Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of martin luther king jr
The impact of martin luther king jr
Philosophy of martin luther king jr life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of martin luther king jr
Discuss the extent to which the philosophies and activisms of Martin Luther King Junior and Malcolm X encouraged young African-Americans to “Stand up” for civil rights between 1950 and 1965. Martin Luther King Junior is regarded as the most influential civil rights leader in the history of America, and is certainly the most remembered, and coming a close second would be the different thinking’s and beliefs of Malcolm X. These two men both fought for the freedom and civil liberties of the African-Americans in the civil rights movement. These men both had a similar overall goal, they differed on the means and tactics of getting to this goal. Kings core belief was that of “active non-violence”, while X’s belief of “Black Nationalism” had a resentment …show more content…
of white people and how they constantly oppressed the Black community. Despite these two very different beliefs, these two men both helped to inspire African-Americans to “stand up” and fight in the civil rights movement. Professor August Meier has stated “he [King] communicates the Negro aspirations to White America more effectively than anyone else”. This praise of King’s oratory skills is the most prominent praise King receives. The reason of his great speaking skills is his past as a pastor and preacher in a Baptist church. King studied Ghandi’s belief that “Active non-violent” protest is the way to a true victory, and King whole heartedly believed and supported this method and ideology. The first protest where king implemented this tactic, was the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955. This was the first protest that king was a part of, and it was in support of Rosa Parks who was arrested for sitting in the “White” section of a bus. King at the time was leader of the Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA) and he came up with the idea for all African-Americans to boycott the buses in Montgomery and so cutting off the main source of profit for the bus company. This boycott lasted from December 1st 1955 to December 20th 1956. This economic boycott helped launch Kings career as a major influence in the civil rights movement, helping king create the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). Kings ongoing activism helped inspire many young African-Americans to fight for the ongoing civil rights movement. King also received his fair share of criticism as well as praise. The main criticism was his use of children in protests, especially their use in the Birmingham campaign where children were on the front line of protests against fire hoses and police dogs. These criticisms are well informed, but they draw away from the main influence of King, the influence that he helped shape the civil rights movement and that he inspired many. Malcom X had very different philosophies, and X was very much against King in the civil rights movement, shown in his anger towards the march on Washington, which he called the “Farce on Washington”.
X’s belief in Black Nationalism meant that he wanted African-Americans to have a pride in their community and otherness, and to take pride in the fact that they aren’t “white”. This was not seen as a good thing by many people, including some prominent figures in the civil rights movement. X did have his support though, historian Peter Ling stated that “[X] had every reason to mistreat whites”, and his treatment of whites could be seen as payback for his father’s death when he was a child. Ling also has his criticisms of X stating “[His] influence rested on ‘shock value’”. X later in life became a spokesperson for the Nation of Islam, and this is where he gained most of his influence. He did not do a lot for the civil right movement except inspire through his great oratory skills that gained him and the Nation support from many …show more content…
African-Americans. James M.
Cone a professor at the union of theological seminary is quoted saying “no one had a greater impact on the cultural impact of African-Americans during the second half of the 20th century than Malcolm X” and he goes on to state “No area of the African-American community escaped Malcolm’s influence”. This clearly shows that even today Malcolm X’s impact is still felt, inspiring many to fight for civil rights. King and X were both very different people, but that should not draw away from the fact that they helped many African-Americans “stand up” for themselves and for their people during the civil rights movement. Neither of these men should be ignored when discussing the impacts of the civil rights movement as they both had massive impacts in the movement, and both were very successful in inspiring people, which will forever be their main
legacy.
In the same year X left the Nation of Islam, he went on a personal and spiritual journey to Africa and the Middle East, where did the pilgrimage in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. In that journey, X corrected his view of Islam and the whole world; he left the idea that all whites are devils and believed in the idea that blacks and whites can peacefully live together
The Nation of Islam, which Malcolm X was an important member of, is not a religious organization as the name suggests but rather an organization whose goal was to make the lives of African Americans better instead of actually teaching the proper ethics of Islam. One of the main objectives of this organization was Black Nationalism, through which Black leaders can control the areas where there is a majority of African Americans. This cause was greatl...
The 20th century was a definitive time period for the Black civil rights movement. An era where the status quo was blatant hatred and oppression of African Americans, a time when a black son would watch his father suffer the indignity of being called a “boy” by a young white kid and say nothing in reply but “yes sir”. Where a Black person can be whipped or lynched for anything as little as not getting off the sidewalk when approaching a white person, for looking into their eyes, or worse, “for committing the unpardonable crime of attempting to vote.” In the midst of the racial crises and fight for social equality were Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. who despite their difference in philosophies were “icons of social justice movement both in the United States and around the world” .
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were both African American civil rights leaders wanting to bring freedom to black people during the 1960s. Even though both leaders wanted to liberate black people; their philosophies were drastically different. Malcolm X was wanted racial separation, while Martin Luther King wanted to both races to coexist. Religion is also a major part of this situation because most African Americans including MLK in America were Christian while Malcolm X’s goal was to turn all people who follow his path to convert into Muslims. Martin Luther King’s philosophy would’ve made more sense to 1960s America because most people who wanted freedom in society would rather consider coexisting than more racial
Malcolm X and James Baldwin were two men that played a large role in defining a people and a cause during the 1950s and 1960s. Both of these men were dynamic African-Americans who lived primarily to help their people, who were terribly persecuted in the United States for many years. The interesting thing about these two men is that they strove towards the same goal—to unify African-Americans and give them strength and confidence—but they accomplished this goal in very different ways. Malcolm X, a leader in the Nation of Islam movement, believed that African-Americans needed to acquire strength and confidence so that they could separate from the White man and live together in peace, harmony, and production. On the other hand, James Baldwin, renowned writer, believed it necessary for African-Americans to have strength and confidence so that they might coexist on the same level as whites and accomplish what whites were accomplishing. The methodology and teachings of James Baldwin and Malcolm X differed greatly, but their general belief, that African-Americans were just as good as everybody else prevailed over all else, and made these men two of the very important faces of a generation.
Both Fannie Lou Hamer and Malcolm X rejected the idea that the main goal of the civil rights movement should be based on an aspiration to gain rights “equal” to those of white men and to assimilate into white culture. They instead emphasized a need to empower Black Americans.1 Their ideas were considered radical at a time when Martin Luther King Jr. preached the potential of white and black americans to overcome “the race issue” together and in a gradual manner. Malcolm X’s attempt to achieve his goals through revolutionary top-down methods and Fannie Lou Hamer’s focus on the need for grassroots movements contributed to the Civil Rights movement significantly by encouraging and assisting Black Americans.
In history we know that no two men are alike but, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were phenomenal people and leaders. Both had visualized some type of change in the future, yet were not literally able to see it. Both Dr. King and Malcolm X set out to bring a sense of confidence to blacks all over the United States. Their main purpose was to help instill black’s power and strength so that they could overcome racial disparity and prejudice that surrounded them, but both of them had very unique and distinct different ways of promoting their message. Martin was more geared and focused on equality and wellness of the world as a whole, a Malcolm X’s personal interpretation of the world was very well blinded by anger, bitterness, and the desire to get revenge at the expense of the world that he thought treated him unfairly.
African Americans are fortunate to have leaders who fought for a difference in Black America. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X are two powerful men in particular who brought hope to blacks in the United States. Both preached the same message about Blacks having power and strength in the midst of all the hatred that surrounded them. Even though they shared the same dream of equality for their people, the tactics they implied to make these dreams a reality were very different. The background, environment and philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were largely responsible for the distinctly varying responses to American racism.
Malcolm X should be everyone’s hero, someone people like myself should look up to as a human being. Anyone who thinks otherwise is either a racist or is extremely ignorant. Malcolm X wore his heart on his sleeve and whether right or wrong he was never afraid to say what was on his mind to anyone who cared to listen. I personally believe Malcolm X’s beliefs give me strength to do what's right and carry myself with dignity. I remember, as a kid, my parents had tons of books about Black History books. The first book I read was a Malcolm X biography. I realized Malcolm X was truly a powerful, significant, and essential work for all time.
Until the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., his life’s work was dedicated to the nonviolent actions of blacks to gain the freedoms they were promised in the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 by Abraham Lincoln. He believed that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (King, 1963). These injustices had become so burdensome to blacks that they were “plunged into an abyss of despair” (King, 1963). The nonviolent actions of the sit-ins, boycotts, and marches were so the “individual could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths…to help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism” and ultimately lead to “inevitably opening the door to negotiation” (King, 1963). Not only was King’s approach effective with the older black generation, it was also successful with white people. They did not feel threatened when approached by King. White people gained a sense of empathy towards the plight of black freedom as King’s promise of nonviolence did not threaten their livelihood. Malcolm X viewed the world similarly to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., however; his beliefs to changing the status quo were slightly different from his political counterpart. Malcolm X realized that “anger could blind human vision” (X, 1965). In realizing this, X knew that in order to achieve racial freedom blacks had to “forget hypocritical politics and propaganda” (X, 1965). While Malcolm X was more so an advocate for violent forces against white people than King, X merely used force when it became necessary for defense. According to X, “I don’t go for non-violence if it also means a delayed solution. I am for violence if non-violence means we continue postponing a solution to American black man’s problem” (X, 1965). However, this le...
“I’m for the truth, no matter who tells it. I’m for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole” (X). This quote by Malcolm X represented his attitude towards equality and self-empowerment. The true Malcolm X was a passionate human rights activist as well as an extremely outspoken man during the fifties and sixties. X encouraged millions of African Americans to fight for what they believed in and to take pride in their ethnicity. X persuaded a multitude of African Americans that they are supreme and should not be degraded for their skin color. He learned at a very early age if he wanted something in life, he had to make some noise
The two men joined the fight for equality for similar reasons. King’s family were terrorized by all the whites in his area, and X’s father. was murdered by the Ku Klux Klan. This inspired and motivated both to challenge the society to be more inclusive. Whilst fighting for the same thing - equality for blacks - the movements they became involved with went about achieving their goals in completely different ways. The Civil Rights Movement is most commonly linked with Martin Luther.
After the death of Malcolm X the movement started to get funky. It seemed as though after the assinaition of Malcom X, the revolution’s focal point began to change. The movement began to head towards a more intense, and nitty gritty level. It seemed as though all the non-violent organizations such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, the Congress of Racial Equality, as well as the Christian Leadership Conference had little hold on what was about to happen to the movement. The death of Malcolm X brought a new direction in the movement. In a society of a violent system it was hard for young blacks to take charge in an non-violent organization, it seemed to be a hypocrisy. And the idea of tolerance was wearing thin for the whole generation.
Whenever people discuss race relations today and the effect of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, they remember the work of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. He was and continues to be one of the most i...
Based on some of the things Malcolm has done, Martin Luther King Jr. definitely had a different way of approaching issues. With both of their totally different ways of getting their point across, discussion could be made on who was more effective in the civil rights movement as a whole. If Malcolm X wasn't around and fighting for civil rights around the same time as MLK was doing it here he probably would of had much of a chance and would have just been killed, he in a way motivated the whole world into fighting for civil rights in their country, without his “black power” philosophy. He was easily in the top five people that got the civil rights movement to follow its course and end up getting equality for black and white. Malcolm X was orphaned early in life.