Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is international law really a law
Nietzsche's on the genealogy of morality essay
Demerit of international law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is international law really a law
Law of Nations: An Overview
Human nature consists of three basic components. These are to live, to propagate and to dominate. If Humanity was left without any other parameters, this natural state of existence would govern its behavior. Fortunately, there are parameters that exist. These parameters are law. The topic of this paper addresses the type of law that operates in creating potential boundaries for the behavior of states. This law is called the Law of Nations or international law. Patrick Moynihan, a senator from New York, has written a book on this subject called On the Law of Nations. His book argues that states need international law to monitor their actions and to maintain order. He also notes the frequent departures states do from international law. This essay will reflect his plea to return to the norms that international law provides; it will also discuss and identify the moral dilemmas that are present with international law and its relationship with states.
The term "laisser aller" or "letting go" is used by Friedrich Nietzsche to describe this state of nature, in which man resides absently of law. His use of the term represents the struggle morality wages against nature and reason. He equates morality in any form, with "tyranny and unreason."
Nietzsche proposes that man's natural existence be, in essence, nihilistic.
Logically, the political entity known as the state, created by man will inherit these traits. Thus, the conclusion is that the creation and institution of international law are in direct violation to nature.
However, international law exists and states "generally" submit themselves to it. . Since most of this law is derived from codified norms of states, the term submission can be used. There is a disservice committed to humanity when the law is broken, not just to those who are weaker in the global community but to the law itself. A violent raping of the law is committed when it is taken in an a la carte form. The constant shifting back and forth from international law to nature creates an incoherent system and a basis for calling the reversion to the natural state, evil. In this setting "illegal" unilateral action is immoral. Conversely, the adherence to the law is equally immoral. This conclusion is drawn from the virtue of integrity. Either have a commitment to comply with morality or completely abstain from a hypocritical form of servicing the law with words and no conformity. Consistency, is an extremely important factor of a system of law.
Moynihan argues that the United State has begun to traverse a path leading away from its adherence to international law.
On the word of Martin Luther King Jr., “An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the
The study began by arresting the prisoners at their respective houses unexpectedly. They were then taken to the mock prison and processed at they would be in a real prison. This included finger printing the prisoners, removing their clothes and belongings, and providing them a uniform. Inmates were then only referred to by the numbers on their uniform. The guards and inmates began to confirm to their roles very quickly. Although no physical violence was permitted, the guards harassed the inmate...
up their own laws about it, but at the federal level, there are only two set laws. The first is “if an
The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study put together by Phillip Zambardo to test the psychological effects of a prisoner and guard scenario in a mock prison setting. The experiment lasted approximately fourteen days and was comprised of twenty-four male students, all of whom were picked at random to take part in the experiment. Each individual was also randomly given the role of either guard or prisoner. The mock prisoners were subjugated to psychological abuse, harsh authoritarian rule by the guards, and intense living conditions to ensure maximum results were met. Due to the intense amount of stress brought on from the ordeal, a few prisoners were unable to continue and the experiment concluded prematurely. Everything about this observation
On August 14, 1971, the twelve men that were given the role as “prisoner” were arrested without warning and taken to the police station on charges of burglary and armed robbery in front of their family and friends. There they were processed, fingerprinted and photographed, by the police. Then were blindfolded as they were transferred to the mock prison that was built in one of the basement of a campus building. They were deloused, had their heads shaven, and given their uniform and ID number and then placed in a cell as they would in a real prison setting. The other twelve men were the “guards”, those men were given a guard’s uniform, sunglasses, and a baton. Their orders only being to do what they thought was necessary to keep order in the prison but not to use any kind of violence. Even though the first day was uneventful you could see within hours both groups began to settle into their roles very quickly. It wasn’t until the second day there was a situation when the prisoner started a rebellion, which made the guards further adopt their role and began using more mental
Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychology experiment conducted by students at Stanford University in 1971. The purpose of the experiment was to study the psychological effects of prison life. Candidates were selected on basis of having no psychological problems, medical disabilities or a history of crime or drug abuse. Eventually, twenty-four college students from Canada and America were selected for participation in the study. Participants were paid $15 per day. Boys were divided into two groups by a flip of a coin. Hence, half of them were assigned to be guards and the other half to be prisoners. Prisoners were then taken to the cell and locked up. The experiment started and guards, prisoners and other staff members got in to their roles. To begin with, psychological effects started as the prisoners were stripped, sprayed and shaved to make sure prisoners were bringing in no germs. A uniform was issued to prisoners with an ID number that was their identity for throughout the experiment. Prisoners were expected harassment and humiliation by the guards. Prisoners were punished physically as the confrontations began between the guards and prisoners. At first, prisoners were easier to handle but after day one, prisoners had revolted and guards had to use psychological tactics. Astonishingly, the psychological approach, to separate the prisoners and provide special privileges to a few of them resulted in discovery of a trick for guards to handle the prisoners. This strategy by guards left prisoners being distrustful of each other. Prisoners suffering from emotional disturbance disorganized thinking and rationalized behavior insisted to quit. Further, parents and friend’s visit was also held for offenders that went smoothly as eve...
Last but not least, injustice does not provide the most good for the most number of people. Just acts spawn other just acts just like unjust acts spawn other unjust acts. If everyone behaved unjustly, mankind would return to a state of nature (everyone is for themselves) which would be very unprofitable for the unjust individual due to a decreased likelihood of survival. An action is clearly unprofitable for the unjust individual if it would eventually create a hostile environment for him. Hence, one should set an example for others by living a just life which would create a better environment for him as well as for others.
To be sure, modern laws are made to express the general will, a will that aims at the common good. This means that laws in most cases intend to protect every social member’s rights under the principle of justice and fairness. For telling examples one need to look no further than American judicial system. The access to the two courts systems, one federal court and one state court, provides citizens with the greatest potential to have their legal problems resolved quickly and justly. Besides, the entire U.S. legal system depends upon the involvement and integrity of citizens in the roles of parties, witnesses, jurors, legal counsel and judges, making the legislation, judgment and enforcement respecting more citizens' will, which is probably based on various interests, so that laws can be as just as possible. Therefore, modern laws are in nature pursuing to treat and protect every individual in the society.
How does humanity govern its self? The world, as seen today, is an extremely diverse nation with various, backgrounds, traditions, and customs. The aforementioned are informal social controls used to help govern citizens in an unceremonious way. These informal controls developed over time into formal controls, laws, to try and restore harmony within a society and punish those who are in violation of laws. Laws are defined as a set of rules developed by a body of legislation to maintain order and peace of an organized people. Laws can be used as an umbrella to blanket a multitude of subsets, such as, political, administrative, financial, and civil infractions. Public Order crimes can also be placed in to a subcategory of criminal legislation. When defining a criminal infraction there are two sides of the spectrum, the victim and the offender. Drug usage and drug-related crimes have the most relevant association when it comes to violation of federal and state statutes. So what happens when there is not apparent “victim?” Is there a thing as a “victimless” crime? Public order and drug crimes may not seem to have an effect in an instant, but over time it damages our nation as a whole.
In Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s 2015 film The Stanford Prison Experiment, he illustrates Stanford professor Philip Zimbardo’s 1971 study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. In Zimbardo’s experiment, he had his subjects adopt roles as either prisoners or prison guards and set up a mock prison in the basement of Jordan Hall, Stanford’s psychology building. In psychology, a role is a set of expectations concerning the ways in which people are supposed to behave in certain situations. Generally, the prison guards were psychologically abusive to the prisoners, making prisoners endlessly repeat menial tasks and attempted to make them turn against each other. Although some of the guards felt bad about doing these things,
The rule of law, simply put, is a principle that no one is above the law. This means that there should be no leniency for a person because of peerage, sex, religion or financial standing. England and Wales do not have a written constitution therefore the Rule of Law, which along with the parliamentary Sovereignty was regarded by legal analyst A.C Dicey, as the pillars of the UK Constitution. The Rule of Law was said to be adopted as the “unwritten constitution of Great Britain”.
Crimes are not ‘given’ or ‘natural’ categories to which societies simply respond. The composition of such categories change from various places and times, and is the output of social norms and conventions. Also, crime is not the prohibitions made for the purpose of rational social defence. Instead, Durkheim argues that crimes are those acts which seriously violate a society’s conscience collective. They are essentially violations of the fundamental moral code which society holds sacred, and they provoke punishment for this reason. It is because of these criminal acts which violate the sacred norms of the conscience collective, that they produce a punitive reaction. (Ibid)
Law is a tool in society as it helps to maintain social control, promoting social justice. The way law functions in society and its social institution provide a mechanism for solutions. There are many different theories of the function of law in relation to society in considering the insight they bring to different socio-legal and criminological problems. In the discussion of law’s role in social theory, Leon Petrażycki and Eugen Ehrlich share similar beliefs in the jurisprudence of society. They focused their work on the experience of individuals in establishing meaning in their legal relations with others based on the question of what it means to be a participant in law. Jürgen Habermas presents a relationship between law and morality. From a certain standpoint, law is a key steering mechanism in society as it plays an educational role in promoting conducts, a mean of communication and it
Crimes results from the inability to achieve monetary success of others positively valued goals through legitimate channels (Agnew and Collen, 2003,p.208). The process one that is difficult to identify and define, but it is also one that allows easily for the insertion of concepts of justice to make us clear on what street justice actually is, conflict and adaptation theory. Conflict and adaptation theory extends our understandings of the relationship between strain and street relationship. Locke argues that state of nature enforce each individual possesses the right to enforce the law of nature, that is the right to pursue punishment of those who harm his or her own life, liberty, or property. Also Hobbes, on the other hand,portrays a less ordered vision of retribution in the natural state, suggestions that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in owe, they are in that condition which is called war. Both social strain and conflict theory relates to social control, which in turn relates directly to notion of justice both in dominant culture and street culture. It is very important to view street justice from social control and social solidarity
In my formative years, I am sad to admit that I was the most critical of my mother. We suffered from what experts would identify as ‘mutual incomprehensibility’, and I believe at times we still do; however, as I grow more and more into woman hood and our bond has been strengthened with experience, I have had the amazing opportunity to gain a true sense of my mother and have come to admire her in many ways ( though she probably doesn 't believe me). For whatever reason, I once found solace in reducing all my problems as some fault of my mother’s inability to prepare me for adulthood. Instead of seeking advice and wisdom, I rebelled! Looking back, I now realize she only wanted to protect me, to help me, but as a teen that felt like control