Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The rise of puritans
Political puritan values
The Impact of Puritans on American policy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The rise of puritans
If one were to examine England during the 1620’s and 1630’s, one would see an England writhe with religious anxieties. These worries permeated every aspect of English society from the wealthiest of gentry to the lay Englishman and woman. Having said that, it is difficult to pinpoint precisely what key event contributed to this level of worry; nevertheless, when English society is examined as a whole, a clear picture emerges of England as a nation plagued by a plethora of concerns, not just one solitary issue. However, all of these concerns have a tenuous connection to the actions of the monarchy.
Realistically, the monarchy of England during the 1620’s and 1630’s did little to stifle religious anxieties left over from the reign of King James I. Rather, King James’ son King Charles I only exacerbated already existing conditions. King Charles I inherited a largely Protestant England from his father that was still facing questions over church structure and doctrine. In particular, the question over episcopacy was still unpopular amongst Puritan reformers within the Church of England. This issue was further compounded during King Charles’s reign by the rise of the Arminians and their doctrine, which for Puritan minded reformers bared a strong resemblance to Roman Catholicism.
With this in mind, King Charles I angered the Puritan contingent in England by appointing Arminians to positions of power and prestige. In 1628, the king appointed William Laud Bishop of London, and then the king appointed Laud Archbishop of Canterbury in 1633. William Laud’s appointments to positions of power and his strong Arminian tendencies worried both Puritan reformers and more moderate English Calvinists. This anxiety was created because of several key ...
... middle of paper ...
...his fact did not abate concerns over religion. Realistically, the perception created by Charles played the largest role in the fuelling of religious anxieties. With this in mind, many Protestants in England perceived the king as a leader being undermined by a Catholic queen, a king who had abandoned the Protestant cause, and a monarch that supported a controversial theology. All of these perceptions, whether true or not, served to create a period of great religious tension.
Bibliography
Bucholz, Robert, and Newton Key. Early Modern England 1485-1714 A Narrative History. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2009.
Reynolds, Mathew. "Predestination and Parochial Dispute in the 1630s: The Case of the Norwich Lectureships." The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 59 (July 2008): 407-25.
Worden, Blair. The English Civil Wars 1640-1660. Phoenix: Orion Books Ltd., 2009.
In The Voices of Morebath: Reformation and Rebellion in an English Village, renowned scholar Eamonn Duffy investigates the English Reformation. Duffy pears through the eyes of the priest of a small, remote village in Southwestern England. Using Sir Christopher Trichay’s records of the parish, Duffy illustrates an image of Reformation opposite of what is predominantly assumed. Duffy argues the transformation that took place between 1530 and 1570, through the transition of four monarchs, was much more gradual that many interpret. Even though state mandate religious change affected the community of Morebath, the change did not ensue the violence that is often construed with the Reformation. Sir Christopher Trichay’s leadership and his portrayal of community life, the development and removal of St. Sidwell, and the participation in the church through stores develop Duffy’s argument of appeasement rather than violence during the English Reformation.
In the 1700’s the Puritans left England for the fear of being persecuted. They moved to America for religious freedom. The Puritans lived from God’s laws. They did not depend as much on material things, and they had a simpler and conservative life. More than a hundred years later, the Puritan’s belief toward their church started to fade away. Some Puritans were not able to recognize their religion any longer, they felt that their congregations had grown too self-satisfied. They left their congregations, and their devotion to God gradually faded away. To rekindle the fervor that the early Puritans had, Jonathan Edwards and other Puritan ministers led a religious revival through New England. Edwards preached intense sermons that awakened his congregation to an awareness of their sins. With Edwards’ sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” he persuades the Puritans to convert back to Puritanism, by utilizing rhetorical strategies such as, imagery, loaded diction, and a threatening and fearful tone.
With any new monarch’s ascension to the throne, there comes with it changes in the policies of the country. From Elizabeth’s new council, to Henry’s documented polices and even to William the Silent’s inaction in response to threats were all policies that needed to be worked out by the new rulers. This group of rulers all had something in common; they chose to let their people make their religious preference solely on their beliefs but they all differed in their ways of letting this come about. This was monumental for the time period in which they lived, but it was something that needed to be done to progress national unity.
In 1534, King Henry VIII formally instigated the English Reformation. He therefore passed the Act of Supremacy, which outlawed the Catholic Church and made him “the only supreme head on earth of the Church of England” (Roark, 68). Puritans were looking for a more Protestant church and received what they wanted. Along with it, came the King’s total control over the Church. This is what the Puritans didn’t want. Puritans believed that ordinary Christians, not a church hierarchy, should control religious life. They wanted a distinct line between government and the Church of England. Puritans also wanted to eliminate the customs of Catholic worship and instead focus on an individual’s relationship with God developed through Bible study, prayer, and introspection (Roark, 68).
The English Restoration was no minor re-establishment of monarchy: it was rather a restatement of the national character. Regicide was abhorrent to most—we need only peruse the emotive power of Macbeth or Hamlet to gain some understanding of the general sentiment—and the execution of Charles I was an extreme act of an extreme sub-minority. The arrival of Charles II, therefore, was not only a restoration of the natural and Godly order, but, in effect, an appeasement of the national conscience; a way to bury the crisis of revolution once and for all. With so much at stake, it was no simple task to recreate the circumstances of the revolution, but this is precisely what Charles II and James II managed. It is certainly an oversimplification to suggest that this came about solely from religious discord, but similarly it is erroneous to suggest that this was not—if we might resort to religious terminology—the “prime mover.” Charles II had spent much of his life upon the continent, and was, therefore, more a continental than an Englishman. In terms of religion, particularly, his views were consummately European: cosmopolitan and decidedly Catholic.
Under his rule, a second issue came about with religion because of the Archbishop of Canterbury, William Laud. Laud attempted to make the English church adopt more elaborate
The Church of England had formed in an attempt to improve upon the way of life offered by the Catholic Church. In reality it was no better and “By law everybody was supposed to belong to the Church of England” (Lambert 1). When Charles I took the throne, everything became increasingly worse. Not only were people facing persecution from their peers in matters of religion, but the government was also oppressing these people. A specific example of this were the English Civil Wars. This series of battles “began originally as a dispute over financial matters between the King of England (Charles I) and Parliament, but the underlying issue of this time, concerned the religion of the nation” (Richards 1). The issues over religion led to a split in government creating two groups: the Royalists (those who supported the king and his Anglican ways) and the Roundheads (those who did not). Within the rebellious roundheads, various religious groups surfaced. One of these was the Quakers. Their beliefs raised concern and threatened the King’s Anglican ways. The Quakers were persecuted tremendously. They were tortured and killed, which
Pincus, Steven C. A.. England's glorious Revolution, 1688-1689: a brief history with documents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. 15.
Collins, Roger and McClure, Judith, editors. Bede: The Ecclesiastical History of the English People; The Greater Chronicle; Bede’s Letter to Egbert. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.
Haigh, Christopher. English Reformations: Religion, Politics, and Society under the Tudors Oxford University Press, June 24, 1993.
In 1642, Britain was a divided kingdom, on the brink of Civil war. The arrogance and selfishness of Charles I led to resentment from Parliament. A further important factor in the outbreak of war was religion. When he began to impose catholic customs on the predominantly Protestant country, he ignited the hatred of men such as Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell rose from an unadorned, puritan background through the ranks of the military to become Major-General of the army and eventually Lord Protector. Many believe his exploits during the Civil Wars were a primary factor in Parliamentarian victory although the true extent of his role is the subject of debate amongst historians, as I have explored.
Throughout history, religious conflicts have led to war, turmoil, and devastation. From the very beginning of humanity, religion has played an active role alongside man. As religion began to establish various denominations, people started to question the superiority of one religion over another. The dominate religion in many countries reflected the religious views of the king or queen with little choice for the people to determine their own faith. Individuals wanting religious tolerance that was different from the national religion began to cause tension within the country. One of the major religious conflicts between the Protestant and Catholics divided nations through Europe. As the Protestant Reformation spread to England, the tensions between the Protestants and Catholics quickly escalated all over the country. For England, the constant change of rulers altered the nation’s religion from Protestantism to Catholicism. Many people felt conflicted over which religion to practice with the fear of persecution by the crown. However, within these times of turmoil, the Elizabethan era gave rise to radical ideals, influential people, and great works in the arts, as well as advancements in science. The people of England formed a country filled with the brightest political, cultural, and academic minds in history. The Protestant and Catholic conflict during the Elizabethan era boasted numerous accomplishments in the fields of history, art, philosophy, sconce, and literature with a major contribution to humankind.
Sixteenth Century; the Early Seventeenth Century. 8th ed. Vol. B. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006. Print.
How the step taken by the monarch’s of England influenced the Church in England to be transformed into the Church of England. The struggle in the theology of Lutheran, Calvinist, Catholicism, and Moravianism, to name just a few, would all have an influence in the foundation of the Methodist movement. Of how “John Wesley, paternal grandfather was brought before the Bishop of Bristol, Gilbert Ironside, to answer charges of nonconforming to the Thirty-Nine Articles” (p. 1...
Politics, Society and Civil War in Warwickshire, 1620-1660 (Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History) - Paperback (16 May 2002) by Ann Hughes and Anthony Fletcher;John Guy;John Morrill