Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Early european exploration
The Age of Exploration
Early european exploration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Early european exploration
The New World: Similarities and Differences
When the first groups of people began migrating to America, they all had different ideas of the way their lives would be different in the New World. Each group came to America pursuing different things: religious freedom, new resources, a different life. Yet regardless of what they came for, they were all yearning for the same thing: a fresh start.
In La Relacion, the narrator and his crew were coming from Spain and landed in what we know today as Tampa Bay, Florida. The main purpose of the explorers was to find gold, take it back to their home country, and receive fame and wealth in return for their discovery. The main leader of the expedition was a Spanish explorer named Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca. He is the narrator of this story, providing the first European account of the interior of the New World. Cabeza de Vaca is primarily concerned with how the king sees him when they return to Spain; he does not want to be seen as a failure. Therefore, when writing his account, he tends to only speak of his own heroic actions. In Of Plymouth Plantation, William
…show more content…
Bradford was simply writing his account of their first years after landing in Cape Cod in 1620. He was one of the Pilgrims who had come to America fleeing religious persecution. He had no reason to speak of his own accomplishments in place of others like Cabeza de Vaca did. Therefore, he tended to speak of how his fellow Pilgrims were becoming profitable members of society. Cabeza de Vaca not only exaggerated his own actions, but also spoke poorly of the actions of his crew.
For example, in the first paragraph he spoke of how he took the tiller because all of his men were either passed out or too weak to do so. Also, he made it seem like he had eaten nothing but raw corn since they left on their voyage, leaving the other food for his crew. Although he supposedly let them have all the food, he was somehow still stronger than the rest of his men! This was, of course, because he needed the king to see him as the hero of the story. Bradford, on the other hand, did not make his sailors seem helpless. He gave credit where credit was due. He tended to give God the glory for their provisions as well. Also, his crew seemed to overall have a pleasant attitude in comparison to de Vaca’s account. However, that could be due to Vaca’s extreme
bias. Also, the people’s relationship with the natives was completely different in each of these stories. In La Relacion, the Indians were extremely helpful towards the newcomers. Although they had been stolen from, they saw that what had been stolen from them was necessities, such as a pot to cook with. Therefore, they chose to provide food and necessities, especially because the men were nearly dead. In Of Plymouth Plantation, the Indians were not as comfortable with the newcomers, and did not welcome them as readily. Finally, one bold native approached the men and to their surprise, began speaking English. A few days later, he brought their chief and several others to make peace, which went on for several decades. The Indians not only offered food to the foreigners, but also provided them with the knowledge necessary to let them thrive for years afterwards. This relationship was very important to their survival, as they were taught many skills necessary to survive. Also, through the Indians, the Pilgrims got to experience their first Thanksgiving, a tradition that still goes on to this day. The two groups of people that we see in these stories have a few things in common, such as the trouble they encountered, whether it be with the weather or the Native Americans. Ultimately though, the character of the leaders, the actions of the crew members, and the interactions with the Indians are all defining points that distinguish these accounts.
The short story No Oyes Ladrar a Los Perros emphasizes the importance of family. The protagonist in the story is Ignacio. He got mixed in the wrong crowd after his mother died and became a thief and a murderer. One night, he is robbing someone's house and in self-defense, the person stabs Ignacio, which causes a fatal injury. His dad then finds him, carries him on his shoulders, and carries him into the city in an attempt to find a doctor. On their way there, his dad asks him ¿Lloras, Ignacio? Lo hace llorar a usted el recuerdo de su madre, ¿verdad? Pero nunca hizo usted nada por ella. Nos pagó siempre mal. Parece que en lugar de cariño, le hubiéramos retacado el cuerpo de maldad. ¿Y ya ve? Ahora lo han herido. ¿Qué pasó con sus amigos? Los
After reading Alsultany’s “Los Intersticios: Recasting Moving Selves,” I realized that there are many misconceptions among those who have single or mixed racial background. For individuals who have more than one races, it may seem that they are at an advantage since they have luxury to take side with which ever race they choose. However, it actually results in a constant aggravation when one is constantly questioned about their race. Alsultany was asked by her classmate about her racial background. It was apparent that her classmate confirmed in her mind that Alsultany was different from her since she didn’t supposedly fit the description of a typical American, despite mentioning that she was born and raised in the U.S. This further strengthened
Research Question: What role does food play in the formation of cultural identity, but particularly about the formation of Mexican identity?
Ooka Shohei named the last chapter of Fires on the Plain “In Praise of Transfiguration.” Through the whole novel, readers witness the protagonist Tamura transform from an innocent soldier to a killer. Readers watch him go from condemning the practice of eating human flesh to eating human flesh for his own survival. At the end, Readers see Tamura’s redemption as he shot Nagamatsu who killed and ate his own comrade Yasuda. What was the difference between two men who both killed and ate human beings? To Tamura, the guilt of eating human flesh distinguished himself from Nagamatsu who cold-bloodily killed Yasuda. As Tamura recalled, “I do not remember whether I shot him at that moment. But I do know that I did not eat his flesh; this I should certainly have remembered.” (224) The fact of him shooting at Nagamatsu had no importance to Tamura. However, his emphasis on not eating
In "The Narrative of Cabeza de Vaca", Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca’s fight for survival, while being deprived of the basic necessities of life, proves there is a change in him from the beginning of the narrative to the end. This transformation, though, affected multiple aspects of de Vaca, including his motives, character, and perspective of civilization. Cabeza de Vaca’s experience is crucial to the history of America, as well as Spain, because it was one of the first accounts that revealed a certain equilibrium between the mighty and superior Spaniard and the Indian, once the Spaniard was stripped of his noble stature. The idea of nakedness is consistent throughout the narrative and conveys the tribulations he experienced and a sort of balance between him and the Indians. The original intentions of conquering and populating the area between Florida and a northern part of Mexico quickly shifted Cabeza de Vaca’s focus to the need to survive. His encounter with different Indian tribes and ability to get along with them (no matter what the means), and then prosper as a medicine man, shows that through his beliefs in Christian faith, and in himself, he turned the failure into an unexpected success.
The passage from Bernal Díaz del Castillo’s The True History of the Conquest of New Spain is a clear example of a narrative source. Díaz is presenting his personal account of Hernan Cortes’s expedition into Tenochtitlan. An interesting aspect of this narrative is that it was written almost 50 years after the events described occurred . Bernal Díaz del Castillo was only 24 years old when on November 8, 1519 he and the rest of Hernán Cortés’s expedition first entered the city of Tenochtitlán . He did not finish his account, titled The True History of the Conquest of New Spain, which many suspect was intended as a slight to Francisco López de Gómara’s accounts of the expeditions , until 1567 . This was not his first travel to the New World, in fact, it was his fourth . Díaz del Castillo was 19 years old the first time he traveled to the Americas, this time was to Panama . Díaz later became a governor in Guatemala, mostly as a reward for his actions as a conquistador . The event that is commonly seen as spurring the not-well-educated Bernal Díaz del Castillo to write of his experiences with Cortés was the publication of Francisco López de Gómara’s Coleccion de historiadores primitivos de las Indias Occidentales, which Díaz saw as seriously flawed and underappreciating the work of the conquistadors . The book this passage comes from languished on shelves until it was published in 1632, posthumously .
Admittedly, these men are responsible for much of the exploration of the America’s, but to focus on so few of the explorers ignores how reactive their actions were, and the larger narrative of the world at that time (4). For example, Columbus is praised and idolized for discovering the America’s, however it was only by luck that he arrived on those shores. Moreover, there were many other explorers at the time who could have reached the America’s if Columbus had not done so first (9). Another man who is seen as the key figure in the actual Conquest is Cortes. Cortes’ campaign in the America’s is commonly viewed as the standard to strive for, yet it is also the exception to a typical conquest (19). He is viewed as some above-it-all conquistador idol, when in all actuality he merely followed the standard protocol of the Conquest (19). This does not mean that Cortes’ actions were any less inspirational, merely that they were not uncharacteristic acts that he created (19). Both Columbus and Cortes were merely following standard procedure of the time, yet they are written about as if they were heroes of their time, bravely going and doing what none had done before. And in some sense, they were the first to discover and conquer, but it is foolish to assume that just because they were the first to be in the America’s
America is a land filled with immigrants coming from different corners of the worlds, all in hopes of finding a better life in the country. However, No one had an easy transition from his or her home country to this foreign land. Not every race thrived the same way—some were luckier than others, while some have faced enormous obstacles in settling down and being part of the American society. Many people have suffered
In the years from 1860 through 1890, the prospect of a better life attracted nearly ten million immigrants who settled in cities around the United States. The growing number of industries produced demands for thousands of new workers and immigrants were seeking more economic opportunities. Most immigrants settled near each other’s own nationality and/or original village when in America.
Between 1790 and 1820 the U.S. population more than doubled due to the high immigration rates. They had come to America hoping for a better life, and to get
In the eyes of the early American colonists and the founders of the Constitution, the United States was to represent the ideals of acceptance and tolerance to those of all walks of life. When the immigration rush began in the mid-1800's, America proved to be everything but that. The millions of immigrants would soon realize the meaning of hardship and rejection as newcomers, as they attempted to assimilate into American culture. For countless immigrants, the struggle to arrive in America was rivaled only by the struggle to gain acceptance among the existing American population.
Since the 19th century, America became a place where millions of people aspire to immigrate intensively. In order to pursuit a better life, freedom, and equality, people have to leave their hometowns and family, deal with uncertainty. Why were so many people willing to leave their family and go to the United States for pursuing their American Dreams? The most important reason that people chose to immigrate to America was they believed that they had opportunities to earn a better life. No matter how hard they tried, their lives are barely improved. Therefore, people were dissatisfied and despaired with their own countries since their efforts did not pay off. However, reality was cruelly destroying the path to the dream, additionally; people
America the land of opportunities, millions of people have left their countries to look for a chance to start a new life, a new beginning. Over the last 400 years, immigrants from different parts of the world left their countries for different reasons, some for war in their homelands others for economic and social reasons. Mexican community was one of the first group of people that stablished a strong presence in the country; therefor had and still has big influence in the development of the United States economically and industrially. Besides the contributions of the Mexican Community to America, Mexican decedents had faced challenges of acceptance from the American society, in a land that once was Mexican territory.
Immigrants leave their countries in search for a better life and improvement of their situation. There is no singular reason for immigration; motivations range from better economic prospects to political safety. As of late, the number of immigrants living in the United States is an estimated 11 million. Those who immigrate are expected to contribute to the United States culturally, politically, and economically. Yet, full assimilation becomes difficult to achieve when the immigrant is made into “the other” by the country of reception.
Determined to join the American lifestyle thousands of immigrants have journeyed to this great land to have a life based upon “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” This country’s backbone is immigration and it started when this