Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Computer system failures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Computer system failures
Major Computer System Failures Caused by Software Bugs In early 2006 problems in a state's financial monitoring software resulted in incorrect election candidate financial reports being made available to the public. The state's election finance reporting web site was shut down until the software was repaired. Trading on a major Asian stock exchange was brought to a halt in November of 2005, reportedly due to an error in a system software upgrade. The problem was rectified and trading resumed later the same day. A May 2005 newspaper article reported that a major hybrid car manufacturer had to install a software fix on 20,000 vehicles due to problems with invalid engine warning lights and occasional stalling. In the article, an automative software specialist indicated that the automobile industry spends $2 billion to $3 billion per year fixing software problems. Media reports in January of 2005 detailed severe problems with a $170 million high-profile U.S. government IT systems project. Software testing was one of the five major problem areas according to a report of the commission reviewing the project. In March of 2005 it was decided to scrap the entire project. In July 2004 newspapers reported that a new government welfare management system in Canada costing several hundred million dollars was unable to handle a simple benefits rate increase after being put into live operation. Reportedly the original contract allowed for only 6 weeks of acceptance testing and the system was never tested for its ability to handle a rate increase.
The purpose of this program was not stereotypical because the nature of the act corresponds with the actual needs and circumstances of the claimant as this treatment is actually giving aids to younger people to secure employment. (http://casebrief.wikia.com/wiki/Gosselin_v_Quebec_(Attorney_General). It was found that welfare recipients under 30 were not suffering from any negative pre-conception but rather it was an affirmation of their potential (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gosselin_v_Quebec_(AG)#Supreme_Court.27s_opinion). The government had a purpose for adopting this conspiracy because they had the plan to get people under the age of 30 into the working system. This would instill in them valuable skills to get permanent employment while also making up for the lower base amount they received. By doing this, the government was supporting the welfare recipients under 30 indirectly. The system that was adopted gave young people an incentive to be compelled to partake in its training program, which enabled them to learn and also have experience. Also aiding in the long run of their employment
Linda Gordon's article is thoughtful, insightful and highly relevant. As governments slash poverty relief programs at all levels and as welfare-bashing reaches an all-time high, it is instructive to take a step back and look at how the current system developed.
Hays found that initially most welfare workers were optimistic and even excited about the changes. Most workers felt that the Act represented real progress and allowed for positive changes which would positively impact the lives of their clients. Hays spoke to one welfare who said that welfare reform “offered the training and services necessary to 'make our clients' lives better, to make them better mothers, to make them more productive.'” But as she was soon to find out, welfare reform, while it did have a positive impact on the lives of some welfare clients, made the lives of most clients more difficult, not to mention the stress that it caused for the welfare workers who had to deal with the often confusing and illogical new rules.
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
The system could handle 4 million, but not 12.9 million, so people got frightened they would lose their money. People panicked and started selling. The ticker tapes were an hour and a half behind the market. By the end of the day, the market had fallen 33 points, or around 9%. On Monday, the market bounced back a bit, just enough for people to feel a sense of security, until the end of the day when high trading volumes also put too much pressure on the market.
O?Beirne, Kate. ?The State of Welfare: An old and tricky question resurfaces.? National Review 54.2 (February 11, 2002): 1--2. Online. Information Access Expanded
The attacks of 9/11 resulted in history’s longest stock market shut down since the 1930s. The New York Stock Exchange remained closed for six days after the attacks. Furthermore, Davis (2011) reports that upon reopening, the New York Stock Exchange fell almost seven hundred points, the biggest one day loss in history. Additionally, Jackson (2008) reports a 14% decline in the Dow Jones, a loss the Dow still felt almost a year later. But, it was American Airlines and United Airlines that experienced the greatest loss. Following the reopening of the stock market, American experienced a 39% decline and United experienced a 42% decline (Davis, 2011). However in face of discouraging numbers, Jackson (2008) reports that the U.S. markets rebounded second only to Japan, showing the great economic resilience of the U.S. While the stock markets present a bleak outlook immediately following the attacks, the financial loss is far from reassuring.
LaPierre, T. A. (2012). Comparing the Canadian and US Systems of Health Care in an Era of Health Care Reform. Journal of Health Care Finance, 38(4), 1-18.
It has been said that every good thing must arrive at an end. On account of the Roaring Twenties that end came suddenly and startlingly. It is simple for one to think back upon the monetary circumstance that prompt the accident and disparagement the specialists for not seeing the indications of a potential calamity. Be that as it may, it was not all that simple for them to see such an accident coming. The 1920 's were a blasting decade and stock costs appeared to be at an unfaltering move for an apparently interminable ascent. Numerous elements can be ascribed to the reason for the accident however nobody element can be singled out as the lone reason. The real reasons for the share trading system accident of 1929
Swan, Richelle S., et al. "The Untold Story of Welfare Fraud." Journal of Sociology & Social
Jeff Grogger, Lynn A. Karoly, Jeff Grogger. Welfare Reform: Effects of a Decade of Change. New York: Harvard University Press, 2005.
In today’s America, there are many people who would either be disgusted at the very mention of Welfare or be highly grateful for its existence. I believe that in order for welfare to be more effective in America, there must be reform. From the time of its inceptions in 1935, welfare has lent a helping hand to many in crisis (Constitution Rights Foundation). However, at present many programs within the system are being abused and the people who are in real need are being cheated out of assistance. The year after the creation of welfare unemployment was just about twenty percent (Unemployment Statistics). The need for basic resources to survive was unparallel. Today, many people face the same needs as many did during the 30s. Some issues with
"National Insurance Could Prove Disastrous. (Cover story)." USA Today Magazine 133.2719 (2005): 1-2. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 15 Mar. 2011.
Hasking, Ron. "Work over Welfare: The Inside Story of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law." Brookings Instituteion Press [Wahington, DC] (2006) 364
In keeping with the Keynesian economic philosophy, despite the continued focus on social programs, the spending was still justified on economic grounds. Already in 1968 it is clear that the government was concerned about inflation and stagnating economic growth. While the term: “Stagflation” was not yet coined; the Liberal government was desperately trying to prevent this unforeseen circumstance and was trying to recapture the economic growth that was the hallmark for the previous two decades. In stark contrast to the current neo-liberal philosophy, the Liberal approach to ensure future economic growth was to implement economic programs at the national level and have these programs government-directed and government-controlled. The importance that the national economy held in the Liberals’ political eye in 1968 cannot be overstated. The Minister of Finance, Edgar J. Benson’s, first budget speech in 1968 was incredibly detailed, looking at everything from life insurance companies to short and long-term economic outlooks and proposed resolutions for the House. However within this speech contains the serious problem that would cause havoc for the Liberal government, and indeed all of Canada, during the Liberals first term: a mounting deficit. The problem was that for the Liberals, in the modern era of the welfare state, there was no precedent for dealing with this fiscal