Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lesotho Highlands Water Project disadvantages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lesotho Highlands Water Project disadvantages
The World Bank has had many projects fail, almost becoming known for them in continents like Africa. These projects almost always negatively affect those that live near them, causing many to be forced out of their homes, to make room for the project's construction. These projects essentially make people give up what little they have, for something that will most likely never benefit them. Most if not all of these projects cost millions, or billions of dollars to complete. When or if they fail, these projects can cause chaos in the country, such as destroying its economy, and leaving it's citizens homeless. One of the largest billion dollar failures was called the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP). Costing around four billion dollars …show more content…
Meaning that LHWP, could have an even larger impact on Lesotho then it would have on any other country. Lesotho is also considered one of the poorest countries in the world, as most of its citizens lived off of $550 a year. Most of Lesotho's people relied on their land, for food, and resources to make and repair shelters. They would also sell wood, to gain what little money they had. During the Lesotho Highland Project's construction, almost 27,000 people were deprived of their land in order to make room or free up resources for the project. These citizens that were affected by LHWP were promised compensation for all that they had lost. To this day, most if not all of the citizens affected has never received the full compensation that was promised, because of this some groups have attempted to sue LHWP in the hopes of getting the rest of the money. Those citizens weren't the only ones affected by LHWP, Lesotho's environment also began to change. Flooding became more common, and rainfalls were so strong that crops were almost completely destroyed. Those that raise livestock were probably affected the worst out of all. Because LHWP required so much land and resources, farmers had less land to use to raise livestock, which lead many animals to die of starvation. Farmers also had little to no land to shelter animals during the winter months, leading to many of the younger livestock to die. Many types of vegetation were also almost wiped out, such as trees, plants used for medicine, and
“Clearing a rain forest to plant annuals is like stripping an animal first of its fur, then its skin. The land howls. Annual crops fly on a wing and a prayer. And even if you manage to get a harvest, why, you need roads to take it out! Take one trip overland here and you'll know forever that a road in the jungle is a sweet, flat, impossible dream. The soil falls apart. The earth melts into red gashes like the mouths of whales. Fungi and vines throw a blanket over the face of the dead land. It's simple, really. Central Africa is a rowdy society of flora and fauna that have managed to balance together on a trembling geologic plate for ten million years: when you clear off part of the plate, the whole slides into ruin… To be here without doing everything wrong requires a new agriculture, a new sort of planning, a new religion” (524-525).
The impact of the Structural Adjustment Programs imposed by International Financial Intuitions (IFIs) such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund on the developing countries of Africa has led to the destruction of Africa’s social sectors and has handicapped Africa in its fight with poverty, the AIDS pandemic, and keeping children in school.
Since there was hardly any usable land or animals and families had no money, food supplies were becoming limited. There was very little food being produced from the remaining animals because they could not get enough to eat to stay healthy. There also were no crops that could be harvested and eaten.
It was created with the idea that it would help end hunger for people in the poorer countries. Actually, it does the opposite as Hardin points out, “If poor countries received no food from the outside, the rate of their population would be periodically checked by crop failures and famines. But if the poor can always draw on a world food bank in time of need, their population can continue to grow unchecked, and so will their ‘need’ for aid.” (588). The problem begins then with more people needing help and taking from the foodbank without replenishing it the supply. Hardin states that, “People will have more motivation to draw from it than to add to any common store. The less provident and less able will multiply at the expense of the abler and more provident, bring eventual ruin upon all who share in the commons.”
The population that is primarily effected by the poverty are mostly the underdevelopment nations. Huge population in the nation depends on the agriculture for wealth and even with the support of the developed country, a natural disaster still can cause the entire nation to have a tremendous hardship. Because the lack of the health care, most of the destitute family have a higher mortality rate and need more children to carry on the responsibility. The poverty will also cause the lack of education within the children, because they simply need to work for their family’s food. If we continue this bad loop, the situation will only become worse and effect not only the underdeveloped nations but also all around the
In 2009, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization publicized that over one billion people globally suffered from hunger (Banerjee and Duflo 19) and economists estimate that at least one billion people live off of less than one U.S. dollar a day (Ovaska 1). With these facts present, recent scholarly debate has risen over recent years over whether foreign aid successfully works toward the removal of poverty. Two opposing viewpoints have arisen. Economists and philanthropists similar to Jeffery Sachs believe that a poverty trap confines countries with lower GDP per capita and higher rates of populations living beneath the poverty line which calls for the assistance of outside aid in order to free populations from perpetual poverty. Such economists promote foreign aid with the belief that the proper amount of foreign aid such as the implementation of schools, freshwater wells and subsidized food costs can free those stricken with poverty. However, many other economists such as Dambisa Moyo believe that foreign aid merely disrupts local economies causing more harm than benefit to developing nations. Since the 1970s, the real per capita income of Africa has dropped (Moyo 5) and similar drops have occurred in other developing nations worldwide. Foreign aid focused on reaching the specific needs of an individual more affectively fights poverty than aid projects aimed at large-scale economic progress.
Angola is one of those countries that is full of such examples. It is also full of contradictions and inefficiencies that dictate that more than often these interventions are only temporary on not fully abided by.
Although the economy of Ethiopia has grown a lot, hunger and poverty still remains prevalent. Many of the people have no supply of clean water, education, or healthcare. Organizations like UNICEF, Tropical Health and Education Trust (THET), Medecins San Frontieres (MSF), and other organizations have been a great help to this country. With donations and medical assistance from these organizations Ethiopia can make its way out of being a third world country.
If they make wrong choices, such as building a factroy in a place that doesn't have 24/7 electrical power guaranteed, they are an impediment to the country's development.
The gap between developed and underdeveloped is evident in today’s world. In naïve effort to bridge this gap a host of aid projects and development schemes are plotted onto less developed countries. But what is development really? James Ferguson attempts to explore this concept in his book “The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho”. The book is an extension of Ferguson’s PhD dissertation and was published in 1990 by Cambridge University Press. The book is interesting in that it seeks to give the reader a critical understanding and insight of the actual processes that take place when development projects are implemented. Using the small African country of Lesotho as his setting, Ferguson’s book is centre around the Thaba-Tseka Development Project. This book is likely interest a variety of audience, namely anthropologists, sociologists, economists, development practitioners or any lay person interested in the field of development.
This may be due to nations which refuse to open their doors to world trade, growing populations, and corrupt governments. Many of these countries also carry a high amount of debt and are unable to invest any earnings into infrastructure projects (education, health care, utilities, and roads), (Hill, 2013. p. 32). Highly indebted poorer countries (HIPCs) consist of about 40 countries such as Cambodia, Libya, Nigeria, Sudan, and Vietnam. Political movements in the past, to offer debt relief, have been fueled by celebrity profiles like Bono, the Dalai Lama, and Harvard economists Jeffrey Sachs. In 2000, the U. S. enacted legislation to provide debt relief of $435 million for HIPCs. If the money is invested wisely into infrastructure programs then these countries may have a better opportunity to reduce their levels of poverty. According to the WTO removing trade barriers and tariffs on agriculture may expand trading of agriculture. “The faster growth associated with expanded trade in agriculture could reduce the number of people living in poverty by as much as 13 percent by 2015, according to the WTO” (Hill. 2013. p. 32).
The United States should assist developing Countries through means, that are necessary to reduce poverty, to sustain their population, and to increase the GDP per Capital across the country. If we are hungry, or we are in need of a necessity, then we could just buy it. But, people in Central Africa's Republic or Burundi whose GDP per capita is less than one thousand dollars can't buy that necessity. So, we as a country who regards equality and justice among all very highly should help those in need. To help those who need it and those who deserve a chance that needs it. By helping them survive to the next day, by helping them gain wealth, by helping them move up the social and economic ladder, and by helping them help others who are in need.
At the height of the conflict, about one third of the country's people were displaced. The chronic financial crisis became severe and the economy was close to collapsing. Poverty has become deeper in the rural areas of the Congo where poor people are now powerless, vulnerable and isolated. This is a big contributor to the poverty Congo is experiencing today, because little has improved and won’t improve until these problems are fixed. Overall, Central Africa’s dependence on agriculture could improve the wellbeing of the people but a long history of corruption, violence, and prevalent transportation issues have hindered an improvement in the economy resulting in poverty in the region.
The majority of the continent of Africa has not been as economically progressive as the other continents in today’s world. However, over the past few years, it has been rapidly growing. Although there have been multiple countries in Africa that have reflected a strong growing economy, such as South Africa and Botswana, there are many other countries that are still corrupt and are still struggling to grow as a nation. There are many challenges that are facing Africa currently. Some of these major challenges being, corrupt governments, vicious cycles of aid, and poverty traps. However, among these challenges, there still lies to be great opportunities for Africa within their technology and business sectors.
Growth in Africa is not enough for its people to grow, which is leading to poverty and hunger in Africa. Today Africa is one of the leading countries having poverty and economic problems. One half of the Africans live below the poverty line which leads to low human development in Africa. The main cause of poverty in Africa is a problem in its economic system and environmental factors. Because of poverty people of Africa remain hungry as they don’t have enough money to buy their food and their basic needs. Some of the African countries have less poverty rate than others due to good government and economic system in those countries. Most of the African is facing challenges to survive and keep their family healthy.