Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How feminism played a part in kate chopin's writing
The Role Of Women In Kate Chopins The Story Of An Hour
How feminism played a part in kate chopin's writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How feminism played a part in kate chopin's writing
In the story “The Silk Stockings” by Kate Chopin, the main character is named Mrs. Sommers. For some reason, Chopin never gives Mrs. Sommers a first name. In this semi-ironic story, Mrs. Sommers is a young mother with four kids that keep her pretty occupied, but one day she receives a good amount of money. Her marriage is not explained in a lot of detail, but it hints that the marriage itself is quite weak. This story that Chopin writes at the surface can be taken as a busy mother taking a day for herself, but it has a way deeper meaning than just that. When an unhappy married woman struggling financially unexpectedly receives money, she self-indulges and finds self-indulgence.
In the beginning of the story, Mrs. Sommers becomes and “unexpected
Sommers’ marriage has had on her. When she first started on her trek to look for new clothes for her four children, she realised that she was so focused on feeding her kids, she forgot to eat (Chopin 1)! This shows how she was always focused on her kids and almost never on herself. But as we see later into the story, she completely forgets about her kids. “[...] with Mrs. Sommers next buying herself boots, gloves, high-priced magazines, an expensive lunch, and a ticket to a matinee-- is a masterful nod to the psychological accuracy of the woman in need” (Wagner-Martin 2). Mrs. Sommers at this point, has spent so much money on herself, it almost seems excessive. Sadly, it shows how long it has been since she has had a day to just spend the money in herself. “Desperate to bring some autonomy and beauty into her meager, overburdened existence, she rebels against the conditions under which she was laboring [...] that insists that one’s true worth is determined by the quantity and worth of one’s possessions and amusements” (Allen 5). If she were in her right mind and was in a pecuniary-rich marriage, she would have actually spent the money on her kids. But what Chopin is trying to emphasize is what a woman in need can do. Of course the action of self- indulgence lasts a little while, so eventually as the day comes to a close and she heads home from her outing “Mrs. Sommers would find her pleasure tinged with guilt when her children realised
The Roles of Wives in Silko's Yellow Woman and Chopin's The Story of an Hour
On the surface, the protagonists of Silko's "Yellow Woman" and Chopin's "Story of an Hour" seem to have little in common. Yet upon closer inspection, both stories relate tales of women who are repressed by the social tenets that define their roles as wives.
In the story “A Pair of Silk Stocking” by Kate Chopin, she uses indirect characterization to describe Mrs. Sommers, as a mother who wants to relive her old rich lifestyle, but is instead trap in a new life struggling with money. For Example, as Mrs. Sommers goes shopping for her children, “she would buy so-and-so many yards of percale for new shirtwaists for the boys and Janie and Mag” (437). Kate Chopin's uses action, a method of indirect characterization, by showing her concerns for her children necessity needs. As well of trying to use as less money she had for her children than herself. Behaving very much differently than her original self, where rather she would spend the money on herself blindly than anyone else. Furthermore, when Mrs.
In "The Story of an Hour" and "A pair of silk stocking" Chopin illustrates how women face the consequences of never acquiring happiness in their lives if they follow the ways society expects them too.
In the short story, “The Story of an Hour,” author Kate Chopin presents the character of Mrs. Louis Mallard. She is an unhappy woman trapped in her discontented marriage. Unable to assert herself or extricate herself from the relationship, she endures it. The news of the presumed death of her husband comes as a great relief to her, and for a brief moment she experiences the joys of a liberated life from the repressed relationship with her husband. The relief, however, is short lived. The shock of seeing him alive is too much for her bear and she dies. The meaning of life and death take on opposite meaning for Mrs. Mallard in her marriage because she lacked the courage to stand up for herself.
Chopin shows that some social pressures and responsibilities can in fact hold one back from their own potential as was Mrs. Mallard. Marriage was introduced as one of these social expectations, and Mrs. Mallard’s internal conflict shows the reader that sometimes it is hard to question these normalities. By creating such an internal visual of Mrs. Mallard, Chopin provides a tale of the true importance of seeing past socialistic deception, and choosing to find happiness beyond
Many authors find inspiration through their past experiences, whether it is subconscious or not they incorporate a little part of their life into their stories. Katherine O’Flaherty, later Kate Chopin, grew up very differently from many girls in the eighteen hundreds. Her unusual childhood had her surrounded by three independent and educated women, which is how she grew up with such strong feminist views. Throughout her schooling and homelife, Kate was taught to live independently and think for herself. Kate Chopin uses her life’s experiences to help shape her characters and plot throughout many of her writings including “The Story of an Hour” and The Awakening.
Mrs. Mallard is the example of a typical housewife of the mid 1800’s. At the time, most women were not allowed to go to school and were usually anticipated to marry and do housework. During that time, the only way women could get out of a marriage was if they were to die or their husbands was to die. In that time period, the husband had control of all of the money, so it would not be wise if the wife were to leave the financial freedom that was provided by the husband. This is most likely why Mrs. Mallard never leaves her husband’s death, she is sad at first but then experiences an overwhelming sense of joy. This shows that she is not in a fulfilling marriage as his death means she will finally have own individual freedom, as well as financial freedom being the grieving widow who will inherit her husband’s wealth. In the words of Lawrence I. Berkove he states, “On the other hand, Chopin did not regard marriage as a state of pure and unbroken bliss, but on the other, she could not intelligently believe that it was desirable, healthy, or even possible for anyone to live as Louise, in the grip of her feverish delusion, wishes: to be absolutely free and to live totally and solely for oneself.” (3) Mrs. Mallard’s reaction to her husband’s death is Chopin’s way of expressin...
Chopin displays a need for more independent women in this piece, suggesting that wronged womanhood is the simple fact that society didn’t allow them to be on the same level with men. Mrs. Mallard realizes a “possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being.” This suggests a dying will for independence. Mrs. Mallard realizes that she can now rely upon her self for everything and it will become her number one driving factor in life. After she realizes this, Chopin says Mrs. Mallard thinks “spring days, and summer days, and all sorts of days that would be her own.” When she has days to herself, she will have no one to tell her what to do, as this line suggests her husband used to.
“The Story of the Hour” by Kate Chopin portrays an opposing perspective of marriage by presenting the reader with a woman who is somewhat untroubled by her husbands death. The main character, Mrs. Louise Mallard encounters the sense of freedom rather than sorrow after she got knowledge of her husbands death. After she learns that her husband, Brently, is still alive, it caused her to have a heart attack and die. Even though “The Story of the Hour” was published in the eighteen hundreds, the views of marriage in the story could coincide with this era as well.
...ge that she does not wish to be in. This woman suffers a tremendous amount from the commitment of her marriage, that the death of her husband does not affect her for long. A marriage such as this seems so unbelievable, yet a reader could see the realistic elements incorporated into the story. This begs the question of how undesirable marriage was during Chopin’s life. The unhappiness felt by Mrs. Mallard seems to be very extreme, but Chopin creates a beautiful story that reflects upon the idea of marriage as an undesired relationship and bond to some women in the nineteenth century.
The time period, season, location, and surroundings of a character reveal a great deal about them. Kate Chopin's "The Story of An Hour" is an excellent example of how setting affects the reader's perception of the story. There is an enormous amount of symbolism expressed through the element of setting in this short story. So well, in fact, that words are hardly necessary to descriptively tell the story of Mrs. Mallard's hour of freedom. Analyzing the setting for "The Story of An Hour" will give a more complete understanding of the story itself. There are many individual parts that, when explained and pieced together, will both justify Mrs. Mallard's attitude and actions toward her husband's death and provide a visual expression of her steadily changing feelings throughout the story.
Both characters suffer from internal conflicts. In “A pair of Silk Stockings" By Kate Chopin, Mrs. Sommers struggles and constantly attempts to find a balance between her family life, her responsibilities inside the house and her personal satisfaction and selfish pleasures. For instance, at the end of the story, she finally gives in to her greedy temptations thus, making her personality take a major turn. She becomes a self- centered and egocentric woman to whom money is a central motif.
The ending of “The Locket” by Kate Chopin{{fragment}}. I found myself having to go back and re-read the story a few times because I thought I missed something.{{avoid I statements in formal essays}} Although, the setting changed drastically at the opening of the second part, there was a soldier killed in the first part and the readers are led to believe that it was Edmond. A combination of the setting, the locket, and the character descriptions led me to believe that the story was building up to a sad ending.{{not a bad start, but you need to remove me from your thesis statement.}}
Not attempting to hide, Mrs. Mallard knows that she will weep at her husbands funeral, however she can’t help this sudden feeling of seeing, “beyond [the] bitter moment [of] procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely” (Chopin, 16). In an unloving marriage of this time, women were trapped in their roles until they were freed by the death of their husbands. Although Mrs. Mallard claims that her husband was kind and loving, she can’t help the sudden spark of joy of her new freedom. This is her view on the release of her oppression from her roles of being a dutiful wife to her husband. Altogether, Mrs. Mallard claims that, “there would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature” (Chopin, 16). This is the most important of Mrs. Mallard’s thoughts, as she never officially states a specific way when her husband oppressed her. However, the audience can clearly suggest that this is a hint towards marriage in general that it suffocates both men and women. Marriage is an equal partnership in which compromise and communication become the dominant ideals to make the marriage better. It is suggested that Mrs. Mallard also oppressed her husband just as much as he did to her when she sinks into the armchair and is, “pressed down by a physical exhaustion