Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dr. Martin Luther King's philosophy
Civil disobedience in general word
Civil disobedience in general word
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The actions of Martin Luther king Jr. was necessary to acquire a real change in American culture. To civil disobey is the active, professed refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government or of any occupying international power. It also a symbolic violation of the law, rather then rejection of the system as a whole. Martin King Jr use this a nonviolent form of resistance to change a society for the better.
The actions of civil disobedience in the way Martin Luther king Jr preached and used are justified because of the way they were handle. Of course using the word justified to describe something that means to pretty much break the law might be a flawed by itself. In a time were racial conflicts were high and the mistreatment of African Americans liberties were based on the color of their skin, a leader
…show more content…
need to focus all that frustration and anger into something positive, and non violent. It is better to focus all that anger in peaceful protest, parading, demonstrating, boycotting, trespassing and picketing then it is to use violence and make things even worse to set back the cause. The strategy of civil disobedience in the way Martin Luther King Jr. used was a perfect in getting the message across. The Civil rights movement was inescapable the discussion was all over the place because of the use non- violent civil disobedience."One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws"(king). Martin Luther king Jr understood the power of non-violent protest and these actions spread like wild fire. Soon a race was united in a common goal equality for African Americans. The technique was use perfectly it help a lot of African Americans from loosing their life's, and created a respectful issues because of the manner of how the issue was fought against using non-violent protest. Martin Luther king Jr notion of nonviolence had six key principles.
First one was to resit evil without resorting to violence. Second was through non- violence was to seek to win the "friendship and understanding" of the opponent, not to humiliate him(King, Stride,84) The third was, evil itself, not the people committing evil acts, should be opposed. Fourth those whom commit to nonviolence must willing to suffer with out retaliation as suffering itself can be redemptive. Fifth, nonviolent resistance avoids "external physical violence" and "internal violence of spirit" as well:‘‘The nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent but he also refuses to hate him’’ (King, Stride, 85). The sixth principle is that the nonviolent resister must have a ‘‘deep faith in the future,’’ stemming from the conviction that ‘‘the universe is on the side of justice’’ (King, Stride, 88). These ideals are direct from Martin Luther king Jr they also show what kind of man he was. To love his opponent and use and teach civil disobedience in this way is amazing. Martin Luther technique was well thought and his commitment to nonviolence was
absolute. In conclusion Martin Luther king Jr technique of civil disobedience was the best strategy to unite every one in the mind state to use nonviolence. His actions were correct in every way to stop the youth at the time from using violence which would have solved nothing and made things worse in every way. A leader was capable of making a real change in U.S society by protesting and using civil disobedience in a nonviolence way. Martin Luther king Jr strategy change America culture. Kingencyclopedia staff , Nonviolent Resistance Martin Luther King Jr and the global freedom struggle Setember 26, 2015 http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/encyclopedia/enc_nonviolent_resistance/ King, ‘‘Pilgrimage to Nonviolence,’’ in Papers: 5:419–425. King, Stride Toward Freedom, 1958. King, Where Do We Go from Here,1967.
Throughout history, many historical figures that has had a very astounding impact on the world today were people who were willing to go against the norm or sometimes even the law. This act of civil disobedience is not a crime but rather it is a eye opener. This is because sometimes it takes breaking the law to show the flaws hidden within the law itself. In the case of Rosa Parks, her civil disobedience is what sparked change and allowed the nation to see the unsightliness of the law that put her and others into confinement.
today, perhaps it could be justified. For one, President Donald John Trump’s Immigration Executive Order, which practically bans all foreign immigrants from residing nor entering the nation. America is what it is today because of its diversity. Yet, President Trump and a considerable number of people believe that the country should be of its natives instead of those who seek the privileges of its constitutions and hence potentially violates the Declaration of Independence, which says that all men have the right to seek asylum. Considering how the Declaration of Independence originated the U.S., it is ironic for the nation to limit it. Therefore, civil disobedience is required. As it is apprehended that the matter requires civil disobedience, the negotiation comes in; however, a president could be convinced, but not negotiated with his own nation, and thus this step is nullified. Moving on, the enactment of non-violent direct actions is legally safe from the nation’s military forces, but it could be met with a group of people, potentially possessive of deadly weapons, who support the Immigration Executive Order. As it could be life threatening to some extent, one should be ready to self-defend, but not retaliate to the extent where the other is harmed. Finally, launch coordinated systematic direct actions nationwide for the maximum effect. In doing so, President Trump would eventually have to nullify
MLK Jr. Apostle of Militant Nonviolence. Everyone that has been through the American school system within the past 20 years knows exactly who Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is, and exactly what he did to help shape the United States to what it is today. In the beginning of the book, Martin Luther King Jr. Apostle of Militant Nonviolence, by James A. Colaiaco, he states that “this book is not a biography of King, [but] a study of King’s contribution to the black freedom struggle through an analysis and assessment of his nonviolent protest campaigns” (2). Colaiaco discusses the successful protests, rallies, and marches that King put together. .
Martin Luther King, Jr. defines “civil disobedience” as a way to show others what to do when a law is unjust and unreasonable. As King stated in the letter from Birmingham, “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.” When Negros were being treated unfairly, Martin Luther King, Jr. stepped in to show people how to peacefully protest and not be violent. The dictionary definition of civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest (Webster Dictionary). That is what Martin Luther King, Jr. did when nothing was changing in the town after the law for public school to be non-segregated. In Antigone, Creon created an edict that states that nobody could bury Polynices’s body because he was a traitor to Thebes and his family. Under Martin Luther King’s definition of an unjust and a just law, Creon’s edict is unjust and degrades Polynices’ right to be buried because of lack of information and favoritism of one brother.
Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.’s essay “Love, Law, and Civil Disobedience” has two main features. The first feature of King’s essay is a call for action; action to bring about change. The second feature, the more easily viewed feature of this essay is a call for a specific type of action to bring about a specific type of change. The change King wishes to bring about is a peace and equality brought about through non-violent actions.
In 1968, Martin Luther King Jr passed away from a sniper’s bullet. He gave us thirteen years of nonviolent protest during the civil rights movement of the 1950’s. Before I can give my opinion on the history of race relations in the United States since King’s assassination in 1968 strengthened or weakened his arguments on the necessity and value of civil disobedience? You should know the meaning of civil disobedience. The word civil has several definitions. “The one that is intended in this case is "relating to citizens and their interrelations with one another or with the state", and so civil disobedience means "disobedience to the state". Sometimes people assume that civil in this case means "observing accepted social forms; polite" which would make civil disobedience something like polite, orderly disobedience. Although this is an acceptable dictionary definition of the word civil, it is not what is intended here. This misinterpretation is one reason the essay (by Henry David Thoreau that was first published in 1849) is sometimes considered to be an argument for pacifism or for exclusively nonviolent resistance”.
Civil Disobedience occurs when an individual or group of people are in violation of the law rather than a refusal of the system as a whole. There is evidence of civil disobedience dating back to the era after Jesus was born. Jesus followers broke the laws that went against their faith. An example of this is in Acts 4:19-20,”God told the church to preach the gospel, so they defied orders to keep quiet about Jesus,” In my opinion civil disobedience will always be needed in the world. The ability to identify with yourself and knowing right from wrong helps to explain my opinion. Often in society when civil
(Ansbro, 231) instead of promoting love and violence among all races. King’s purpose in promoting nonviolence direct action was to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiations. He felt that practicing nonviolence would portray his followers as moral beings while making apparent the brutality of the segregationists. King’s preaching of nonviolence was monumental in succeeding in demonstrations such as the Montgomery bus boycott and the desegregation of public schools. King’s reaching of nonviolent direct action furthers the arguments that King is the most influential person of the twentieth century.
...y, and also fidelity to the law. Acts of civil disobediences are aimed to defend principles of justice. In King’s case he aims to persuade the local government and the businesses to comply with desegregation laws. It was important for him to communicate fidelity to the law. You should lovingly break a law, because your reason behind protesting to to achieve what you see as a higher good. You are not directly hurting the people. King’s argument ultimately is you can break the law to make the law more just. You are attempting to break the law to show that the law is unjust, and it is an act of saying that the law can be made better than it is now. He’s gathered his facts and understanding of the law, it is 100% clear there’s a problem. For civil disobedience to be justified a real injustice must exist, or else it wouldn’t addresses a sense of justice of the majority.
Comparing the Civil Disobedience of Martin Luther King Jr., Henry David Thoreau, and Mohandas Gandhi. From the onset of man fighting for freedom or his beliefs, the question has always been whether one person can make a difference using words rather than wars. Philosophically, the concept of civil disobedience would appear to be an ineffective weapon against political injustice; history however has proven it to repeatedly be one of the most powerful weapons of the common man. Martin Luther King Jr. looked at the way African Americans were treated in the United States and saw an increase in inequality.
Have you ever wondered what it was like to make a difference and even change something in your country? How would you feel if you were considered a hero by your people? Civil disobedience is a form of protest that uses a law to show that it is not needed. The protestors intentionally violate a law that they are protesting against (Suber). For example, Rosa Parks used civil disobedience by sitting at the front of the bus because she believed that all people are the same and deserved equal rights. Although civil disobedience uses tactics of nonviolence, it is more than a little passive resistance because it is used to take action by illegal street demonstrations or by peaceful occupations (Starr). Mandela’s involvement in civil disobedience was due to his strongly hatred of racism and racial prejudice in South Africa. Mr. Mandela did achieve success by using guerrilla tactics as well as civil disobedience to stand up to what he believed was right.
An example of civil disobedience would have to be the famous story of Rosa Parks in which she was arrested for Civil Disobedience on December 1, 1955. Rosa Parks stood up for what she had faith in. At about night fall of December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks, being an African women, was burned out after an extensive day of working, predetermined to take a seat at the front of the bus for her ride home. She refused to give up her seat to a white commuter; she was then taken into custody for overstepping an Alabama law that required black people to give up their seats to white people when the bus was full. Blacks also had to sit at the back of the bus according to Alabama law. Rosa Parks arrest was successful by a one-day bus boycott on her court date. The NAACP knew it needed to carry forward with their action, to prosperously challenge segregated public transportation. The new pastor was Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in which he became the commander of the boycott. He demanded there be nonviolent actions to accomplish the objective of justice. Martin Luther King Jr. quoted, "We must use the weapon of love.” Rosa Parks being arrested flared a 381-d...
In the course of human history, countless rulers and authorities have refused to administer freedom to their people. Untold populations have been taken advantage of and denied personal liberties. This is seen through the Middle Ages’ institution of serfdom, the monarchs of the Age of Absolutism, the oppressive regimes of the 21st century, and many others. To overcome such injustice, it is vital that oppressed persons refuse to be subjugated. Through the act of civil disobedience, this necessary action is achieved, and is thus the catalyst of free society.
Civil Disobedience was always and will always be a part of society whether people like it or not. Whether it be through woman pretending to be men to fight in an army, or through refusing to give up your seat to a human of a different race, it is undeniable how massive the change that civil disobedience has caused. When one hears the phrase civil disobedience they most likely automatically think of Dr. Martin Luther King and his struggle to fight or basic equality. He inspired his followers to fight non violently and to fight for what is right. He would march peacefully through the streets, so everyone could see their efforts, he would encourage sit ins, where black people would sit benignly at all white counters, showing how they should be allowed to sit anywhere.
We all know that in the past colored people slaved, they faced a lot of problems, their women were not allowed to vote, someone needs to take a stand for colored community, King Martin Luther took a stand for them, he said: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”. Civil disobedience corrected these injustice laws for colored people. Yes, civil disobedience can be moral for justices, sometimes law can be wrong, sometimes it’s the only way to make wrong- right and Sometimes it’s the only tool in the box.