More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the traits of jack in lord of the flies
Symbolism in lord of the flies pd
Lord of the flies character analysis essay jack
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the traits of jack in lord of the flies
“‘I don't agree with all Jack said, but with some. ‘Course there isn't a beast in the forest. How could there be? What would a beast eat?’ ‘Pig.’ ‘We eat pig.’ ‘Piggy!’” In the story, the group is having a meeting next to the fire after the hunters had let the fire go out. During this meeting between the boys, a topic about the beast, that all the boys fear, came up. In this conversation, the boys end up saying that the beast eats pig and then another boy screams Piggy to gain everyone's attention. This is all that's really happening in the story, however, there is a deeper meaning behind this quote. I believe there is a deeper meaning behind this quote because of how it is worded. The way that it's worded as, “‘What would a beast eat?’ ‘Pig.’
In the Lord of the Flies the littluns share a big role. One of the main importances is that the littluns provide situations and are able to interact with the bigger kids. They seem to be the followers in the novel. There trying to mind their own business but also help and do what they can do for survival.
A group of kids got stuck on an island after their plane got shot down and they all have many different personalities. Being stuck on an island usually brings out the worst of people.But, there were two characters in novel, “The Lord of The Flies” that had good morals. These two characters were Ralph and Simon. Ralph and Simon weren’t intimidated by not having any adults around, instead, they tried to bring out the best of themselves and not take part in any horseplay the rest of the boys did.
The influence of power, or “power hungry”, has had a huge effect on many people who feel that they must be in charge. These people often have trouble being told no or being told that they can’t be in charge. People throughout history have done it in many ways. Our own government displays this when we elect a new president every four years. These candidates often tell the public what they want to hear and how they’ll make it a better place, when, in reality, they only mean half of it and they just want to be able to have the power of the president. In the novel Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, the antagonist, Jack, shows throughout the book that he craves power and feels that he deserves it more than anybody else.
the novel, Lord Of The Flies by William Golding, the idea of cruelty is shown through many brutal actions that the characters find pleasurable.
"His [Piggy] head opened and stuff came out and turned red. Piggy’s arms and legs twitched a bit, like a pig’s after it has been killed. Then the sea breathed again in a long, slow sigh, the water boiled white and pink over the rock; and when it went, sucking back again, the body of Piggy was gone."
At the signal fire, Jack and his hunters cook the first pig. Initially, Jack gives meat to everyone, but Piggy. Jack tries to “leave him in doubt, as an assertion of power; but Piggy by advertising his omission made more cruelty necessary” (Golding 73-74). Piggy openly argues with Jack, telling him that even though he didn’t hunt, nor did Ralph or Simon, who already had pieces of meat. This change is positive. Piggy is voicing his opinion on how unfair Jack is being.
Mankind is innately evil. The allegorical novel, The Lord of the Flies, allows for little interpretation about human nature. William Golding depicts the idea, “evil is an inborn trait of man” (Golding). Throughout the novel the children who have crash landed on the island begin to uncover their savage nature. Although all of the children somehow succumb to a heinous behaviour, Jack, Ralph, and Roger become most noticeably corrupt. Ultimately, it becomes clear that malicious intent is intrinsic in mankind.
Freedom is a fragile effect on human nature, and it allows humans to expose their inner thoughts and true feelings. William Golding's Lord of The Flies depicts scenes of disagreement and anger, which adds emotion to the book. Throughout the novel, three major characters all portray aspects of humans in the real world.
Momentarily after Piggy was killed, his limbs “twitched” like a “pig’s after it has been killed” (181). Comparing Piggy to an actual pig reveals how the savages are beginning to hunt and kill each other like they are pigs. Additionally, having Piggy’s name be Piggy was a foreshadow to this moment, where there was no difference between him and an actual pig prey. Likewise, the tribe “watched Ralph to see what he would do next” after the twins were tied up (179). Here, Ralph is portrayed almost as a wild animal that the savages are observing and just waiting when to pounce on him. In addition to this, after the conch was smashed, Jack “viciously” hurled his spear at Ralph “with full intention” (181). This implies that Jack is hunting Ralph, like he is the new pig. Ralph is his next prey, now that Piggy, his last prey, is dead. Lastly, through all of his frustration, Ralph accused Jack of being a “beast and a swine,” suggesting that through trying to stop and kill the beast, he has let out his inner darkness and become the beast, yet developed the qualities of a pig at the same time (179).
The portrayal of the pig demonstrates his rationality of being a chaotic savage. He tends to cover up his actions with reasoning that only deems to be true through the eyes of insanity. “He rubbed the charcoal stick between the patches of red and white on his face [...] A rounded patch of sunlight fell on his face and a brightness appeared in the depths of the water. He looked in astonishment, no longer at himself but at an awesome stranger. He split the water and leapt to his feet, laughing excitedly.”(Golding 63). There is no room for civilization on the island, and Jack takes advantage of this opportunity. Jack, compels himself to distance himself from social normalities through the exterior of the world. The paint on Jack’s face represents his cover up to society and to make himself believe that he is doing the right thing. Consequently speaking, Jack desperately desires confirmation of his actions from one of his peers. However, none of his peers condone of these certain actions, so, he relies on the tangible aspects of life to give him a sense of comfortability. “All that makes sense to him is his own need to control others and impose himself, and hunting, because it is a kind of power assertion” (Lord of the Flies, Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations). On the island, Jack’s role is the leader of the hunting party. Although, this seems
In addition, Jack treated Piggy with extreme cruelty. Jack's brutal behavior toward Piggy exposed his evil side. This could be why he wanted to kill him, as they began arguing since they had first met. Jack also felt a desire for power; Piggy would never grant him this supremacy, which led to violence either physically or verbally. After Jack let the fire go out, Piggy reprimanded him leading to frustration in Jack; “This from Piggy, and the wails of agreement from some of the hunters, drove Jack to violence. The bolting look came into his blue eyes. He took a step, and able at last to hit someone, stuck his fist into Piggy’s stomach ” Jack could have hit anyone else but struck Piggy, showing his deep hatred for him. All Jack needed was the opportunity to kill Piggy, and he would have taken it just like when he punched him in the stomach.
...er mock Piggy, when he “made a move toward Piggy…[and] mimicked the whine and scramble by saying, ‘Jus’ you wait-yah!’” By doing this, Jack causes all of the younger hunters to laugh, giving him even more power over them all because of the new power that the mask gave him, by allowing him to be cruel and unkind.
Jack begins the novel partially innocent, cruel enough to yell at the boys yet pure enough to hesitate when faced with the task of killing the pig. Jack obtains the tools necessary to kill the pig, yet claims to need help cornering the animal. Jack, not truly needing help to kill the pig but rather needing the support provided by the mob mentality, acquires the support of his choir and together the boys hunt and kill the pig, all the while chanting, “Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill her blood”...
When havoc occurs regarding the beasts and the boys suggest it is a ghost, Piggy states “I don’t believe in no ghosts” (90). Piggy’s rationale is superior to that of the other boys. Everybody is on the verge of insanity, yet Piggy has held onto his sanity. His statement is logical and not unreasonable, unlike the others’. Also, he is not forward enough with his idea though, so no one listens. His quiet voice is drained by the others’ loud and boisterous voices. Very rarely Piggy fearlessly speaks his opinion to the others. When situations get out of hand, he tries to create order and take control of the situation. For example, during a meeting, Piggy constantly shouts, “I got the conch” but is not forceful enough; therefore, no one listens to him (83). The system of only the person holding the conch talking is much more efficient than everybody yelling at once. If the boys would listen to Piggy, they would be much better off. They could have harmony as Piggy suggests so often. Piggy sometimes watches
“The scariest monsters are the ones that lurk within our souls” - Edgar Allan Poe. Poe is alluding to the idea that there is no greater evil than that which is perpetrated by people, whether in oneself or in others. William Golding's novel, Lord of the Flies, examines the matter of how evil can emanate from human beings. The reader sees examples of this complex topic throughout this parable when a group of British schoolboys turn into savages after being stranded on a deserted island. The image of the young boys’ barbarism becomes more prevalent throughout the novel, as conveyed in the following quote: “... they had outwitted a living thing, imposed their will upon it, taken away its life like a long satisfying drink” (Golding 121). These