Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socioeconomic status and academic achievement
The influence of racism essay
The influence of racism essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socioeconomic status and academic achievement
Imagine the demographics of the average urban classroom. Perhaps you picture a bell curve; a relatively small number of low and high-income students, with the majority being represented as middle class. This, however, is not the case in Chicago Public Schools, where I teach. In 2013, Chicago Public Schools (CPS) reported that over eighty-five percent of enrolled students were low-income, reporting a yearly income of $30,630 or less (Bogira, 2013).
Traditionally, low-income students struggle in school. For example, compare the achievement of Lincoln Elementary, where eighty-five percent of students’ families exceed the income limit for free lunch, with Brenneman Elementary, not fifteen minutes from Lincoln, where ninety-six percent of family incomes fall below federal free lunch guidelines. According to the Illinois State Board of Education’s 2015 School Report Cards, seventy-five percent of Lincoln students met or exceeded state standards while only thirty-six percent of Brenneman’s students did so (Illinois Report Card, 2015). These schools are just a fifteen minute drive from one another, yet they have completely different socioeconomic statuses and more importantly, academic achievement levels.
While there are many factors that influence low-income students’ achievement, in this paper I will argue
…show more content…
Stanford University researcher Susana Claro explains that, “Mindset is an important part of how socioeconomic disparities get replicated from generation to generation. Structural barriers get in the way of people being able to succeed, and they reinforce mindsets that tell [students] they can't succeed." She goes on to argue that teacher interventions that help shape and develop student attitudes toward a growth mindset can have positive effects on students’ academic achievement (Blad,
(1). By changing their mindset to a growth mindset can lead them to be successful students demonstrate consistency on their desire to learn. “Children who are praised their effort on the other hand, believe they are capable of taking on new challenges are more motivated, perform better and take failure as a stride”(1). Those who have a growth mindset have a positive mindset and take failure as a new opportunity to improve not only in their academic performance but also in their lives they will see failure as an opportunity for them to do better and change so they can be
In the article Mind-Sets and Equitable Education, Carol S. Dweck studies the link between mind-sets and beliefs and the influence it has on student success. This article examines how beliefs about how you learn impact the manner in which you learn. It is stated that growth mind-set as opposed to fixed mind-set promotes student success and achievement. Growth mind-set is the idea that intelligence is not something individuals are born with, but is rather a skill that individuals can develop through hard work and perseverance. Fixed mind-set opposes this idea as it views intelligence as an immutable trait individuals are born with. The article mentions that not only personal mind-set impacts an individual’s success but how they perceive the mind-set
There are many attitudes that form certain mindsets. Some of these mindsets can change how a person does and perceives things. Some mindsets that can do just that are Dweck’s example of a growth mindset and fixed mindsets. According to Dweck, a fixed mindset is one in where “.. students believe that intelligence is fixed..” and a fixed mindset is the “..believe that intelligence is a potential that can be realized through learning. As a result, confronting challenges, profiting from mistakes, and persevering in the face of setbacks become ways of getting smarter. Because people with growth mindsets can through setbacks, and find alternatives to better themselves; They turn to perseverance and hard work to achieve their goals.
America’s school system and student population remains segregated, by race and class. The inequalities that exist in schools today result from more than just poorly managed schools; they reflect the racial and socioeconomic inequities of society as a whole. Most of the problems of schools boil down to either racism in and outside the school or financial disparity between wealthy and poor school districts. Because schools receive funding through local property taxes, low-income communities start at an economic disadvantage. Less funding means fewer resources, lower quality instruction and curricula, and little to no community involvement. Even when low-income schools manage to find adequate funding, the money doesn’t solve all the school’s problems. Most important, money cannot influence student, parent, teacher, and administrator perceptions of class and race. Nor can money improve test scores and make education relevant and practical in the lives of minority students.
Inequalities in Education Funding inequalities have been an issue from past to present, especially in the low-income communities. In fact, students in urban areas with less funding have low attendance, score lower on standardized testing, and a low graduation rate. Also subjected to outdated textbooks, old dilapidated buildings, students in the inner cities need to compete with their suburban and wealthy counterparts for this reason funding inequalities must end and more money should be directed to these communities from federal, state, and local governments. Frank Johnson, a writer for the National Center for Education Statistics, “Disparities in Public School Spending.”
One major affliction of the American public education system is money, or the lack thereof, and the impact funding inequality has on educational quality. Benjamin Barber, in his article “America Skips School,” says the federal government only funds about 5% of public education (121). Public school funding comes primarily from local property taxes, meaning suburban schools can have up to twice as much money to spend on education than those in urban areas (Barber 122). Increasing federal financial aid in public schools could solve the problem of funding inequality by providing lower income schools with more available resources without taking money from other schools or increasing local taxes. Increasing funds would allow schools to provide better facilities and repair “leaky, broken-down habitats” often found in impoverished school districts. More money would allow all schools to hire better teachers and improve ...
Grubb, Norton. The Money Myth: School Resources, Outcomes, and Equity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2009. Print.
Education is an integral part of society, school helps children learn social norms as well as teach them how to be successful adults. The school systems in United States, however are failing their students. In the world as a whole, the United States is quickly falling behind other countries in important math and reading scores. The United States ranked thirtieth in math on a global scale and twentieth in literacy. This is even more true in more urban, lower socio-economic areas in the United States. These schools have lower test scores and high dropout rates. In Trenton Central High School West, there was an 83% proficiency in literacy and only 49% of the students were proficient in math. Many of these students come from minority backgrounds and are often from low income families. There are many issues surrounding these urban schools. There is a severe lack of proper funding in these districts, and much of the money they do receive is sanctioned for non-crucial things. Schools also need a certain level of individualization with their students, and in many urban classes, this simply does not happen. While there are many factors affecting the low performance of urban schools, the lack of proper funding and distribution of funds, the cultural divide between teachers and students in urban districts, along with the lack of individualization in urban classrooms are crucial reasons to explain the poor performance in these districts. Through a process of teacher lead budget committees and further teacher education, urban schools can be transformed and be better equipped to prepare their students for the global stage.
Gulick, Joe. "Economically disadvantaged students provide additional challenges to school districts." Lubbock Avalanche Journal (TX) 05 Aug. 2012: Newspaper Source. Web. 13 Nov. 2013
Low income schools have a tendency to be truly hindered and mistreated by the privileged whites. It appears just as the privilege get the opportunity to choose the destiny of those whose they feel fall beneath their ways of life. Ways that this is being done is by the imbalanced distribution of academic resources , school financing, qualified and experienced instructors, refreshed course books, and innovations to socially rejected low income communities.
In affluent school districts which in most if not all cases are predominantly white students have “the best teachers, most up-to-date textbooks and computers, and superior academic facilities.” School districts made up of mostly wealthy and white students have the money to pay for superior resources and staff. However, struggling schools in equally struggling school districts do not have the money to pay for better resources and staff to improve the education of economically disadvantaged and racial minority students. Students inside of these economically disadvantaged school districts are left at a large disadvantage when it comes to competing for a higher education with wealthy white students with a high quality education. These disadvantaged students are left to fend for themselves without the support system and quality resources that are afforded to wealthy white students when looking for future opportunities such as applying for college. African Americans and other minorities restricted from buying homes and building equity has kept them in a state where they have little to no chance to improve their condition. Even if the people in low-income neighborhoods are very talented and have a large amount of potential they have no way to exercise and build on that potential because they don’t have an opportunity to attain an
Throughout the nation, education inequality affects many minority students that have low-income which reinforces the disparity between the rich and the poor. The amount of children that have a socioeconomic background of poverty in the United States is estimated to be 32.4 million (National Center for Children in Poverty, 2011). Since many of these children are from
Living in poverty exposes children to disadvantages that influence many aspects in their life that are linked to their ability to do well in school. In the United States of America there are an estimated 16.4 million children under the age of 18 living in poverty (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010). “The longer a child lives in poverty, the lower the educational attainment” (Kerbo, 2012). Children who are raised in low-income households are at risk of failing out before graduating high school (Black & Engle, 2008). U.S. children living in poverty face obstacles that interfere with their educational achievement. Recognizing the problems of living in poverty can help people reduce the consequences that prevent children from reaching their educational potential.
Saporito, Salvatore, & Sohoni, Deenesh. "Mapping Educational Inequality: Concentrations of Poverty among Poor and Minority Students in Public Schools." Social Forces 85.3 (2007): 1227-53. Print.
It can be argued that the academic performance of children has nothing to do with their socioeconomic status, because there have been many cases of children from very poor families who have excelled greatly in academics (APA, 2017). Furthermore, many predominantly high-end schools have posted poor results when compared to school with poorer backgrounds. This is despite the fact children from lower socioeconomic classes do not have access to the best forms of learning materials. The high performance of children from poor backgrounds is often attributed to the fact that they are not preoccupied with many activities which would otherwise hinder them from concentrating on their studies (Sacerdote, 2002). Therefore, some believe it is false to say that poor performance is associated with children who come from low socioeconomic classes. Rather, they believe academic achievement is genetic (Sacerdote, 2002).