Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The 14th amendment of the bill of rights
What does the 14th amendment mean when we say equal protection under the law
The 14th amendment of the bill of rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The 14th amendment of the bill of rights
In loco parentis translated from Latin to English means “in lieu of parents.” With the direct translation this should mean that the school is functioning in the role of the parent. The term was derived from British common law in the late 1700’s (Lee, 2011). Ideally the role of in loco parentis is to protect the student as a parent would while the student is at college. However I think we are slowly starting to move away from in loco parentis in today’s colleges. A parent’s primary responsibility is to keep their child safe and healthy while also offering guidance and help as the child grows into a young adult. In today’s colleges we begin to see less examples of a college acting as a parent. One of the reasons for this could be that we are …show more content…
In the early 1900’s it was universally considered taboo for unmarried men and women to share the same room, or suite. In today’s society, some guardians may still be uncomfortable with their son or daughter sharing a residence with someone of the opposite sex; however other parents may not be bothered. This leads to the question of how can in loco parentis successfully obey the 14th amendment and promise equal protection, when one student may have been raised in a stricter atmosphere than …show more content…
The newfound voting rights gave these young students more autonomy and changed the landscape of the college (Sweeton, 2012). As students became more politically involved, activism and student political clubs were seen widely on college campuses. There were also a lot of anti-war movements that happened on campuses due to the suffrage movement. Since a lot of these young students were enlisted or fought in Vietnam, they were already very independent and politically active even before coming to college. According to historians the political involvement of college students in the 1970’s was the beginning of the downfall of in loco parentis (Sweeton,
No greater obligation is placed on school officials than to protect the children in their charge from foreseeable dangers, whether those dangers arise from the careless acts or intentional transgressions of others. Although the overarching mission of a board of education is to educate, its first imperative must be to do no harm to the children in its care. A board of education must take reasonable measures to assure that the teachers and administrators who stand as surrogate parents during the day are educating, not endangering, and protecting, not exploiting, vulnerable children (Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003).
The 1960’s was a time society fantasized of a better world. However, the horrors of the Vietnam War soon became evident; the mass amounts of death occurring because of the war became a reality. It created a “movement”, especially in American colleges, in order to stand up for what they believed to be “right”. By 1970, many Americans believed sending troops to Vietnam was a mistake, however there were also various individuals becoming increasingly critical of the student antiwar movement
Teenagers in the 1950s were restless creatures, tired of listening to parents and doing school work. When they went away to university, it gave them a taste of freedom and responsibility at the same time. Unfortunately, a war was going on for the U.S.: a war not all people thought we should have been involved with in the first place. As Mark Barringer stated in his article "The 1960s: Polarization, Cynicism, and the Youth Rebellion", student radicals Al Haber and Tom Hayden from the University of Michigan formed the Students for a Democratic Society in 1960 as a scholarly arm of an institution for Industrial Democracy. In June 1962, fifty-nine SDS members met ...
Among the riots caused by Nixon’s decision were revolts at many universities, such as Kent State. Young students were upset because they were the ones being drafted and the sooner the war ended the less chance they had of seeing war. On Friday, May 1, 1970 anti-war rallies began to take place at Kent State University. Students gathered and burned a copy of the constitution. Also, many riots broke out in downtown Kent.
The 1960s were turbulent years. The United States was unpopularly involved in the war in Vietnam, and political unrest ran high at colleges and universities across the country.
Those who were not chosen by the draft to fight overseas were left back to fight on the homefront in an effort to bring about the American soldiers return home. College students played a large role in the anti-war movement, as the soldiers fighting in the war were their peers to whom they could closey relate their predicaments. During this time many colleges shut down completely while students and faculty voiced their opinions.
The nation has seen a rebirth of many of the Vietnam-era values in today’s students. Protests, mostly in opposition to the war in Iraq, have become frequent events on college campuses. Student organizations advocating equal rights for women, racial minorities and the gay community have made their voice heard in state and federal legislatures. Perhaps there is some truth to the view that college students are a very liberal group that tends to become more liberal as they approach graduation.
The middle-class youth made up the bulk of the counterculture, so they had the leisure time to focus their attention on political issues in America. At the time, the counterculture rejected the cultural standards of the United States and those older than them, specifically the initial support for the Vietnam War. The politics and government history force held a high influence during this time of change. The Vietnam War devastated the young adult population and families of those who enlisted. Some Americans found the movement to reflect American ideals of free speech and equality, while others thought of it to reflect pointless rebellious acts and very unpatriotic. In the end, authorities restricted political gatherings and the counterculture collapsed once civil rights, liberties, equality, and the end of the Vietnam War were
In many schools, women who became pregnant were often relegated to "alternative" educational programs, the participation in which was mandatory. After Title IX, schools could no longer force the student to go to an alternative school, which often was substandard. These students could not be sin...
The American family is constantly undergoing changes. In the early 1600s, the Godly Family was the prevalent family structure of the first Europeans who immigrated to the United States (Aulette, 2010). Until 1780, families were strictly patriarchal with a male head of the family, who supervised “all social activities, including education, health care, and welfare”, and insured the family’s self-sufficiency within its community (Aulette, 2010). Following this form, the Modern Family and its sub-categories, the Democratic Family and the Companionate Family, were the dominant family structures until the 1970s (Aulette, 2010). Throughout the course of almost 200 years, families evolved into more private institutions aside from the community, women withdrew more and more from physical work on the family’s property and concentrated on their designated occupation as a mother, caregiver and housewife. Men were still the head of the family in terms of pursuing an occupation to financially provide for the family’s needs. During this time, gender-specific roles within the family were reinforced, which are still partially in effect in today’s society and family structure. Since the mid-20th century, the American family seems to be changing more rapidly than ever, partially because of the influences of the Great Depression and World War II, which led to the remarkable baby boom of 1946 to 1964. Not only did the year of 1970 mark the beginning of the most recent stage in the history of the (European) American family, the Postmodern Family, it also was the year in which the first gay couple applied for a marriage license (ProCon.org, 2013). Even though the two men’s request had been denied back then, same-sex couples and their family structure h...
Manning WD, Smock PJ. 1997. Children's living arrangements in unmarried-mother families. J. Fam. Issues 18:526 44
The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) was established to provide employees with ability to take a leave from work for personal or family health issues. The Act lays out specific circumstance in which an employee may take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave within a 12 month period. Under the law, employees may request a leave for personal health issues, to care for a child, spouse or parent with serious health issues, birth or care of a child during the first year or for newly placed adoptions within one year. Employees are covered under FMLA if the employer has 50 or more employees and the employee has worked for the employer for at least 12 months. The employee must submit a written request for FMLA and provide documentation supporting their request. Once approved, the employee may take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave. Upon return the employee is guaranteed a job, if the employer had to fill their position out of business necessity, the employer must provide the employee with a position with equal responsibility and pay.
The intention of colleges in the United Stated during the 18th and 19th centuries was to create a system that would serve in loco parentis (in place of the parent). In the early years of American higher education, college professors sought to be disciplinarians, who played a parental role. However, the students at these institutions often behaved in a disruptive manner towards teachers, as well as fellow students. This unruly behavior can be directly linked to the economic background of the students attending these institutions, in addition to the philosophies set forth by the colleges. During this time period, colleges attracted mostly upper class men who showed little interest in their academic studies. They were individuals following generations of family members to the institution, and as a result of their connections possessed more authority at the school than the faculty. This issue began to change in the early 20th century, when colleges began admitting more economically diverse individuals. The economic background of the students, in addition to their reluctance to abide by the rules, led to violent and unruly behavior at these institutions.
The start of the movements that opposed the Vietnam War were peaceful, but soon more people were joining the movments when the U.S started strategic bombing in Vietnam. Soon a group formed called “Students for a Democratic Society” (SDS) attracted a widening base of support over the next three years. After the success of the Tet offensive by the North Japanese, they proved that they weren't giving up and that they weren't going to lose. Costing many lives of U.S troops.The Vietnam War was a big mistake and many feared of fighting in a war they would not win, which created students to turn to rebel/protest against their government.
Socially, when you look at undergrad students and the rate of their civic engagement it all aligns with the sort of student they are. Full time, part time, whether they’re working and going to college, living on campus, and off campus etc. all of them are specifics that can influence ones participation in society, in becoming engaged socially and politically. (Newell 2014, 795). Newell’s study explores the idea of four year and two year colleges employing more opportunities for students to become engaged politically and socially. Newell (2014) makes the point that civic engagement among students is a crucial key in “helping community college students transform inequitable structures in their community.” Education is said to be one of the influencing