Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Communism vs capitalism comparison
Karl Marx's critique of capitalism
Political philodphy of karl marx
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Communism vs capitalism comparison
In this paper, I will summarize Karl Marx’s Alienated labor, where I will cover his topics that make up his economic theory and his human nature. In doing so, I will take his position on economic theory and argue against his theory of human nature. The arguments will be done through an analogy. Karl Marx’s version of human nature is actually called species being which emphasizes that we humans need to manipulate the environment by working in order to satisfy our needs. We manipulate the environment to suit our behaviours, and once our behaviours change, so does the environment. We do not need to simply serve to exist like animals do; rather, we are a social animal who wishes to share and create with other beings. In his view, we need a job …show more content…
Generally, there are four arguments Marx has against capitalism: lack of freedom from production ownership, lack of freedom due to unfavourable work, lack of creativity, and lack of economic distribution. All of his arguments are about the lack of freedoms, which can be reflected back to his position on human nature, which is about us being social animals who like to share and create with other beings, essentially a freedom. These four concepts of deprivation are what contribute to his concept of Alienation. Alienation can best be described as participation in a capitalist society, becoming deprived from freedom of choice. For example, the value of a worker is determined by the employer. If five burger flippers produce 500 dollars of profit through their labor and the employer gives 50 dollars of that profit to the workers, then it must be split between those five. The burger flippers are alienated due to their value determined through the employer. Another economic theory is communism, which puts the control of the company in the workers hands. Through the distribution of production amongst all, its goal is not to focus on wealth of private members, but to allow freedom amongst all. Unlike the limitations from capitalism, communism meets Marxs’ view on human nature by allowing the freedom of decision, to share and create with other beings, an agreement to his position against
Marx, discusses a certain concept of alienated labor as an unavoidable result of a capitalist system. The framework that he tries to draw in the book is that capitalist system should be blamed for class strafication and alienated labor in the society. In a capitalist society, people suffer from class conflict and property ownership of bourgeoisie. Bourgeoisie owns the big factories and businesses, so then, small manufacturers have to shut down and basically have to join the labors in the big businesses. Workers in the capitalist system are obligated to work for long hours under unhealthy conditions for really low salaries.
His critiques highlight his concern that capitalism makes economic exclusion inevitable. He believes that under a capitalist system, workers lose their identities as individual agents and instead become slaves to their own labor and to their employer. One may initially claim that working actually contributes to a sense of self, rather than detracts from it. While this makes sense intuitively, Marx contends that “labor is external to the worker, i.e. it does not belong to his intrinsic nature; that in his work, therefore, he does not affirm himself but denies himself” (30). In other words, while work may not be inherently isolating at first, under capitalism, work shifts from where individuals first develop skills to where employees are then performing labor for the sake of another. Additionally, when an agent no longer identifies with his labor, it may compromise his identity. For example, if I am a skilled plumber and I consider this to be central to who I am, then under a capitalist system where my plumbing is only valued insofar as it brings instrumental benefits, I am stripped of the intrinsic value of plumbing. In this regard, “the life which he has conferred on the object confronts him as something hostile and alien” (29). Essentially, labor for a system of capital perpetuates alienation, as each worker just becomes another cog in the
Marx had rather extreme views on the extent to which nature in his time had become humanized as a result of human labor. He commented, “Even the objects of the simplest, “sensuous certainty” are only given to him through social development, industry and commercial intercourse. ”[2] "Throughout their labor, humans shape their own material environment, thereby transforming the very nature of human existence in the process. ”[3] One always seemed to know their role in society.
Marx explains the condition. of estranged labour as the result of man participating in an institution alien to his nature. It is my interpretation that man is alienated from his labour because he is not the reaper. of what he sows. Because he is never the recipient of his efforts, the labourer lacks identity with what he creates.
Marx was a huge supporter of freedom and believed that freedom was a result of the Communist party and its beliefs. Karl Marx had little faith in the future of Capitalism and the system of Monarchy, and he believed that once these two ideas of politics were eliminated, Communism would move in and replace the wrong thoughts instilled with Capitalism and Monarchy, and provide the world with sense and reason. Stating his feelings clearly in the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx noted that the selling point in the economy should be the people themselves, not the working labor, money, or rent from the property.[2] To supplement these theories, Marx proposes an end to the problem of men and their activities, which is to direct men’s attention on the economy so that there could be prevailing freedom. There are some discrepancies in Marx’s theories, like the question of what else has an impact on freedom. There are other issues, but the issue remains that people are unaware if freedom ethics applies to all people and how it affects the modern society.
Karl Marx’s article titled Estranged Labor as found in his 1844 Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts pays significant attention to the political economic system, which is commonly referred to capitalism. He further delves into nature of the political economy with a keen focus on how it has negatively impacted the worker or laborer. Therefore, the laborer forms the subject of his critical and detailed analysis as tries demonstrates the ill nature of the political economy. To start with Karl Marx portrays how the political economy as presented by its proponents has led to emergence of two distinct classes in society; the class of property owners and on the other hand, the class of property less workers. According to Karl Marx (2004), proponents of the political economy have introduced concepts such as private property and competition indicating without providing any form of analytical explanation but rather just expecting the society to embrace and apply such concepts. In particular, political economists have failed to provide a comprehensive explanation for division that has been established between capital and labor. Estranged Labor clearly depicts Marx’s dissatisfaction as well as disapproval towards the political economy indicating that proponents of such a system want the masses to blindly follow it without any form of intellectual or practical explanation. One area that Karl Marx demonstrates his distaste and disappointment in the article is worker or the laborer and how the worker sinks to not just a commodity but rather a wretched commodity (Marx, 2004). This is critical analysis of Karl Marx concept or phenomenon on the alienation of the worker as predicted in Estranged Labor in several aspects and how these concepts are ...
Because of the conditions that the wage-workers worked in, Marx described it as exploitation. Marx felt that the wage workers were being exploited. The capitalist, also known as the bourgeoisie, were exploiting the wage workers, the proletariats, because of their cheap labor. They were essentially using them to create and increase their own profit. This in turn brought up alienation. Basically, alienation, also known as estrangement, is when a person is separated from their work, what they produce, themselves, and their environment. Marx’s theory of alienation was used to describe workers laboring under the capitalist society. The workers, also known as wage laborers, were commodities—things that are bought, sold, or exchanged in the market. They were selling their labor which means that they were being alienated from what they were doing.
“Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844” is a collection of writings that appear to be intended to be a book. These manuscripts provide important information about the the way in which Marx interpreted history, particularly the ways in which the revolution of the proletariat and the future prevalence of communism as the result of historical progression. It also tells the historical story of man's alienation.
However, he also believed that religion in fact alienates society from reality and it is used to mask life to make it seem more endurable. Marx theorised that class orientated society workers are those who have been denied access to the results of their hard work which is then taken from them and given to someone else, resulting to them becoming alienated, Marx calls this the first type of alienation. The second is alienation from productive activity, this is workers only working to survive, the third type is alienation from the human species, where the workers perform less and less like humans, this is because they are forced to work like animals. The final type of alienation, is alienation from fellow humans and the community. According to Marx, all social institutions in a capitalist society were marked by alienation, as he stated ‘Objectification is the practice of alienation.
Marx takes his idea of alienation from Feuerbach, who shows the alienation of man from God. Briefly, Feuerbach's argument is that God is created by man as the 'projection of man's species-essence, the totality of his powers and attributes raised to the level of infinity' (1). Religion alienates man by reversing the relationship between the subject and predicate - the Deity is supreme over man, even though it is created by man. Leszek Kolakowski suggests that the clearest material example of religious alienation is blood sacrifice. In general, therefore, alienation of man is the process that separates man from part of himself. In Feuerbach, the separation is between man and the god created in man's image. In Marx, as shall be seen, alienation is the separation between man and his life-activity, his product, society and the species. Each of these four relations can be seen as one aspect of man being separated from himself.
Marx’s theory of alienation describes the separation of things that naturally belong together. For Marx, alienation is experienced in four forms. These include alienation from ones self, alienation from the work process, alienation from the product and alienation from other people. Workers are alienated from themselves because they are forced to sell their labor for a wage. Workers are alienated from the process because they don’t own the means of production. Workers are alienated from the product because the product of labor belongs to the capitalists. Workers do not own what they produce. Workers are alienated from other people because in a capitalist economy workers see each other as competition for jobs. Thus for Marx, labor is simply a means to an end.
Marx starts off with saying that our relationship to nature arises from the material world. The relationship of nature to the material world is organized by the capitalist and socialist mode. The individual becomes who he is as Marx states "Thus, what individuals are depends on the material conditions of production."(Marx, 1845-46, pg. 46) The individual first must establish who he is within the organization he is placed in through what he produces. The material, what he produces expresses the life he lives. (Marx, 1845-46, pg. 46) Our consciousness is above in the heavens but do not shape us. Our consciousness is produced through the life we live, the material that comes from the ground, from the earth. (Marx, 1845-46, pg. 47)
... have a say in what is produced and how it’s produced, and even how they are distributed. This is how Marx believes the labor and market could become democratic and humans can be emancipated.
My paper talks about the riveting account of human nature and modern society that Karl Marx gives us, in comparison to Max Weber and Emile Durkheim. Meanwhile, Durkheim believes that organic solidarity and division of labour are modernity’s main features. Weber looks at rationalization and disenchantment, and Marx offers an account centered on class struggle and social instability. We often think about whether the problems we face every day are a result of our own intrinsic nature, or rather the environment we currently live in today. The founding fathers, in a way, were asking the question.
THE TERM "alienation" in normal usage refers to a feeling of separateness, of being alone and apart from others. For Marx, alienation was not a feeling or a mental condition, but an economic and social condition of class society--in particular, capitalist society.