Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of technology on the English language
The importance of phonology
The evolution of human speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of technology on the English language
Language can be cognitive, material or social, and is a complex set of conventions that allow a group of people to communicate with one another (Gee & Hayes, 2011, p.6). Finocchiaro & Brumfit (1983, pp. 65-66) explain that there are five essential functions to all languages: Personal, Intrapersonal, Directive, Referential and Imaginative. These key features allow people to communicate or convey a message to one another through a variety of different forms, such as spoken or written. Now that technology is becoming increasingly prominent in society, it is important for educators to understand and acknowledge that language is multimodal in nature and that digital media has an influence in the way language is communicated (Gee & Hayes, 2011, p. …show more content…
It is multifaceted in many ways as language is a material object, due to it being physically present in the world we live in, through the use of speech and text, and cognitive, a set of rules in our minds (Gee & Hayes, 2011, p.6). The analogy of ‘Language as a Fish’ delves into the notion that when taken out of the water, a fish can be inspected more thoroughly thus creating a greater understanding of the creature (Grugeon & Gardner, 2000). This analogy applies to language because once you remove it from its social context or Discourse one can view its rules and conventions more clearly. Language encompasses many rules, including Lexis; the words, Syntax; the grammatical rules, Orthography; spelling, Phonology; sounds and Semantics; the meaning of words. Children all have a basic understanding and knowledge of a language by the time they enter preschool and are relatively proficient in being able to communicate with others. Chomsky (1957) equates this knowledge to a language acquisition device, a linguistic processor we are all born with, that enables children to understand language without any real formal education. From a young age children communicate through sound and their phonic knowledge, the principle that explores the sounds of language, develops at a rapid pace (O’Donnell et al., 2015, p.127). The role of an educator is to guide and to teach …show more content…
Grugeon and Gardner (2000), elaborate on this notion in the ‘Language as a Fish’ analogy when they discuss that when viewing language as though it were only an object, the quality of the language lacks quality meaning altogether. The authors argue that language needs to be looked at in a variety of ways, thus making language dynamic in nature. The dynamic nature is evident through the constant diachronic changes, the evolution, of language that has taken place over the course of history and continued to do so. Social interaction and communication and language are both on a continuum called a register that ranges from very informal to very formal. Phatic communication is a form of very informal communication and bonding type of language, also known as small talk (Gee & Hayes, 2011, p.24). People not only use language as a form of communication, but they also use language, in particular, small talk, to maintain social interactions with each other. The use of communication to sustain social interactions is reinforced by the social semiotic theory, which explores how people use social communication to actively make meaning of the world (Loerts, 2010, p.27). Anstey and Bull (2003, 2015) explain that social semiotics also refers to
26) ‘the dimension of language that involves its practical use by people in various social and cultural contexts’. In other words, it is the practical use of language. This is when Children learn that conversation customarily begins with the greeting and a response, and also understands that talking also includes precise meanings and concerns which they communicate to match the listener’s interests, knowledge and language ability (Fellowes, & Oakley, 2014,
How can it be that something so uniquely human and commonplace in our everyday existence as language, could transcend the limits of our immediate understanding? We all know how to speak and comprehend at least one language, but defining what we actually know about that language an infinitely more demanding process. How can a child without previous knowledge of the construction and concepts of language be born into the world with an innate ability to apprehend any dialect? Mark Baker, in his book The Atoms of Language, seeks to address these unsettling questions, proposing as a solution, a set of underlying linguistic ingredients, which interact to generate the wide variety of languages we see today.
“We can know so much because in a sense we already knew it” (Chomsky, 1976 p.7). Within this quote are the foundations for Chomsky’s theory of an innate predisposition to learn language by his imagination of a mind that holds a priori knowledge. It is suggested by Chomsky (1976) that this innate knowledge is within the human mind at birth and is unlocked by experience. Essentially, Chomsky’s argument is that there is some sort of biological basis only evident within humans that permits the acquisition of language across different cultures, notwithstanding the complexities or differences between them. Christiansen and Chater (2008) provide for Chomsky’s position by noting that children can obtain their native language before being able to carry out tasks such as tying laces or riding a bicycle.
Language, according to Owens (2012, p. 6), “can be defined as a socially shared code or conventional system for representing concepts through the use of arbitrary symbols and rule-governed combinations of those symbols”. Language is thought to be a complex system; however, it can be broken down into three different components. These three components consist of content, form, and use. Within these three components, language has five main components which includes semantics, morphology, phonology, syntax, and pragmatics (Owens, 2012, p. 18).
Most children learn language with remarkable ease, but how are we to account for this extraordinary fact? The problem plaguing our understanding of language and language acquisition can be described as. How can one learn anything genuinely new and become linguistically creative and how this learning is possible at all, unless one already has some path into language, for example, a suitable framework in which language learning takes place? It is this framework that interests us here.
Language refers to the method that humans use to communicate, either through speech or written. It consists of the use of the word in a structured and conventional way. Language has been referred to as ‘our means of classifying and ordering the world; our means of manipulating reality’. In structure and in its use, we bring the world into realisation and if it is inherently inaccurate, then we are misled. Dale Spender, 1980.Language has power that allows us to make sense out of the reality we live in.
Language is a form of verbal communication via words and its pronunciation that is used and comprehended by various people of the same nation, culture, or geographical background. It has been said to be dated back as far as one thousand years ago before writing. Like culture, language is passed on through the process of enculturation. Meaning that it is something that is learned (Kottak, 101). In the video, “TED TALK:
Next, we shall evaluate the key features of language which are; communicative, arbitrary, structured, generative, and dynamic. Communicative, language can allow one to interact with another. According to Willingham (2007), the bond found with the elements in language and what they mean is arbitrary. The way language is set up shows how the symbols are not arbitrary. The set up language shows precisely how intricate it can be. Generative, one is able to build countless number of meanings from words. Dynamic, language never stays the same, therefore it can be known as sporadic. According to Willingham (2007), changes are being made all the time as new words get added and as the ways of grammar change. These elements can be quite critical when it comes to language.
Have you ever wondered who taught you to talk the way you do? People learn to talk and express themselves everyday of their lives. Starting from the day you were born you used language or some form of it to communicate with those around you. As a baby you usually show your displeasure with your new surroundings by crying, and if you don’t the doctor will make sure you do. Everyday we express our point of view to others in some form of language. Whether it is through verbal communication, written discourse or through body language, you can tell if a person is upset, angry, or happy. We as human beings don’t realize how much language has to do with our lives. How can you determine if one of your friends is angry with you? Is there a different tone to their voice? Do they have a stern look on their face? Of course they do, your friend feels the need to express their anger to you by these different forms of language. Where do we learn to use these different forms of language? How are our uses of these languages shaped? The three main contributing factors to how we express ourselves through language come from our schooling, our friends, and most of all from our families.
The way we perceive language is the foundation of our social construction an individual or group relationships, and studies in sociolinguistics have tried to explain this relationship between the use of language and the importance of perceptions. A particular discourse, spoken or written, can stem from different sources
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.