Lady Macbeth Gender Roles

896 Words2 Pages

Margaret Thatcher, former prime minister of the United Kingdom, once said that “If you want something said, ask a man; if you want something done, ask a woman.” This meaning that most men are all talk when it comes to any kind of confrontation. But a woman is more likely to actually take action, instead of hiding behind impolite words. Gender roles and power are reversed and in flux, a leader's personality and action shows through in times of adversity. Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are very much alike, however, the main difference between the two are based on their gender.
When reading the book, Macbeth, I noticed that Lady Macbeth is more powerful in the book than in the play itself. It felt as though her devious actions were more noticeable …show more content…

This relates to Macbeth because of how Macbeth is now the King. You could ask yourself, how long do you think his kingship would last? Sooner or later people will find out that he killed the previous king to obtain his current position. In the hook, G-Eazy asks, “How long does famous last?” In the song, G-Eazy repeats it multiple times. This song is about how G-Eazy is making a serious name for himself but is not quite where he wants to be yet, he has yet to achieve everything he knows he is capable …show more content…

Kind of like how Macbeth is competing for kingship, but no one is really competing against Macbeth. They are given the choice to kill or not to kill, but they all have to think about doing what is best for themselves. In Macbeth, this happens to be his kingship; and in the Hunger Games, it's their lives that they care about, their lives that are on the line. In our society today, if you killed someone no matter the reason, there would and will always be some kind of consequence. Macbeth is hallucinating, “Is this a dagger which I see before me, the handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee” (2.1.44-45). This was the moment in the book where Macbeth was hallucinating, he kept envisioning a dagger. This was also the moment before he killed Banquo. Not to say that there was no consequence to killing someone back then, but I wouldn't say that the consequence is nearly as harsh as it is today. And in the Hunger Games there was no consequence in killing someone. In fact, that was the main objective of the whole

Open Document