Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of crime on society Essay
Effects of crime on society and individual
Effects of crime on society Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of crime on society Essay
The term “that’s offensive” is often used whenever a piece of language is being consumed. The language may be in any form whether it’s a tweet, text, or essay they can all be deemed to be offensive. However what language is offensive and what language is not being never defined. Regardless, the entire world lives in agreement and thus there appears to be no need to ask the fundamental question: What makes language offensive?
The questions itself is about language: the method of human communication, either spoken or written, consisting of the use of words in a structured and conventional way. Something so inherent to all of us yet so foreign.
Recently Louis C. K.’s monologue on “Saturday Night Live” shocked the media. It was reported on
…show more content…
He pointed out that at the time no one was offended by racist language and that to this day he is still “mildly racist”. Then we began to dwell on the topic of child molesters. He said “Child molesters are very tenacious people” pointing out the unequivocal consequence of being a child molester. He then made the claim that child molestation “must be amazing” if the molesters are willing to take the risk. His exact words were “Which from you can only really surmise that it must be really good! From their point of view, it must be amazing for them to risk so …show more content…
Clearly, Louis C. K’s joke was intended to get us to think about societies attitude and treatment of pedophilia. Perhaps insinuating that we revile this demographic to blindly. That we take solace in our normalcy when the complexity of sexuality means that the urge to pedophilia is something that is not chosen. He never forgives or validates the act, it is taken for granted that pedophilia deserves the harshest retribution. The intent of the joke was a subtle indictment of our smug righteousness and our fear of the lawlessness of sexuality in society. So the intent of the joke was perfectly moral even
What does it mean to say the “N-word” both it in its original form, or as the “N-word’, and what is the context for the impact which occurs when it leaves the mouths of blacks and or whites. I begin with a look at ‘Teaching the N-Word” by Emily Bernard, she is a 30 year old African American professor who teaches at University of Vermont which happens to be a predominantly white institution. She works alongside her husband, a white man, who is also a professor of African American History ; her brother writes for The Source and urges her students to think about the ways in which the “N-word” is used in pop culture. The students in Emily Bernard’s honors literature class must question the effect of the n-word on black people and just as importantly
Language, whether oral, or written is the primary type of interaction we have. In “Learn! Learn!” by Hugo Martinez-Serros, the author stress the importance of language and education in society rather than your social class. He shows the importance of language to us by outlining the everyday life of a hard working Mexican that lingers in developing his authorship, and really likes to criticize the writing of the higher class enlightened priest. He lives in the south side of Chicago, and in his spare time he loves to study and critic others writings for improvement.
What he was claiming was that African Americans slaves were born in the United States so they should be entitled to same American values given to the white Americans. He also goes ahead to bash the government for the attitudes towards his people and goes on to explain how he feels they are be exploited. His impact that he intended to have from this speech had been to bring freedom to African American’s by letting proper democratic ideals decide who is entitled to what rights. During the time of the speech he said black American’s should be ashamed to celebrate this holiday due to the misdeeds and unfair enforcement of these laws. His main take away from this was that the slavery going on in America was harmful and illegal because they violated the founding father principle rights. Throughout him speaking he goes on to undercut many powerful institutions in America that are simply letting slavery go on and not doing anything about it (Church). He is a very faithful man and believes looking back at his sentiments will ring home and show that he was inevitably correct in due time. In conclusion this ties to the ideas that African Americans should not have to celebrate this holiday until they feel like they are being equally treated under the same law are the white
He refers to all the immigration groups in a judgmental way. He complains about the intelligence levels of the Italians, how dirty and deceitful the Jews are, and even the immaculate cleanliness of the Chinamen. Although he does possess quite a bit of bigotry that boarders on the line of prejudice when it comes to African Americans he recognizes that they are suffering from racism and he sympathizes with th...
He then moves on to the topic of white people should be the ones defending why they oppressed and exploited us and not blacks defending why they are in this country and defending their position before they come in the country… after all whites are the ones who took us out of Africa. He says the reason for the oppression the blacks received was due to their skin color and no other factor.
He mention the reason why people would claim why it is not a good to mange racist speech. The argument is that the freedom of speech is a stimulus in our democratic setup. Also another claim is that people suffer hate speech but it is necessary for the convenience of the society as a whole. To add it is essential to minorities because it's their only source of getting people to feel bad for them. Regulating racist speech would be impossible it would surge an imbalance between the continued free ideas and the parliamentary process dependent and on the other the need for the further cause of
But more basically, I am in Birmingham because injustice is here”. He is telling them that he has credibility on the matter of injustice, not because he is the recipient of white privilege, but because he is well researched on the subject.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Throughout the span of the past few weeks I have traversed the globe, visiting several countries and regions, only to realize that although new methods develop, language as a way of expressing ones self has remained the most effective. Despite this fact, language still has its pitfalls. Neil Postman, in his essay “Defending Against the Indefensible,'; outlines seven concepts that can be used to aid a student in better understanding the language as a means of communication. He describes how modern teaching methods leave a student vulnerable to the “prejudices of their elders';, further stating that a good teacher must always be skeptical. He urges teachers of all subjects to break free from traditional teachings as well as “linguistical tyranny';
...is our present reality. However, the discussion raised by Jordan and her students is one that every modern classroom should engage in. With the illumination of these relevant issues that both cross and exist within racial lines, the new generation of students can carry on the ultimate goals of Willie Jordan and his classmates: to hold on to language, as it is akin the possession of power in a time where there is a lack thereof.
“Morreall argues that, if we want to answer these questions, we shouldn’t focus on whether the joke happens to trade on a stereotype. Instead, he takes the primary problem with some humor to be that it involves disengaging from things with which we ought to be engaged.” (Morreall, 529)
He mentions the very recent violence that occurred in Selma, Alabama; where African Americans were attacked by police while preparing to march to Montgomery to protest voting rights discrimination. Without mentioning this violent event that occurred a week prior, there would not be much timeliness to his argument, and it wouldn’t have been as effective. The timeliness of his argument gave the speech a lot more meaning, and it heightened the emotions of many who heard the address. He is appealing to the emotions of many American people, both Congressmen and ordinary citizens, to encourage them to support his cause. He reminds us of all of the Americans around the world that are risking their lives for our freedom. He refers to them as “guardians of our liberty.” He also address the problem as the whole nation should be concerned not just the north, the south, or the African American
—. Language: Readings in Language and Culture. 6th ed. New York: St. Martin's, 1998. Print.
The meaning of the “n-word” changes based on the speaker and the context
He writes "If the purpose of racist ideas had always been to silence the antiracist resisters to racial discrimination, then the postracial line of attack may have been the most sophisticated silencer to date" (Kendi 791). The deception that postracial thinkers offered after Obama was elected, and continue to disseminate widely still, is that race itself has no effect on how people of color are treated in America; other personal qualities, like aggressiveness or a predisposition to stupidness, can affect how people of color are treated, but certainly not their race. Postracial ideologues also offer this hollow whammy: if a person of color is treated "differently" (see: treated sub-human) than a white person because of their race, it is not because the person who is treating them in such a manner is racist, but because that particular person of color is acting deviant from social norms. The person of color might be acting too "black" - or, in other words, uneducated, unintelligent, lazy, aggressive, and any other slew of adjectives that have been disproportionately applied to people of color. The racist person is, therefore, absolved of all guilt for their racist behaviors.
Humor can be used like a sniper's gun, picking people off when they least expect it. When we use humor to hurt, we abuse the fundamental essence of this wonderful gift. We must teach our children the difference between what is funny and what is cruel. A joke is never humorous if it is at the expense of another.