Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Eassy on human evolution
Eassy on human evolution
Eassy on human evolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Eassy on human evolution
In his essay, “The Damned Human Race,” Mark Twain makes the argument that humans did not evolve from the animals to become a higher species, but that instead, they have sunken below the animals to become a lower race. He calls this the “Descent of Man from the Higher Animals,” in a parody of the Darwinian theory of “The Ascent of Man from the Lower Animals.” Twain’s character takes the role of a scientist performing experiments in the London Zoological Gardens, and he establishes his credibility early on, saying that he has “subjected every postulate… to the crucial test of actual experiment…” The narrator opens with an experiment contrasting an English Earl and an Anaconda. The Earl, Twain says, went hunting buffalo. He killed seventy-two, …show more content…
Next, he compared Man’s relentless hoarding to “squirrels and bees and certain birds” that only accumulated a winter store and then refused to collect any more. Twain continues, claiming that Man is the only animal that engages in revenge, indecency, vulgarity, obscenity, and war. He says Man is the only animal who takes land from the previous owner and drives him out. He says Man is the only animal that enslaves his own kind and views them as lesser. After going over some more of Man’s faults, Twain approaches coexistence. He claims he taught a cat, a dog, a rabbit, a fox, a squirrel, some doves, and even a monkey to be friends and live together affectionately. Then tells the reader that he put together many men of different nationalities and religions. When he came back two days later, he found they had all killed each other over a theological dispute. Twain finishes his essay by stating that the one thing Man has that causes him to be so much worse than the animals is his Moral Sense. It gives Man the ability to distinguish between good and evil, and by doing that, makes it possible for there to be evil, instead of just doing what it takes to
The structure of the essay leads the reader to make conclusions about the morality of the human species. Twain presents specific examples of human deficiency that certain populations can identify with, then moves to broader topics that anyone can relate to. Twain describes mankind's moral dilemma by saying (quote). Allowing the readier to come to the conclusion that man kind is jaded when it comes to issues on morality Twain has successfully achieved his goal. He does state his opinion but does not force the reader to come to the same idea. The manner that he presents the information allows the reader to come to the conclusion that humans are flawed in comparison to animals in a logical manner even though the overall theme of the essay is a satire
Mark Twain uses several metaphors throughout two opposite episodes to expose the reality of humanity.
Throughout the book it is obvious that there are characteristics that Mark Twain either detests and despises, or respects and values them. Twain quite obviously is making fun of the undesirable characteristics such as the natural curiosity of people and also the greed for money. Although there are not many values that he respects, there is one that is shown in this book, friendship.
In the novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain illustrates several traits that are common in mankind. Among these traits are those that are listed in this essay. Through characters in the story Twain shows humanity's innate courageousness. He demonstrates that individuals many times lack the ability to reason well. Also, Twain displays the selfishness pervasive in society. In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, many aspects of the human race are depicted, and it is for this reason that this story has been, and will remain, a classic for the ages.
Twain uses mock heroic diction in throughout his essay, most prominently seen through the example of the anaconda and the Earl. Although many assume that the Earl has better moral values than the anaconda, Twain contradicts this idea by proving the anaconda is a better animal. The anaconda only destroys
Twain displays his beliefs through his character, Sherburn, “But a mob without a man at the head of it is beneath pitifulness.” (Twain 167) Twain reveals his extreme distaste for Southern mobs and their cowardness. He eludes to their cowardness through their inability to mob and lynch people, except for when they attack at night and when the man is not expecting it. Twain must have been exposed to many mobs during his time on the river, and it's more than likely that he got to experience one up close. Mobs are controlled by one emotion, fear. The mob is afraid of their target, the target of the mob is afraid for their lives, and the mob’s men themselves are afraid of each other. They go storming through the swampy woods like a herd of elephants, no real leader, no sense of their direction. Simply stampeding through the swamps by fear. Twain expresses his distaste for Southern mobs through his character, Colonel
The short story, “The Damned Human Race”, seems to take the form of a scientific journal. Throughout the passage, Twain writes of experiments he performed and hypotheses he had developed by watching the human race. The whole article has almost a mocking tone. He writes of how he was able to put several animals in a cage together and they all “lived together in peace;even affectionately”, but when he placed people of different religions and ethnicities together, they all killed one another. I think that he used this tone, because it is effective in creating a satire, which is highly effective at catching people’s attention. It makes a passage memorable, because it almost seems ridiculous. This use of tone completes the idea that humanity is
His writing reveals more depth about the mind and art of Twain than its clearly satirical, critical and anti-chauvinist theme it seems to indicate. Through the voice of his character, Twain echoes his own ideals and personality. This attack on the conformist attitude paints his desired utopia of a world in which he visualizes each individual with a unique identity driven by individual passions. Such distinctiveness can only emerge when each individual designs his or her own
Mark Twain is one of the best-known writers of all time, writing things that are most commonly known for being humorous and relaxed. In “The Lowest Animal”, Twain discusses his final outcome after completing a series of experiments he undertook at the London Zoological Gardens. His end result is Charles Darwin’s theory that man evolved from earlier ancestors, but flipped completely upside down. This theory is widely known, but Twain argues a different one. In this essay, he uses affective reasoning and facts from his experiments to back up his claim, all while using Aristotle’s appeals and logical fallacies.
Twain satirizes this concept about fearfulness that often leads to the inhumanity to man and hypocrisy. Huck shows confusion while describing his experience with the Grangerfords. He sees that they want to be good people; however, they would do anything to anyone if it is in their own interest. For instance, when Buck shoots and Harney from behind a bush, Col. Grangerford, Buck’s father, said, “‘I don’t like that shooting from behind a bush. Why, didn’t you step into the road, my boy?’” (Twain 111). This gives insight to what the characters really value, pride, but at the cost of one’s safety to bring harm to another due to fear and selfishness. Twain uses the Grangerford and Shepherdson feud to show that man, as a whole, tends to be inhumane to man due to selfishness and fear.
The overall argument that Twain presents is that people don’t have entirely original opinions or ideas. He breaks down his argument by using several premises and backing them up with examples and reasoning that is easy to follow. If the audience was persuaded by his reasoning the most obvious consequence would simply be that we would be more aware of the things and changes that are going on around us. The general public, or those that read and agreed with the essay, would begin to question or analyze why this or that became popular. People would be more mindful of the decisions that are made subconsciously, and would question them.
Mississippi Twain tells us of a man with a dream. As imperfection has it this
This story clearly depicts the epitome of Twain’s pessimism as he talks of the nephew of Satan, with the same name as his uncle, and his adventures with three boys; Theodor, Nikolaus, and Seppi. Satan performs extraordinary feats that excite the boys, such as giving life to people made of clay, leaving them in awe and wonder. The children practically worship Satan, even though his mentality is different from theirs. Though Satan entertains them, he all the while enlightens them to his own beliefs of human inferiority and irrelevance. He causes excitement wherever he goes, for better, but mostly, for worse. In the end, he ends up killing off Nikolaus, altering the lives of some of the villagers, and ultimately giving Theodor awareness of his existence; telling him “there is no God, no universe, no human race, no earthly life, no heaven, no hell. It is all a dream- a grotesque and foolish dream. Nothing exists but you. And you are but a thought.” (Applebaum 121) By the end of the story, Twain leaves the reader astonished by his thoughts on
... the human condition. Flaws such as its poor excuse for morals, hypocrisy, corruption. It is evident that Twain believed that if he is able to draw to a problem through his writing his readers will take note of it and work to finding a solution.
Twain claims that his observations are based on experiments executed in the London Zoological Gardens. With these examinings, he went on to state that humans displayed a variety of shortcoming not seen in other animals. His first point was that humans were cruel, while other animals were not. This was backed by the story of the hunter killing seventy-two buffalo, and eating only part of one. He contradicted this by experimenting with anacondas and calves. The anaconda only killed what it needed, as opposed to the Earl. This seemed to suggest to Twain that the man descended from the anaconda, and not the other way around. Perhaps the Earl did not respect the buffalo, which is true. But does it mean that all humans always kill to be cruel and wasteful? Or could some animals exhibit sig...