Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Creative writing on war
Good effects war had on literature
Essay about the Ernest Hemingway biography
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Aaqib Dal
George Slobodzian
Essay
English 103
25-october-2017
Krebs life post-war experience
Introduction:
The story of Soldier’s Home by Ernest Hemingway talks about Krebs who came back home
from a war and have a hard time to readjust in the society where he came from. Krebs starts
telling lies to people about what happens in the war because no one listens to him. Hemingway
shows the connection, fear, and conflict of Krebs in the society after coming back from the war
through conformity characterization, symbolization. The author’s message is that the
experience of war is a very personal one for everyone that experiences it and that war
distances people from society’s norms,
…show more content…
values and even emotionally from their family. First, Hemingway uses conformity to show his actual connection with society before and after the war. “There is a picture which shows him among his fraternity brothers, all of them wearing exactly the same height and style collar” (9). Hemingway shows us the picture where Krebs is with his college friends. It shows that there is a time when Krebs is able to connect with his friends and people of the society. The authors describe Krebs life’s after the war when he comes back and he did not receive the greeting from the society where the other soldiers get it. It feels him that he is no longer part of the society. Earlier he did not want to talk about the war but after he wants to talk but no one interested to hear. The narrator says “Later he felt to need to talk but no one wanted to hear about it. His town had heard too many atrocity stories to be thrilled by actualities. Krebs found that to be listened to at all he had to lie, and after he had done it twice he, too, had a reaction against the war and against talking about it” (10). People think that there is something strange which allow Krebs to come late from the war and they did not listen to him because they already listen to many stories from other soldiers. To get the attention of the society, Krebs has to speak some unimportant lie about his time during the world war. The war experience would not allow him to live his life as a normal person as he had before the war. (Hemingway 9, 10) Second, the author uses characterization to tell about the fear of Krebs on how he interacts with the people of society and other soldiers who are with him in the war.
The narrator says:
“Krebs acquired the nausea in regard to experience that is the result of untruth or
exaggeration, and when he occasionally met another man who had really been a soldier and
them talked a few minutes in the dressing room at a dance he fell into the essay pose of the old
soldier among other soldiers: that he had been badly, sickeningly frightened all the time. In this
way he lost everything” (10).
Hemingway reveals that all the stories which he tells are all lie to everyone in the society even
the stories are a lie as he did not have a very good experience in the war. He speaks lies to
those soldiers also who are with him during the war which makes him more scared and
frightened and in this way he loses himself completely because the other soldiers know the
reality what actually happens in the war. The authors show his character at one more place
when his mother says to him, “Don’t you love your mother, dear boy? “(11).
“No,” (11) Krebs said. The author shows us the character of Krebs that how emotionally he
…show more content…
lose everything after the war experience even he cannot share his feeling with his mom. (Hemingway 10,11). Lastly, the narrator uses girls as a symbolization to show us the conflict of Krebs towards them before and after the war.
He says, “He liked to look at them from the front porch as they
walked on the other side of the street. He liked to watch them walking under the shade of the
trees”
(10). The narrator describes the strong feeling of Krebs toward the girls that in the start he is
interesting to looking at girls in the town. He would like to have a girl. He loves to see them.
“He did not want any consequences. He did not want any consequences ever again. He wanted
to live along without consequences. Besides he did not really need a girl” (10). The author
reveals us that he has good feelings before the war but after the war, his feeling changes
completely toward the girl. He just looks them as he has some sexual feeling and wants some
good time with them but on other hand he wants his life to be simple and he did not want any
consequences with anyone. This all shows that how difficult is for Krebs to reconnect himself
with girls in his hometown. (Hemingway,10).
Conclusion:
Ernest Hemingway shows the life of the main character in the story that how Krebs life
changes after the war experience as he did not receive the respect of a soldier after coming back to the town. The people of his town do not believe in him as he comes late from the war. He starts telling lie stories of war to get people close but he speaks lies to everyone even his fellow soldiers which makes him fear and becomes mentally ill where he feels isolated from the society. The author uses the girl as a symbol or weakness of the man he likes them before the war but after he just likes them but does not want the further relationship with them where he does not want any consequences or trouble with them. He just wants to live his life in a simple way.
He figured out that his personality had changed and realized that he now felt more mean. War changes people, with some changes being very dramatic and very quick. This is evident in the behavior of Norman Bowker, Bob “Rat” Kiley, and Tim O’Brien. These changes affected each person differently, but they all had dramatic changes to their personalities. These changes have very severe effects on each person.
about the war and his lack of place in his old society. The war becomes
There is a major change in the men in this novel. At first, they are excited to join the army in order to help their country. After they see the truth about war, they learn very important assets of life such as death, destruction, and suffering. These emotions are learned in places like training camp, battles, and hospitals. All the men, dead or alive, obtained knowledge on how to deal with death, which is very important to one’s life.
Tim O’Brien’s ultimate purpose is to detract the fine line between fiction and reality. In order to fully grasp what a true war story consists of, the definition of true must be deciphered. O’Brien seems to believe that it does not need to be pure facts. Instead, it is mostly found in the imagination of the individual. Readers need to receive a story based on the truth in its overall purpose and meaning. It just needs to feel true. The author implies that it is not important whether the event actually occurred or not, because if the reader wants to believe it that badly, the feeling of truth will always be present.
An interesting combination of recalled events and editorial commentary, the story is not set up like a traditional short story. One of the most interesting, and perhaps troubling, aspects of the construction of “How to Tell a True War Story” is O’Brien’s choice to create a fictional, first-person narrator who might just as well be the author himself. Because “How to Tell a True War Story” is told from a first-person perspective and O’Brien is an actual Vietnam veteran, a certain authenticity to this story is added. He, as the “expert” of war leads the reader through the story. Since O’Brien has experienced the actual war from a soldier’s point of view, he should be able to present the truth about war...
To write a true war story that causes the readers to feel the way the author felt during the war, one must utilize happening-truth as well as story-truth. The chapter “Good Form” begins with Tim O’Brien telling the audience that he’s forty-three years old, and he was once a soldier in the Vietnam War. He continues by informing the readers that everything else within The Things They Carried is made up, but immediately after this declaration he tells the readers that even that statement is false. As the chapter continues O’Brien further describes the difference between happening-truth and story-truth and why he chooses to utilize story-truth throughout the novel. He utilizes logical, ethical, and emotional appeals throughout the novel to demonstrate the importance of each type of truth. By focusing on the use of emotional appeals, O’Brien highlights the differences between story-truth and happening-truth and how story-truth can be more important and truer than the happening-truth.
He arrives back at his town, unused to the total absence of shells. He wonders how the populations can live such civil lives when there are such horrors occurring at the front. Sitting in his room, he attempts to recapture his innocence of youth preceding the war. But he is now of a lost generation, he has been estranged from his previous life and war is now the only thing he can believe in. It has ruined him in an irreversible way and has displayed a side of life which causes a childhood to vanish alongside any ambitions subsequent to the war in a civil life. They entered the war as mere children, yet they rapidly become adults. The only ideas as an adult they know are those of war. They have not experienced adulthood before so they cannot imagine what it will be lie when they return. His incompatibility is shown immediately after he arrives at the station of his home town. ”On the platform I look round; I know no one among all the people hurrying to and fro. A red-cross sister offers me something to drink. I turn away, she smiles at me too foolishly, so obsessed with her own importance: "Just look, I am giving a soldier coffee!"—She calls me "Comrade," but I will have none of it.” He is now aware of what she is
Several stories into the novel, in the section, “How to tell a true war story”, O’Brien begins to warn readers of the lies and exaggerations that may occur when veterans tell war stories.
The truth to any war does not lie in the depths of storytelling but rather it’s embedded in every person involved. According to O’Brien, “A true war story does not depend on that kind of truth. Absolute occurrence is irrelevant. A thing may happen and be a total lie; another thing may not happen and be truer than the truth” (pg. 80). Truths of any war story in my own opinion cannot be fully conveyed or explained through the use of words. Any and all war stories provide specific or certain facts about war but each of them do not and cannot allow the audience to fully grasp the tru...
...often times tragic and can ruin the lives of those who fight. The effects of war can last for years, possibly even for the rest of the soldiers life and can also have an effect on those in the lives of the soldier as well. Soldiers carry the memories of things they saw and did during war with them as they try and regain their former lives once the war is over, which is often a difficult task. O’Brien gives his readers some insight into what goes on in the mind of a soldier during combat and long after coming home.
In Hemingway’s short story “Soldier’s Home”, Hemingway introduces us to a young American soldier, that had just arrived home from World War I. Harold Krebs, our main character, did not receive a warm welcome after his arrival, due to coming home a few years later than most soldiers. After arriving home, it becomes clear that World War I has deeply impacted the young man, Krebs is not the same man that headed off to the war. The war had stripped the young man of his coping mechanism, female companionship, and the ability to achieve the typical American life.
When people think of the military, they often think about the time they spend over in another country, hoping they make it back alive. No one has ever considered the possibility that they may have died inside. Soldiers are reborn through war, often seeing through the eyes of someone else. In “Soldier’s home” by Ernest Hemingway, the author illustrates how a person who has been through war can change dramatically if enough time has passed. This story tells of a man named Harold (nick name: Krebs) who joined the marines and has finally come back after two years. Krebs is a lost man who feels it’s too complicated to adjust to the normal way of living and is pressured by his parents.
...has failed to help him deal with his inner emotions from his military experience. He has been through a traumatic experience for the past two years, and he does not have anyone genuinely interested in him enough to take the time to find out what's going on in his mind and heart. Kreb's is disconnected from the life he had before the war, and without genuine help and care from these people he lived with, and around all his childhood life, it's difficult to return to the routines that everyone is accustomed to.
nobody realizes how bad the soldiers actually have so he is forced to lie. He says “No,
...ien writes this story in a completely non traditional way and manages to create a whole new experience for the reader. He takes the reader out of the common true, false diameters and forces the reader to simply experience the ultimate truth of the story by reliving the emotional truth that the war caused him. Although this may be a bit challenging for the reader, it becomes much easier once the reader understands the purpose for the constant contradictions made by O’Brien. The difference between “story-truth” and “happening-truth” is that “story-truth” is fictional, and “happening-truth” is the actual factual truth of what happened. The “story-truth” is the most important when it comes to O’Brien, and understanding his work. It is meant to capture the heart and mind of the readers and take them on a journey through war with the O’Brien, as he experienced and felt it.