Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should vaccination be mandatory
Negative effects of vaccination
Negative effects of vaccines
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Vaccination was first introduced globally for small pox and later on extended to other communicable diseases which are now known as vaccine preventable disease. Vaccination is beneficial both for individuals and community. This bring us to the ethical dilemma - Vaccination of a healthy child with the intention of protecting both the individual child and the community at the same time exposing the child to the theoretical risk of exposure to disease products whether live, attenuated or killed. There was a time when people never questioned the government or their physicians. Now because of more public awareness and accessibility to medical information, they are questioning the safety aspects of vaccines.
Most of the time parents take decision for a minor, even in the worst scenarios their decisions are always for the best interest of the child. Parental autonomy should always be respected unless the child is at greatest risk for not getting the vaccine.
Is it justifiable to scare the public by the statement by not vaccinating yourself or your child it poses a threat for the community? Who has the right to take a decision for a child – parent or physician or the legislation? Whose interest is to protect a community by vaccination – the government, the legislation, the pharmaceutical companies, researchers, physician or the individual?
The Case
Mrs. A with her new born is at a pediatric clinic. She is been advised to vaccinate her baby for a disease X,Y, and Z. Mrs A has a discussion with Dr.D regarding the benefits of vaccines, possible side effects and why her baby needs to be vaccinated. She understands the benefits and the risks, but decides not to immunize her baby because she believes that her baby is not at risk of contractin...
... middle of paper ...
...iriam Fine-Goulden Opticon1826, Issue 8, Spring 2010
16. Bradley, Peter, ‘Should childhood immunization be compulsory?’, J Med Ethics, 25 (1999)
17. Isaacs, David et al., ‘Ethical issues in immunisation’, Vaccine, 27 (2009):
18. Salmon, Daniel A. and Saad B. Omer, ‘Individual freedoms versus collective responsibility:immunization decision-making in the face of occasionally competing values’, Emerging Themes Epid, 3 (2006):
19. Moran, Nicola E. et al., ‘From compulsory to voluntary immunisation: Italy’s National Vaccination Pland (2005-2007) and the ethical and organizational challenges facing public health policy-makers across Europe’, J Med Ethics, 34 (2008):
20. Kennedy, Alison M et al., ‘Vaccine beliefs of parents who oppose compulsory vaccination’, Pub Health Rep, 120 (2005)
21. Isaacs, David et al., ‘Ethical issues in immunisation’, Vaccine, 27 (2009): 615-618.
This fear was the reason the authors explained the creation of vaccines early on. At this point, the authors again used fear in an attempt to convince readers/parents to ignore these warnings. The authors placed blame directly on those spreading negative propaganda, as well as those who accepted it as fact by stating, “such warnings, if widely heeded, raise the specter of widespread refusal to practice vaccination, thus putting the wider society at risk” (Lee, Carson-Dewitt, 2016, p.2). This directed blame seems to claim that every unvaccinated child puts all members of society at risk, without considering evidence of how an individual’s choice to vaccinate one’s self would offer protection in any
There is a war going on against parents that refuse to vaccinate their children. It is coming from the government that makes and enforces laws requiring parents to vaccinate their children, hostile parents of vaccinated children, and doctors that refuse to see unvaccinated children. They are concerned about the potential health risk unvaccinated children pose to the public. These parents aren’t lunatics but are concerned parents that are trying to make the best choice for their children. In fact, these parents aren’t fighting alone; a number of pediatricians and medical experts are apart of this crusade and have taken the lead. They will tell you there is an agenda, “Vaccine manufacturers, health officials, medical doctors, lead authors of important studies, editors of major medical journals, hospital personnel, and even coroners, cooperate to minimize vaccine failings, exaggerate benefits, and avert any negative publicity that might frighten concerned parents, threaten the vaccine program and lower vaccination rates.” 4
The article “People Should Not Be Allowed to Refuse Vaccination” focuses on the dangers people who choose not to vaccinate are opening to others. The argument stems from the ease with which disease can spread through an unvaccinated community and the threat this poses to those who cannot vaccinate. Because of this danger the author of the article believes vaccination should not be left to choice, but required for the good of public safety.
“Vaccinations are causing a major upsurge in childhood diseases, adult maladies, and even deadly ailments such as Gulf War Syndrome and Lou Gehrig’s disease” (Blaylock). Every now and then an individual’s doctor calls telling them about the latest vaccine they should receive. The person immediately schedules a time to come in and get it done. But do they even give a second thought about it? Have they ever thought that maybe they do not need another vaccination? Many people have not taken the time to seriously think about the process of immunization. The truth is, there are many dangers that the average person should be unaware of. Rarely do vaccines actually accomplish what the public has been told. In fact, a lot of vaccines contain harmful substances that have been linked to disorders such as autism. The lack of education and dishonesty from doctors are putting people in danger of health problems without even realizing. Many parents feel obligated for their children to get vaccinated because of school, not knowing they have the alternative option of refusing immunization.
This article focus on a document publishes in the Canadian Paediatric Society website, which can help council hesitant parent that refuse to vaccine their children due to safety concern. This article use research information and premeditated steps to exemplify the issue surrounding the use of vaccine on children. Research shows that health care provider has a major influence on parental decision. In addition, Doctors should take into consideration and understand parent’s specific concern, by taking the time to explain the evidence so the hesitant parents will have a better understanding and this will determine whether a child get immunize. The information that present in the article comes from the “CPS” Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee, which is research and educational source. This article provide a clear information on what can happen if a child is not vaccinate, due to the facts that parents believe if their child is healthy and strong that they will disease free. However, most parents based their information on what they heard on the media and internet for example, that vaccine cause autism, there is no prove that it does, however things like that will make any parents not want to vaccine their child. There are consequences of a parent not having their child. In Ontario if a child is not immunize they are, not allowed in the school system, this is due to the risk that may occur. For example, a child who is vaccine, but may have a low immune system will mostly like catch whatever disease or bacteria when he encounters that specific chi...
Through the years, controversy has surrounded vaccinations such as, whether or not they have harmful side-affects, are a government scheme, or simply unnecessary. Parents today have a choice whether or not to vaccinate their children, but should vaccinations be choice? By mandating vaccinations, fewer people are likely to contract diseases. Although vaccines have been subject to scrutiny, vaccines have worked for many years, are not harmful, and use safe ingredients.
Two and half million children everyday are saved from vaccines (“Should”). Many people in America think that parents should not have the decision to let their children opt out of getting vaccines. The controversy of immunizations can be understood through learning about immunizations and how they are used, why people are for and against immunizations and why they are used, and the cons and pros of immunizations.
Ethically speaking, patients have a right to autonomy. The patient or parent has the right to make his or her own medical decisions even when the provider is in disagreement. However, this should not necessarily preclude the patient from receiving necessary medical care. What further complicates the issue is the need for the provider to protect the health of the health of the public. Protecting the population from infectious diseases requires a high level of immunization in a population. Under-immunized populations can lead to the destruction of herd immunity, which, in turn, can lead to non-immunized individuals becoming infected. It is for this reason that decreased immunization rates creates an ethical issue with serious public health repercussions. Vaccine preventable diseases are dependent on herd immunity to increase population-wide protection to those individuals that cannot be immunized due to issues such as age, immunosuppression, underlying disease, or allergies (Halperin, Melnychuk, Downie, & MacDonald,
As a parent, you make daily choices about your child's health and safety. You read food labels to find the healthiest foods, you ask for advice from your family, friends or doctors about what eating or sleeping schedules are best for your child's health, you even spend countless hours looking up what is best for your baby, what you should or should not do. The choice to vaccinate your child is no different. Making the decision to vaccinate your children is critical to protecting their health and wellbeing. Vaccines prevent unnecessary illness, protects the world,and helps eliminate diseases. A very small amount of parents decide not to vaccinate their child. That decision alone is very fatal and has a mass amount of consequences. Without
There is a growing concern that parents have for their children’s health. Vaccinations are available to help prevent those children from becoming a victim of a disease which can take a toll on their health. The parents of these children are beginning to contemplate whether or not their children should be immunized. They are unsure because they have been informed that vaccinations can have negative side effects, and may contain dangerous chemicals or compounds. Many are against specific vaccinations because they seem unnecessary, or were made to look as if they create complications in children. For example, a vaccination...
According to World Book Advanced Encyclopedia, immunization is defined as the process of protecting the body against disease by means of vaccines or serums (Hinman). While medical science backs up the efficiency and necessity of vaccines, within the past decade, a rise in parents disbelieving the medical community and neglecting to immunize their children has occurred. This “fear of vaccines” is nothing new, but with the ever-increasing safety of vaccines, the benefits of inoculation far outweigh the risks. Parents who refuse to vaccinate, or anti-vaxxers, put more than their children’s lives on the line, but also risk the safety of the whole community. Because vaccines are essential to protecting individuals and communities
Health care professionals and health educators were identified as instrumental in the effort to educate and positively influence immunisation, well informed doctors and nurses are the key in preventing parents refusing childhood immunisations. Redsell et al (2010) pointed out that surveys show some parents criticised the information they received about the vaccination from healthcare staff, suggesting it was of poor quality and biased in favour of immunisation. Health care providers need to be more fully prepared to have productive discussions with parents who resist or refuse immunisation. Redsell et al. (2010) recommended that parents and young people should be provided with tailored information, advice and support to ensure they know about the recommended routine childhood vaccinations and the benefits and risks. When parents chose to refuse vaccination, health care providers need to listen carefully and validate why parents may hold a specific belief about
Recently the number of parents who are intentionally delaying their children’s general vaccinations is increasing. The controversy that is causing the number of delayed vaccinations to go up is based on the fact that there are negative articles connecting them to autism and other similar diseases. When parents are researching vaccinations and they read those negative articles, those articles make them believe that vaccines cause autism. Vaccines are important because they protect humans from preventable diseases and getting them could save human lives. Vaccines are important throughout life no matter what some research suggests. Parents are now more likely to intentionally delay vaccines because of negative press, even though vaccines
Many parents who choose not to vaccinate their children are often shamed and stereotyped for putting their own kids at risk. But what I find to be stranger than this attack on individual freedom and choice, is that the parents who do vaccinate their children are attacking those who don’t because they believe that their vaccinated children are at a risk.
The Immunization study was released over 18 years ago by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others (Sathyanarayana Rao & Andrade, 2011) however, the effects of it still make a wave in the majority of parent’s decision to vaccinate their children, as it is a story that the majority of us may have never read, but have