Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stop police brutality
Police brutality and criminal justice system
The importance of police brutality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stop police brutality
Q1)
Many young people took to the streets of London during the August 2011 riots, which ensued following the death of Mark Duggan. For many, the handling of Mark Duggan, who was shot dead by the police was the final straw in terms of their frustrations and grievances with the police and triggered the need to take action. The first night of the riots was to “point to prove” as suggested by a young person from Clapham junction (NatCen, The August riots in England, p34) , the youths were not going to tolerate police brutality and unjust discrimination due to their background and areas where they reside. A great number of youths felt the police as well as the central government no longer deserved their respect and the retaliation was a way to
…show more content…
Law is a set of guidelines constructed by Governments in order to govern the behaviour of a land, it sets the standards, procedures and principles that we must all adhere to.
Justice on the other hand is an ideology; it is centred on principles of equality, righteousness, morality and ethics. It is the unwritten duty of judges to ensure they are just with their judgements as they are subordinate lawmakers in the UK and other common law countries. Judges are required to follow precedent and follow previous authorities, however in unusual circumstances whereby the law produces outcomes of apparent injustice, judges have the authority to set new precedents. There are many cases where the law was set but for many the law was not providing justice,
One example of the law not providing justice relates to marital rape; prior to R v R (1991) marital rape in UK was not a punishable crime, morally and ethically cases where the defendants were not found guilty was a mass injustice to claimants on the grounds of ethics and morality. However following the findings of LORD BRANDON OF OAKBROOK, LORD GRIFFITHS, LORD ACKNER and LORD LOWRY new precedent was set in the UK whereby the courts recognise non-consensual sex in marriage to be marital rape and can be punishable by
McOskar Enterprises, Inc. owns and manages a health and fitness center identified as “Curves for Women”. Tammey J. Anderson, the complainant, joined Curves on April 2, 2003. As part of the joining process Anderson signed a release of liability agreement. This agreement released Curves from any liabilities related to injuries that might be sustained by contributing in any activities or through the use of equipment. The agreement also stated that participants agreed to all risks of death or injury that could occur, Anderson read and signed the agreement of terms with Curves. After completing the liability agreement, Anderson began working out under the observation of a Curves’ trainer using the machines within the facility. During the workout Anderson notified the trainer that she began to feel pain in her neck, shoulder and arm, but finished her workout. She continued to feel the pain when she got home and pursued medical attention. As part of her prescribed medical treatment she was sent for a course a physical therapy. In June 2003 Anderson underwent a cervical discectomy, a procedure used to treat nerve or spinal cord compression. After her procedure Anderson sued Curves, claiming negligent acts during her workout. Anderson v. McOskar Enterprises, Inc., 712 NW 2d 796 (Minn. 2006).
Facts: Two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter a colored woman and Richard Loving a white man, got married in the District of Columbia. The Loving's returned to Virginia and established their marriage. The Caroline court issued an indictment charging the Loving's with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. The state decides, who can and cannot get married. The Loving's were convicted of violating 20-55 of Virginia's code.
Laws are objects that dictate how people act every single day, but laws are not just made easily with a flick of a wand, there is a specific and tough process to go through if a bill wants to become a law, which
In this essay, I will be examining how the court system can fail to deliver justice for particular cases and people’s circumstances, as well as looking at alternatives to court, like circle sentencing, restorative sentencing and alternatives for children to the formal court system, as outlined in the Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW). Crime is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as an action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law. On the other side of this is justice; the quality of being fair and reasonable.
The London Riots took place from the 6th to the 11th of August 2011 in London, England. It started off as a peaceful protest, to attain justice for the killing of Mark Duggan, who was killed by the police for allegedly being armed. The rioting began when the police restrained and injured a 16-year-old girl for throwing a champagne bottle at them. Over the next few days, “copycat” riots began to occur in parts of London and these riots were organized via the use of social media. Although there was no individual culprit of the riot, many believe that some of the blame goes to the media for representing the Mark Duggan case as well as the coverage of the riots wrongly, which in turn sparked subsequent riots in London. In this essay, I will discuss
Law is a system of rules that are implemented throughout social establishments to govern behavior. A principle for judging acts as reasonable or unreasonable and they may seem objective, universal, and knowable, which dispositions are guide. Our function is rational activity, and our rational nature gives us dispositions when we are naturally disposed to seek to know, understand, and be
Laws have an important role in maintaining order within society. Understandably, society comprises of different individuals with differing aspirations, beliefs, personalities, and merits – just to name a few. Allowing individuals to push their personal desires using resources available to them would not only lead to a disordered society, but also one that embraces injustice and prejudice. Laws are the common principles that guide the conduct of individuals in society while ensuring that society upholds the rights of everyone who is part of it. Such laws accrue as a resemblance of morality for entities in society to which all members are held accountable irrespective of their race, social class, or popularity. However,
According to Black's Law Dictionary Law is defined as, "A system of principles and rules of human conduct, being the aggregate of those commandments and principles which are either prescribed or recognized by the governing power in an organized jural society. " Laws are what keep society from chaos and anarchy. Laws are used by lawyers to help promote "justice" and fairness, yet at times they look out for their own best interest instead. Lawyers, in general, do not have a good reputation. Social commentary can be read in literature as lawyers have been negatively portrayed since Shakespeare.
One such case is R v Rimmington (2006) where Lord Bingham said that conduct forbidden by law should be clearly indicated so that a person is capable of knowing that it is wrong before he does it and that nobody should be punished for doing something which was not a criminal offence when it was done. Moreover Lord Bingham and Lord Walker in the Privy Council decision in Sharma v Brown-Antoine (2007) said that the rule of law requires that, subject to any legal immunity or exemption, the law should be even-handed and apply to all
Laws or something that almost every society has in today's generation. A law can be defined as some a set of rules or regulations that are set out to define the behaviors that develop a society or community. These laws restrict certain behaviors, actions, and sometimes even words. Words throughout time in over history a set of laws turn to be a standard of conduct that was set amongst individuals. A source of a law is simply a background in which a law is created from.
Also voting. Laws are the rules under which a society or community is governed. A city a major, a state has a governor and a country has a
According to Reference.com (2007), law is defined as: "rules of conduct of any organized society, however simple or small, that are enforced by threat of punishment if they are violated. Modern law has a wide sweep and regulates many branches of conduct." Essentially law is the rules and regulations that aid in governing conduct, handling disputes, and dealing with criminal actions.
Judicial Precedent "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very little discretion in their decision making." Judges have always been relied upon to interpret and apply the law. Therefore, their decisions should be fair and consistent so as the individuals seeking legal remedies would have more faith in the judicial system of the state. AS the UK has not a very complete and/or codified constitution, this doctrine is very much relied on as contrasted with other countries which seemed to have provisions for virtually any kind of offence, like France or the US where judges had only to refer to legislation.
The Rule of Law means that the state should govern its citizens, in a way which works with the rules that have been agreed on. The Rule of Law is simply a fundamental principle of our constitution. Britain and other Western democracies are different in that Britain has an unwritten constitution, meaning that our constitution is not found in a certain document but that we actually have a constitution from the rules about who governs it, and about the powers they entail and how that power can be passed or even transferred. The Constitution includes; Acts of Parliament, Judicial decisions and Conventions.There are three main principles around the Rule of Law being the separation of powers, the supremacy of Parliament and the Rule of Law. The
Both law and morality serve to regulate behaviour in society. Morality is defined as a set of key values, attitudes and beliefs giving a standard in which we ‘should’ behave. Law, however, is defined as regulating behaviour which is enforced among society for everyone to abide by. It is said that both, however, are normative which means they both indicate how we should behave and therefore can both be classed as a guideline in which society acts, meaning neither is more effective or important than the other. Law and morals have clear differences in how and why they are made. Law, for example, comes from Parliament and Judges and will be made in a formal, legal institution which result in formal consequences when broken. Whereas morals are formed under the influence of family, friends, media or religion and they become personal matters of individual consciences. They result in no formal consequence but may result in a social disapproval which is shown also to occur when breaking the law.