Martin Luther King Nonviolent Resistance

617 Words2 Pages

The actions of Martin Luther king Jr. was necessary to acquire a real change in American culture. To civil disobey is the active, professed refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government or of any occupying international power. It also a symbolic violation of the law, rather then rejection of the system as a whole. Martin King Jr use this a nonviolent form of resistance to change a society for the better.

The actions of civil disobedience in the way Martin Luther king Jr preached and used are justified because of the way they were handle. Of course using the word justified to describe something that means to pretty much break the law might be a flawed by itself. In a time were racial conflicts were high and the mistreatment of African Americans liberties were based on the color of their skin, a leader …show more content…

First one was to resit evil without resorting to violence. Second was through non- violence was to seek to win the "friendship and understanding" of the opponent, not to humiliate him(King, Stride,84) The third was, evil itself, not the people committing evil acts, should be opposed. Fourth those whom commit to nonviolence must willing to suffer with out retaliation as suffering itself can be redemptive. Fifth, nonviolent resistance avoids "external physical violence" and "internal violence of spirit" as well:‘‘The nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent but he also refuses to hate him’’ (King, Stride, 85). The sixth principle is that the nonviolent resister must have a ‘‘deep faith in the future,’’ stemming from the conviction that ‘‘the universe is on the side of justice’’ (King, Stride, 88). These ideals are direct from Martin Luther king Jr they also show what kind of man he was. To love his opponent and use and teach civil disobedience in this way is amazing. Martin Luther technique was well thought and his commitment to nonviolence was

Open Document