Machiavelli's The Prince

929 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Machiavelli on political power

Niccolo Machiavelli (Florence, 1469-1527) was Born in a noble family and lived in Florence. After the fall of Savonarola, he was secretary of the Second Chancery in charge of Foreign Affairs and War City, a post he held until 1512 and that led him make major diplomatic missions to the king of France, Emperor Maximilian I, and Caesar Borgia, among others.
Niccolo Machiavelli wrote The Prince, a historical and political advice text written in Italy on 1513 and dedicated to Lorenzo de Medici, ruler of Italy at that time. It is assumed that Ferdinand and Cesar Borgia were the inspiration for this book. In The Prince, Machiavelli describes several models of states depending on their origin. He talks about the most appropriate policies for the prince’s …show more content…

Machiavelli’s ideas can be described as the art of conquering, which identifies the power within the state. Politics is the art of governing, and must be free of all rules. The common good is the power and strength of the state, and not in any case seek for private purposes. Thus the State can articulate social relations, ensuring that men live in freedom through its laws. Only then the common good is achieved, and any attack against it may be rejected, with any lawful means.The Prince “Il Principe” is a book that we can describe as a manual for the conduct of the princes. It describes ways of conducting internal and external public affairs, and most importantly, how to win and maintain a principality. In view of the political situation in the period of the Italian Renaissance, we could say that the writer was as Republican, he has named the principality as a compromise to unify Italy, after which the republican form would be possible. This book has also a dedication to Lorenzo de 'Medici, Duke of Urbino, offering him the Book and the wisdom of the knowledge that he acquired over the years and uncomfortable …show more content…

Thus, we find hereditary or new principalities. The new principalities may be completely new, or have been annexed to an existing kingdom. In the case of being annexed, these domains are used to live under the authority of a king or rather to live in freedom. They are always conquered with weapons, through fortune or virtue. Machiavelli describes four types of principalities hereditary principalities have been governed by a prince, so the keep does not imply much difficulty they have only to continue doing what their ancestors did. The Mixed principalities are new principalities, but have been annexed to another State. These rulers have a problem. Its inhabitants expect much improvement with the change of Sovereign, and if a prince does not do well, they are disappointed and will turn against him. Thus, the prince cannot even trust the people who snatched a territory or on their own people. Civil principalities have a prince who has been designated by their fellow citizens and he has made no effort. This way of coming to power resembles the current democracy, in which we, the citizens vote for who we want to be in power. Finally, there are ecclesiastical principalities where the difficulty lies before acquiring the rulers themselves, because, once acquired, by virtue or fortune, they are sustained by the power of the Church. They are very

Show More
Related

  • Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    582 Words  | 2 Pages

    Machiavelli enumerated in his work, different types of princedoms and whether they are bound to fail from the start, simply based on their type and the way they are attained. Those princedoms are either Hereditary, Mixed, or completely New. Hereditary princedoms would of course be those in which power is passed down within a family. Mixed princedoms would be princedoms that are reinvented through

    Read More

  • Machiavelli's The Prince

    747 Words  | 2 Pages

    Machiavelli’s, “The Prince” is the ideal book for individuals intending to both govern and maintain a strong nation. Filled with practical advice, he includes numerous religious references to support his claims. He devotes a chapter within the book to speak about the ancient founders of states. In the chapter called, “On new principalities that are acquired by one’s own arms and by virtue”, Machiavelli discussed the importance of a prince to have their own talent in governing a nation, rather than having relied on fortune to rule. The latter is a risk no leader should take and he cited past leaders as a guide for both the current and future princes.

    Read More

  • The Qualities Of A Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    Niccolò Machiavelli was a man who lived during the fourteen and fifteen hundreds in Florence, Italy, and spent part of his life imprisoned after the Medici princes returned to power. He believed that he should express his feelings on how a prince should be through writing and became the author of “The Qualities of a Prince.” In his essay, he discusses many points on how a prince should act based on military matters, reputation, giving back to the people, punishment, and keeping promises. When writing his essay, he follows his points with examples to back up his beliefs. In summary, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of a Prince,” provides us with what actions and behaviors that a prince should have in order to maintain power and respect.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli's Advice to Republics

    581 Words  | 2 Pages

    In secular democracies, power is necessarily derived from the will of the governed. That power is then entrusted to a leader, who Machiavelli would understand to be a "prince". Inherently, his book, The Prince, has been close at hand for most politicians for centuries, as it provides general, historically proven advice for principalities and republics on how to govern and maintain relations with their most important resource and the very core of their power, which would be the people themselves.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli: The Prince of Political Writing

    1219 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Machiavelli wanted to return to his longtime dream and understanding of politics. One of his goals in writing The Prince was to win the favor of Lorenzo de’ Medici, then-governor of Florence and the person

    Read More

  • Machiavelli And Cruelty 'And Loved Or Feared'

    899 Words  | 2 Pages

    Machiavelli was a Florentine Statesman. In 1512, the Florentine Republic collapsed and the Medico's came back into power. Machiavelli was labeled a traitor and was sent to prison where he was tortured and threatened with execution.1 He was subsequently released into exile. He went to the country and wrote “The Prince”. He had wanted to present it to Lorenzo Medici as a show of his loyalty but it did not have the effect that Machiavelli had envisioned.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli’s The Prince

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli lived in Florence, Italy in the 1400’s. The country of Italy was divided into city-states that had their own leaders, but all pledged alliance to their king. In time in which great leaders were needed in order to help the development of a city-state and country, Machiavelli had a theory that man needed a leader to control them. In his book The Prince, he speaks of the perfect leader.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli On The Iraq War

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    "The Prince," written by Niccolo Machiavelli in 1513, is a political treatise addressed to the Medici family of Florentine. "The Prince" was written to analyze and explain the acquisition, perpetuation, and use of political power in the west. Machiavelli’s theories in the work describe methods that an aspiring prince could possibly use to acquire power, or an existing prince could use to keep power. Though this work was written in 1513 and published in 1532, its context can be applied to foreign policy in today’s world. The principles suggested by Machiavelli provide insight into the issues that arose with the war on Iraq and issues involved with occupation and transition to a new government.

    Read More

  • George Bush as a Machiavellian Leader

    1442 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most astounding aspect of The Prince is Machiavelli’s view that princes may indeed, be cruel and dishonest if their ultimate aim is for the good of the state. It is not only acceptable but necessary to lie, to use torture, and to walk over other states and cities. Machiavellianism is defined as “A political doctrine of Machiavelli, which denies the relevance of morality in political affairs and holds that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power (Def.)” This implies that in the conquest for power, the ends justify the means. This is the basis of Machiavellianism. The priority for the power holder is to keep the security of the state regardless of the morality of the means. He accepts that these things are in and of themselves morally wrong, but he points out that the consequences of failure, the ruin of states and the destruction of cities, can be far worse. Machiavelli strongly emphasizes that princes should not hesitate to use immoral methods to achieve power, if power is necessary for security and survival.

    Read More

  • Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince: A Guide to Being an Effective Ruler

    1042 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The Prince”, by Niccolo Machiavelli, is a series of letters written to the current ruler of Italy, Lorenzo de’ Medici. These letters are a “how-to” guide on what to do and what not to do. He uses examples to further express his views on the subject. The main purpose was to inform the reader how to effectively rule and be an acceptable Prince. Any ruler who wishes to keep absolute control of his principality must use not only wisdom and skill, but cunning and cruelness through fear rather than love. Machiavelli writes this book as his summary of all the deeds of great men.

    Read More

  • The Prince Controversy

    1883 Words  | 4 Pages

    Machiavelli stated “..., if the prince is reasonably assiduous he will always maintain his rule, unless some extraordinary and inordinate force deprives him of it; and if so deprived, whenever the usurper suffers a setback he will reconquer.” 1 Here Machiavelli proclaims that the natural prince will have the peoples support as long as the princes ambitions are moderate. Machiavelli also states that the natural prince will have less reason to cause the people to hate, when he states “ The fact is that the natural prince has less reason and less need to give offence; and so it follows that he should be more loved; ” 1 Now Machiavelli shifts his focus toward new states. Machiavelli states that new principalities are far more difficult to sustain than hereditary principalities for many reasons. Machiavelli claims that conquering new states is the most dangerous and difficult mission

    Read More

  • The Principles Of Machiavelli Exposed in The Prince

    512 Words  | 2 Pages

    Machiavelli understands the importance of a military force, and that a country has to be kept in order, even if that means lying to the people to get them to fight against a common foe. In Europe, the church was entangled in politics, and everything else, but Machiavelli suggests a secular state, which would allow the leader to do that which is necessary for the country and for his continued reign, though not necessarily moral.The ends do not justify the means, yet sometimes if the end is necessary for the continuation of a society, then the means do not have to be morally bound. A ruler cannot please everybody all the time, so therefore, he has to be cunning in order to maintain control. There are times when a ruler needs to lie to the populace, in order to reach a goal that is better in some way for the nation. By tying the church to the government, people expected the government to behave morally, but often times, an entirely moral ruler will be overthrown.

    Read More

  • When the Ends Justify the Means in Machiavelli´s The Prince

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    Machiavelli, N., 1988, The Prince, Q. Skinner and R. Price (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli's The Prince: Still Relevant after All These Years

    2155 Words  | 5 Pages

    Written almost 500 years ago, Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince” brings forward a new definition of virtue. Machiavelli’s definition argued against the concept brought forward by the Catholic Church. Machiavelli did not impose any thoughts of his own, rather he wrote from his experience and whatever philosophy that lead to actions which essentially produced effective outcomes in the political scene of Italy and in other countries. While Machiavelli is still criticized for his notions, the truth is that, consciously or subconsciously we are all thinking for our own benefit and going at length to achieve it. On matters of power where there is much to gain and a lot more to lose, the concept of Machiavelli’s virtue of “doing what needs to be done” applies rigorously to our modern politics and thus “The Prince” still serves as a suitable political treatise in the 21st century.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli: The Father of Modern Political Science

    1046 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the time 1469, a child by the name of Niccolo Di Bernardo Del Machiavelli was born. Some may know him as an Italian philosopher, humanist, or an evil minded fellow associated with the corruptness of totalitarian government. In Machiavelli’s home state of Florence, he introduces the modern political theory. Hoping to gain influence with the ruling Medici family, Niccolo wrote a pamphlet called The Prince (Prezzolini). Niccolo lived a nondescript childhood and his main political experience in his youth was watching Savonarola from afar.

    Read More

More about Machiavelli's The Prince

Open Document