Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Story of an hour analysis 123helpme
Story of an hour analysis 123helpme
Role of women in the 19th century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Story of an hour analysis 123helpme
Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” takes place in the late nineteenth century in the year 1894. The date is important because society at the time was a patriarchal and the role women played in society was very limited. In the story, the main character, Louise Mallard, has a heart condition and in the beginning suffers the loss of her husband, Brently Mallard. When she finds out, she weeps immediately showing her genuine sadness for the loss of her husband. Shortly after grieving, she runs to be alone in her room and finds herself gazing out her window. The images Louise sees opens her mind and she begins to feel body and soul free, this is because she can live the rest of her life for herself and is not burdened with trying to please her …show more content…
Kate Chopin put the year 1894 right below the title so the reader could relate the story to what was going on in the world at that time. Men controlled much of society during this time, and the main role of women was to be under the authority of their husbands. The marriage law specified that women basically did not have any legal existence separate from their husbands. Women of the time could not own their own land or manage their own income; they had as much power as a young child or slave (“Women and the Law” 1). This shows how hard and boring life would have been for Louise Mallard because she had no legal rights. It had said in the story that Mallard was young, but already appeared much older because her life had brought so much physical and emotional exhaustion upon …show more content…
Mallard’s thoughts in the last hour. The joy that kills is an ironic statement because the reader has been able to see Louise’s thoughts and how she was mostly happy for the hour she found out her husband was dead. The doctors on the other hand, had thought she was so overjoyed to see her husband walk through the door her already troubled heart could not take it. The doctors represent the society and how badly society misunderstands women like Louise. Of course they would think she was thrilled to see her husband because she loved him so much, right? It says in the story “yet she had loved him—sometimes. Often she had not. What did it matter!” (Chopin) Up to this point in the story there was no doubt that Louise loved her husband, but now her new bold possession of freedom seems to be valued more than that of the love for her husband. Louise’s thoughts throughout the story are not the norm for society, and people of that time would not suspect a wife who just found out her husband had passed away to feel joy looking forward to what her life is about to become. Early on in the story it said Louise “was young, with a fair, calm face” and had “a dull stare in her eyes”, but later in the story it says “There was feverish triumph in her eyes, and she carried herself unwittingly like a goddess of Victory.” (Chopin) These particular quotes show the change in how Louise was
Although I believe that Louise has a distorted image of love, I think that it is evident that society had pressured her into a constrained marriage. Louise exclaims “free, free, free!” after the news of her husband’s death (Chopin). This new overwhelming sense of freedom sends her into deep thought of a future to live for herself only. I do not believe that Louise was selfish because women of this time were forced into a selfless wife role. As a woman of the time she would be expected to live for a man, although this is not directly quoted in the story. Her husband’s death would break the bond on societal and marital constraints that had controlled her life for years. Because of this, she experienced a new sense of freedom like no other she had before. For once she had no pressure of a relationship or the expectations that come with it. I believe that she was not selfish for wanting a life of living only for herself. The thought of future excited her; death was not the consequence of her self
She whispers, “Free! Body and soul free!” (Chopin). Though her situation is sad, she does not have a remorseful response. She locks herself in her room and reflects upon her new reality. She instead comes to find a form of liberation for herself from her husband’s death. As she looks out the window, Chopin writes, “…she was drinking in a very elixir of life through that open window,” (Chopin). Chopin is stating Louie’s newly found greatness for her life. She is now able to live for herself and not behind her husband as society has told her. She can be different and gain more from her life now because she does not have to follow or live for a man, as many woman did in society. She feels exonerated from her bondage, which is marriage, and she now feels she can have a life for herself. In the end, her husband is actually found to be alive as he walks into the room. Chopin writes, “When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease--of the joy that kills,” (Chopin). From seeing her husband, Louise dies. It was joy that had killed her. Readers can easily believe that she died because of the shock that her husband was still alive, but in reality she died from the loss of her new found greatness. The joy that killed her was her own
Throughout her transformation, she does not only lose her unwanted body parts but also herself. She was “born as usual.” She was “healthy.” She was “intelligent.” Yet, she “offered” her body and became an object for others to point and critique at. Upon the judgments that are harshly thrown at the poor child, “her good nature [was] worn out/like a fan belt.” The poet creates this simile and the tone of insecurity to show that over a long period of time she is no longer able to take in any more criticism. She cannot be “apologizing” any more for how she is. Thus, she conforms to the ways of society by having pieces of her cut off. She becomes a doll, an object that does not live life and that is easily wielded and manipulated by others. This child takes her own freedom away, a freedom that Louise from Chopin’s work strives
Louis, Missouri. She married Oscar Chopin in 1870 and then they moved to New Orleans. Oscar died unexpectedly of malaria in 1882, leaving Kate a widow at the young age of 32. Embracing her new life, she moved back to St. Louis and began to write literature. In the story, the author and narrator are not the same. The narrator is only privy to the emotions of one character. Chopin inserts her personal opinions into the story, and the story mirrors her life. Chopin feels that women are oppressed by their husbands, and only when they are not longer under their husband is a women truly free. Kate Chopin uses repetition, and minimalistic style to tell the story. Repetition helps reiterate and emphasize the main themes. Chopin uses statements about Louise Mallard’s heart issue at the beginning and end of the story to show that Louise has a physical and emotional heart trouble. She also uses the word “free” throughout most of the story to emphasize her opinion about the oppression of women (Epperson 60). Chopin makes every aspect of this story minimal. The story itself only covers one hour. The story is also very short, with each paragraph only being 2-3 sentences. Another aspect that Chopin employs the minimalistic style is her use of a limited third person narrator. The narrator only clues the reader in on Louise’s emotions and of nothing else, leaving the reader with only a small part of the entire
Brently opens the door at the end of the story, and Louise is surprised to find her husband alive. She was shocked and died of a heart attack. Ironically, the doctor declares “she died of heart disease--of the joy that kills” (Chopin). In the movie we saw, it was different. Louise was kept in the house because Brently is afraid that she might die or because he is afraid that seeing the world could give her an idea to rebel against him.
Mrs. Mallard is the example of a typical housewife of the mid 1800’s. At the time, most women were not allowed to go to school and were usually anticipated to marry and do housework. During that time, the only way women could get out of a marriage was if they were to die or their husbands was to die. In that time period, the husband had control of all of the money, so it would not be wise if the wife were to leave the financial freedom that was provided by the husband. This is most likely why Mrs. Mallard never leaves her husband’s death, she is sad at first but then experiences an overwhelming sense of joy. This shows that she is not in a fulfilling marriage as his death means she will finally have own individual freedom, as well as financial freedom being the grieving widow who will inherit her husband’s wealth. In the words of Lawrence I. Berkove he states, “On the other hand, Chopin did not regard marriage as a state of pure and unbroken bliss, but on the other, she could not intelligently believe that it was desirable, healthy, or even possible for anyone to live as Louise, in the grip of her feverish delusion, wishes: to be absolutely free and to live totally and solely for oneself.” (3) Mrs. Mallard’s reaction to her husband’s death is Chopin’s way of expressin...
Louise’s fate was tragic. But still I think that it’s better to live an hour of freedom and happiness than to spend an entire lifetime in the shadow of the “gray cloud”. Louise experienced real freedom that meant the absence of her husband’s domination. The irony of life killed her too early, but it seems to me that there is no need to feel pity for her. Even if it was a short hour, it was the time when all her dreams came true. She found the freedom from her husband that her lonely soul was searching for, and just for this we can consider her as a really happy woman.
The “Joy that Kills” ends this dynamic short story, as well as Louise Mallard’s life. As the audience reads about Mrs. Mallard’s epiphany, it is likely they experience realizations of their own. Works Cited for: Chopin, Kate. “The Story of an Hour.” Backpack Literature.
Unfortunately, her hope for long years and many beautiful spring days was abruptly ended in an ironic twist. Unbeknownst to herself and her company, Mr. Mallard had survived, and within an hour the promises of a bright future for Mrs. Mallard had both began and came to an end. Her grievous death was misconstrued as joy to the others: "they said she had died of heart disease-of joy that kills" (Chopin 471). This statement embodies the distorted misconception that a woman lives only for her man. The audience, in fact, sees just the opposite. To Louise her life was elongated at the news of her husband's death, not cut short. Throughout the story, one hopes Louise will gain her freedom. Ironically, she is granted freedom, but only in death.
Mallard’s emotions over the presumed death of her husband. The author used both dramatic and situational irony to mislead the reader and surprise them with a plot twist ending. By utilizing both external and internal conflict the author expresses the internal debate of Mrs. Mallard’s true feelings and those of the people around her. The author used symbolism to display Mrs. Mallard’s desire for freedom from her marriage. In the end it was not joy that killed Mrs. Mallard but the realization that she lost her
In the story it states, “There stood, facing the open window, a comfortable, roomy armchair… She could see in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life” (Chopin 22). Through this quote, Chopin describes two different places that are a part of the same setting. By using the adjective, comfortable, when describing the armchair, Chopin creates a symbol representing her marriage. Then when she uses the adjective new, she creates another symbol representing the start of a new life without her husband. By using these two symbols, Chopin illustrates the new possibilities Louise has now that she is free. Due to the two symbols, and their context in the story Chopin further supports the main idea of the
The descriptions in the story foreshadow the tragedy that ends the story. The author believed unexpected things happen often. In the case of this story, Louise Mallard believed her husband to be dead, having been told this by her sister, Josephine. However, when it is revealed that her husband had been alive the whole time, she is unhappy to see him and suffers a fatal heart attack. While she did have heart trouble, Richards and Josephine thought that the news of her husband’s death, not her seeing him again would be detrimental to her health, possibly even fatal. Chopin succeeded in getting this message across.
In “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin, the main character of the story, Mrs. Louise Mallard, is oppressed by her husband. Chopin’s works focus mainly on feminism, the relationships between classes, and the relationships between men and women, specifically between husband and wife in “The Story of an Hour” (“The Story of an Hour” 264). Mrs. Louise Mallard lives under her husband for her whole marriage. Mrs. Mallard gets news through her two best friends that Mr. Mallard was in a railroad accident and did not survive. Mrs. Mallard was hit with waves of guilt, agony, sorrow, fear, and grief. Mr. Mallard later comes back home, as he was mistakenly not involved in the accident. Throughout “The Story of an Hour,” Chopin demonstrates how the repression
The entire action happens in the "spring" (Chopin 69) of a year in the 1890's. Spring means hope. But woman are restricted by the society in 1890's. The two time settings create a conflict between Louise's expectation and reality. Secondly, the author uses a lot of place setting.
Kate Chopin, author of “The Story of an Hour” written in 1894 was the first author who emphasized strongly on femininity in her work. In the short story, Chopin writes about freedom and confinement Chopin is an atypical author who confronts feminist matter years before it was assumed. The time period that she wrote in women were advertised as a man’s property. The main idea in the short story is to illustrate that marriage confines women. In “The Story of an Hour” the author creates an intricate argument about freedom and confinement Mrs. Louise Mallard longing for freedom, but has been confined for so long freedom seems terrible. Mrs. Mallard wife of Brently Mallard instantly feels free when her husband dies. The reason she feels this way