Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Moral Leadership Of Martin Luther King
Transcendentalism: conclusion
Transcendentalism analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Chris and Martin Luther King Jr.both found incredible success on their quest and jumped over incredible obstacles such as violence and starvation.These individuals learned to never give up and anything is possible. Chris and King excluded themselves from society either by leaving society as a whole or just taking a different route which in a way shows a form of transcendentalism.Chris McCandless is a character who differs from society,this individual is what I consider a nonconformist. Martin Luther King, Jr. is also a powerful individual and possess a lot of the same character traits as chris but also slightly differs. An example of success from Chris is when he actually decided to make the move to quit college and donate all his money to …show more content…
One of the big problems chris had was starvation and it was self inflicted,he could have gave up and went home but he choose to live out his quest.On the other hand King faced more obstacles against society, violence among him and his family during marches or even in his own home,not so much self inflicted like Chris.One of the Most known obsticles that King faced was called the civil rights march on washington. Chris learned that isolating himself in the wilderness was not the best choice,he did attempt to return back to society by waving down the helicopter.Martin luther King Jr. learned to not be helpless like his peers.He was one of the few black people that grew up dealing with racism and learned to not accept it. I personally learned a lot from both characters.King I learned that even though the odds are against you you can still make a change that impacts the world for many years.From Chris I learned there is more to life than material things,and do what makes you the most happy. Two completely different ways and forms of transcendentalism was
...ng a fire, and purifying water. He may not have mastered the skills, but he was experienced enough to get by. In order to see that Chris was prepared, you have to look past the gear that he packed. You have to go through his mental process and you also have to look at what he learned in order to live off the land. Had he not been prepared, he would have most likely died after he ran out of rice.
As Chris McCandless once said, “I now walk into the wild,” a phrase that not only represents a future with unknown mysteries, but a phrase that finishes the puzzle of his and Martin Luther King, Jr’s life. When looking at a historical or inspirational person, you may notice they operated outside the usual bounds of society to achieve a particular purpose. Such is the case for McCandless and King. Although Chris McCandless and Martin Luther King, Jr both shared a fatal death, these men had many similarities and differences between how they reached success, encountered obstacles, and left an impact towards people's lives.
I think that Chris is a very motivated person. He knows what he wants and he is willing to do anything to get there. This quote describes when Gallien was trying to persuade Chris not to go through with his hitchhiking plan, “But he wouldn’t give an inch. He had an answer for everything I threw at him” (Krakauer 7). This quote shows the depth of his motivated character because of his unwillingness to change his mind. Additionally, I also think that Chris has a very optimistic character and outlook on life. Chris is not willing to totally accept the danger of what he is about to do because he is quick to hope for the best. Proof of this character trait can be found in the following quote, “‘I’m absolutely positive… I won’t run into anything I can’t deal with on my own’” (Krakauer 7).
In a certain sense that’s how Chris lived his entire life” (112). Chris was creative in everything he did, separating him from his classmates and most of society in general. He was also intensely spiritual from such a young age and viewed running an almost religious exercise. “Chris would use the spiritual aspect to try and motivate us,” recalls Eric Hathaway, another friend on the team. “He’d tell us to think about all the evil in the world, all the hatred, and imagine ourselves running against the forces of darkness, the evil wall that was keeping us from running our best. He believed doing well was all mental, a simple matter of harnessing whatever energy was available. As impressionable high school kids, we were blown away by that kind of talk” (112). McCandless was wise beyond his years to say the least. Testimony from Eric Hathaway’s experiences with Chris should be more than enough to prove how individual Chris was, even in high
Excerpt #3→ Carine McCandless specified an unique detail about Chris when she said, “Chris would never, ever, intentionally burn down a forest, not even to save his life. Anybody who would suggest otherwise doesn't understand the first thing about my brother (198).”
power than many men do. For instance she is able to convince Zeus, ruler of
...tic things. He sacrificed so much and put himself in danger to follow what he wanted to do. Chris was a smart cookie, and maybe that was what kept him going was the knowledge flooding through his body and the inspiration that reading gave him.
was and found happiness in his life. In general, Chris knew that the only way he could
Ella Baker and Martin Luther King Jr. did have their similarities as leaders of the Civil Rights Movement, but there were vast differences as well. Their differences allowed the Civil Rights Movement to be more encompassing while fighting for the same cause. Baker and King both grew up in the South, had religious upbringings, had at least some level of a higher education, and were public speakers. What set them apart was their differing opinions on who contributed to social change, and how. This is expressed through the varying social classes they depended on, importance placed on reputations developed through public associations, and nonviolence tactics that used to fight for equality. Even though Baker and King had different methods in which
All in all, it is interesting how the trials of life can lead a person into an awakening that inspires millions. Many people believe that walking “into the wild” to live off the land and find himself alone in nature was arrogant, foolish and irresponsible. Chris lacks of knowledge about the wild was a major factor in his death. Chris did not plan how he will survive in the wilderness without proper equipments. He misunderstood that he would have no problem in setting in the wild. Chris immature manner and decisions lead him to starvation and ultimately death. If he planned it out in the beginning he would have saved his life.
He couldn't wait to head out there and get started. " Chris's determination may have been the reason he didn't make it, but it goes to show why people cared about him and why he made an impact. It's why they remember him, and why they remember him being all about adventure, being very serious about the matter. Having people's input about Chris' story helps show who he really is.
Multiple times he risked his life when it could have be easily avoided. One of Chris’s adventures was to take the Colorado River to the Gulf of California, without a map. “All hopes collapse! The canal does not reach the ocean but merely peters out into a vast swap.” (35). Chris’s game of randomly picking which way to take proved to not work when he reached a dead end. He would have been dead if a group of duck hunters didn’t pick him up and take him to Tijuana. Chris didn't see the risk of canoeing into Mexico unprepared and almost dying. He once again got saved by some random help. “if you plan everything out completely from beginning to end, you destroy your chance for adventure”(107). His mindset of doing everything freely, made Chris’s adventure very dangerous. He had no plans for food, shelter, or income which is not smart because if you don't find food or water for a week you end up dead. Some might say that Chris was just trying to be himself and go out and explore the world. This is ok except there are a ton of ways to do this safely. The amount of risks Chris took on his adventure made it an overall reckless adventure. If he truly cared about his safety he would always bring enough food and water to survive and he would know the area he was going
Is Chris McCandless admirable or a fool? Chris McCandless was an admirable person because he had motivation and ambition to follow his dreams. He wanted to prove his family wrong and show them that he could do it on his own. In the beginning Mccandless went Into the wild with the mindset that he didn't need anyone but towards the end it changed. Mccandless said” HAPPINESS ONLY REAL WHEN SHARED,(pg.189).
Chris played by his own rules, not others he was a leader not a follower. Another interesting characteristic of Chris was that he hated money too. Well he did not exactly hate money he always wanted to be self reliant. Self reliance, he teaches that people have to be in solitude to hear their own thoughts, because society, and its pressure urges them to conform and not having to rely on money to lead him to happiness. Chris noted (189) "HAPPINESS ONLY REAL WHEN SHARED."He lived money and worry free in the wild
This was not the kind of young man most people would expect especially coming from the upper class family that Chris did. He always wrote to the people he met along his way to Alaska just to reassure them of his well being and that he is still on his way to completing his ever so sought after journey. He cared about everyone he met along his voyage and they all cared about him. He valued and appreciated everything they done for him he always told them in his letters. Without these people he never would have made it to Alaska. Another time he showed he cherished in what he believed in was how would not let life be handed to him, that is the way he was brought up and raised. Chris being a bigger man than that knew every man, woman and child should be treated. That is one of the main reasons why he chose to change his socio economic status. Lastly Chris never had the same values as his old friends did. At a party one night he was with his “friends” when he then left the party without telling them and went over to the “sketchy” part of town. The part he went to was known for having prostitutes, homeless people, and drug dealers. Chris would then proceed to offer them a meal and would take them to restaurants and attempt to persuade these people into a better life. He cared for these people, did not know them but knew they were struggling he was willing to help and be there