Machiavelli's The Prince: The Ends Justify The Means

1099 Words3 Pages

Team C believes that Machiavelli’s principal idea is demonstrated in politics, “the ends justify the means”. If a leader is vicious and effective it is better than being virtuous and ineffective. Machiavelli, however did not endorse vicious behavior in general, just whatever would not “allow disorders to arise”. To remain in power, a leader must avoid the hatred of his people. It is not necessary for a leader to be loved; in fact, it is often better for him to be feared. The author states, “It is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be lacking” (p. 103). Machiavelli warns leaders against doing things that might result in hatred, such as the confiscation of property. Being hated, however, can result the downfall of a prince. Machiavelli, asserts that a number of traits are inherent in human nature. People are generally self-interested, ungrateful, fickle, liars who shun danger; although their affection for others can be won and …show more content…

This is apparent throughout the study because in order to be a good prince, a man must obtain certain types of qualities and characteristics. Consequently, if exhibited properly they will bring him security and prosperity among the state. Throughout a comprehensive analysis of the case, it is obvious that the skills learned in order to become a good prince are adapted from the norms of elders and other successful princes. An example is when discussing in the case on how to ,“strive for mastery” (p. 104). In the study Machiavelli speaks on how Achilles, known for being one of the mightiest Greeks who fought in the Trojan War, was raised on norms and discipline. Due to Achilles bold characteristics and fame, other princes wanted to obtain the same qualities of success and survival. In turn, this was paramount to the princes and human nature did not see much change back

Open Document