Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
War and post traumatic stress disorder
Physical effects of war on soldiers
Impact of ptsd on veterans of the iraq & afghanistan wars
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: War and post traumatic stress disorder
“The Sniper” by Liam O’Flaherty is a short story that tells the story of a man who is a sniper during the Irish Civil War. O’Flaherty uses “The Sniper” to show the harsh reality of a war as it relates to the physical dangers and the psychological consequences affecting the sniper. Some of the physical dangers of war in this short story include, people starving, informers risking their lives to do their job, and soldiers taking the risk of being shot. Some of the psychological consequences are PTSD, depression, attempting and/or committing suicide, families turning against each other, and the trauma from being shot or shot at could leave someone permanently scarred. “The Sniper” is set during the Irish Civil war between June 1922 and May 1923. …show more content…
The Sniper is positioned on a roof near the O’Connell Bridge; this alone is a physical danger because, he could potentially fall off the roof. O’Flaherty makes a point to include that the sniper had not been able to eat since morning. In the third paragraph, the narrator says, “He was eating a sandwich hungrily. He had eaten nothing since morning.” (O’Flaherty 7). By saying this, the author makes it known that when fighting a war there is not always time to eat and properly nourish their bodies. Another danger is the job of the informer. “She was pointing to the roof where the sniper lay. An informer… The woman’s corpse lay still in the gutter.” (O’Flaherty 8). The woman had to have known when she became an informer that there was a chance she would die. Soldiers took the risk of being shot. “’I’m hit,’ he muttered.” (O’Flaherty 8). When getting involved in a war one of the most obvious physical dangers is being shot; which the sniper was. When he was shot he had to fix himself up as soon as it happened because, now he ran the risk of getting an infection. There are many more dangers that are physical, but many people forget about the psychological consequences of war. Some of the most common psychological consequences of war are PTSD, depression, aggression, etc.
“The lust for battle died in him. He became bitten by remorse.” (O’Flaherty 9). Some people go into war without having prepared themselves mentally, emotionally, and psychologically. Even with preparation, people can still feel the things listed above. Families do not always choose the same sides of war. “Then the sniper turned over the dead body and looked into his brother’s eyes.” (O’Flaherty 10). The “lust for battle” already died within the sniper and now he has to live with the fact that he killed his brother. When people choose sides, they do not always realize exactly what that means. The sniper will most likely have some psychological effects because of that. The trauma of being shot or shot at can leave someone permanently scarred. “’I’m hit,’ he muttered.” (O’Flaherty 8). When people are shot, everyone seems to focus on the healing, physically, and the PT (Physical Therapy). However, another side effect of being shot is PTSD, which can be caused by a traumatic event. In conclusion, O’Flaherty included a number of both psychological and physical risks in “The Sniper”. By doing so, he informed readers of just how bad war can get. The ending of the short story can teach readers to consider what they could be risking before fighting for a cause and decide whether it is worth
it.
In “The Sniper” the conflict is man vs man, which means main character is tasked with killing his enemy, but it proves to be quite a challenge. Even though there were many challenges the sniper followed through with his job and persevered even after he was shot in the arm. Wanting to kill his enemy, stay alive, and be one step closer to ending the war was his main goals. Being brave, he took off his hat, placed it on his gun, and raised it above the edge of the roof. Instantly the enemy shot at it and the sniper, pretending to be dead, waited until the enemy got up for him to shoot him. He did some quick thinking and, with determination, handled the conflict quite well.
In the story, “The Sniper”, The sniper showed that he was an intelligent soldier. In the beginning, after Being shot by the enemy sniper the sniper took care of his wound and was able to compose himself and think of a plan. Thinking he had won the battle after the snipers successful decoy the enemy sniper dropped his guard and the second he did the sniper
In Liam O'Flaherty's "The Sniper," all of these. are brought to an acute reality in a single war-torn city. Strong cerebral convictions and opposing philosophies, due to which people want to destroy the seemingly “wrong” plague this world and are the ones who are the ones who are the main reason for the plight. To aid in his creation of such emotional conflict, turmoil and plight, the author has portrayed the sniper as a very controversial character in the story. This story is oriented around one character in the Civil War which he should not even be in as he is. mentioned to be a “student” in the story.
Murder is a reprobate action that is an inevitable part of war. It forces humans into immoral acts, which can manifest in the forms such as shooting or close combat. The life of a soldier is ultimately decided from the killer, whether or not he follows through with his actions. In the short stories The Sniper by Liam O'Flaherty and Just Lather, That's All by Hernando Téllez, the killer must decide the fate of their victims under circumstantial constraints. The two story explore the difference between killing at a close proximity compared to killing at a distance, and how they affect the killer's final decision.
Liam O’Flaherty’s realistic fiction story, “The Sniper,” takes place in Dublin, Ireland, where there is a civil war waging between Republicans and Free Staters. The Republican sniper, who is the main character in the story, is fighting in the civil war for the Republican organization. There are numerous amounts of people who are attempting to assassinate the sniper because of his organization, and his enemies are located all around him waiting patiently until they gain their chance. The Republican sniper, however, leaps before he looks most times, thus leading to severe consequences throughout the story. By using description and suspense, O’Flaherty creates the lesson that actions, without thought, will lead to consequences.
As we saw earlier, both authors of both stories were born in different places and did many things. “The Sniper” sets in Dublin, Ireland, during a time of a bitter civil war. It was a war between the Republicans, which wanted Ireland to become ...
The main character of “The Sniper” is the republican sniper and the main character of the “Cranes” is Songsam. In “The Sniper”, the sniper is in a war and he is trying to kill his enemy. At the beginning of the story, he is on a rooftop near O’Connell Bridge lay watching. Beside him lay his rifle and over his shoulders was slung pair of field glasses. He looked like he was a student. He was self disciplined but was extremely devoted towards the war. He was eating a sandwich because he eaten nothing since morning. He is going to smoke but he paused and thought whether he should or shouldn’t but he did. In the “Cranes”, Korean War is going on. During this war, many villages along the thirty-eighth parallel changed hands several times.
The basic plot of the story is based during an evening within the Irish civil wars. It tells of a republican sniper sitting on a rooftop and neutralising enemy units as the cross a bridge. When a free-states sniper shows himself on an opposite roof they wage a fierce and innovative war to see who would end up the better. Eventually the republican sniper gains the upper hand and after taking a bullet in the arm destroys the worthy opponent. After a curious inspection to the identity of the enemy sniper he finds himself looking into the eyes of his dead brother.
The Frontline video titled, “A Soldier’s Heart” describes what life is like as a soldier with mental illness. In the video you take a look at multiple lives that were affected by the negative conditions that derive from being enlisted in the war. The video begins by taking a look at the life of Rob Sarra, an Iraq War veteran. He described how an event that took place during the war, affected his life dramatically. Before going into combat one day, his unit was warned that there were suicide bombers in the area, and to be on the lookout for them. So when a woman appeared, walking with a bag under her arm, his initial reaction was to either kill her or be killed. She continued to walk toward a vehicle of soldiers, after they ordered her to stop. Rob then continued to aim his gun and take the shot. After he took the shot, the Marine’s near by continued to unload their weapons on the woman also. However, when all was said and done he came to the realization that what she was holding was not a bomb, but a white flag. Instantly, he was surrounded by guilt and shame because he was the reason for the death of a civilian. Rob decided
O’Brien’s unique verisimilitude writing style fills the novel with deep meaning and emotion. Analyzing the novel through a psychological lens only adds to its allure. Understanding why characters act the way they do helps bring this novel to life. The reader begins to empathize with the characters. Every day, the soldiers’ lives hang in the balance. How these soldiers react to life-threatening situations will inspire the reader. Life has an expiration date. Reading about people who are held captive by their minds and who die in the name of war, will inspire the reader to live everyday as if they are currently in the
The mood of the story is dark and weary. In this scene the sky is gloomy and there are Republican and Free Starter soldiers fighting in the Irish Civil war, “The long June twilight faded into the night. Dublin lay enveloped in darkness but for the dim light of the moon that shone through the fleecy clouds.. machine guns and rifles broke the silence of the night, spasmodically” (O’Flaherty 1). Although the mood of the story is creepy and dim for the most part, it is silent with the sudden sounds of guns firing. As the story progresses, the sniper’s emotions begin reflecting on his actions. He begins to feel guilt and remorse for killing someone and the mood shifts to tension and violence.
Birdy, who is a new soldier, fears that he will end up dead during the war. He said,“Then I realized that it was the noise, the constant booming, that just filled my guts with a trembling sensation. I knew if I heard the boom I was safe because whatever had exploded hadn't hit me. But it was the idea that at any moment it could be all over, that I could be dead or lie in the sand twisting in agony, that filled me with a terror that I hadn't known before. Terror. It wasn't just being scared. It was a feeling that was taking me over. I knew it but I hoped no one else saw it,” (Myers 71). This description of Birdy's fear develops the idea that in Iraq, surviving emotionally during the war is important to be alive. Walter Dean Myers wants the reader
Wars affect everyone in some way, especially soldiers who fight in them, like those in Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried. O 'Brien concentrates a lot on the psychological trauma that solders, like himself, confronted before, during, and after the Vietnam War. He also focuses on how they coped with the brutality of war. Some were traumatized to the point where they converted back to primitive instinct. Others were traumatized past the breaking point to where they contemplated suicide and did not fit in. Finally, some soldiers coped through art and ritual.
Like "The Lives of the Dead," it begins with a statement that the rest of the chapter throws into question. "The War wasn 't all terror and violence," the narrator tells us, "Sometimes things could almost get sweet" (31). What follows, however, is a series of vignettes that are anything but "sweet." When a Vietnamese boy with a plastic leg approaches an American soldier with a chocolate bar, the soldier reflects, "One leg, for Chrissake. Some poor fucker ran out of ammo" (31). When the same soldier steals his friend 's puppy, "strapped it to a Claymore antipersonnel mine and squeezed the firing device," he responds with an ironic affirmation of the initiation right of the conventional war story: "What 's everyone so upset about? ... I mean, Christ, I 'm just a boy" (37). Here, the novel renders ironic both the loss of innocence and the "reconsideration" that structure the traditional war story. The positive spin that underlies the war story as a genre emerges here only as a bankrupt fantasy. Thus in "How to Tell a True War Story," the narrator warns, "If a story seems moral, do not believe it. If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted, or if you feel that some small bit of rectitude has been salvaged from the larger waste, then you have been made the victim of a very old and terrible lie" (68). Aimed
Many individuals look at soldiers for hope and therefore, add load to them. Those that cannot rationally overcome these difficulties may create Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Tragically, some resort to suicide to get away from their insecurities. Troops, notwithstanding, are not by any means the only ones influenced by wars; relatives likewise encounter mental hardships when their friends and family are sent to war. Timothy Findley precisely depicts the critical impact wars have on people in his novel by showing how after-war characters are not what they were at the beginning.