Kids Should Not Be Allowed To Participation Trophies

711 Words2 Pages

Every person wants a trophy, but sometimes can’t get one. Then people added to the leagues a participation trophy everyone gets. People like Jeff Barker, Jim Madrid, Reason Magazine, and Fox & Friends are part of the discussion on participation trophies. Around 2015 participation trophies became a hot topic if kids should receive participation trophies. O’Sullivan is a former student of the University of California, Berkeley. People say participation trophies help motivate them to become better players. Although some people believe trophies are what every kid deserves and participation trophies help kids motivate themselves, participation trophies should not be handed out, because participation trophies don’t prepare them for a loss, and losing motivates them to become …show more content…

According to the information provided above, Participation Trophies cause them to be unprepared for losing in an event with no Participation trophies since losing motivates them to become better in the future. They also give participation trophies even if you didn’t win any game. According to “Are ‘Participation Trophies’ Worthwhile?”, they believe, “Most teams give participation trophies even if your team didn’t win a single game or didn’t place in the top 10 in the league” (Are). They are just giving participation trophies for nothing and don’t help them learn to lose. To conclude, opponents argue Participation Trophies don’t prepare them for a loss. Critics argue that participation in trophies doesn’t motivate you to become a better player. Losing helps you learn from the mistakes that were made in the game. According to John O’Sullivan, “The benefit isn’t winning but improving because you can lose but still gain more and more skills each day” (O’Sullivan). According to the paraphrase above, O’Sullivan says winning doesn’t improve, but losing makes you realize and become

Open Document