Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of child abuse on child development
Effects of child abuse on child development
Impact of child abuse and emotional development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of child abuse on child development
Humans beings are inherently good at the beginning of life. Many people wonder though how can so many people who were good turn evil. People turn evil because of the childhood was messed up. Katherine Knight, Ted Bundy, and John Wayne Gacy all have a common thing which is that their childhood is not the best. Katherine Knight dad was an alcoholic. Her father was so drunk that he would physically abuse her mom and constantly rape her mother. Her mom would confess to Katherine and her twin that men are terrible people and that she did not like to have sex with her husband because it is force all the time. Katherine said that she was sexually assaulted by couple of her members of her family in her early childhood. Katherine was a quiet girl but would have random angry outburst. By the time she got to high school she was a lone wolf but bullied younger kids at her school. When she became an adult she …show more content…
would later harass men she dated until she killed one. I believe her action was effected how her childhood was. How her father made her to hate men and how she was sexually abuse made her into a killer. Her punishment was life sentence without parole. I agree with the court system because she attempted to murder three other guys and did kill one. Bundy childhood was rough to. His mom gave birth to him and she was not married. Her mom and dad did not want people to shame their family so they became Bundy parents and Louise had to be his sister. His mom told him one day that he is her son. This made Bundy all confused because he felt his whole life was a lie. Also when Bundy was growing up his granddad was very angry person. He would get mad and take his anger out on his family. Bundy was an interesting child. One time when his aunt was babysitting him he surrounded himself with knives. In highschool he was smart, charming, and handsome person. Many people thought he will be a nice lawyer in the future. When he became an adult he raped and killed thirty women but many people claim he killed more than hundred. When he got caught he turn down all attorneys and defend himself. His punishment was sentenced to death row and was executed by the electrical chair. Personally I feel this punishment was fine. He torture these women and killed them for his own pleasure and that is not right. John Wayne Gacy had a unhealthy childhood.Gacy had a poor heart condition which cause him to be chubby and unathletic.
He had a good relationship with his mom and sister but his dad disapprove him. His dad was an alcoholic and was very abusive.The only thing he wanted when he was a kid was to make his father proud. His dad would taunt him and physically abuse him. At a young age John was molested by a family friend who was a friend to his father. In high school he was not the sharpest tool in the shed. He had a hard time in school due to his heart condition and his weight. Gacy soon got married and moved to Iowa. Gacy started to hire teens to come work for him. His advance would lead his new employees being sexually harassed. John would lure male teens to come to him if they want jobs. He would rape them and then kill them. The evidence they have is John killed thirty three male teens. He was sentence to the death row too. He was executed by a lethal injection. He deserve this too because he took so many innocent lives who wanted a job but got killed by a psycho
guy. Each of these killer had brain damage from their childhood. They were told that they were no good in life. They grew up in families that were dysfunctional and abusive towards them. Two of the killers were sexually harass from people who they trusted. In their mind they think it is the norm. The killers felt that they had power over their victims. By hurting them they felt that nothing could have stop them. They had their own way of healing but it so unhealthy by killing people. If they just grew up in a family that was safe and happy they would not be doing evil deeds. People just don't wake up and decide that they are going to kill someone. They need a motivated by people who did them wrong. I feel that people deserve to have a happy childhood so they can grow up and be good people but that is not the real world. People were made evil; not born evil.
There are many different points of view about human behaviors. Through specific characters mentioned in Fahrenheit 451, “A Very Old Man Enormous Wings”, and “The Lottery”, individual attitudes are exaggerated to the point that their evil motivations behind their behaviors are obvious. Everyday humans attempt to attach the connotation of good to humanity, but it’s just because humans want to look past the fact that we are realistically not good. It is very difficult for us to reflect on our own behaviors. Even though people try to avoid admitting it, we always try to be the best in whatever we do. We naturally make our own survivals the best we can make it. Harming others knowingly and enjoying it is a hallmark of being evil. Good is not only
In the article "Frivolity of Evil" Theodore Dalrymple, psychiatrist Anthony Daniels narrates his fourteen years in the prison hospital. Daniels says that man is intrinsically evil and the rest of the society is not evil. New evils are met and older evils are disappeared, with the outbreak of every evil. Man will act normal until a new evil is raised and catches on. More a person performs well and is supposed as being good, they are supposed to be less evil.
There IS a connection between murderous beings, such as Ted Bundy and Charles Manson, and a common high school bully. Such characters share similar traits such as a lack of remorse/shame/guilt and changing themselves if they know it will help keep them from being found out. This is known as sociopathy. The connection between the two characters listed earlier, is that the root of their behavior stems from their childhood. More specifically, it stems from their upbringing. A child who suffers from maltreatment or neglect are two very common problems. There is even the opposite of neglect, a parent who praises and pushes their child to do their best, throughout their entire life, until the child finally snaps. How a young child is treated from the moment they are born to adulthood can immensely affect the kind of person they become. If signs of sociopathy are found early on enough in the child’s life, something can be done about it.
His mother made him go back to the store, return the toy, and apologize to the owners. His mother told his father, who beat him with a belt as punishment. After this incident, john's mother attempted to shield her son from his father's verbal and physical abuse, yet this only succeeded in john earning accusations from his father that he was a sissy and a Mama's boy who would probably grow up queer (up). In 1949, John's father was told that his son and another boy had been caught fondling a young girl. As a punishment, his father with a razor strap whipped him until he bled. The same year, john himself was molested by a family friend, a contractor who would take Gacy for rides in his truck, then touch him. He never told his father about these incidents, as he was afraid his father would blame
The difference in the way humans perceive things is part of the complexity of mankind. What is thought of as evil to one person can be seen as good to another, and vice versa. The issue of good and evil is brought up in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, when innocent boys are set on an island to bear the weight of society on their backs. What happens to them? How do past influences effect them? Are their actions good or evil? The actions of the boys were not a matter of being good or evil, but were actions for survival. A man’s environment does not influence him towards good or evil, nor is he born with it inside. Man has instincts and inner drives that are not matters of good and evil, but of survival.
Wades actions in Vietnam made him be labeled as an evil man especially when news came in that he was involved in massacring Vietnamese civilians and an American soldier; this made the voters of Minnesota lose confidence in him. John killed many other people, one can view it as his troubled father to son relationship, his sinking marriage and his terrifying experience in Vietnam contributed to his killing . On the other side, one can view it as John felt the urge to kill and not his father and not Kathy. . After learning of his father’s death, John felt the desire to commit a murder crime. At the funeral, John had this passion to kill everyone on the scene. The idea of John of killing anyone in this chapter could link to chapter 2 where evidence is significant. Is it possible that John killed Kathy in revenge for his father, or for love reasons? However, since Katy’s body missed, the credibility of the evidence is another factor to consider. In the previous chapter, John woke up to find Kathy missing in the cabin. Coming on, the ambiguity of the story comes in when John sleeps under his pillow and imagines himself being his dead father. John’s behavior gets controversial in the sense that his father’s was not justifiable according to him. In fact, the revenge sought by John was
Are humans naturally good or evil? This age-old question dates back to as early as the Chinese Dynasty and is still being argued to this day. Thomas Hobbes believed that all humans were born cruel, that they began cheating others to benefit themselves. Whereas, John Locke believes that humans are born good and pure, but become evil based on experiences and obstacles in life. In my opinion, all humans are born good and become cruel based on their experiences. I feel this way because when you look at a new born baby, they are seeing the world for the first time, and although they are screaming and crying, they are pure. They do not want to do anyone any harm, and you do not wish to cause them any harm. The same goes for young, growing children
In “Frivolity of Evil” psychiatrist Dr. Theodore Dalrymple, recap his 14 years of experience in a prison hospital. Theodore states that man is inherently immoral, and the rest of society is not. Man will act normally until a new evil is raised and problems are nonstop. The more a person does well and is distinguished as being good, the less evil they are. Also, the confusion behind evil bring attentions of determining the true meaning, identifying immoral behavior, and discovering the origins of evil. Although persecution of the wicked has been based upon unreliability, I claim that environmental, biological, and humanistic factors also structure an individual to be manifest evil.
Throughout history many events have occurred which has brought up the seemingly unanswerable question; what is it that make good people commit malicious actions? The reasons for these actions are presumed to be unknown, and are reliant on the the circumstances of the situation. Throughout history, in times such as the McCarthy era and Salem Witch Trials, people who trusted in the community, can be seen acting disorderly and immorally against innocent people. Even throughout literature in history including The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne and The Crucible by Arthur Miller, the situation and circumstances the characters were placed in resulted in the characters acting far from their normal selves. In an effort to explain what causes
Ted Bundy The concept of evil is hardly ever clear cut and many would argue that people were either born evil or were, by circumstance, made evil. The decisions behind the immoral or moral actions of an individual are said to be influenced by nature or by the nurture the individual received as they were growing up. But what about individuals who don’t fall under either category? Ted Bundy, the infamous mass murderer that killed and raped around 36 women during the mid 1970’s could be said to be one of these gray area individuals.
Not all men are inherently evil because many try to live righteous lives through acts of kindness and selflessness, such as those who fight for rights, help the less fortunate and look for a better tomorrow. Circumstances greatly influences whether a man becomes evil. As seen in the bible, Cain killed Abel out of spite, for believing that Abel’s offering was accepted by God rather than his own (Bible). Aggression and envy ate away to Cain’s very core enough to kill his innocent brother and therefore a murderer was born out the premise of evil. Man’s natural instinct lays under being overly aggressive and can make a man falls out of
Buddha once said that “it is a man’s own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways”. In my opinion man is inherently evil, who succumbs to the corruption of the human society. I believe that Man have the ability to distinct good, from evil based on factors they have learned from surrounding others. From the dawn of time man has accumulated power through communities, parties, villages etc. We can infer that man was evil throughout history due many congregations, rituals, and basically the overall culture that was prominent before the times of Christ. You may read in many books of the Puritan era where witches were burned due to the simple version of today’s autocracy. Man would accuse them of witchcraft and have them murdered. A prime example would be the Salem Witch Trials. During these trials, it was easy to believe that in 1692, with an Indian war raging less than 70 miles away, that the devil was close at hand (Linder). As we progress through time we continue to see these occurrences through genocides, and massacres. An example would be Hitler’s reign, and his genocide of the Jewish people. They learn the ways of good and bad through association of what their family has done. Also that parent’s have the upmost influence on their children, and children imitate what they see, hear, or accomplish. I believe that Man is born evil, but he is taught the way of right from wrong from his parents. Man today has the opportunity to choose from good, or evil. Unfortunately, in today’s era, we have built nations that have the will to supersede others, which clouds their judgment on what is good or bad. This has led to the great famines of man. Man is inherently evil because of war, avarice, and envy.
The three theories I have been exploring likewise do not have a perfect answer, but they do shed some light on the human condition. I do not think that humans are inherently good or evil. However, the three theories all have something radically different to say about human nature. Thinkers with a biological approach would argue that there is no good or evil, just nature (Gahtan, 2014). Freud postulated that humans are inherently evil and flawed. At our core, the Id, part of our unconscious mind seeks to extract as much pleasure from the world as possible. The ego and superego emerge as a response to keep the Id behaving in a rational and moral way. (Funder, 2012). Phenomenological thinkers, however, have generally more optimistic views than Freud. Maslow, for instance believed that people are inherently good. He thought that everyone sought to self-actualize, which is the pinnacle of perfection an individual can reach (Maslow, 1987). In contrast, humanistic and existentialist Sartre said that “This means that man first exists, occurs, arises in the world, and is only defined later” (Sartre, 1973). What Sartre is saying is that humans are created without good, evil, or a purpose. We emerge from nothingness. What I find so profound about this statement is that if a person chooses to be good, it means that they achieved the ability to be a good person
What makes these people good is their ability to empathize, have compassion, be unselfish, and to put others before himself. Whereas evil people lack all of these qualities and do the exact opposite. Then he goes on to say that most people are in the gray area between. The qualities of a good person that Taylor notes in his article of “The Real Meaning of ‘Good’ and ‘Evil’,” are accurate to today’s world, however, there are many more aspects that lend a role in deciding what is good and what is evil. For instance, the situations one goes through on a daily basis can determine this for
Are human beings born to be good? Or are we naturally born to be evil? A person’s nature or essence is a trait that is inherent and lasting in an individual. To be a good person is someone who thinks of others before themselves, shows kindness to one another, and makes good choices in life that can lead to a path of becoming a good moral person. To be a bad person rebels against something or someone thinking only of them and not caring about the consequences of their actions. Rousseau assumed, “that man is good by nature (as it is bequeathed to him), but good in a negative way: that is, he is not evil of his own accord and on purpose, but only in danger of being contaminated and corrupted by evil or inept guides and examples (Immanuel Kant 123).” In other words, the human is exposed to the depraved society by incompetent guardians or influences that is not of one’s free will in the view of the fact that it is passed on. My position is humans are not by nature evil. Instead, they are good but influenced by the environment and societies to act in evil ways to either harm others or themself.