Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of lenin in russia
Role of Lenin in Soviet revolution
Role of Lenin in Soviet revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of lenin in russia
Socialists were less determined and tenacious, leading to their lack of success in taking control over Russia. Furthermore, not only was Lenin an intelligent speaker who was able to gain supporters, but a steadfast and focused leader willing to make a change.
Lenin was also known for his strategic military, however, although it may have been important, it was not as effective as his central motivation nor his insistent leadership. Lenin led a strong military called The Reds. The reds were very technologically advanced and consisted a large number of soldiers. These examples show how Lenin's’ militarism aided in their success and the actual (physical) defeat of the whites in the war. However this was not as meaningful in terms of their success. If it were not for Vladimir Lenin’s guidance, control and ambition to help gain followers and guide them, nobody would have took
…show more content…
part in the revolution in the first place. There would be noo revolution without a leader. Before Lenin rose to power, Bolshevism was not as powerful and prominent as it was after Lenin came along, proving how much Bolshevism was impacted by Lenin. According to World History in context, “When V. I. Lenin and his comrades finally gave the order to overthrow the provisional government, they could rely on over 250,000 Red Guards, soldiers, and sailors to help them storm the Winter Palace” (World History in context, page #1). All in all, there were many components that granted the Bolsheviks success, however, the most significant reason was Lenin’s ruthless determination. Although many may think that Lenin’s militarism led the Bolsheviks to success, in reality, it was Lenin’s goals and ability to gain the citizens trust and approval that caused the Bolsheviks to succeed and gain domination.
Vladimir Lenin organized the communist party, and created a large party by using his wise words to convince citizens to join him and support him. This led to Lenin essentially overthrowing the Provisional Government and defeating the less organized and forceful Socialists. It was Lenin’s leadership that started Bolshevism in the first place, and although his tough military helped them physically win against the Socialists, if there were no ideas to start with a war would have never happened. This, however, is not the first time such bold authority has changed a society. Toussaint L'ouverture of Haiti similarly led his people to achieving a goal they had, freedom. Through hard work, dedication and leading his people to take a stand, Haiti became the first successful slave rebellion. Both countries were able to reach their goal through the help of a fanatical, determined
leader.
Trotsky played a key role in the Bolshevik party, encouraging revolution, which saw the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917. He built up a strong Red Army during the civil war, used to ensure the survival of the Bolshevik government and was seen by many as the most likely candidate to take over as leader after Lenin’s death, showing the significance he was held in by Russians. However, evidence suggests that after Lenin’s death he lost his a considerable amount of power, eventually being exiled from the Communist party. In the short-term it is clear that Trotsky had a huge significance in the development of Russia, shown clearly through both his letters and documents, and the opinions of those close to Trotsky. The significance is obvious through his role in the build up to the October Revolution, his negotiations with Germany through the Brest-Litovsk Treaty, his contribution to Bolshevik success in the civil war and his attitude towards terror and his failure to out maneuver Stalin to succeed Lenin.
The continuation of the violent anti-Jewish riots that had plagued the Russian Empire in post-Revolutionary Russia forced the response of prominent communist party leaders. Both Vladimir Lenin, leader of the Bolshevik party and head of the Soviet state, and Leon Trotsky, leader of the Bolshevik army, formulated responses that attempted to promote the ideas of communism through condemnation of the attacks. However, the content of these responses varies in a way that reflects both their differing backgrounds with communism, and reveals their distinct purposes in responding to anti-Jewish violence. A comparison of Lenin’s speech “On Anti-Jewish Pogroms” and Trotsky’s “A Word to the Ukrainian
...ho were unable to escape. Leninism had demonstrated that it was opposed to a representative government designed with the wants of the workers in mind.
The accumulation of these factors centred on Lenin's leadership helped stamp Bolshevik power across the Soviet Union. Lenin’s pragmatic leadership was the most considerable factor in helping to fortify Bolshevik power. His willingness to take power in October/November 1917 and the successes of the move, through his right-hand man, Trotsky, was critical as it helped give him unquestioned authority within the party despite members of the Central Committee i.e. Zinoviev and Kamenev suggested industrialisation needed to occur first. This highlighted Lenin’s communist ideology, which was essential to the Bolsheviks maintaining power. Following the failure of the Provisional Government, Lenin recognised that it was the Bolshevik’s priority to legitimise their government.
Isaac Murrin Mr. J. Pharion Freshman English 20 February 2013 The Similarities and Differences between Lenin and Stalin Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were similar in what they claimed to be, but in actuality they were very different people. Although Stalin claimed that he followed Leninism, the philosophy that Lenin developed from Marxism, he often distorted it to follow what he wanted to do. While Lenin wanted to make a unified society without classes, with production in the hands of the people, while Stalin wanted to make Russia into a modern industrial powerhouse by using the government to control production. Lenin accomplished his goals through violence, because he thought achieving the Communist revolution was worth using violence, with a ‘The ends justify the means’ mentality. Stalin also used violence to accomplish his goals, however Stalin used much more violence than was often necessary to accomplish his goals.
middle of paper ... ... They trained the Latvians, these troops effectively suppressed insurrections throughout Russia during 1918 and formed the early core of the newly established Red Army. As the Bolsheviks, commonly known as the Reds, were consolidating power. Lenin had opponents from multiple directions.
In 1905 , Russia had a prerevolution that was put down of the Czar. Instead of learning from this prerevolution, Czar Nicholas II, made a very big mistake by in not introducing some reforms to correct the problems. So because of his actions, the situation grew worse. In 1917, the Russians were fighting in World War I. A good majority of the Russian people were weary and uncontent with the way the war was going and with the Czar's rule. This uncontent along with economic hardships caused riots and demonstrations to break out. The Czar called for the army to put down the revolution as they did in 1905. But the army joined the revolt and the Czar was kicked out of power soon afterwards. A temporary government was set up to decide on what kind of government Russia was gonna set up. Two political parties were set up. The Bolsheviks were one of the two. The leader of the Bolshevik party was a man named Lenin. Lenin was a firm believer of the theories and ideas of Karl Marx. So with his slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land", Lenin gained the support of the peasants and gained control of Russia and setup a communist state.
Early in the nineteenth century rebellion against European authority broke out in Latin America. First, slaves on the island of Haiti revolted against their French masters. Led by former slave Toussaint L'Overture the Haitians defeated France making Haiti the...
Vladimir Lenin was the founder and first leader of the Soviet Union. He adopted a state that was in dire need of economic help and Lenin was in hopes of creating a better more social economy. Rebuilding the economy was a hardship for Lenin as effects of the revolution miscarried the economy into a downward spiral. During his time as leader he experienced reestablishing the economic policy twice both of which were due to the fact the union was recovering from war.
After the death of Lenin, his chief lieutenant Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin fought for control of the country. Stalin was able to win out over Trotsky and gain control of the Russian government. He felt that Lenin and Trotsky’s socialistic ideas were flawed in that they were to wait for other countries to revolt and become socialistic as well. Staling believed that a single country could make socialism .
The Black Jacobins is the story of the only successful slave revolt in history: The Haitian Revolution, led by Toussaint L’Overture. Self-emancipated slaves joined L’Overture’s revolutionary army and defeated three major empires of the eighteenth century: Spain, England and France. It was because of their determination; independence was obtained after ten solid years of struggle in 1804. Until this course, knowledge of the Haitian Revolution was unfamiliar for myself while there are plentiful tomes on other revolutions such as the French Revolution or the American Revolution. While this book highlights the fact that fundamental change comes from social revolution, the Haitian Revolution did not get the recognition it merits.
According to most historians, “history is told by the victors”, which would explain why most people equate communism with Vladimir Lenin. He was the backbone of Russia’s communist revolution, and the first leader of history’s largest communist government. It is not known, or discussed by most, that Lenin made many reforms to the original ideals possessed by many communists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He revised Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ theories to fit the so-called ‘backwardness’ of the Russian Empire. Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it was not for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization.
Russian Revolution Essay. Throughout history, there have been many revolutions between the population of a country and its government. People always wanted change, usually in the directions of freedom, peace and equality and in the lead up to the 1917 Russian revolution; there were a variety of social, political and economic situations that all played their part. In the years leading up to the revolution, Russia had been involved in a series of wars. The Crimean war, the Russo-Turkish war, the Russo-Japanese war and the First World War.
Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov better known as Lenin. Lenin was an important part in Soviet Union history . lenin had a determined goal , he wanted power . Lenin was so powerful , he took the practice communism and made it reality throughout Soviet plus other countries he had an influence on. Lenin believed that communism could solve the problems of society , because his brother was killed by a tsarist regime. He started as a politician and war general , he later became the leader of the Soviet Union. Before Lenin was the leader a man named Stalin Ruled Soviet . Lenin despised Stalin , Lenin then started to take control of the states he created.
Lenin's Economic Policies in 1924 When the Bolsheviks seized power in October 1917 they inherited many of the problems faced by the old Tsarist regime as well as those of the Provisional Government after the Tsars abdication. Lenin, as leader of the Bolsheviks took many measures to try and solve these problems, each with varying degrees of success. This essay will, therefore, go on to look at and discuss the various measures that Lenin and the Bolshevik party took, and, whether these measures created more problems for Russia in the end or in fact made significant progress towards the communist society that Lenin had prophesised for Russia. In the early days of Bolshevik rule, there were many problems facing Lenin.