Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay with comparison and contrast
College level compare and contrast essay
How to write a compare and contrast essay high school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When I got done reading the book Maniac Magee, I was excited to watch the movie, however the movie was a total letdown. There are so many differences between the book and movie. In the movie, Maniac Magee has a different personality, the plot events are different, the minor characters are different, and the event that unites the blacks and whites together is changed. Overall Maniac Magee is the same character in the book as he is in the movie. However, in the book, the author made Maniac Magee sound quiet and he kind of kept to himself, but in the movie Maniac was outgoing, he stood up for himself, and talked a lot. For instance, it says in the book “He didn’t do much talking, but he didn’t have to. Hands down did it for him.” (55, Magee) Maniac Magee was playing football with the high schoolers and was juking them so Hands Down was trash talking the other team who Magee was juking. I like how the book illustrated Magee’s personality better because in the movie, Maniac Magee’s personality was cheesy. …show more content…
The plot events in the book are different from the movie.
First of all in the beginning of the movie it has Maniac Magee at his parent’s funeral and he runs away straight to Two Mills. In the book Maniac is with his relatives and he can’t stand the fighting between his aunt and his uncle so he runs to Two-Mills. I like this part of the book better because I think the situation of why he runs away is more interesting. Another set of plot events in the book that are different are the three plot events that Maniac goes through when he first comes to Two-Mills. In the movie the same three plot events that are at the beginning of the book are distributed all throughout the movie. I like this about the book better because when the movie puts the three plot events in there are terrible
transitions. Another big difference are some of the minor characters in the story. The book and the movie both mention Amanda Beale, but the movie makes Maniac and Amanda in a love relationship and at the end of the movie they end up as husband and wife. At one point of the movie Amanda and Maniac actually hold hands. The book just makes them friends. The book says, “The way he said it she believed, ‘Want to come to my house?’ she said.” This is an example of their friendship and this is where Maniac and Amanda’s friendship all started. I like what the book did because I like that they are just friends. Another minor character in the book is Grayson. This character is not even in the movie he is just in the book. Maniac goes with Grayson when he runs away from the Beales. I like that the movie that the does not add him because he is not a necessary character and just makes the story longer. An event that unites the blacks and the whites together is told differently in the book than it is in the movie. In the book Russell gets stuck on the trestle and Mars Bars saves him but in the movie Russell falls from a window and Mars Bars saves him. Those two events unite the blacks and the whites but are told different. I like what the movie does and has Russell fall out the window because it happens faster and isn’t as confusing as it is in the book. The book is longer than the movie. It's good that the movie didn’t include all of the events that the book had or the movie would have be long and boring. I like how the movie tied all of the events together to make it more precise but I didn’t think the events were as interesting.
book was blander. The book did not catch my attention as much. The movie really caught my
The characters make a big difference in the movie and the book. One thing they both have in common is that Otis Amber and Berthe Erica Crow get married. And that Edgar Jennings Plum and Angela Wexler get engaged instead of Doctor Denton Deere. Also Jake Wexler is a gambler instead of being a bookie.
Both the movie and the book have many simulators in common. For example, Maniac’s parents died because of a drunk driver. This is how the whole story starts. Without this, the story in the book and movie
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
There are many examples in both movie and book that compare and contrast to each other. I felt that the book and movie portrayed characters differently. The main character of the book was Jon Krakauer, the book told about the way he felt about people and his struggles and toils. In the movie I felt
When you get to the beginning, middle, or end u realize they are both very different. The movie and book have a lot in common like they both have the same characters .
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The differences in the movie and the book might have been intentional. If audiences were to read the book, watch the movie, and reach conclusions, I think they would have great understanding of what’s inside them both. For example, a scene in the movie in which Atticus tells his children why it is a sin to kill a mockingbird was not in the book; from that scene, I inferred on how that became the initial title of the book. By using both resources, I was able to gather information and grasp its contents tighter.
The plot in the film is very similar to the book but in parts, especially towards the end, the plot is slightly different to the film. The plot is varied in the film to show
Each version also has the main characters boarding up the windows. Anyone who thought the birds won’t attack are usually found dead, but in the movie they are found with their eyes pecked out. Also, both the story and the movie have REALLY bad endings! They aren’t very similar, but they both leave you hanging. When you see a movie or read a book you want to know what happens to the main characters. In these two, you didn’t get an ending. They left you hanging and for some people that ruins it all.
One is megs glasses and braces. In the book she has them but in the movie she doesn't . Another difference is Charles Wallace. In the book he's 5 and doesn’t go to school and can't read. Wile in the movie he's 6 reads and goes to school. Also in the book Camozots is bright and colorful but in the movie its dark and gloomy. The setting is also different the book take’s place in the past were there was no technology such as computers or internet while the movie dose. lastly another difference is the endings. In the book meg got to Camozots rescues Charles , her father and go home. Shortly after Mrs. Whatsit in a very faint mist tries telling meg something before she blows away and doesn't finish what she was saying. Wile in the movie meg saves Charles,Dad and the people of Camozots. Then go home to have a final goodby from the three