More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis on Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War
The life of Abraham Lincoln
Analysis on Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis on Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War
A historian’s job is to use analysis of the past in order to convey information and potentially pursued the reader. I believe that Bradford did the best job at this, compared to Paludan. Bradford provided a thorough analysis of Lincoln’s actions in order to prove that he was corrupt. He had multiple points to prove this and persuades the reader against the typical view that Lincoln was a great president. Pauldan also provided analysis of Lincoln’s actions to support his side, but he seemingly had less points to support a common perspective. 2. What methods used by historians did you use in your investigation? Be specific. Based on scale, simultaneity, and selectivity, I mostly used the historical process of selectivity. This allowed me to
In “The Presidency of Abraham Lincoln,” Phillip Shaw Paludan argues that even though Abraham Lincoln faced unparalleled challenges, Lincoln was America’s greatest president as he preserved the Union and freed the slaves. According to Paludan, Lincoln’s greatness exceeds that of all other American presidents as Lincoln’s presidential service was remarkable in both the obstacles he faced as well as the ways in which he overcame them. Before accepting the distinguished chair in Lincoln studies at the University of Illinois, Springfield, Paludan was a professor of history at the University of Kansas for over 30 years. Paludan has authored several books including Victims: A True Story of the Civil War and A People’s Contest: The Union and Civil
In Richard Hofstadter’s book “American Political Tradition” he describes twelve biographical portraits of American statesmen, breaking them from longstanding reputations and putting them under scrutiny. Shockingly, among these statesmen is Abraham Lincoln. Hofstadter criticizes both his legacy and his political intentions. Lincoln, a president nationally regarded as a “self-made” man, nicknamed “Honest Abe,” and generally well liked, is not typically heavily criticized (Hofstadter 121). Hofstadter believed his reputation of being “self-made” was simply just a myth that he used to advance his political career and to seize opportunities of advancement (122). Although Hofstadter believes Lincoln’s reputation is not as notable as history says
Abraham Lincoln was one of the greatest presidents to ever serve in office in the history of the U.S., serving from 1860 to 1865. A self-educated attorney from Illinois, he proved himself to be a brilliant leader throughout the Civil War period. Although President Abraham Lincoln faced the biggest crisis in American history, he saved the nation by preserving the Union during the Civil War, boosting the economy, by fighting for the abolition of slavery, and by boosting the Northern economy.
DiLorenzo was very successful in writing this book, Alexander Marriott states that he “reached a relatively wide audience of libertarians and conservatives.”(Marriott) DiLorenzo is very convincing in his book “The Real Lincoln” because of the many quotes and questions he presents to his audience. By persuading his readers to question all their formal beliefs of Lincoln he gets them to think Lincoln might be this monster that he portrays him to be. Lincoln probably was not a saint like many have made him out to be but he was still the man who demolished slavery and held the United States together during a tough period. By making such a historical figure look like a freud many refuted him, one article by Ken Masugi tells of how DiLorenzo misused quotes and made people believe they meant something by it that they did not. Masugi states DiLorenzo “frequently distorts the meaning of the primary sources he cites, Lincoln most of all.”(Masugi) Masugi then gives examples of how Dilorenzo misused quotes in his book. DiLorenzo’s book had strengths such as its persuasiveness, but also had weaknesses like his misuse of primary sources, and not only diminishing a few of Lincoln’s accomplishments but continuing by degrading his who he was as a
The ideal historian is someone who wants to find the answer, but does not care what the answer is, curious but not committed. One might only look at the Declaration of Independence, or the Gettysburg Address to see how even a valuable historical document contains what some might call bias. Bias, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is defined as “an attitude that favors one way of feeling without considering other possibilities.” Subsequently, if Founding Fathers, and Abraham Lincoln wrote documents that fit the definition of being biased, what document is not. One such document, Memorable Decision of the High Court of Toulouse, is written impartially, and is styled with such particularity, that the reader is left wondering, what did
U.S. Labor History Unionism can be described as "a continuous association of wage-earners for the purpose of maintaining or improving the conditions of their employment" (Smelser). This means that a group of workers can unite to gain more power and leverage in bargaining. The bargaining process may include many aspects but usually consists of wages, benefits, terms and conditions of employment. The notion of union came about in the 1700's. In the beginning, as it is today, workers united to "defend the autonomy and dignity of the craftsman against the growing power of the company" (Montgomery).
Thomas DiLorenzo does a good job in documenting Lincoln’s ruthlessness and hypocrisy and how historians have covered it up. The founding fathers had a fear of federal governmental abuse. They saw state sovereignty as a protection. That’s why they gave us the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. I found this book very interesting and it makes you wonder what else we may have learned growing up that could be completely untrue according to your elementary school history books. I do however understand that there is two sides to every story and I wish DiLorenzo did a better job at explaining why history has painted Lincoln as such a hero.
During Lincoln’s first presidential term, he openly opposes the practice of slavery. Lincoln faces a dilemma with ending slavery because he doesn’t know what to do with the slaves once they are free. Lincoln personally believed in the idea of colonization for a post-slavery solution. Colonization consisted of deporting recently freed slaves to either Liberia or South America. Lincoln believed that white people and black people could never live together because black people would never be considered truly equal to white people. Lincoln says in his Address on Colonization, “The aspiration of men is to enjoy equality with the best when free, but on this broad continent, not a single man of your race[black] is made the equal of a single man of
Abraham Lincoln is regarded by many Americans as the greatest president to ever hold office in the history of the United States, and his reputation is definitely well deserved. Lincoln wasn't scared to stand up and fight for what he knew was right. He was convinced that within the branches of government, the presidency alone was empowered not only to uphold the Constitution, but also to protect, and defend it. Lincoln was able to lead our country and preserve the Union, keeping the United States from splintering during the devastating times of the Civil War. As President, he built the Republican Party into a strong national organization, and he rallied most of the northern Democrats to the Union cause. On January 1, 1863, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation that changed the war into a battle for freedom and declared forever free those slaves within the Confederacy. That November, Lincoln gave his famous Gettysburg Address, which stated how a country must be dedicated to human freedom in order to survive. He dedicated the battlefield to the soldiers who had perished, and called on the living to finish the task the dead soldiers had begun. (Donald, 1995) Lincoln believed that democracy could be a lasting form of government. He showed a nobility of character that had worldwide appeal, and he was a man of great integrity. However, Lincoln was not only the 16th president of the United States, he was an American hero. Lincoln was a well-rounded individual and he had numerous outstanding qualities. However, it is important to remember that Lincoln also led a private life, complete with close friends and family.
The National Monument that means the most to me is Abraham Lincoln Memorial. Abraham Lincoln born on February 12th, 1809 in a small Kentucky cabin. His family was poor and could only provide limited material needs, yet Lincoln was still able to learn and grow as a person. His Memorial was built to remember him and everything he accomplished.
President Lincoln in his Inaugural Address explains the cause of war in order to unify the nation. One of the causes of war, as described by Lincoln, was that "slave constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that interest was the object of the war." At this point in United States history the young nation was divided in half by those who opposed slavery and those who agreed with slavery. Lincoln brings forth a larger and more profound meaning to the war that it is more of a holy war of God's ultimate judgment. During this war the divided nation is praying for their own intentions and reading the same bible "yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil
Abraham Lincoln spent long hours in the White House telegraph office communicating with military and state leaders. To convey his strategy to insure clarity and alignment throughout the Civil War (Kuhla, 2014).
Throughout history there have been many debates in regards to the qualifications required for an individual to be considered a strong and efficient leader. In discussion of Abraham Lincoln, one controversial issue that he and his fellow countrymen experienced was the separation of the Union into two opposing branches, which are the Confederacy and the Union. However, even with the issue of a Civil War right in his backyard no one has come close to the level of leadership that was demonstrated by Abraham Lincoln during his presidential terms. Abraham Lincoln exemplified his leadership qualities by expressing concern for his soldiers, maintaining integrity throughout his terms, and his courage in keeping the Union together
Based on both of the readings, Abraham Lincoln has the more persuasive argument. He starts off by stating that the writing itself is very broad and therefore does not limit the Declaration to any one group of people, but rather everyone in the country as a whole. Even though Thomas Jefferson was for state independence, Douglas’ argument is not very concrete in the fact that allowing for states to choose whether or not they should be a slave or free state would start a war that Abraham Lincoln wanted to start.
Abraham Lincoln had an interesting childhood, law career, and political life which led him to being elected President during the Civil War but sadly he was assassinated. He was the 16th president. He is remembered as a great American president mostly because of the impact he made on the nation. His is an interesting story from starting slow to achieving the highest position in all of America; sadly he was killed off at a time when his country needed him most to complete the great task remaining before the nation. Abraham Lincoln’s personality and his position as the savior of the Union and destroying slavery created a legacy which has endured to this day. Abraham Lincoln’s view that the idea of being a unified nation was worth saving embodied