Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Depiction of authority in Lord of the Flies
The human nature of lord of the flies
Character development of lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Depiction of authority in Lord of the Flies
Meant to Fail
Everyday, everywhere rules make our lives structured. Maybe you are not noticing it, but we live in quite squared boxes formed by some leaders. Yes, you read it right, leaders. And luckily there is not just one person with leadership. Questioning why? Then it’s time to look at the story of lord of the Flies that gives excellent examples!
Lord of the Flies is a story about a group of schoolboys during a nuclear war that ends on a deserted island due to a plane crash. Just imagine the situation: being on an island where there is no way to escape, you do not know the dangers, and only with a group of unstructured boys. To me this sounds like madness. Problems will be on every corner of the island and someone will have to fix them.
…show more content…
He trusts too many people and forgets that they all are kids, but not everyone is focused like him. The second bad thing was that his tribe split up when Jack told them to follow him. A true leader must keep his group together. He also lost himself one time and participated in killing Simon. No good leader would do that.
The other possible chief, that later became the chief of a tribe, was Jack. Jack is different than Ralph. When Ralph thinks they should care, Jack does not want to. Jack does not think about getting rescued, because he gets caught up in hunting. He said: “we’ll hunt, I’m going to be chief.” He is a person who leads like a dictator, but was not bad at everything he did. Jack wanted to look brave and strong. Jack’s group was more united than Ralph's tribe.
I think everyone can see why the group ended up as savages that killed each other. They needed someone or something with leadership qualities. Someone that keeps the group together, cared, was intelligent and knew how to listen. There just isn’t one person that has all of the qualities. In the story you can see Ralph needed to much structure but could not make it true. Jack on the other hand, was a bd leader because he did not know what priorities were. The plan they made was meant to fail. In my opinion they should have formed a democracy for more decisions. Also they should have listened more to Piggy. He was really smart and knew what to do. If they worked together, it could have been a winning
When Jack loses the election to become chief to Ralph, it becomes apparent that Jack is schismatic and wholeheartedly intends to act against Ralph’s actions and decisions. From small nuances such as churlish remarks to fights, it is obvious that Jack intends to eventually either dethrone Ralph or form his own tribe. In one instance, Ralph assigns Jack a very simplistic task of watching the fire on the mountain, yet Jack decides that his appetence for blood and meat is more important than fulfilling his duty to the fire. Disobeying Ralph’s orders, Jack defects from his post to hunt and does not attempt to have another person tend the fire in his absence. Because of Jack’s actions, Ralph verbally scolds Jack and states to Jack, “You talk. But you can’t even build hut...
In conclusion, there were obviously many problems on the island in William Golding’s story, Lord of the Flies. The first thing that went wrong on the island was that there were no adults on the island. Without adults on the island, the kids have no one to give advice, and no one to keep them in check. The second thing that went wrong on the island was that there was no good form of government on the island. Without a good form of government, the boys all turned to different dictatorships, and everyone knows that those almost always end in multiple deaths, and this story is not an exception. The last thing that went wrong on the island was that there were only boys, and of course they did what boys do, and that is fight, just like any other boy in the world. In the end, there were a few boys that didn’t live to see a military man come and save them.
Ralph shows that he has a better understanding of the boys than Jack. He knows that the boys need some sort of order on the island in order for them to survive. He starts a simple form of government and sets a few rules for them. Even though they don’t last very long, the fact that he tried to help the group is what makes him a better leader. Ralph’s wisdom and ability to look toward the future also has an advantage over Jack. He has a sense to keep his focus on getting off the island. When the fire goes out, Ralph gets upset because the chance to be rescued was gone as well. Ralph enforces his role of leadership as he gives the boys a sense of stability of an authority figure. He keeps the boys in pretty good order at the meeting by making a rule that they can only speak if they have the conch. Ralph knows that the littleuns are afraid and they need shelter to feel more secure. They work together for a while, but as the time goes on the smaller boys want to go play. They slowly lose all their help until Simon and Ralph are the only ones left to work on them. Ralph knows that this is a necessity and keeps bringing it up at the meetings. Jack, on the other hand, is doing nothing but causing chaos.
Being a part of a group of children having to adapt after being trapped on a island with no surrounding civilization is an unimaginable situation. However, William Golding shows just how terrifying it can be in his novel, Lord Of The Flies, by his use of symbols to represent hardships. The main symbols, which best portrays characteristics are the fire and the conch; symbols leadership and confidence.
Lord of the Flies by William Golding is about a group of British boys who get plane-wrecked on a deserted island. The boys cooperate, gather fruit, make shelters, and maintain a signal fire. When they get there they are civil schoolboys but soon show that being away from society and the real world it brings out their true nature and they break apart and turn into savages.
Much of history’s most renown literature have real-world connections hidden in them, although they may be taxing uncover. William Golding’s classic, Lord of the Flies, is no exception. In this work of art, Golding uses the three main characters, Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, to symbolize various aspects of human nature through their behaviors, actions, and responses.
So Ralph had really struggled dealing with everybody. In my opinion Ralph was doing a good job, Yes he kind of gave up for a little bit but he was trying his best as a leader. Instead of just letting everybody go kill animals and run around adventuring like Jack he was trying to protect everybody. Here is a quote when Ralph says “ I'm chief”, because you chose me and we are going to keep the fire going.
The first leader that Golding shows to the reader is Ralph. He is presented to the reader as a handsome young man who is not afraid of anything and likes to have fun. Since he is the one who blows the conch, the boys automatically designate him as "chief." Ralph starts off as a great leader who knows what has to be done in order for survival, knows to assign certain people certain jobs, and knows they need to be rescued as quickly as possible.
Leadership is a major issue when it comes to whether or not a society is going to be viable. It seems that if the leader is a good leader, a leader that puts his people first and wants the best for his country, then the land and the society should flourish. But if the leader is a bad leader, a power driven leader, a leader who puts himself first, and lets his people starve while he and his nobles live in excess, then the society and land will not flourish. This idea is not demonstrated to us in Utopia or The Prince; it seems like the exact opposite.
A leader is someone who leads a group, organization or country. Furthermore, a good leader is someone who has the ability to lead people effectively using only their positive leadership qualities. The novel Lord of the Flies illustrates that everyone possesses a variety of positive leadership qualities, as is evident through Jack, Ralph, Simon, and Piggy's different leadership qualities.
In William Golding's Lord of the Flies a group of kids who are fleeing a war, plane crashes and they are stranded on a deserted island without Adult supervision. The first thing all the kids do is vote for a chief and Ralph, who is more responsible, wins over Jack. They are the choices because Ralph is the Colonel of the whole group and Jack is the oldest out of all the boys. As the story goes on and when Jack starts his own group all of the kids lose sight of their main goal, to be rescued. They're all having too much fun when they switch over to Jack's group hunting and killing for food. In the story there are four main characters that are in a sense the leaders of the crew. There's Piggy and a quiet Simon who do not possess the scrappiness that Ralph and Jack do. These strengths are what help Ralph and Jack survive. Piggy is always talking about how his Auntie would not let him do this or that and Simon was just a quiet, reserved kid who is regarded as weird just due to the fact that he is calm.
People are privileged to live in an advanced stage of development known as civilization. In a civilization, one’s life is bound by rules that are meant to tame its savage natures. A humans possesses better qualities because the laws that we must follow instill order and stability within society. This observation, made by William Golding, dictates itself as one of the most important themes of Lord of the Flies. The novel demonstrates the great need for civilization ion in life because without it, people revert back to animalistic natures.
In the Lord of the Flies, William Golding uses a variety of symbols to represent ideas, or abstract notions or conceptions about people, places, and things. A symbol, according to the Webster's Dictionary, is an object that stands for something in addition to its literal meaning. In the book, there is a continual breakdown of society and civilization on the island. During this breakdown, Golding uses symbolism to further explain the process. Some of the things he symbolizes in the novel are the island itself, the conch, the boys clothing, and the violence.
In the fictional novel, The Lord of the Flies by William Golding. The hunters started off as a chorus and no trace of savagery in them. The longer they are on the island the more savage they become. They crash land on the island trying to escape a bomb threat. They are proper but the will to survive kicks in and so does savagery. They had fully immersed in savagery when they did unthinkable things to each other. On their time on the island the chorus/ hunters, slowly loose civilization and slip into savagery, when they first land on the island there is not a single trace of savagery in them, the longer they are on the island the farther they slip away from civilization. There civilization has shattered all they have
Boys love the idea of being home alone without adult supervision, but isn't it hard to imagine what they would do if they were stranded on an island for months, without any adults around? Lord of the Flies is an astounding novel that explores the idea of what it would be like for a group of boys to be stuck on an island after their plane crash lands and kills the few adults on board. In Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding, is attempting to relate to the ideas of the German philosopher Immanuel Kant in the fact that everyone is born evil and as humans age society shapes who they are and how they act. How William Golding conveys this view of human nature is very well thought and interesting!