Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book and a movie compare and contrast
Book vs. movie
Book and a movie compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book and a movie compare and contrast
The book and the movie is the Landlady, and they’re the same story but the book has missing details in the movie. Like in the book, there was a yellow chrysanthemums but in the movie, there isn’t.
The book has lots more details about the setting than the book because in the story it said, that there was a yellow chrysanthemum vase. There is also a similar event that happens as well. Billy Weaver is searching for the Bell and Dragon and he gets sidetracked by the Bed and Breakfast sign. This doesn’t affect the story at all because in both stories, Billy does the same thing. The author’s choice to put it there so that the story connects to the movie. This affects the story by making Billy have a reason to continue the story.
There’s not that many similarities and differences but in the book and the movie, they were the same names that gone missing like Gregory Temples and Christopher Mulholland. The author chose this because, it wouldn’t make sense if two different people went missing with them. The story would sound weird if the reader read the story on paper and then saw the movie. One difference in the middle of the story is that he is 17 but, in the movie he is 18. One reason why the author
…show more content…
At the end of the story on paper, the story ends with the landlady smiling at Mr. Weaver while in the movie, we see him pass out and the landlady visiting the other victims she stuffed. The director makes this choice because in the story, the author couldn’t explain the ending well enough so he stops the story. It affects the story because, the reader has to assume the ending while in the movie, we know what’s happening. A similar detail that was in the movie and the book was when the Landlady’s tea tasted bitter to Billy but, he didn’t say it tasted like bitter almonds. The author chose this because, the audience didn’t know that cyanide tasted like bitter almonds so the author put just bitter
With both the movie and the book there were similarities and differences involving the names of the characters. Justice Wargrave was known as Author Cannon in the movie. Also, Vera Claythorne was Ann Clyde. Another difference is Philip Lombard was Charles Morman in the movie. However, there were some similar names, Mr. Blores’ name continued to stay the same as well as Dr. Armstrong.
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
One thing that happened in the movie and not in the book is when a window shatters it was Mr.Kraler trying to get into the business. The reason why Mr.Kraler had to break the window was because Peter forgot to unbolt the door. In the book/play when the window shatters it is a thief robbing Mr.Frank’s business, not Mr.Kraler. Another difference is in the movie Mrs. Frank burns a pan while she is making lunch which causes there so become smoke. In the book/play it doesn’t say anything about Mrs. Frank burning anything. The third difference is in the book/play it states that Peter and Anne go to Peter’s room to talk and get away from the adults. In the movie it shows that they go up to the attic where they kissed. There are many more differences, but these are just a few of
One of the main differences between the book and movies are how Penn and Krakauer interpret Chris McCandless and his story. In the book the story seems to focus more around examining and understanding Chris and his life, whereas the movie shows his life as more of an
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
One thing that can make a book good is characters. In the book, there were many more animals in the farm. The movie did not show many animals except for the main animals. Even thought this is a small difference, it can be noticeable. In the book, Mollie was a character.
For example Norman and Jesse are married way before Norman meets Neal (Jesse’s brother). In the movie Norman meets Neal while is he still courting Jesse. This brings forth another difference Norman doesn’t date Jesse in the book. When Jesse is first introduced, she is already married to Norman. A viewer of the movie who has read the book might also notice that when Norman is never offered a job to teach at Chicago University in the novel. Another big difference between the movie and the novel is the role that Norman’s mother plays, she is a very lively, dynamic character in the book, but in the film she is depicted to a flat character. Paul and Norman have equal fly-fishing skills, but in the movie Norman is just a mere amateur compared to Paul. Rev. Maclean expresses displeasure with Paul's decision to change the spelling of the family name in both version of the story. Someone who might have read the book may believe that the movie didn’t do the book justice when showing Paul’s struggle with his alcohol and gambling addictions. Norman offers to help Paul out with is personal struggles when he is driving Paul and his girlfriend home after a long night of drinking. The offer to help in the novel is done when Paul and Norman go fishing. Some other differences are Rev. Maclean’s personally is almost completely lost in the movie and his most important line “you can love completely without complete understanding” (a
One thing they have in common is that the author had you guessing on who murder Mr.Wright. She keep the mystery theme in the story and didn’t change up on the type of theme on of the books was going to be. Second thing they have in common is that there is no added or absent character from both stories. They keeped all the same characters to play the same role and not interfere with how the story's played out. The last thing they have in common is that they still have some of the same quotes.
There’s 2 different versions, one was released in 2004 and directed by Jeffrey M. Hayes. The version made in 1979 which was directed by Tobe Hooper, and starred David Soul (an American-British actor) and James Mason (an English actor). Both the movie and the book are about the same thing, has the same story, but they do have their differences, whether they be major or small. Mostly every book and movie are not going to be 100% the exact same, for the reason being, when written, stories are told with more enthusiasm, emotion, and told much more deeply, rather than in movies, you might not get all of the details and feelings you do in the
This paragraph is about the story of “The Landlady” which is one of the two stories. This story is mysterious because when Billy Weaver goes to the bed and breakfast