Legal Matters: The Criminal Case Of Cannibalism

257 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of cannibals

2.2.2 Legal matters
The legislature in the United States nor Europe introduces a law against cannibalism. However, the consumption of human flesh violates primary laws as murder or desecration of corpses (Legal Information Institute, n.d.). Considering the criminal case of the cannibal of Rotenburg as an example on how the justice sentenced his act of cannibalism. The then 40 year old was charged with murder in the act of cannibalism. In 2001, Armin Meiwes placed an advertisement in the internet, which requested a man who was willing to get eaten. Bernd Brandes, an engineer, replied to the cannibal’s ad. Shortly afterwards the men met, Bernd took in sleeping tablets and alcohol to endure the coming agonies. Meiwes killed his victim, then chopped

Show More
Related

  • The Omnivore's Dilemma Book Report

    644 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many families in America can’t decide what food chain to eat from. In the book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan lists four food chains: Industrial, Industrial Organic, Local Sustainable, and Hunter-Gatherer. The Industrial food chain is full of large farms that use chemicals and factories. Industrial Organic is close to it except it doesn’t use as many chemicals and the animals have more space. Local Sustainable is where food is grown without chemicals, the animals have freedom and they eat what they were born to eat. Lastly, Hunter-Gatherer is where you hunt and grow your own food. The omnivore's dilemma is trying to figure out what food chain to eat from. Local Sustainable is the best food chain to feed the United States because it is healthy and good for the environment.

    Read More

  • Beth A Conklin's Consuming Grief: Cannibalism in an Amazonian Society

    1208 Words  | 3 Pages

    Every society has it’s own cultural traditions and norms. Many of the traditions are passed down from generation to generation for so long that they become the norms of the culture. The Wari’ are no different than anyone else in that their traditions become cultural norms. In Consuming Grief: Compassionate Cannibalism in an Amazonian Society, Beth A. Conklin travels to the Wari’ people in order to study illness and death from both before and after they had foreign contact. While there she finds herself going into depth on the lifestyle of the Wari’ people and how their norm of cannibalism came about and how it was phased out by the outside world.

    Read More

  • Execution by Hunger

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    Execution by Hunger Miron Dolot. Execution By Hunger: New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc., 1985 Miron Dolot’s book, EXECUTION BY HUNGER, is a detailed account as seen through the eyes of a true survivor during the reign of Stalin and the Soviet Union between 1929-1933. In his accounts, he portrays atrocities against human civilization while documenting his real life experiences and those of his fellow Ukrainian village farmers. He portrays them as victims of their own time period.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Des Cannibals

    1538 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the events preceding the selected passage of Des Cannibales, Montaigne gives several situations of events in which man’s honour has been tested and proven, citing the example of the Hungarian’s merciful attitude towards their captured enemies, whom they released unharmed after having defeated them in battle. The classical reference to Seneca with the quote, “Si succiderit, de genu pugnat” foreshadows the passage in question, in which the captured Brazilians refuse to surrender or feel fear, but rather taunt their captors and remain defiant until their last breath. The passage then develops into an observation of the polygamous culture of the New World, which Montaigne praises and later goes onto defend as natural, arguing that it was customary in Biblical times and therefore should not be condemned by supposedly superior and cultured Europeans.

    Read More

  • The Carnivores Dilemma, by Nicolette Hahn Niman

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    Millions of animals are consumed everyday; humans are creating a mass animal holocaust, but is this animal holocaust changing the climate? In the essay “ The Carnivores Dilemma,” written by Nicolette Hahn Niman, a lawyer and livestock rancher, asserts that food production, most importantly beef production, is a global contributor to climate change. Nicolette Niman has reports by United Nations and the University of Chicago and the reports “condemn meat-eating,” and the reports also say that beef production is closely related to global warming. Niman highlights, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxides are the leading greenhouses gases involved in increasing global warming. A vast majority of people across the world consumes meat and very little people are vegetarian, or the people that don’t eat meat, but are there connections between people and meat production industry when it comes to eating food and the effect it has on the climate? The greenhouse gases, methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxides are not only to blame, but we should be looking at people and industrialized farming for the leading cause of greenhouse gases in agriculture and the arm-twisting dilemma we have been lured into, which is meat production itself.

    Read More

  • Sociological Analysis Of Cannibal Tours

    684 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Sociology film “Cannibal Tours,” depicts a group of tourists visiting villages or places cut off from the rest of the synchronized world, at which native people live. The main reason they are trying to reach that kind of locations is that they finally want to see with their own eyes, all those things they read and saw in movies. At this particular film, wealthy tourists visit Sepia River, in the jungles of Papa New Guinea, near which inbred cannibal people live. We can clearly see two different perspectives of what the visitors think of the life the indigenous populations are having and on the other hand what the aboriginal peoples think of the modern people and their lives.

    Read More

  • Filial Cannibalism Essay

    1533 Words  | 4 Pages

    Filial cannibalism is a biological phenomenon where an adult or a parent of a species attacks and consumes all or some of its offspring. This behaviour is quite common among fish species, the family poeciliidae in particular. Filial cannibalism in poeciliids is very well documented due to their commercial popularity as aquaria fish. Poeciliids are live-bearers and engage in partial clutch cannibalism where the parents only cannibalise on some of their offspring (Manica 2002). Scientists do not fully understand as to why this behaviour exists as it is seemingly disadvantageous since the act decreases their reproductive success and ability to pass on their genes. Yet, if the behaviour was to the detriment of the poeciliids the trait would not have been favoured, evolutionarily speaking. Filial cannibalism is so widespread among poeciliids, which means that there must be benefits to this behaviour. However, does this behaviour only benefit those in captivity or is it as prominent in wild poeciliids?

    Read More

  • On the Cannibals by Michel de Montaigne

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...er” becomes the Barbarians. If the strangers were the Cannibals, then the status quo of the French society is preserved and the cannibalistic behaviors of the foreigners become unconventional. This is assuming the belief that the Europeans are the norm. By identifying the “self” and the “other”, he first sets the differences between the two and then blurs them to state that the universal human posses characteristics of both societies and that one is not necessarily more civilized than the other. As the essay progresses, the coming together of the Barbarian and the European suggests that the Cannibals are closer to the operations of Nature but will eventually progress toward the same society structure as the one present in Europe. He therefore addresses the universal human by examining both societies but not offering an absolute standard for which is more barbaric.

    Read More

  • Cannibalism: A Study of Culture and Morality

    1828 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind” (Genesis 9: 5-7). If God created man in his image, what does eating a fellow human being suggest? We would certainly agree that it is wrong to eat the image of God. Unlike vices like murder or lying, cannibalism is hard to justify even when you’re deserted on an island with a few others with no food in sight. However, to believe that cannibalism is wrong or unnatural in every case might make us ignorant of what it can tell us about the breadth of human culture or about the balance between revenge and justice. Either way, our stance on cannibalism depends on our understanding of what it represents and the role it plays, as reflected

    Read More

  • The Sexual Politics Of Meat

    883 Words  | 2 Pages

    Research of feminist-veganism is the oldest of such research, and was mainly begun by writer and women’s rights scholar Carol J. Adams in 1989 when she published the book The Sexual Politics of Meat. In this book, Adams (1990) argues for the connection between meat-eating and masculinity, claiming that consuming meat is usually associated with virility and only strengthens stereotypes placed upon any gender. Drawing upon historical research, she shows that this connection existed when men were the only people in power, as they always ate meat and excessive consumption of meat was considered to be a sign of wealth (Adams, 1990, p. 26). This history of sexism within meat consumption is still covert in the current state of society, as such attitudes have been ingrained and not widely addressed. Furthermore, Adams (2006) explains in a later interview her analysis of the abuse of the female reproductive system in farm animals, pointing out how female chickens and cows are the most abused and also arguing that the industry thrives and profits off of this abuse (p. 126).

    Read More

  • Euthanasia And The Law

    1843 Words  | 4 Pages

    request. It comes to be seen as practice for those whose "quality of life" is

    Read More

  • Why Eating Meat is Morally Impermissible

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is it morally permissible to eat meat? Much argument has arisen in the current society on whether it is morally permissible to eat meat. Many virtuous fruitarians and the other meat eating societies have been arguing about the ethics of eating meat (which results from killing animals). The important part of the dispute is based on the animal welfare, nutrition value from meat, convenience, and affordability of meat-based foods compared to vegetable-based foods and other factors like environmental moral code, culture, and religion. All these points are important in justifying whether humans are morally right when choosing to eat meat. This paper will argue that it is morally impermissible to eat meat by focusing on the treatment of animals, the environmental argument, animal rights, pain, morals, religion, and the law.

    Read More

  • Ethics and Morality in Vegetarianism

    1942 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that their treatment has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."(Schopenhauer). I always wondered why some people are not so drawn to the consumption of meat and fed up with only one thought about it. Why so many people loathe of blood, and why so few people can easily kill and be slaughter animal, until they just get used to it? This reaction should say something about the most important moments in the code, which was programmed in the human psyche. Realization the necessity of refraining from meat is especially difficult because people consume it for a long time, and in addition, there is a certain attitude to the meat as to the product that is useful, nourishing and even prestigious. On the other hand, the constant consumption of meat has made the vast majority of people completely emotionless towards it. However, there must be some real and strong reasons for refusal of consumption of meat and as I noticed they were always completely different. So, even though vegetarianism has evolved drastically over time, some of its current forms have come back full circle to resemble that of its roots, when vegetarianism was an ethical-philosophical choice, not merely a matter of personal health.

    Read More

  • Use of Cannibalism as Psychological Warfare

    1737 Words  | 4 Pages

    War demands innovation. The constant political corruption and tension between the Congolese Government and its people have forced both sides to resort to drastic measures. The threat of cannibalism is one of the ingenious war tactics that the people of the Congo have used during times of need. While killing someone with a gun, public executions, or torturing have not gotten the desired results, the Congolese viewed cannibalism as the new method for winning the war. During the Congo-Arab War, the Second Congo War, and the violence that still lives on today in the Congo, cannibalism has been a constant presence, but is used in war rather than in terms of survival or desire of human flesh. Though the act of cannibalism cannot make a dead human more dead, it is viewed as a means to kill the opponent’s spirit. The use of cannibalism for psychological warfare is intended to portray the Congolese soldiers as radical and predatory, though it is not part of their historical culture. Without the constant violence throughout the Congo’s history, cannibalism would never have been used by the Congolese as a psychological weapon against their enemies.

    Read More

  • Barbaric Law Case Study

    1212 Words  | 3 Pages

    Free will of mankind is a gift from God. Nowadays, it is difficult for us to distinguish what is right from wrong. Free will sometimes eradicates values. In our country, different crimes and unjustified acts of human beings because of excessive freedom destroys one another’s life. In the old days, the very popular barbaric law was “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” which it is a vengeful nature of compensating justice that a person who has injured another person is penalized to an equal or similar degree of damages the victim received. Everyone feared for their lives. Today, many people firmly believe that, it is against the law of God especially with the modern Christians and the moral standards of the society. Thus, laws are promulgated

    Read More

More about Legal Matters: The Criminal Case Of Cannibalism

Open Document