Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of symbolism in Lord of the Flies
Essays of symbolism in lord of the flies
William golding philosophy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies showcases the loss of innocence in major characters through the use of powerful imagery; more specifically, Simon’s vision of the pig’s head, Jack’s new identity with his painted face and Roger’s determination to kill demonstrate that innocence is broken during times of survival. In the first instance, Simon is a young boy that distances himself from the other children; additionally, his visit to the “acres of fruit trees” (Golding 56), and his encounter with “dark aromatic bushes” implies that he represents the goodness of human nature. However, when he returns back to the jungle, he witnesses “the spilled guts” (137) on the pig’s head; moreover, Golding describes the pile of guts as “a black blob …show more content…
of flies that buzzed like a saw” (138). Stunned by the horrific image, Simon is puzzled and confused when he sights the pig’s head; because of his feelings of perplexity, he “f[a]ll[s] down and los[es] consciousness” (144). Simon is unable to respond to his hallucination because he is a child that has never faced pure evil; because of this mature event, we can infer that Simon will never be able to return back to his old ways because he has experienced the darkness that lurks within every human soul.
Furthermore, Golding’s use of the phrase “black blob” (138) reveals that the pig’s head was not an ordinary object for children to view; because of this phrase, readers learn that it …show more content…
will be impossible now for Simon to live a pure life because of the trauma that he endured with this vision. Even though he is told that he is “a silly little boy” (143), this perception will never leave his mind because Satan has evoked him; consequently, his life will never be the same as it was before coming to the island. In addition to Simon’s confrontation with devilry, Jack is a boy that is devastated when his desires are not fulfilled; hence, after declaring that “Next time there would be no mercy” (31), he decides to use camouflage to give himself an advantage while hunting.
Additionally, Jack abandons Ralph’s group out of frustration; but, his anger drives many boys to join his tribe. After Simon suffers a tragic death, most of Ralph’s allies become part of Jack’s army, and Jack gains full power over his tribe; because of his aspirations, he “was sitting there, naked to the waist [with] his face blocked out on white and red” (160). Motivated by his eagerness for meat, Jack chooses to change his identity when he camouflages himself with clay and charcoal; because of his actions, we can surmise that Jack is now a primitive animal and not the innocent boy he was before. His ambition has taken over his entire soul because he will not give up until he reaches his goals; furthermore, Golding’s use of the phrase “no mercy” (31) foreshadowed his destiny to become a true savage. Resultantly, Jack is no longer a human but rather a violent
creature. Finally, Roger is a character that undergoes a major change in his personality; specifically, he becomes a ruthless boy that has the enthusiasm to create chaos. Initially, he attempts to throw stones at Henry; but, he held back because of the “taboo of old life” (62). However, as the novel progresses, Roger develops into a dangerous character that is manipulated from the craving of power; thereby, when Jack and Ralph attempt to settle their grudge, Roger has “a sense of delirious abandonment [and] lean[s] all his weight on the lever” (180). Driven by his evil motives, Roger releases the huge boulder without hesitation; hence, Piggy falls to his death, which exposes Roger’s brutality and passion to hurt others. Golding use of the phrase “delirious abandonment” (180) depicts that Roger has lost all of his self control because he is no longer a preteen with strong morals. Readers can suspect that Roger has lost all humanity within him because his intentions are to commit barbarity; likewise, this cruel act showcases Roger’s beastlike personality in his soul. His insanity unveils that he is a menacing creature with unpredictable qualities; more specifically, he has become an unstoppable wild beast. In Lord of the Flies, there are many instances where characters were forced to make certain decisions that were necessary for individual survival but destroyed their innocence and maintained major conflicts, so we can conceptualize children’s suffering and abandonment of civilization, which made primal savagery apparent on the island; as a result, we can conclude that the boys have ended their childhood because the hardships of the world were discovered.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies portrays the lives of young British boys whose plane crashed on a deserted island and their struggle for survival. The task of survival was challenging for such young boys, while maintaining the civilized orders and humanity they were so accustomed too. These extremely difficult circumstances and the need for survival turned these innocent boys into the most primitive and savaged mankind could imagine. William Golding illustrates man’s capacity for evil, which is revealed in man’s inherent nature. Golding uses characterization, symbolism and style of writing to show man’s inhumanity and evil towards one another.
This is symbolised through the fire that the boys light as the fire represents the boys’ connection to civilisation seeing as the fire gets dimmer their will to get back to civilisation decreases and their true instincts come out the more they are exposed to nature. "Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!" The repetition of this quote many times demonstrates the primal and evil diction that Golding utilizes through each character's speech. aggressive verbal expression conveys the harshness of their wicked and blood thirsty intent. Additionally, the diction of the boys is immature and unsophisticated which aids in portraying and reinforcing the youthfulness of the characters. The pig's head on a stick is also symbolism for the metaphorical Lord of the Flies, which is ultimately the demon found to be within each of the boy's hearts and minds. This can be interpreted as the inner voice of evil. "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close, close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are what they are?" This certifies that the beast is indeed within Simon as well as all of the boys. In truth, when the Lord of the Flies is talking to Simon, it is really Simon hallucinating as he hears the voices of the boys as a whole in his own
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change of character is significant as he leads the other boys into savagery, representing Golding’s views of there being a bad and unforgiving nature to every human.
Throughout the novel, Lord of the Flies the major theme shown throughout is innocence. For the duration of the novel the young boys progress from innocent, well behaved children longing fir rescue to bloodthirsty savages who eventually lose desire to return to civilisation. The painted bloodthirsty savages towards the end of the novel, who have tortured and killed animals and even their friends are a far cry from the sincere children portrayed at the beginning of the novel. Golding portrays this loss of innocence as a result of their naturally increasing opened to the innate evil that exists within all human beings. “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast. . . . Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill! . . . You knew, didn’t you? I’m par...
Golding makes very good use of characters in Lord of the Flies, he shows both good and evil through each of the characters. One of the characters that represents goodness is Simon. He is very good and pure, and has the most positive outlook. Simon is very different from the other boys, he seems to always be helping the Littluns and many other vulnerable boys such as Piggy. "Simon sitting between the twins and Piggy, wiped his mouth and shoved his piece of meat over the rocks to Piggy, who grabbed it." (Golding, pg.74) This quote interprets an example of a time when Simon helped Piggy by giving him food, it shows Simon's wholeheartedness. Another example would be when Simon helps the Littluns pick fruit from high to reach places. All in all Golding tries to portray Simon as a Christ like figure.
It’s one of the most famous stories to ever exist, the story of how two people changed what defines us as humans. It’s the story of Adam, Eve, a serpent, and the unbecoming of mankind, the Fall of Man. This iconic account has been the premise for many works over the centuries. Today, Lord of the Flies by William Golding is considered one of the most influential novels of our time, not only for its adventurous story of stranded boys on a lost island, but also because of its allegorical tale of the true fault in man’s soul. William Golding leans heavily upon the Biblical account of the Fall of Man to highlight man’s depravity in his novel, Lord of the Flies.
For all their differences the Lord of the Flies and Simon have one singular trait in common; they both know what the pig’s head really means for the boys on the island. At first glance, the Lord of the Flies is just a pig’s head on a stick, however it is so much more than that. The moment Jack and his hunter’s kill that pig, a part of them is lost forever and this lost part is their moral sense of right and wrong (149).
Much of history’s most renown literature have real-world connections hidden in them, although they may be taxing uncover. William Golding’s classic, Lord of the Flies, is no exception. In this work of art, Golding uses the three main characters, Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, to symbolize various aspects of human nature through their behaviors, actions, and responses.
As much as everyone would like to believe that all people are inherently good, the illusion of innocence that is often presumed throughout childhood makes the revelation of human nature especially hard to bear. Arthur Koestler said, “Nothing is more sad than the death of an illusion”, and this one is certainly a very hard reality to cope with. In the novel Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding tells the story of a group of British schoolboys who crash land on an uninhabited island in the midst of a world war, and how they regress from civilization to savagery. By conveying Ralph’s reactions to the deaths of Simon and Piggy, providing detailed, symbolic imagery of the cliffs and the lagoon, and showing Ralph’s despair at his new understanding
In the novel The Lord of the flies, William Golding illustrates the decline from innocence to savagery through a group of young boys. In the early chapters of The Lord of the Flies, the boys strive to maintain order. Throughout the book however, the organized civilization Ralph, Piggy, and Simon work diligently towards rapidly crumbles into pure, unadulterated, savagery. The book emphasized the idea that all humans have the potential for savagery, even the seemingly pure children of the book. The decline of all civilized behavior in these boys represents how easily all order can dissolve into chaos. The book’s antagonist, Jack, is the epitome of the evil present in us all. Conversely, the book’s protagonist, Ralph, and his only true ally, Piggy, both struggle to stifle their inner
Circumstance and time can alter or determine the different paths a group of young boys will take. These paths can have the power to strip children of their own innocence. Such a statement can be explored in William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies” as it ventures into the pros and cons of human nature. William Golding’s tale begins with a group of English school boys who crash land on a deserted tropical island during World War II. In Lord of the Flies, the island that the boys crash on is beautiful, glamorous, and magnificent; yet, it proves to become a dystopia by the horror of the cruelty, violence, and inhumanity.
Although there are many interpretations of Golding’s Lord of the Flies, one of the most important is one that involves an examination of Freudian ideas. The main characters personify Sigmund Freud’s theory of the divisions of the human mind; thus, Jack, Ralph, Piggy and Simon are metaphors for the id, ego, and the super-ego of Freudian psychology, respectively. The inclusion of psychological concepts in this literary work distinguish it as a commentary on human nature, beyond labels of “adventure” or “coming of age” novel. Many readers are left in shock upon reading Golding’s masterpiece because of the children’s loss of innocence, but most fail to consider
In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, the boys who are stranded on the island come in contact with many unique elements that symbolize ideas or concepts. Through the use of symbols such as the beast, the pig's head, and even Piggy's specs, Golding demonstrates that humans, when liberated from society's rules and taboos, allow their natural capacity for evil to dominate their existence.
“I think that’s the real loss of innocence: the first time you glimpse the boundaries that will limit your potential” (Steve Toltz). In the previous quote, Steve Toltz discusses the transition from innocence to corruption. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies illustrates the loss of innocence through various characters: Jack, who struggles with pride and a thirst for power; Roger, who revels in the pain of others and uses fear to control the boys; Simon, who represents the demise of purity when humans are at their most savage; Ralph, who illustrates the struggle people endure when attempting to be civilized near the savage; and Piggy, who suffers because he has the only technology necessary to survive. Golding enforces the theory that true innocence will often pay the price to sustain true evil by arranging the characters' personalities and actions in a way that correlates to the effects of Darwin's evolution theory, "survival of the fittest" (). Jack is a good example of this as he exerts power over the weak and uses his skills in hunting to survive. The thirst to prove his masculinity overrides his innate purity, effectively corrupting him. Jack’s loss of innocence begins a domino effect that begins to influence the others.
Something as small and random as a shell or pair of glasses can be viewed as a powerful symbol. In William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies” the stranded boys find many distinct elements that have this strong symbolism. Through items like the conch shell, Piggy’s glasses, and a pig’s head, Golding shows how when humans are taken away from society, they begin to crumble and the morals that were once so important becomes meaningless.