More handpicked essays just for you.
Discussing the abortion debate essay
Discussing the abortion debate essay
Ethical and moral perspective of abortions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Justifiying Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest
Abortion:" the expulsion or removal of a human foetus from the uterus
before the foetus is capable of independent survival" (Heinemann
English dictionary).
"…In these tragic cases the great value of the mental health of a
woman who becomes pregnant as a result of rape or incest can best be
safe-guarded by abortion. It is also said that a pregnancy caused by
rape or incest is the result of a grave injustice and that the victim
should not be obliged to carry the foetus to viability." Biochemist
Andrew Varga
"In a rape case, if there's anyone who deserves a death sentence, I
think we'd agree that it's the guy who commits the crime. But to say
that the child deserves death is to punish a totally innocent
bystander. He (or she) had nothing to do with his mother's rape, but
now he should be killed? The baby is a living human being, not a
cancer that has to be cut out." Randy Alcom
There is a large controversial issue on abortion there are two
different sides to the argument on whether abortion is justifiable
those who believe that abortion should be legalised either in certain
cases or on demand (pro-choice) and those who believe abortion is
wrong and unjust in every case (pro-life).
With pro-choice there are two categories-
(a) Those who believe abortion should be legalised and therefore women
can have abortion whenever they choose, for example, financial
reasons, the mother wants to pursue a career, overcrowding in the home
(other children may feel neglected by a new baby in the family), these
are social reasons for having an abortion.
(b) Those who believe that in...
... middle of paper ...
...s be limited to only those who can afford to travel?
From my essay you have probably established that I am pro-choice.
Abortion should be legal to those who want or need it. Those with
strong religious and moral objections to abortion argue that the
rights of the unborn child override those of the mother. I think that
the woman should be allowed to make her own choice, as it her body and
it is her life that will be affected by the birth of the child.
Abortion should be legal to those who want or need it. Though, to
prevent unnecessary deaths, there should be a rigorous
screening/questioning program to ensure that the mother really doesn't
want the child, or to make sure she knows all the alternatives.
I think it should be the mother's choice of whether to have the baby
or not. If you think about it, it is her life.
...f a man becoming an adult is too much dependent on them. They should not have their bodies mutilated for the pleasure of a man feeling as though he can now be considered as an adult.
Internationally, issues revolving around the female body and reproduction are extremely controversial. For a woman, her body is a very private matter. At the same time, however, a woman's body and her reproduction rights are the center of attention in many public debates. Several questions regarding women's reproductive rights remain unanswered. How much control do women have over their bodies? What kind of rules can be morally imposed upon women? And who controls the bodies of women? Although the public continues to debate these topics, certain conclusions can been made concerning women and their reproductive rights. An undeniable fact is that government has a large degree of control over female reproductive organs. All around the world, time and time again, several national governments have implemented policies, enacted laws, and denied women control over their reproductive organs. Several governments have crossed the border between intimate and public matters concerning women's reproductive organs, by making laws about contraceptives, abortion, and family planning programs.
...to have an abortion because of her own specific reasons due to health reasons, or unable to support her baby that is her reasons and her reasons alone, that right should not be taken from her.
abortion is morally right should be left up the conscience of the woman whom is
Mrs. Smith is faced with the decision on whether or not to have an abortion. She has already two kids of her own and is struggling to make ends meet. Mrs. Smith does not know why she is once again pregnant when she has been using contraception consistently. At the end, she makes the conscious decision of having the abortion. Is her abortion morally justified? The view of abortion simply depends on the person’s point of view on life. The philosopher Don Marquis, argues that abortion is morally wrong because we will then be depriving a fetus of a future life while Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that having an abortion is morally justified because Mrs. Smith did not want to have the baby at the beginning. At the end, Mrs. Smith’s decision to have an abortion is morally justified because of the following reasons. First she did not want to have the baby since she was already struggling to make ends meet. Second, she was already using contraceptives, which means that she was
Twenty-one percent of all U.S. pregnancies end in abortion (“Induced ABortion in the United States). Abortion is murdering defenseless babies who would‘ve otherwise had a happy life with a couple that is unable to have their own child. Is killing an innocent person ever moral?
The following essay will examine the morality of abortion with specific reference to the writings of Don Marquis, Judith Jarvis Thompson, Peter Singer and Mary Anne Warren. I will begin by assessing the strength of the argument provided by Marquis which claims that abortion is impermissible because it deprives a being of a potential “future like ours,” and then go on to consider the writings of Singer, Thomson and Warren to both refute Marquis claims and support my assertion that abortion is morally permissible primarily because of the threat to the freedom and bodily autonomy of women extending the right to life to a foetus in utero would pose.
Abortion has so many different view points on the topic, some positive some negative. Roe verse Wade played a huge part in the decision making process on abortion. Everyone has their own opinions about abortion but the opinion concerning when life begins had a significant effect on a person’s views concerning whether they are for or against abortion. The studies of long term effects from abortion on women are traumatic and devastating. They can include mental, physical, and emotional problems after an abortion.
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
The permissibility of abortion has been a crucial topic for debates for many years. People have yet to agree upon a stance on whether abortion is morally just. This country is divided into two groups, believers in a woman’s choice to have an abortion and those who stand for the fetus’s right to live. More commonly these stances are labeled as pro-choice and pro-life. The traditional argument for each side is based upon whether a fetus has a right to life. Complications occur because the qualifications of what gives something a right to life is not agreed upon. The pro-choice argument asserts that only people, not fetuses, have a right to life. The pro-life argument claims that fetuses are human beings and therefore they have a right to life. Philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, rejects this traditional reasoning because the right of the mother is not brought into consideration. Thomson prepares two theses to explain her reasoning for being pro-choice; “A right to life does not entail the right to use your body to stay alive” and “In the majority of cases it is not morally required that you carry a fetus to term.”
Abortion is defined as a procedure that is done to remove an embryo or fetus from the uterus of its mother in order to prevent its birth (Roth, 2005). Abortion is categorized as a bioethical issue because it relates to the morals of biomedical advances, policies and research. Abortion is a difficult subject that can involve personal morals and beliefs, legality and religious values. The issue is often viewed from either the side of pro-life, which places emphasis on the fetus and its right to life or pro-choice, which emphasizes the rights of the mother to decide the appropriate action (Roth, 2005). This brings the ethical question of should the government have the right to outlaw abortion into debate. The two viewpoints of pro-life and pro-choice explore the two main moral issues concerning abortion (Roth, 2005).
Abortion is one of the most debatable subjects in our society. There are many different points of views when it comes to this sensitive topic. Initially when I started researching the topic I was almost certain that I would fall into the category of Pro-life individuals. However, after thinking long and hard and taking rape into consideration I have to say my views have changed completely. Although I am still against abortion, I think there should be certain exceptions made for women who are sexually assaulted and become pregnant from the rape. Hopefully after reading the research information I am providing, you will also take into consideration an abortion in the event of rape.
ccording to Webster’s New World Medical Dictionary, “In medicine, an abortion is the premature exit of the products of conception (the fetus, fetal membranes, and placenta) from the uterus. It is the loss of a pregnancy and does not refer to why that pregnancy was lost.” The act of abortion is spontaneously through a miscarriage or through therapeutic or non-therapeutic procedures. This creates the moral complexities and controversies of the mother’s decision to abort at a specific stage of embryonic development. More specifically, the three grounds for justifying the morality of abortion are “self-defense” where the mother’s health and life are at high risk, “mercy killing” where through a prenatal screening the fetus is found to have debilitating diseases or disabilities, or the “general good” which aims to control population growth and reduce the number of disabled children. For the purpose of this paper I would like to evaluate the morality of these points by utilizing the traditional Roman Catholic beliefs.
In my Opinion, abortion violates a person’s right to life. No one have right to play with another life. If a woman chooses to have sex, she is doing in her own
Abortion is the killing and removing the fetus/ embryo before there is any possibilities of it surviving outside of the mother’s uterus. Abortion is the end of a pregnancy that is normally chosen by the mother, but is also known as a miscarriage. Abortions are mostly known as a surgical procedure, this is done multiple ways but all killing the fetus/ embryo. There is a variety of viewpoints on abortion such as through the religious tradition, also from seeing it as a crime to beneficial, this is an on-going debate about abortion.