Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lizzie borden is guilty essay
Lizzie borden on trial essay
Why lizzie borden is innocent essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lizzie borden is guilty essay
Lizzie Borden (Final) Axe in Cellar. No Fishing Pole. Ate three Pears. These are three of the reasons of the Lizzie Borden case.The issue of the Lizzie Borden case is a complex one, but it is vital to discuss because there are many reasons why she could be proved guilty ,but there are also reasons why she should be proved not guilty. In the 1880’s the people thought that Lizzie Borden was not guilty.There was seven witnesses. The witnesses was Dr. Benjamin Handy, Hyman Lubinsky, Adelaide Churchill, Bridget Sullivan. I believe that Lizzie Borden is guilty because she was like the only one home other than Bridget and many other reasons One vital reason is that Lizzie Borden is guilty is because she knew that there was a axe in …show more content…
Lizzie and the questioner states in the Inquest “ Q. Had you got a fish line?A. Not here. We had some at the farm.Q. Had you got a fish hook? A. No sir” (7). Lizzie knew that they didn't have any fishing lines. If Lizzie knew they did not have any fishing lines at the house , so even if she was to look for the sinkers she could have lost them again because she did not have a fishing line to put them on at the moment. So over all the some of the people in the 1880s believed that Lizzie was not guilty. The people of the 1880s point is accurate because Lizzie Borden could have just been looking for sinkers, then putting the sinkers in a safe place where nobody will find it, or mess with …show more content…
In the Inquest Lizzie and the questioner stated “Q. How long do you think you were up there?A. Not more than 15 or 20 minutes, I should not think.Q. Should you think what you have told me would occupy four minutes?A. Yes, because I ate some pears up there”(8).With Lizzie knowing that she was sick she ate three pears in less than fifteen to twenty minutes in the morning. Another reason is that why did she get up onto the second level just to eat pears when again she was supposed to be looking for sinkers for her fishing pole for the fishing derby that she was going to in two weeks. Some of the people of the 1880s believe again that Lizzie Borden was not guilty.The people of the 1880s point is accurate because Lizzie Borden could have just been hungry and those could have made her stomach feel
The first reason that Lizzie Borden is guilty is that Lizzie Borden switched up her story many times. In the inquest testimony Lizzie says “I was in the kitchen” (3). She was asked if she was sure about that and then she changed her story. She said she couldn’t remember if she was in there or in the dining room (3). Lizzie then changes her answer again
Being such a narrative, when I was reading about the details of Kate’s attacks I was actually scared. It gave a sense of spookiness to the book that I hoped for. I remember visiting the city of Salem, and the same chills I had walking through the town was relived while reading the book. However one difference about this book compared to the historical teachings of Salem was that in Kate’s trail it was less of a he said she said event and more on the cold hard facts. In GodBeer testimony, he examines much of what Jonathan Selleck notes on how to determine a witch is guilty because he knew how serious of an offense it truly was. I sometimes found myself wondering if this was a fictional story because of how elaborate it was or however, when he used experts from documents such as the petition for Elizabeth Clawson. The last two chapters is much about the trial process than I expected, which helped me to understand this book as a narrative with much historical
Your honor before we start I would just like to inform you that I am very happy that during this case you will you logic and evidence to decide the fate of my client Martha Carrier. In this case I will be defending Martha Carrier against the charge of witchcraft. One of the main allegations that has been presented by the prosecutor is that the defendant killed the cows of several villagers. The accusers of this crime are Mr. Abbot, Mr.Toothaker, Mr. Rogger, Mr.Preston. They all state that after some confrontation with the defendant their cow or in some instances several cows died from no seeable natural causes. Now blaming this on witchcraft when there are other plausible reasons is ridiculous it is possible that the cows caught a disease as this would show no outward sign other than possibly
Imagine being wrongfully trialled for the murders of your father and stepmother. Well, this was Lizzie Borden’s reality in the notorious 19th century case. In August, 1892, the gruesome murders of Andrew and Abby Borden took place in a small town named Fall River. Because Lizzie Borden was believed to have a lot to gain with the murders of her parents, she was the only one accused of being the murder. With this case, I believe the council was right for pleading Lizzie as innocent. The public and police tried to use theories against her in court to prove she was guilty. With the whole public against her, Lizzie still stood strong and was proven innocent for the murders.
	Even though most people believe those young girls were the only ones accused, also grown men and women were too. History tells about how a neighbor’s pig fell astray into the Nurse family’s yard and Rebecca Nurse yelled at her neighbor. Soon after the neighbor feel ill and died of a stroke.
...y the accused there really was no hard evidence of witchcraft, the only reason anyone hanged was because the judges believed themselves so righteous that no one would dare lie in front of them, therefor the girls were telling the truth. I see no reasoning in the whole system they used to find witches back then in Salem.
Billy Joel once sang, “Only the good die young”. In life, it is true, the young and innocent seem to touch more lives around us than anyone else. In the Casey Anthony trial, Anthony was a suspect in the murder of her daughter Caylee. Caylee’s life shouldn’t be counted in years, it should be counted by how many lives she affected, the love she has gained, and the support the country has given her to find out what really happened. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a boy killed his father; however, both cases were challenged by the obvious and the abstruse evidence. Large cities towards the east coast, in 1982, Twelve Angry Men, and 2008, Casey Anthony Trial, affiliated with two major trials able to modify the lives of the living and the dead. For that reason, during the Casey Anthony case, jurors were conflicted throughout the trial.
A basic sense of honesty is another of Mary Warren’s traits. In Act I she goes to Salem to convince Abigail to tell the truth about what really happened in the woods. When the witchcraft scare gets out of hand, Mary joins Abigail and the other girls in falsely accusing women of being witches. These false accusations are motivated by hysteria. There is evidence that Mary really believes that the women in court are bewitching her. She tells the judge that she thought she saw spirits. The other girls were screaming, and before she knew it, Mary was screaming with them. When she realizes that there are no spirits, Mary is willing to be truthful. After Elizabeth Proctor’s name is brought up in court, Mary Warren defends her against the accusation. At the end of Act II, the reader hopes that the basic sense of honesty will remain strong enough to allow Mary to testify on behalf of the accused women in Act III.
Rebecca Nurse was known to all as a saintly woman. She followed God with all her heart, soul, mind, and strength. The Lord was her savior and protector. But because of mass hysteria, Mrs. Nurse was incriminated of exploiting witchcraft. This aghast most people because the most religious person they knew had been a witch. This was false. Rebecca Nurse was not a witch and had not demonstrated witchcraft by any means. She was innocent. She, like John Proctor, was solicited by Reverend Hale to confess but to no avail. Rebecca Nurse had held an immaculate reputation, and she was not about to let it get defamed by some false accusation. Rebecca Nurse, again like John Proctor, was hung for her falsely accused treacherous actions. This again is a prime example of what people will go through in order to keep a reputation that is accepted by
Some scholars attempt to make the claim that she was the turning point of the trials due to the fact that people began to wonder if someone as devout as Rebecca could be accused, what’s to say that any other innocent person could be thereafter accused? However this has been very difficult to prove as trials went on long after her death, and Martha Corey, another accused, can be considered for that role in the following trials (Smith). Surely her family had been jumping for joy at that verdict, but the happiness did not last long at all, when the public demanded a reconsideration on the jury’s decision, consequently ending in an overturning of the non-guilty result (Hansen 128-129). While this is considerably the worst possible situation for Rebecca, it did seem to be the wake-up call for the judges and priests, though this reaction was not instantaneous. Why did so many of these professional judges and jury members ignore their responsibilities by overturning their original judgement when she was so clearly
Patty Hearst was a normal 19 year old girl, living in an apartment with her fiance and attending university in Berkeley, California, until one day her life, and the lives of everyone around her changed forever. On the evening of February 4, 1974, some members of the left-wing radical group called the Symbionese Liberation Army barged into Hearst’s home armed with guns, and beat up her fiance before kidnapping Hearst and bringing her to their house where she was kept blindfolded in a closet for 59 days. While locked in the closet, Patty Hearst was verbally and sexually abused and she was denied the use of even a toilet or toothbrush if she didn’t tell them that she agreed with the group’s ideas and beliefs. It is believed that while being locked in the closet like this, Patty was being brainwashed by the SLA and that she may have even developed Stockholm Syndrome, a condition in which a person who was kidnapped starts to empathise with their captor, and even starts defending them. This is how the Symbionese Liberation Army convinced Patty Hearst to join their group. They released an audio tape to the public in which Patty Hearst said she was changing her name to Tania and that she had decided to join the SLA. She then helped the SLA rob a bank and steal an ammunition belt from a sports store. After this, she started travelling around the country with two members of the SLA named John and Emily Harris, to try avoid being captured by the police. During this time, the police found a house where some members of the SLA were hiding out. Attempts to make the SLA members surrender ended up in a massive gunfight, ultimately ending up in the deaths of 6 SLA members. The FBI eventually found and arrested Patty Hearst on September 18, 1975. T...
Burton's testimony basically tells the prosecutors exactly what they want to hear. She pins the bulk of the conspiring on her masters, the Hughsons, and two slaves, Prince and Caesar. The Hughsons were suspected of fencing sto...
In the Crucible, the accused were unfairly tried and convicted on limited evidence or even word of mouth from the girls.
In conclusion to the defending of Margaret Atwood scapegoating really is not the right way to experience success because you should not make someone else take the blame for what you have done you should take your punishment and move on with your life. Therefore in the “Crucible” and “Half-Hanged Mary” there happened to be a lot of scapegoating going on so that others could stay out of trouble which made people that did not do what they got scapegoated for to have to take the blame and get someone else's
penalty will be severe. Any student refusing to sign will be sent to a German