Lenin Research Paper

434 Words1 Page

Socialists were less determined and tenacious, leading to their lack of success in taking control over Russia. Furthermore, not only was Lenin an intelligent speaker who was able to gain supporters, but a steadfast and focused leader willing to make a change.
Lenin was also known for his strategic military, however, although it may have been important, it was not as effective as his central motivation nor his insistent leadership. Lenin led a strong military called The Reds. The reds were very technologically advanced and consisted a large number of soldiers. These examples show how Lenin's’ militarism aided in their success and the actual (physical) defeat of the whites in the war. However this was not as meaningful in terms of their success. If it were not for Vladimir Lenin’s guidance, control and ambition to help gain followers and guide them, nobody would have took …show more content…

Vladimir Lenin organized the communist party, and created a large party by using his wise words to convince citizens to join him and support him. This led to Lenin essentially overthrowing the Provisional Government and defeating the less organized and forceful Socialists. It was Lenin’s leadership that started Bolshevism in the first place, and although his tough military helped them physically win against the Socialists, if there were no ideas to start with a war would have never happened. This, however, is not the first time such bold authority has changed a society. Toussaint L'ouverture of Haiti similarly led his people to achieving a goal they had, freedom. Through hard work, dedication and leading his people to take a stand, Haiti became the first successful slave rebellion. Both countries were able to reach their goal through the help of a fanatical, determined

Open Document