Matisse was born in the year 1869, in French Flanders, attended classes of art in Paris, and at age 22 he started his artistic career and painted life of the Parisian on paper and canvas.
Picasso was born in the year 1881, 12 years after Matisse in Malaga in Spain, he was from a painter father and in 1900 he set to Paris.
One can say that Matisse was the leader in the use of “brutal” colors, and had nearly decade of painting around the 1906 when Picasso was emerging with his Cubism idea. Matisse wanted to show his colors to sing, by using his sunlight kind colors he was painting “fauve” and wild beasts. In 1906 , Matisse experiments on his painting of his fauve “le Bonheur de vivre” or “the joy of life” .The painting depicts of reclining nudes, embracing lovers and carefree dancers, using flat colors and some figures were sensuously done as the nude one Ingres, but others were as the boldly Cézanne bathers. This was never been done by Matisse this type of painting and it was shown in the Salon des Independents in the 1906, it was not so comprehensible , but Matisse has been able to draw a harmony of unexpected elements in this painting. This fact has made Picasso take the challenge as
…show more content…
It was an over and over painting work, where he used primitive masks and African women postcards as models, taking as guide the drawing of Cezanne also like Matisse. The worked was framed and reframed as it was a sailor with five prostitute which ended with only a simple primitive and unimaginable new where the faces were reduced to crude masks and bodies to fragmented fetishes. The British art historian John Golding has writes in his catalogue about the two paintings of Matisse and Picasso saying that “if l Bonheur de vivre is one of the landmark in history, then les demoiselles ... Has changed it very
Pablo Picasso is certainly a genius who has left an indelible mark on his time. Consequently, many artists all over the world have had their own career influenced by his work. Among those artists can be listed Willem de Kooning, a Dutch American painter, and the Cameroonian artist Koko Komegne. For instance, both artists have had their early work, and later their career impacted by Picasso’s cubism. While de Kooning spent hours looking at each detail of Picasso’s paintings, Koko Komegne learnt to paint by reproducing the master’s artworks. Another thing both artists shared with Picasso through their career was the woman as subject matter. Unsurprisingly, de Kooning and Komegne have extensively painted the woman in their own career. Among all those pieces, Seated Woman, 1940, from Willem de Kooning and Toilette, 2006, from Koko Komegne are very similar; the characters on both pieces are ladies, and they have the same pose. However, although the two paintings are similar in term of descriptive subject matter, de Kooning and Komegne draw from their environment and their personal style to highlight their specificities.
Henri Matisse, the leader of the Fauvist movement and master of aesthetic order, was born in Le Cateau-Cambresis in northern France on December 31, 1869. The son of a middle-class family, he studied and began to practice law. In 1890, however, while recovering slowly from an attack of appendicitis, his mother bought him a paint set and he became intrigued by the practice of painting. In 1892, having given up his law career, he went to Paris to study art formally. His first teachers were academically trained and relatively conservative, Matisse’s own early style was a conventional form of naturalism, and he made many copies after the old masters. He also studied more contemporary art, especially that of the impressionists, and he began to experiment, earning a reputation as a rebellious member of his studio classes.
It marks a point in time, where Picasso that took art by the hand and turned it around by 108 degrees. The art work shows five naked women, without a recognizable background. They are all making different poses, almost as if they were leaning against a wall. Some of the women have very abstracted faces, one of them looks as if she was wearing a mask. It portrays Picassos interest with African sculpture, and how he incorporated it into his passion for art. The way the women are drawn, with their bodies having sharp edges, shows how Picasso was starting to evolve the new style of cubism. It took Picasso months of revision to finally show this work in
In this movement, they barrow visual forms from primitive societies (i.e. African, Micronesian, Native American) or non-Western (Asia) and integrate them into their art. This movement was inspired by such artist as Paul Gauguin and Henri Matisse. This was the case with Pablo Picasso, where he combined European prostitutes of cubism with African masks and Iberian features in his art piece. According to Joachim Pissarro, curator at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City, “...it was like an earthquake in the art world. It shook the foundation [that] everything that was accepted...was shattered.” (Museum of Modern Art) Picasso 's “Les Demoiselles d 'Avignon” was actually a painting response of his rival “Blue Nude” by Henri Matisse. These two artists have been fighting to be the best artist of the art movements. Public reaction to the art caught everyone by surprise, especially Matisse who finds that everyone marvels Picasso 's
Henri Emoile Matisse was born in Le Cateau in northern France on December 31, 1869. The son of a middle class family, his first career was in the law field. However, an appendicitis attack in 1890 rendered him bedridden, and with much time on his hands, he began to study the art of painting. To help alleviate his boredom, his mother bought him a paint box, and thus began his new passion: painting. In 1893, the work of Matisse was noticed by Gustav Moreau, (1826-1898) French painter, who developed a distinctive style in the Symbolist mode. Matisse displayed his work for the first time in 1896 at the ‘Salon de la Societe Nationale’. In 1903, Matisse was exposed to the pointillist paintings of Henri Edmond Cross and Paul Signac. Pointillism was a late 19th-century method of painting, consisting of depositing small dots or strokes of pure color on the canvas. Seen from a distance, these “points” blend and give the effect of a different color and heightened luminosity. The style, a development of impressionist color theories, was originated by the French painters Georges Seurat and Paul Signac.
During a visit to Brittany, Matisse discovered Impressionism (Essers 8). The works of Cezanne and Van Gogh influenced him. When he returned, he exhibited his first painting, Dinner Table, in 1897. This was his first painting of impressionistic style. Matisse’s art began to concentrate on landscapes, still life, and domestic interiors. Still life is a theme Henri would follow for the rest of his career.
His styles and techniques were so particular and well-liked, that he succeeded regardless of the trends going on around him; The Dance (1910) being the perfect example, for it was loved and hated by many. By the 1920's, he was increasingly noticed as an upholder of the classical tradition in French painting. He was appreciated for bringing that traditional style painting into the modern age and not allowing it to die out like many other artistic traditions had.11 Even though he had been firmly criticized for how he painted, he was still respected for his eclectic style of line and brushwork. Matisse dreamt of, "an art of balance, of purity and serenity, devoid of troubling subject matter" (MA, 38).12 He did this by painting things with simple detail, and also with a light, airy, feel. He wanted to convey the message of classical art, as well as very modern styles of art. As he was influenced by many, he, later on, influenced other great modern artists. He carefully prepared his works but chose colors spontaneously and freely, this is what he called instinct. Like his art, Matisse's career is tightly consolidated. In the context of his development as an artist, his illustrations of the nude females in The Dance (1910), have quite a different significance than judgmental commentators give
Picasso was born into a very artistic family on October 25th 1881. At the age of 14 he started producing and selling oil paintings. He was a very determined young man and dropped out of a renowned art school
This painting by Vincent Van Gogh is on display at the Art Institute of Chicago Museum, in the Impressionism exhibit. There are many things going on in this painting that catch the viewer’s eye. The first is the piece’s vibrant colors, light blues and browns, bright greens, and more. The brush strokes that are very visible and can easily be identified as very thick some might even say bold. The furniture, the objects, and the setting are easy to identify and are proportioned to each other. There is so much to see in this piece to attempt to explain in only a few simple sentences.
Picasso ignored the traditional aesthetic canons governing the representation of the female nude. The bodies are deformed. The woman sitting presents both his back and his face. The influence of African art, which replaces that of Orientalism of the nineteenth century, is very clear in the
Pablo Picasso was born on October 25, 1881 in Malaga. Picasso’s father, who was a drawing teacher at the Escuela Provin cal de Bell Artes starting teaching Picasso how to paint. His father recognized and encouraged his son’s talent as an artist. His childhood and teenage drawings showed his father’s repertory, an interest with the bullfight and conventional academic work. He enrolled in his father’s drawing classes in 1892 and produced about fifteen oil portraits in 1895.He did experiments with caricatures and sketches in 1894. At fourteen years old in 1895, Picasso passed exams to enter the high level courses in classical art and still life. He studied the old master paintings in 1897 and he critized the teaching of the academia real de. During the next couple of years Picasso began to assert his independence and went out and found a studio and started ...
Pablo Picasso and Raoul Dufy both had a very different vision than any artist back in their time had. They both wanted to show that art could be different, but at the same time also beautiful. However, not everyone back in their time thought it was beautiful. In their works they both used women to show their different style. Picasso used the method of Cubism and Dufy used the method of Fauvism. They both wanted to show how they thought that a woman should look to portray their different visions. These two works of art are both very different because, Picasso made his woman dark and exaggerated and not so pleasing to the eye. Meanwhile Dufy wanted to show the beauty and grace of his woman with his colors. They both show their brilliance by the way they portray their women.
Fauve’s art were different in each other of their own exclusive ways, but they all have the same origin, different feelings but same structure. They all did different mediums as well; for an example like I said they used art to express music, literature, and an emotional vision of the world from their perspective. Artist like Henri Matisse and André Derain with many more artists’ art was bright colored, exciting, attractive, and vividly expressed within their hands. They used communicative colors like red to show pain and hurt or blood or even the items that within the painting that describes the mood. Or another example could be Henri Matisse 'The Open Window, Collioure', 1905; he used his colors wisely and intensely. Most of the artist used oil, oil on canvas, and paint. Each piece of art work was used to perfection. ...
Matisse's work had some resemblance to, and was inspired by the work of the French artist Paul Cezanne. In his paintings, "Matisse used pure colors and the white of exposed canvas to create a light-filled atmosphere in his Fauve paintings. Rather than using modeling or shading to lend volume and structure to his pictures, Matisse used contrasting areas of pure, unmodulated color" (Artstory, n,d). Bonheur de Vivre (Joy of Life) painting - oil on canvas, using broad fields of colors, linear figures and independent motifs to form complete composition is evident of Cezanne's influence. In this painting, Matisse used similar objects in the painting such as landscape as a state to unify the figures and the landscape.
With these conclusions, de Beauvoir shows herself clearly to be a feminist. To summarize, she asserts that the negative traits of women that seemingly depicts them as less than men are not intrinsic but rather a circumstance of their situation. This means that women are as capable as men so long as they have access to the same opportunities. Furthermore, de Beauvoir demonstrates how the situation of women is one that is trapped by patriarchy. In addition, she explains how men seek to preserve the unfavourable situation of women in order to continue to benefit from the status quo.