Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of lay magistrates in the legal system
The role of lay magistrates in civil and criminal cases
Role and powers of a lay magistrate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of lay magistrates in the legal system
Use of Lay people in the English court of Law By Atis Stafeckis Lay magistrates are legally untrained and unpaid individuals who live locally to the magistrate court in the city they reside in . Lay Magistrates come from a range of occupational backgrounds, while some training is provided to magistrate upon appointment of their position , largely it is not considered to be a suitable amount. Lay magistrates are cost effective, and partake in cases such as speeding penalties, and other criminal cases. Although magistrates are unpaid, they're eligible to claim travel expenses and loss of earnings during their duty. To become a lay magistrate, one must be aged between 18 and 65. This isn't the only limitation as individuals who have been previously declared bankrupt, hold criminal convictions and are civil servants (military, police) are unable to be appointed as a Lay Magistrate by the Lord Chancellor. The bench consists of 2-3 justices , as well as a Magistrates clerk whose job is to inform the bench of the appropriate legal procedures, legal practice and Law. Magistrate courts are widely known as 'police courts', this comes from criticism that justices tend to be easily persuaded by even the most implausible police evidence. Reasons such as having access to a list of the defendant’s previous offences; can easily persuade a magistrate to conclude a guilty verdict. This in-turn has become a concern to many individual's as to whether they're likely to have a fair trial. As approximately 80% of justices in the United Kingdom are above the age of 40, it can be argued that younger offenders are stereotyped and verdicts maybe passed with a lack of understanding of the offenders status within society, an example of this would be the o... ... middle of paper ... ...rs are dealt with for hundreds of years. This would allow one to assume that trial by jury, and trial by magistrate; are simply the most effective methods of dealing with offenders. Despite the negatives of using non-legally trained personnel within the legal system, there are many positives, an example of a positive is simply the random selection for jury service, this random selection effectively eliminates many discriminatory allegations such as stereotyping, racism, sexism, and others; made by a defendant (Ward, R and Akhtar, A . 2011). Martin, J and Gibbins, M . (2010) AZ Handbook Law . 4 ed . Oxfordshire: Philip Allan Updates. Ward, R and Akhtar, A . (2011) English Legal System . 11 ed . New York: Oxford University Press. Websites used: http://www.inbrief.co.uk/legal-system/when-are-juries-used.htm [Accessed 13 October 2013] . Accessed: 13 October 2013 .
Gunther, G. (1991). Constitutional Law. Twelfth Edition. New York: The Foundation Press, Inc. pp. 1154-1161.
9. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003). Legal Studies for Queensland, Volume 1, ForthEdition, Legal Eagle Publications: Queensland. 10. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003).
Gardner, Bryan A. (2009). In Black's Law Dictionary. St. Paul, Minnesota: West / Thomson Reuters.
The General Court. "General Laws." : CHAPTER 265, Section 37. 2014. Web. 20 Apr. 2014. .
A jury is a panel of citizens, selected randomly from the electoral role, whose job it is to determine guilt or innocence based on the evidence presented. The Jury Act 1977 (NSW) stipulates the purpose of juries and some of the legal aspects, such as verdicts and the right of the defence and prosecution to challenge jurors. The jury system is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society as members of the community ultimately decide whether the person is guilty or innocent. The creation of the Jury Amendment Act 2006 (NSW) enabled the criminal trial process to better represent the standards of society as it allowed majority verdicts of 11-1 or 10-2, which also allowed the courts to be more resource efficient. Majority verdicts still ensure that a just outcome is reached as they are only used if there is a hung jury and there has been considerable deliberation. However, the role of the media is often criticized in relation to ensuring that the jurors remain unbiased as highlighted in the media article “Independent Juries” (SMH, 2001), and the wide reporting of R v Gittany 2013 supports the arguments raised in the media article. Hence, the jury system is moderately effective in reflecting the moral and ethical standards of society, as it resource efficient and achieves just outcomes, but the influence of the media reduces the effectiveness.
The use of the jury in some trials shows how the everyday atmosphere is brought into the courtroom. Jurors have a part in deciding the outcomes of cases and as a collective decide the extent of the harm in the case. They apply socially accepted norms to the courtroom when determining the enforceable situation of the alleged criminal (Garfinkel: 104). A juror is asked to be a blank slate when entering the courtroom. However, what needs to taken into consideration is the fact that each individual carries his or her own values, bias and beliefs in any situation. They decide to what extent the case at hand goes against the standards of the normal individual. The definition of normal in this case is subjected to the context in which the event is
Culver, Keith Charles. Readings in the philosophy of law. 1999. Reprint. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2008. Print.
Since 15th century, barristers have been split up into two professions in United Kingdom, Barristers and Barristers. Barristers have traditionally been the people who research cases, deal with clients directly, and Barristers have had the rights of advocate in courts. Hence, Barristers' ethical duties are very important to the court and the client, and this is an essay to discuss the duties to the court, clients and conflicts in between.
This concludes my summary of lessons gleaned from the course BSL 301 Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis referencing Honigberg, G. "Gilbert Law Summaries: Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis" 10th ed. BarBri Group, 2006.
NSW Government 2014, Courts & Tribunal Services Attorney General & Justice, viewed 30 April 2014, .
"Preamble | LII / Legal Information Institute." LII | LII / Legal Information Institute. Web. 26 Sept. 2011. .
INTRODUCTION: Parliament, the supreme law-making body, has unrestricted legislative power, and the laws it passes cannot be set aside by the courts. The role of judges, in relation to laws enacted by Parliament, is to interpret and apply them, rather than to pass judgment on whether they are good or bad laws. However, evidence has shown that they have a tendency to deviate from their ‘real roles’ and instead formulate laws on their own terms. Thus, the real role of a judge in any legal system continues to be a phenomenon questioned by many.
United Kingdom is a country with a distinctive set of legal system. It is fairly different from other countries having civil law based legal systems. The legal system in the United Kingdom consists of various sources of law, where other civil law based countries rely only on a written set of law. European influences on the English Legal System came much later in near decades. This essay will aim to examine the development of the English Legal System by reviewing applications of various sources of law in the English Legal System furthermore to discuss the recent European influences on the law of England.
The courts of England and Wales acknowledge that the above must be something of value, in order to amount to consideration. A valuable consideration in the perspective of the English La...
Keating Daniel. The University Of Chicago Law Review. 1986, Vol 53, Issue 1, p 258.