Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Complex Character of King Richard II
The Complex Character of King Richard II
Morality in Richard III
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Complex Character of King Richard II
“RICHARD: To entertain these fair well-spoken days, I am determined to prove a villain And hate the idle pleasures of these days. Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous, By drunken prophecies, libels, and dreams” (Act 1, Scene 1, Lines 29-33) It is clear in these lines that Richard possess a will to cause harm unto others. He has laid plans and made active choices that are villainous in nature. Furthermore, he himself is “determined to prove a villain”. Sometimes more important than the roles that others place on us are the roles we assign to ourselves. Not only does Richard feel as though he must be villainous to achieve his ends, he actively wants to take on the role of the villain. To further build on to Richard’s role as an antagonist, …show more content…
To be very blunt, there is a certain amount of death and despair to go about in all worlds. The purpose of this examination is not to determine what of this death and despair Richard directed to others, but rather the determine how much additional harm he caused unto the world around him. The first way we determine what falls under the general despair of the universe and what does not is by establishing necessity. Richard does not need to be king- he wants to. This means that any actions taken by Richard in the name of ascending to the throne are relevant to our examination. Next, and actions that were taken by Richard in self-defense, or as a response to the actions of others can be taken to be necessary. Given these two broad criteria, why is Richard conclusively a villain under the scope of utilitarianism? First, let us examine the …show more content…
GLOUCESTER: Chop off his head.” (Act 3, Scene 2, Lines 193-196) Richard’s pursuit of the throne is unfettered and clouded by no external factors. This is heavily reflected in his actions. Without hesitation, he calls for the death of Lord Hastings at the mere suggestion that he might not comply. His detached approach to human life and liberty lead him to murder and pillage as he sees fit. Often this is not only to achieve personal goals but also for the sake of causing harm as it pleases him. This is exemplified in the following quote: “RICHARD: Which done, God take King Edward to his mercy And leave the world for me to bustle in!” (Act 1, Scene 1, Lines 152-153) Richard not only desires the throne and to rise to power, but also to have the unlimited ability to cause harm that comes with processing the power of being king. He wants to be able to “bustle in” the world as he
I feel that Richard gains our sympathy when he resigns the crown, refuses to read the paper that highlights his crimes, and smashes the mirror, which represents his vanity. In terms of kingship, I interpret the play as an exploration between the contrast with aristocratic pride in the law and the king's omnipotent powers. It also shows the chain reaction on kingship as past events in history determine present
...ive for Richard’s manipulation in different ways, reflecting the values of their respective zeitgeists, and Looking for Richard emphasizes that there is no fear of divine retribution in the modern context, but the impact of their immoral behavior on their individual identity.
Another cause for his unpopularity was the question of benevolences. When he was crowned Richard promised to stop the use of benevolences as this was particularly disliked by the nobles. However because of the war with Scotland , the threat of Henry and rebellions Richard had to later ask for benevolences once again. This made him even more
The undeniable pursuit for power is Richard’s flaw as a Vice character. This aspect is demonstrated in Shakespeare’s play King Richard III through the actions Richard portrays in an attempt to take the throne, allowing the audience to perceive this as an abhorrent transgression against the divine order. The deformity of Richards arm and back also symbolically imply a sense of villainy through Shakespeare’s context. In one of Richard’s soliloquies, he states how ‘thus like the formal Vice Iniquity/ I moralize two meanings in one word’. Through the use of immoral jargons, Shakespeare emphasises Richard’s tenacity to attain a sense of power. However, Richard’s personal struggle with power causes him to become paranoid and demanding, as demonstrated through the use of modality ‘I wish’ in ‘I wish the bastards dead’. This act thus becomes heavily discordant to the accepted great chain of being and conveys Richard’s consumption by power.
Richard did not manage to recover from the usurpation of Edward and after allegedly murdering the two Princes in the tower his reputation had fallen greatly. He had lost a lot of respect from nobles and from the populus. Killing the Princes could be seen as one of the major factors of his downfall. It was common place in monarchical families to have brothers and sisters "put out of the picture", but even in these primitive times, the murder of innocent children was a taboo.
“I am determined to prove a villain / and hate the idle pleasures of these days. / Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous, / by drunken prophecies, libels and dreams.” Richard III, the evil Duke of Gloucester, is fighting a bloody road to the crown in Shakespeare's dramatic play. Stopped by nothing and with brilliant intelligence, Richard fights his way to the king’s position, clothing his villany with “old odd ends stolen out of holy writ.” With no one to fully trust, Richard breaks many hearts by killing all people in his way, and becomes the unstoppable villain. He hides behind a shield of kindness and care, but when he is alone, his real soul comes alive. Sending murderers, or killing people himself, he has no mercy. Manipulating Lady Anne to marry him and promising Buckingham rewards for his deeds, he knows what he is doing, and won’t stop until the crown lies at his feet.
In this play of challenge and debate, could it be possibly suggested that King Richard had a part to play in the murder of his uncle the Duke of Gloucester? Could the reader possibly pick up this assumption having known nothing about the play? These are all factors that one must find by reading in between the lines, noticing and understanding the silence that is exchanged. For the silence is just as important as the speech.Why is it assumed that King Richard II has anything to do with the murder? Let us review a scene from the play were Gaunt accuses Richard of being accountable for Gloucester's death.
...e was also writing in Tudor England and seemed to have openly dislike Richard III. In other portions of his writing he describes Richard as an unattractive deformed man who was born with a full set of teeth. He writes that he had a “sour countenance , which seemed to savour of mischief, and utter evidently craft and deceit.”
Richard the III was labeled a villain in our story but that was a title which he did not deserve. He did commit a few crimes but, it was his full intent to help the people of england and be their saviour. Richard knew what it was like to be weak and be in need of help. He wanted to end a war to save more soldiers lives. And he wanted to stop the lesser line of kings from giving a poor rule to the people. Richard the III was not a villain he was a hero.
This contributes to a very villainous role. Richard begins his journey to the throne. He manipulates Lady Anne. into marrying him, even though she knows that he murdered her first. husband.
"therefore, since I can not prove a lover, To entertain these fair well spoken days, I am determined to be a villain".As a villain Richard must be heartless, he can not let his emotions interfere with his actions.
From the outset of the play, it is obvious that Richard subscribes to the majority of the Machiavellian principles. Certainly, he is not ashamed or afraid to plot heinous murder, and he does so with an ever-present false front. "I do mistake my person all this while,"1 he muses, plotting Anne's death minutes after having won her hand. He will not even entertain the ideas in public, demanding they "Dive...down to [his] soul."2 He knows that he must be cunning and soulless to succeed in his tasks. Richard also knows it is essential to guard against the hatred of the populace, as Machiavelli warned.
Richard is terrible at handling his money and cannot fund the war in Ireland. The people do not have right to get rid of him because he believes he was chosen by God. This also ties into the next privilege of absolute power. King Richard II believes everyone should obey without question. The only way they can question his leadership if he contradicts God’s Law. Another example of King Richard’s II hungry for power is when John of Gaunt dies Richard helps himself to his land and his money. King Richard is starting for power and will do anything to fill that that hunger pain.
had Clarence killed so that he could have an uncontested line to the throne. Shakespeare also said that Richard killed young
This is a prime example of Richard using his authority by way of rulings and pronouncements rather than action, even to the point of disallowing an action. Bolingbroke, on the other hand, is quite ready to do battle no matter what the consequences. Moments before Richard puts a stop to the proceedings, Bolingbroke says, ". . . let no noble eye profane a tear / For me, if I be gorged with Mowbray's spear" (1.3.58-59). Here is a man who is resolved in his intent.