King Ramses Armed Forces At The Battle Of Kadesh

927 Words2 Pages

The novel emphasizes the strategic military intervention of king Ramses, as he forms his armed forces to confront the powerful Hittite forces of the ancient world at the battle of Kadesh.Ancient Egypt and the Hittites are two neighbouring nations constantly at war due to their geographic proximity and relentless desire to expand their empire.The great king Ramses, son of king Seti was a warrior with charming attributes and strong decisions. Although he was not popular like his father, his commitment towards egypt aided him to protect his borders and establish peace.Despite the enemies outside egypt and within egypt, he managed to acquire the strength and stability necessary for his armies to advance successfully.
Author Christian Jacq presented …show more content…

The text “the Hittites were growing restless, and Seti no longer alive.Pushing beyond their territory, the fierce anatolians had moved as far south as Damascus” reflects increasing tensions between the nations and the ignorance of the Hittites towards Ramses, the successor of King Seti. King Ramses did not receive the same respect and consideration from the Hittites as his father Seti. This notion that Ramses would be an effortless competition made the Hittites violate agreements set by his father and seize Egyptian provinces.Another obstacle that hindered king Ramses’s conquest was his own family. The words of Shanar, brother of Ramses, “the treasury maybe depleted for a time, but I ll be king.And ramses will soon be forgotten” portray strong hatred towards Ramses. Shanar had the most trusted position in the royal court and his selfish motives included aiding hittites and betraying Ramses to seek the royal crown.The Hittites viewed this family feud as their weapon to utilize against Egyptian forces; they often contacted Shanar to strike Egypt during the weakest of time.Despite all intrusions, a unique characteristic of this battle is that the egyptian military strategically tackled the hittites and proved excellence to egyptian people.The king's reign gained acceptance and …show more content…

Most cause serious casualties and death on both sides; therefore, many countries avoid such circumstances and take control. Peace treaties and diplomatic relations have led to the advancements of countless nation. However, a warfare similar to egypt versus the Hittites drains optimism and energy from most soldiers.An example of such warfare would be the ceaseless conflict between India and Pakistan that is prevalent even to this day.Because of their geographic nearness, constant disputes were frequently unleashed in borders of these nations.The kargil war, which was caused by the infiltration of pakistan army in the kargil district of kashmir had striking resemblance to the battles fought by Egypt before the battle of kadesh.In the ancient era, the hittites invaded provinces of Canaan and Amurru from egypt; in 1999, pakistan army invaded kargil of kashmir from India.Both forces had similar situations where enemy troops killed and injured thousands of men.Both nation were capable of stabilizing the nation to protect from further attacks. Pakistan army displayed the military strategy of the Hittites, where they organized local insurgents to attack Kargil instead of an open declaration of war with India. Surprise invasion from hittites struck egypt similarly; therefore, most of the events that contributed to the battle of kadesh and the military approach utilized by the ancient worlds are similar to that of

Open Document