Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social effects of technology on humanity
Social effects of technology on humanity
Technology affecting society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social effects of technology on humanity
In the intro to the eleventh chapter of “A History of God,” Karen Armstrong poses a question. Before she gets to her main point, Armstrong first sets the scene with major events that characterize this time period. Then, she states that in the past, religion has always adapted, but that the world may have reached a point where this worldview may no longer fit. The thesis of this passage can ultimately be boiled down to a couple of sentences, “more and more people have found that [religion] no longer works for them, and when religious ideas cease to be effective, they fade away. Maybe God really is an idea of the past.” Although Armstrong’s book is meant to be merely a history of the three main monotheistic religions, in this chapter, she seems …show more content…
Armstrong achieves her purpose by providing different viewpoints so that the reader can make their own informed decision. On the side supporting the idea that God and religion have become irrelevant, it seems that as more of the mystery surrounding natural events becomes attributed to science, there no longer seems to be a need to come up with a divine explanation. With all of the tragedies plaguing this generation, how can there be a god or divine being that would sanction the loss of innocent lives and allow misery and terror to run rampant? God cannot exist from this viewpoint because then He does not actually care for creation. As society becomes more and more educated and evolved, religion loses its purpose. In the past, it was used to control the masses and give rulers an excuse for their decisions and to stay in power. Now, the populace is not as easily swayed and is capable of making informed decisions for …show more content…
This issue is not purely black and white. Although there are people who will cease to believe in a god, God will always remain an integral part of society because belief in a divine being gives a different outlook and dimension to life and its purpose. As the God of biblical times adapted to change to the modern interpretation, so will this present God adapt to fit the needs and mindset of future generations. Much as God no longer sanctions the stoning of a woman for adultery, maybe in the future, all mention of violence will be eliminated to emphasize the need for world peace. As horrible events like the shooting in Las Vegas and the AIDS epidemic are highlighted, there is an ever-increasing need to establish the importance of human life and to protest needless violence. Society seems to be becoming more disillusioned and apathetic as time goes by. News sources keep claiming that millennials cannot do anything for themselves and that this generation is corrupting society. What, precisely, this generation lacks is a comprehensive worldview, a means of interpreting the world around them, a goal, and guidelines for how to live life. Science has failed to provide an interpretation of the meaning of life, and cannot set moral guidelines.
More than forty-five thousand years ago, there have existed two types of bipedal humans, the Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, but only one has survived. The survivors were the humans who we are comprised out of and still breathing and living today the Homo sapiens. Some scientist say that the lack of imagination was the key factor to the Neanderthals demise, while the Homo sapiens with a broader imagination lived on. In Karen Armstrong’s essay “Homo religiosus” she describes her time in the caverns of Lascaux, while she explains the painting on the walls as part of the ancient civilization’s rituals. The painting tells us a story of their daily lives and the myths in which they believe in, that keeps them in a peace of mind. As there were many
It is very hard to tell from the article whether or not Matchar truly believes what is written in support of millennials. Perhaps it is a parody of the earlier generations to say “Be selfish, Gen Y! Be entitled!” (235), but she seems to contradict her earlier statements. The constant repetition that millennials are lazy, unwilling to work, etc paints a bleak picture of their futures for the whole world. Millennials are often portrayed as spoiled rich people who still rely heavily on their parents for everything. This makes them seem childish, and Matchar’s questionable usage of these terms nonetheless is an obvious jab at the poster minority. Millennials overall are hard working and put under more stress than their predecessors, and the ridicule they endure for their work is uncalled for. Therefore, the thesis’s major flaw almost entirely overshadows its main
The 21st century has brought great change and advancement in all aspect of life for mankind across the world. From the creation of high-tech gadgets to innovative ways of basic living, millennials have had a huge engagement in the works of creating such things. They have brought change and advancement through ways in which mankind has never seen before. On the contrary, past generations believe that Millennials are bringing negativity and corruption into the world. The article "The Beat-Up Generation" by Abby Ellin says that " Millennials are, arguably, the most reviled generation in recent history, and armies of consultants are hustling to decipher them.
The Millennial’s values heavily contrast the values of prior generations. Their values reflect the world that we live in today. “Millennials are, arguably, the most reviled generation in recent history, and armies of consultants are hustling to decipher them.” (Ellin) This quote gives
As children, we are often told stories, some of which may have practical value in the sense of providing young minds with lessons and morals for the future, whereas some stories create a notion of creativity and imagination in the child. In Karen Armstrong’s piece, “Homo Religiosus”, a discussion of something similar to the topic of storytelling could translate to the realm of religion. Armstrong defines religion as a, “matter of doing rather than thinking” (17) which she describes using an example in which adolescent boys in ancient religions, who were not given the time to “find themselves” but rather forced into hunting animals which ultimately prepares these boys to be able to die for their people, were made into men by the process of doing.
The new greatest generation was written by Joel Stein, and is critical analysis of the new generation in this article Stein states that people that are in the new millennial generation are considered narcissistic, lazy, and highly unmotivated. He is a writer for the world famous time magazine. The author thinks the only thing the new generation cares about is themselves. The author ran some tests on a huge amount of college students to see if they were narcissistic or not, according to those statistics he found that about fifty percent in 2009 are al considered to be narcissistic. The author shows that technology
... has been deeply rooted in Christianity and influenced by Christianity. This is primarily reflected in our laws that attempt to create all equal, although we know this is not the reality, yet it is before us; but, the part of the book that haunts me: The gods were no longer needed. Have we come to a time when “God is no longer needed;” or, as many put it “God is dead.” This did related to another book I read this year: After God by Mark C. Taylor. There is a trend in the USA with less worship attendance and those who worship tend to gravitate toward “mega-Churches” (see especially, American Trends: Contemporary Religion by Mark Chaves). Nevertheless, perhaps God is dead to many people as the old ways and traditions were dead to many throughout the latter centuries of the Roman Empire. The question is before us: If this is indeed true what will replace it?
As a result of our global society being manipulated by ancient doctrines Sam Harris argues in The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason the ultimate thesis: religion is the basis for all of human conflict. Because faith bypasses all evidence, Harris feels “we are building a civilization of ignorance” and another direction should be taken lest we desire to meet our doom. It is incredible the amount of detail Harris delves into. Each reference to religion, he notes their various foibles and incorporates well-reasoned arguments, including others, that support his view. Though there are flaws, The End of Faith is a worthy read that explores the idiosyncrasies of all facets of religion.
Hitchens, Christopher. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Twelve, 2007. Print.
Girod, Gary. "Are The Millennials The Screwed Generation." Mag.newsweek.com. Joel Kotkin, 16 July 2012. Web. 24 Oct. 2013.
Karen Armstrong’s A History of God is an extremely thorough and comprehensive piece of work which explores the complexities of how human beings have perceived God historically and presently. Karen Armstrong, a British journalist, is well-known for her published works, which include Through the Narrow Gate and The Spiral Staircase, typically concerning comparative religion. As a former nun, Armstrong is able to reflect not only about her experiences, but also her spiritual awakening in which she discovers and relates the intricate fundamentals of the three major monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The purpose of this review is to provide an elaborate analysis of how effectively Karen Armstrong was able to demonstrate her
Critics of this generation have some pretty negative things to say about the Millennials, which are being interpreted in a way that is casting a shadow on their future in politics. Joel Stein, writer for Time magazine, calls them “lazy, entitled, selfish, and shallow” and defends that claim with “the incidence of narcissistic personality disorder is nearly three times as high for people in their 20s as for the generation that’s now 65 or older” (Stein 28). Those critics then take that idea and assume that they will not get up and vote. They then take it even further and...
Blaising, Craig A., Kenneth L. Gentry, and Robert B. Strimple. Three Views On the Millennial and Beyond. Counterpoints. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1999.
In his May 2013 editorial for Time Magazine, “Millennials: The Me Me Me Generation,” Joel Stein explains his viewpoint on millennials, defined as people born 1980 through 2000. Using an occasionally humorous tone, Stein summarizes the typical bleak view that older people have for the younger generation, before offering what he believes is closer to the truth. In the end, he decides that while millennials are not without their flaws and vices, a lot of the fears that older people are mostly due to the advanced technology that we are now dealing with. By the end of the article, it is my opinion that Stein makes a very fair summarization and is correct in his idea that to write off the entire generation is unfair towards younger people.
We blame the millennials for their behavior and their different characteristics compared to previous generations; however, what if we stop looking at the millennials and start looking at the reasons that they behave sensitively? Each generation contains their differences, including the way they educate the next generation. We continuously judge the millennials behavior, but we rarely judge the people who influenced this behavior. Education has changed throughout the ages, not to mention the parenting skills that vary from generation to generation, which has affected the millennials way of interacting in the world. Millennials grow up believing that they are imperative, that they are secure, that the world will conform to their generation, and that the world is a “nice” place. This teaching, causes millennials to be sensitive babies early on in life. True, millennials have the freedom to act the way they want; nevertheless, like other generations, millennials will act the way that parents and other influences taught them to behave. The millennial generation should not be liable for their