Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The English Restoration under Charles II
Restoration england essay
Catholicism in the 17th century in England
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The English Restoration under Charles II
On May 29, 1660, King Charles II arrived in London amongst a sense of euphoria and great fanfare. The monarch, recently arrived from exile on the European continent, seemed to air a sense that the troubles of the past were behind England, and the nation was poised to enter a new period with a Stuart monarch at its helm. Unfortunately, the newly arrived King produced no legitimate heirs during his reign, and the monarchy fell to his younger brother upon his death. After the death of King Charles II, King James II ascended the throne of England. While James II was the legitimate heir to the throne, his personality differences between himself and King Charles II and his policy differences forced England to endure yet another period of political upheaval. In truth, the restoration experienced by King Charles II collapsed twenty eight years later in 1688 forcing King James II to lose the crown and seek asylum on the European continent in the process.
While this collapse of the restoration has many causes, arguably, King James’s personality played one of the most prominent reasons. During King Charles’s reign, the “Merry Monarch” had created a royal court rife with scandalous behavior and never ending avarice. On the contrary, King James II had been a soldier all his life, and as his life progressed, his Catholic piety increased proportionally. Thus, when King James II assumed the throne he had no desire to continue the lifestyle experienced at his brother’s court. James, above all else, prized order, hierarchy, piety, and discipline. As a result, he removed from the royal court “all men and women of pleasure including his own mistress, Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester” This had the effect of making the royal court much mo...
... middle of paper ...
...ul alienation of prominent politicians. Conversely, King Charles II produced no legitimate offspring, and even if he had produced a legitimate heir, King Charles II was a Protestant, at least up until his deathbed when he converted to Catholicism. That being said, his brother was everything that Charles was not, and after a reign of only three years England once again faced a political crisis and a monarch in exile, the often cantankerous King James II.
Bibliography
Bucholz, Robert, and Newton Key. Early Modern England 1485-1714 a Narrative History. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009.
Cook, Harold. "Orange revolution." Nature 452, no. 7190 (2008): 937-8.
The Royal Household. The Official Website of the British Monarchy. 2009. http://www.royal.gov.uk/HistoryoftheMonarchy/KingsandQueensoftheUnitedKingdom/TheStuarts/JamesII.aspx (accessed December 15, 2013).
Goldstein,Gary. "The Life of Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford (1550-1604)" Luminarium: Anthology of English Literature. Anniina Jokinen, 3rd of June 1999. Web. 25th of April 2014.
The Elizabethan Deliverance - Arthur Bryant Reformation and Revolution 1558-1660 - Robert Ashton Elizabeth and her Parliaments - J.E. Neales Elizabeth and her Reign - Richard Salter Elizabeth I and religion 1558-1603 - Susan Doran Tudor England - John Guy Elizabeth I - David Starkey
There was a short time where all was calm right after the civil war. king charles the second and his father were both dead so Charles brother took over. this is king James the secondf and he was a Catholic sao he appointed many high positions in the government. Most of his sibjects were protestant and did not like the idea of Catholicism being the religion theyd have to abide by. like his father and brother king james the second ignored the peoples wishes and ruled without Parliament and relied on royal power. an English Protestant leader wanted to take the power away from james and give it to his daughter Mary and Her husband William from the Netherlands. William saled out to the south of england with his troops but sent them away soon after they landed
Charles I was the second born son to King James I, who had also reigned under a constitutional monarchy, but large disagreement between Parliament and James I led to an essentially absolutist approach to governance. Likewise, Charles I disagreed with the Parliament on many factors. Charles was far from the contemporary model of a figurehead monarchy we see in today’s world, and his political reach extended throughout the English empire, even to the New World. Infact, I claim, he practiced a more absolutist form of monarchy than did the Czars of Russia; he dissolved Parliament three times. This unprecedented power led to (other than corruption) a strict contradiction of the principles of republicanism which most constitutional monarchies agreed on. And while many were in favor of an overlooking Parliament, his unopposed voice led the voyage to the New World as well as the charter for the Massachussets Bay Colony, and he fostered many internal improvements throughout England, which further benifetted the economy. Unfortunately, Charles began to push his limits as a monarch, and many became upset (including New Worlders from Massachussets) to the point of abdicating him and executing him for treason. Nevertheless, his positive effects on society and political rennovations persist in today’s
Burns, William E."Britain in the Late Middle Ages, 1272–1529." A Brief History of Great Britain, Brief History. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010. Modern World History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?
Investigating the Minister Who Did the Most to Preserve and Enhance Royal Authority in France 1610-1715
During the Stuarts, the only people who had the liquid cash to pay for the needs of the modern government were primarily the middle-class and gentry, which were represented by the parliament. The “awkward, hand-to-mouth expedients” (38) of the Stuarts agitated by the differences in expectations of governance, brought them into conflict with their primary tax base. The impatience of the eventual rebels was exacerbated by their Stuart’s disregard for the traditional balance between the crown and the parliament, as they were Scottish royals who had only dealt with a very weak
1. King James I of England can be described as a forceful, independent and corrupt monarch. As a result of dealing with Puritans, who wanted to get rid of the hierarchical episcopal system of Church governance and replace it with a more representative Presbyterian form that is like the one the Calvinists have, James displayed his forcefulness. At the Hampton Court Conference in 1604, James rejected the Puritans and clearly stated that he wanted to reinforce the Anglican episcopacy. Despite the tensions his actions may have caused, James did what he believed to be right, instead of compromising and possibly coming up with an agreement. James was independent because he didn’t want Parliament to help him, so he seldom asked for their assistance.
On December 11, 1689, in his last act as the King of England, James II fled to France with his wife and son. He threw the Great Seal, the symbol of the King of England, into the Thames River. He did this to signify that no one on earth had the power to strip him of his crown and his divine authority except himself. Even after all his dignity had been lost, James adhered to his beliefs. Ironically a fisherman caught the symbol in his net a few days later. A workingman, the lowest rung on the political ladder, now held the power, symbolically and literally. England’s people had become autonomous.
King Solomon King Solomon ruled all of Israel in an outstanding way from 977 to 937 BCE (12). Despite his wealth and power, Solomon is known in history for his wisdom and as the builder of the Temple of Jerusalem. He has been credited with authoring all or parts of three books of the Bible (Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Solomon). King Solomon was the ruler of ancient Israel who reigned from 961-922 BC (8). He is the son of David and Bathsheba.
George I became King of England in 1714 when his distant cousin Queen Ann died. After Ann’s last surviving child had died in 1700, many people claimed that only her half brother James Francis Edward Stuart, a Roman Catholic and son of King James II, had right to succeed her. In 1701, the parliament passed an Act of Settlement that made sure no Catholic would be Monarch. The act provided that Princess Sophia, a Protestant, would succeed Ann as ruler of England unless Ann had another child. Sophia’s son George, became heir to the throne in August 1714(The Royal Heraldry of England).
Sara Mendelson and Patricia Crawford, Women in Early Modern England 1550-1720 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 37-9 Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.utah.edu/journals/parergon/v019/19.1.crawford.pdf
When Louis XV died in 1774 Louis Augusta became king and Marie became queen. She was fast, vivacious, bold and a person who loved to party, gamble, spend late nights and indulge in extravagant fashion. When she would return from her late night partying the king would be fast asleep and when she would get up at noon the king would be at work. Due to this reason their marriage w...
Burns, Julia. "Notes MLA 6318". Church and State in Early Modern England. Fall 2013. Dr. D. David.
Pettegree, Andrew. "The English Reformation." BBC History. BBC, 17 Feb 2011. Web. 1 Oct 2013.