Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Probable cause arrests in domestic violence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Probable cause arrests in domestic violence
Section 2711 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code, entitled probable cause
arrests in domestic violence cases, subsection (a) states that a
police officer shall have the same right of arrest without a warrant
as in a felony whenever he has probable cause to believe the defendant
has violated section 2504 (relating to involuntary manslaughter), 2701
(relating to simple assault), 2702(a)(3), (4) and (5) (relating to
aggravated assault), 2705 (relating to recklessly endangering another
person), 2706 (relating to terroristic threats) or 2709.1 (relating to
stalking) against a family or household member although the offense
did not take place in the presence of the police officer. A police
officer may not arrest a person pursuant to this section without first
observing recent physical injury to the victim or other corroborative
evidence. Under title 23 §6102 a “family or household member” can be
spouses or persons who have been spouses, persons living as spouses or
who have lived as spouses, parents and children, other persons related
by consanguinity or affinity, current or former sexual or intimate
partners or persons who share biological parenthood.
The sections that a law enforcement agent could arrest for were not
all the ones stated above; back in 1989 they could only arrest without
a warrant for sections 2504, 2701, and 2705. The statute was then
added to in 1998 because of the court case Cronin v. West Whiteland
Tp. The police received a 911 phone call stating that a domestic
disturbance was in progress and immediate response was necessary.
Upon entering the kitchen police observed “the defendant had been
holding a knife… the kitchen was in state of disarray, defendant had
bleeding scratch and wife had a cut on hand.” (Purdon’s, 166). Also
in 1989 in addition to what sections officers could arrest for they
also had to “observe recent physical injury or other corroborative
evidence and the victim is a spouse of the suspect or a person with
whom the suspect resides or has formally resided with.” (Zimmerman,
30).
Nancy Drew Suders was hired March 1998 by the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) as a police communications operator for the McConnellsburg barracks, where her three male supervisors subjected her to a "continuous barrage of sexual harassment." Suders said one of the supervisors Sergeant Eric D. Easton, talked to her repeatedly about sex with animals. The second, Corporal Eric B. Prendergast sat on her desk and made gestures simulating oral sex. The third, Patrol Corporal William D. Baker made obscene gestures as many as five or ten times a night. In June 1998, Suders spoke to PSP's Equal Employment Opportunities Officer, Virginia Smith-Elliot, and told her that she "might need some help." Two months later Suders contacted Smith-Elliot again and this time told her that she was being harassed and was afraid. Smith-Elliot told Suders to file a complaint, but she never told her how to obtain the necessary forms or what procedures she should follow. Suders never did file a complaint since she felt that Smith-Elliot had been insensitive and unhelpful.
The Court held that because of the “special facts” the “attempt to secure evidence of blood-alcohol content in this case was an appropriate incident to petitioner’s arrest.” Under current jurisprudence, we would construe the language about “special facts” as relating to the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment – which resists categorical rules – and instead focuses on the need for the intrusion and the availability of a warrant. However, the language also justifies the search as “incident to petitioner’s arrest,” which would indicate that the test was upheld as a search incident-to-arrest. In situations where it is appropriate, that has been described as a “categorical” exception to the warrant requirement that does not require any case-by-case
This is the tenth time that Lisa has been admitted to the hospital within the past two years. At least this time there aren’t any broken bones or concussions to worry about. Lisa only has two black eyes, a patch of her beautiful long hair forcibly yanked from her head, a nasty black and blue bruise on her neck and a few nails ripped directly from the newly manicured nail beds. Lisa swore to God and her best friend Brandy that this was the final straw. Actually, she made that exact same pledge under oath just three months ago, yet she is coincidently in the same position she vowed never to return to. This time was different though. She was making plans to move her things out of the small apartment that she shared with her boyfriend the minute she was discharged from Sinai Grace Hospital, and what seem to be her home away from home. Lisa has made plans for her mom to babysit her 2 year old daughter while she searches for work, and Brandy has already told Lisa she can stay with her as long as she needed to. Yet, the very next day, Lisa calls to inform Brandy that she decided to stay with Jason despite of the awful things that he has done to her. Lisa believes that Jason has changed overnight and that he deserves a second chance, besides a child needs to be raised with both parents in the home. Unfortunately Brandy was not at all surprised by the phone call, in fact, she was expecting it. As the wave of guilt and the “should’ve, could’ve, would’ve” attempts to overcome Brandy again, she quickly snapped back into reality, wiped the tears off her face and placed the white roses on Lisa’s tombstone. A story like Lisa’s usually raises the million dollar question; why do women stay in abusive relationships? Across the nation...
Elsen, Sheldon, and Arthur Rosett. “Protections for the Suspect under Miranda v. Arizona.” Columbia Law Review 67.4 (1967): 645-670. Web. 10 January 2014.
Domestic Violence is a widely recognized issue here in the United States. Though many people are familiar with domestic violence, there are still many facts that people do not understand. Abuse is not just physical, it is mental, emotional, verbal, sexual and financial. Many victims of physical abuse are also fall victim to these abuse tactics as well. An abusive partner often uses verbal, mental, emotional, and financial abuse to break their partner so to speak. It is through this type of abuse the victim often feels as though they are not adequately meeting their partner’s needs.
excessive force cases brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. BYU Journal of Public Law, 26(1),
The Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence 1. What is the name of the organization you selected? The Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence. 2. What is the difference between a..
Common law and written statues in the late 1800's in the US regulated, but did not prohibit, the abuse of women and children. It was considered the duty of males to control their households and property. Within their own judgment and standards, men were allowed to use physical violence to discipline their family or household member.
From the moment an innocent individual enters the criminal justice system they are pressured by law enforcement whose main objective is to obtain a conviction. Some police interrogation tactics have been characterized as explicit violations of the suspect’s right to due process (Campbell and Denov 2004). However, this is just the beginning. Additional forms of suffering under police custody include assaults,
Mr. Rodriguez called 911 to report loud music from his neighbor’s house. He then walked to his neighbor’s house with his firearm and a video camera. After the confrontation with his neighbor, he called law enforcement once more to tell them he felt threatened and that he was standing his ground. While Paul Rodriguez waited for law enforcement to arrive at the scene, he used deadly force against Kelly Danaher. In this case, Mr. Rodriguez initiated the confrontation and there was no proven evidence that he was in danger (Flatow,
Last of all, you have mandatory arrest, which as it says, an arrest is mandatory if there is probable cause that an offense has been committed. Referring back to our scenario, Officer Mydell walked in and saw the wife beating her husband, if the state had mandatory arrest, he would have no choice, but to arrest the wife. This is why I’m for mandatory arrest because it defusing the situation, right there and by arresting the wife, the husband knows he is safe and can now work on staying away from those types of
Domestic violence is not just fighting, hitting or an occasional argument. It’s a chronic abuse of power. The abuser of domestic violence, controls and tortures the victim of threats, intimidation, and physical violence. Domestic violence is one of the leading causes of violence in America. The abusers are not only men, women can be abusers as well. Women make up the vast majority of domestic violence. According to the American Bar Association (ABA), 90-95% of domestic violence victims are females and 70% of intimidating homicides are females. Domestic violence is a serious crime and everyone needs to be aware of its effects. This essay presents and explains the evidence supporting the major risk factors for intimate partner homicides.
The Boston Police Department has started enforcing new laws that require an officer to make an arrest when responding to cases of domestic violence. This is a strict new law that is being enforced. Previously, it was not necessary to make an arrest for such an incident. The officer had to make sure that the parties were safe and could judge on what action to carry out next. Now, it is a requirement by law to make an arrest if they respond to any case of domestic violence. It is important to study whether enactment of this new law has led to a change in behavior of people in intimate relationships regarding domestic violence.
Deviance is described as behavior that is not part of the norms in society. Police officers today are held to high standards due to their motto " To protect and Serve," however, not all police personnel live up to that standard. Due to police officers being held at such high standards, as authority figures some of them tend to abuse their power and engage in police deviance. Police officers have the widest range of deviant acts. These acts of Police Deviance include, police brutality, police gratuity, police shakedowns, police perjury, police profanity, police misuse of confidential information, and police drinking and abusing drugs on or off duty, just to name a few (Policecrimes.com, 2015). However, Police Brutality has to be the most
The first reaction upon hearing about the topic of battered men, for many people, is that of incredulity. Battered husbands are a topic for jokes (such as the cartoon image of a woman chasing her husband with a rolling-pin). One researcher noted that wives were the perpetrators in 73% of the depictions of domestic violence in newspaper comics (Saenger 1963).