Lies My Teacher Told Me, by James W. Loewen, explores the failings of the traditional American historical education. It addresses the portions of history most textbooks willfully ignore, the overly optimistic and nationalistic narrative these selected events tell, and the unfortunate results of these inadequacies. For a subject, which encompasses every interesting event that has ever occurred, to be considered boring by the average student, something must be terribly wrong. Particular points of interest Loewen covers are the process by which historical figures are made uninteresting, the complicated and often unmentioned aspects of the European discovery of the Americas, the downplay of the importance of ideas and beliefs, and the glorification …show more content…
of the federal government. The first chapter specifically addresses the “heroification” of historical figures. This is the process through which events and facts are specifically left out of textbooks with the goal of spreading a narrative.
More often than not, the narrative is one of extreme positivity, removing controversial facts about otherwise complicated individuals and making them seem to be heroes. This process is one of the reasons students perceive history as a boring subject. Reading about an infallible subject is entirely uninteresting, while a realistic subject, complete with both flaws and strengths, is much more likely to hold a reader’s attention. An example Loewen uses to illustrate this is Helen Keller. A traditional history textbook glosses over the nuances of her life, describing her more as a miracle than a person. While her accomplishments as a blind and deaf woman are amazing, they are not the only things she ever did. She was, in fact, a controversial political figure. If a standard American history textbook was the only source of information, her radical socialist beliefs and support of the Soviet Union would be entirely unknown. At the time, the revelation of her economic beliefs was scandalous. At the height of her fame, the public’s opinion of Keller as a role model was reversed. Yet, this is rarely, if at …show more content…
all, mentioned in American history textbooks. The exclusion of socialist politics also ties into the underlying nationalist messages of most American history textbooks. The aspects of historical role models that don’t fit the nationalist model are often almost entirely excluded. One example of this is President Woodrow Wilson’s racism. According to the average textbook, a president of the United States should be presented as a paragon of virtue. His shortcomings are ignored because they conflict with the story the textbooks try to tell. In reality, his policies were blatantly supportive of white supremacist groups such as the Klu Klux Klan, and the landslide presidential victory of Warren G. Harding was justified in a multitude of ways that many textbooks leave unexplained. The second chapter shifts the focus to a very specific case, and perhaps the worst offender, of the ideas discussed in the first chapter, Christopher Columbus. He may be the single most undeservingly heroicized person in all of history. He is often presented as the man who singlehandedly discovered the Americas, however, numerous other explorers had arrived previously, and the native inhabitants had already lived there for centuries. His motives are also commonly misrepresented. Rather than out of a sense of curiosity about the world, or as an attempt to find alternative routes to trade spices, his primary goals were to help maintain the Spanish technological monopoly and to gain glory for himself. It would seem, if history textbooks are to be trusted, that Columbus succeeded in attaining his personal glory to a degree far beyond anything he could have imagined. However, in reality, he died poor and unknown, only able to take credit for the disastrous consequences of introducing foreign diseases to the native population of the Americas. History textbooks likely report inaccurately on his life for both of the reasons discussed in the prior chapter. His failures and motives are do not easily coexist with a narrative of overwhelming positivity, so they are replaced, and, due to his incredible potential to be considered an American hero, his negative impact is ignored. The sixth chapter addresses the fact that history textbooks put little to no weight behind the value of beliefs and ideas.
Loewen suggests that the American educational system gives a disproportionate amount of importance to individual people and specific dates, compared to the ideas and beliefs that motivated these people. This is made particularly worse by the large percentage of American history in which ideas and beliefs played a large and important role. For example, any American history student who payed an ounce of attention in their class could list george Washington, Paul Revere, and 1776 when asked about the American Revolution, but very few are likely to explain it as an ideological war between traditional British monarchy and democracy. As important as it is to know the names and dates, George Washington did not singlehandedly win the war, the American people, motivated by their belief that British rule had to end, won the war. Another example of this is John Brown. Textbooks frequently discuss what his actions were, but, instead of providing examples of his writings or quotes, they often simply label him a madman or a religious fanatic. Brown was aware of his actions, and he had his reasons for doing so, yet these are rarely explored in a textbook. Without understanding the reasons behind the actions of important historical figures, the actions lose all significance and become an uninteresting fact to be memorized, rather than the, otherwise interesting,
potential mental debate over whether it was right or wrong. The eighth chapter concerns textbook’s focus on the federal government rather than other important events and people. This is due to a combination of the heroification of presidents who accomplished little, or even had a negative impact, and the textbook’s ingrained nationalism. Traditional textbooks glorify the government, ignoring many of its darker sides. Whether it is foreign policy designed to benefit the country at the cost of harming other countries and causing internal corruption, or massive corporations using their influence to manipulate the law, the textbooks almost unanimously ignore the flaws of the government in favor of insignificant programs such as the peace corps, which, despite painting a happy picture for the students, accomplished a comparatively small amount. In fact most textbooks go as far as to leave out incredibly controversial events, including governmentally sponsored assassinations, rigged elections, and crippling entire governments. These events could qualify as terrorist acts, so, in order to spread their nationalist message, history textbooks are obligated to leave them out.
Howard goes on to share that the story needs to be told from the standpoint of people from the war that’s not told in schoolbooks, “But to tell the story of the American Revolution, not from the standpoint of the schoolbooks, but from the standpoint of war as a complex
Our history books continue to present our country's story in conventional patriotic terms. America being settled by courageous, white colonists who tamed a wilderness and the savages in it. With very few exceptions our society depicts these people who actually first discovered America and without whose help the colonists would not have survived, as immoral, despicable savages who needed to be removed by killing and shipping out of the country into slavery. In her book, The Name of War: King Philip's War and the Origins of American Identity, Jill Lepore tells us there was another side to the story of King Philip’s War. She goes beyond the actual effects of the war to discuss how language, literacy, and privilege have had lasting effects on the legacy that followed it.
The key concepts that are needed to understand the material in this article are the American Revolution and the relationship between the north and the south in the American Revolution. During his article, he provides some sentences summarized to explain, which helps me to understand some of the materials. Even though he gives me a simple brief, it’s not enough to explain other historical events that are mentioned in this article. I had to look some people and events. In order to understand the material of the article, I’m expected to have the knowledge of political events, relationships, parties, and people. I needed to know about, for instance, what Constitutional Convention was and who Charles Pinckney was, and what he did in order to understand what the author wanted to say.
...s of the Americas, what was their life like, and how did it change when Columbus arrived ,’ wrote a student of mine in 1991. ‘However, back then everything was presented as if it were the full picture,’ she continued, ‘so I never thought to doubt that it was.’” Most students after high school, fail to analyze controversial issues in our society. What citizens know about our past is what they have learned in high school history courses.
Recognition of an excellent historian is by targeting down many key points of the topic. As Baylin’s argument is that the American Revolution is
The education of an author on their topic is the biggest contributor to their reliability; having enough prior knowledge and background information on a subject is crucial when providing a historical analysis. An author’s personal background is of great importance as well, because their personal heritage and beliefs may lead to bias and misrepresentation of information, which removes all credibility of them and/or their work as source. Partiality, favoritism, and/or prejudice towards a specific demographic can create a blurred line between what is fact and what is opinion, which in turn can allow for personal assessments to be presented as arguments and facts even though they have been influenced to a great extent by prior thoughts and opinions.
American History not as a mere nuisance, or an inferior being portrayed by racism but as an Honorable soldier whom endeavors to protect a country he loves despite discrimination received at home or abroad.
Tindall, George, and David Shi. America: A Narrative History. Ed. 9, Vol. 1. New York: WW. Norton & Company, 2013. 185,193. Print.
America is a nation that is often glorified in textbooks as a nation of freedom, yet history shows a different, more radical viewpoint. In Howard Zinn’s A People's History of the United States, we take a look at American history through a different lens, one that is not focused on glorifying our history, but giving us history through the eyes of the people. “This is a nation of inconsistencies”, as so eloquently put by Mary Elizabeth Lease highlights a nation of people who exploited and sought to keep down those who they saw as inferior, reminding us of more than just one view on a nation’s history, especially from people and a gender who have not had an easy ride. In some respects, we can attribute the founding of America and all its subsequent impacts to Christopher Columbus. Columbus, a hero in the United States, has his own holiday and we view him as the one who paved the way for America to be colonized.
Tindall, George B., and David E. Shi. America: A Narrative History. 7th ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc., 2007.
This book is written from a perspective foreign to most Americans. Historically, American students are taught from a single perspective, that being the American perspective. This approach to history (the single perspective) dehumanizes the enemy and glorifies the Americans. We tend to forget that those on the opposing side are also human.
Loewen, James W. Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong. New York: Touchstone, 2007.
After reading “The Betrayal of History”, I realized that a lot of things that I was taught as a kid about the history of the U.S. was manipulated. This article talked in earnest about how the history of this great country has been reduced, exaggerated and transformed to suit certain interest groups. It amazes me that the publishing companies are only interested in making money rather than print true historical happenings
Newman, John. UNITED STATES HISTORYPreparing for the Advanced Placement Examination. Second Edition. New York: AMSCO SCHOOL PUBLICATIONS, INC, 2010. eBook. .
As the first chapter in this long analytical book, chapter one serves as the foundation for the rest of the novel, with a basic premise that “history textbooks make fool out of the students.” It shows how portrayal of historical figures and events in the best light for the reputation of United States leads to biased and distorted historical education.