as well. This could be due to the fact that most politics were tied in some way to religion, but it could also be the way in which the reformations challenged the unquestionable authority of the Catholic Church, that led to questioning the system of governance as well. The reformation opposed traditional views of politics in Europe by challenging the ideas of body politics and the natural law that governed the land.
Martin Luther was a former Priest/Monk and that saw some corruption in the Roman Catholic Church. Luther tried to bring his concerns to the Church in his writing of the “Ninety-five Theses on the Power of Indulgences.” When these question that Luther proposed to the Archbishop of Mainz went unsatisfactorily unanswered in 1517, Luther started defaming the Roman Church and pushed for the utter destruction of the Roman Church. What started out as an internal reform of Church’s discipline, turned into a war against the Roman Church for their total destruction. This was the intent of Luther’s sermon of 1521.
Luther’s concept challenges all who followed to seek awareness of God’s relation between the Law and the Gospel. According to Luther’s doctrine of vocation each person lives life in two realms, the secular and the spiritual. Luther was one of the first theologians to inspire renewed interest in reconnecting faith and everyday life. He associated the greatest commandment “Love your neighbor as yourself” to our service and work carrying out Jesus’ example. Luther reminded us, we are working side by side with God, in all areas of our life; church, household, social, and common order of Christian love and in each area we are responsible to glorify God. Luther insisted Christianity is not a withdrawal from the world, but engaging in the world. Luther’s transition from vocation of the priesthood to including secular occupation brings all people to new accountabilities. In Luther 's doctrine of vocation in includes the concept of two kingdoms. In his words, “each person lives his life in two realms, the secular and the spiritual. The spiritual kingdom is ruled by God 's grace and His forgiveness of sins, while the secular realm is ruled by the sword.” In Luther’s teachings, the secular realm was divided into many offices, stations, and callings, each having significance towards serving your neighbor. Luther gives the example of a literal interpretation of the
At the beginning of the sixteenth century church theologian, Martin Luther, wrote the 95 Theses questioning the corruption of the Roman Catholic Church. In this essay I will discuss: the practices of the Roman Catholic Church Martin Luther wanted to reform, what Martin’s specific criticism of the pope was, and the current practices Pope Francis I is interested in refining in the Roman Catholic Church today.
Luther uses harsh words to describe the popes and the bishops by calling them names such as “humbug”, “block head”, and “hypocrite”. According to Martin Luther’s Letter to the Christian Nobility of the German Nation, it states “He might well make a man into a hypocrite or a humbug, and block head, but never a Christian or spiritual man”. Martin Luther believes that the priests, bishops, and popes are not different from the Christian people. Martin Luther points out that Christians were baptized and read the Bible, so why do the popes receive so much authority and power than Christians. In the Letter to the Christian Nobility of the German Nation, Luther questions “Why are your life and limb, your property and honor, so cheap and mine not, inasmuch as we are all Christians and have the same baptism, the same faith, the same Spirit, and all the rest?”. Therefore, Martin Luther believes that the popes, bishops, and priests are given too much authority and power even though the popes, bishops, and priests do not possess that many special abilities. Martin Luther claims that everyone is a priest since the Christian people can interpret and read the Bible, carry the same faith and spirit, and were baptized just like the popes, priests, and bishops
While numerous theological issues had been brewing for some time, the Reformation was officially began in 1517 by a man named Martin Luther. Martin Luther was a professor of biblical theology who had several issues with the Catholic Church. His complaints or disputes with the Catholic Church are known as his 95 Theses. In his 95 Theses, Martin Luther argued that God offers salvation through faith alone and that religious authority comes from the Bible alone which posed a challenge to the authority of the Catholic Church. After sparking the Reformation, Martin Luther made it his goal to incorporate the church congregation in the praise and worship part of church service. A detrimental and vital aspect of Christianity, Martin Luther believed this needed to be done. Along with his followers, Martin Luther made continuous...
Thesis statement: Martin Luther was responsible for the break-up of the Catholic Church Martin Luther was a representative during the 16th century of a desire widespread of the renewal and reform of the Catholic Church. He launched the Protestant reform a continuation of the medieval religious search. From the Middle ages, the church faced many problems such as the Babylonian Captivity and the Great Schism that hurt the prestige of the church. Most of the clergy lived in great luxury while most people were poor and they set an immoral example. The clergy had low education and many of them didn’t attend their offices.
Luther is uneasy when it comes to how the law affects human behavior. His view is that laws exist to restrict and control man, and we are free to act within the law, but genuine freedom exists when we naturally adapt our actions to the shape of the law: “To have the law on our side is the very nature of freedom from sin and the law...this freedom consists of taking pleasure simply in doing good, or in living uprightly, without being constrained to do so by the law.” (Luther pg. 29, 30) Kant passionately contradicts Luther’s claim: “The citizen cannot refuse to pay t...
" Additionally, it is important to understand Luther’s distinction between the Law and the Gospel in order to further explore Luther’s understanding of human freedom. The Law is God’s commandment; it allows humans to coexist, limits chaos and condemns sinfulness, though it is not God’s road to salvation.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Just about everyone knows or has heard of Superman. His great ways with words and his good looks, Superman was an instant hit in the comic book industry. During the Cold War the comic book industry became a booming sensation, with novels including Captain America, The Hulk and Superman. Because of the amount of stress during the Cold War of possible communists living in the United States, comic books and comic strips became an American form of entertainment and propaganda. During this time period Superman and Captain America were both drawn up to defeat communist scum off the streets of the United States. The Communist Party was formed in the late 1940s to early 1950s, and these comics were written to help the children of the country have roll
Luther states “the law is spiritual. If the law were for the body, it could be satisfied with works. Because it is spiritual, however, no one can satisfy it- unless all that you do is done from the bottom of the heart” (Luther 77). What Luther really means by this is that law can only be fulfilled where there is a spiritual heart and where that spirit is absent from the heart then there is sin and dissatisfaction with the law. A law is achieved by doing works which God decides if we are performing these tasks with the will of God from the heart. However, one will be punished by God for performing deeds when there is no heart because God is not satisfied by individuals who only do good works when others are watching or to get something in return. (Luther 76). Laws are meant to keep the sinful attributes of individuals under control through the fear of punishment. The law shows anyone that compares their life to Christ’s life who was without sin that he or she is sinful. God gave us law not because he is harsh but to help society maintain order and is also a guide so that we can know what good works will please God. The book of laws are found in the Old Testament which teaches what individuals can and cannot do. The Old Testament is comprised of the demanding of good, stories of how laws can be maintained or broken, and promising the forgiveness of sin (Luther 98). The apostles use the
Religion is a predominant force in our world today. It also had a strong impact on the lives of those alive during the Protestant Reformation. Many people became key figures in bringing about the ideas that founded the Protestant Reformation like John Calvin and most importantly Martin Luther. Martin Luther pinned these concerns of his to the door of his church and was not afraid to voice his opinion, I think this was the key to the Reformation, and without people willing to risk everything to bring a change like this about, then it all would have been impossible.